Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jkksz Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-29T01:32:20.952Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Examining child protection practice in New South Wales: Non-accidental injury and the principle of strict liability

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 May 2020

Patricia Hansen  and
Frank Ainsworth Open the ORCID record for Frank Ainsworth [Opens in a new window]
Patricia Hansen
Affiliation:
Hansen Legal, Parramatta, NSW, 2150, Australia
Frank Ainsworth*
Affiliation:
School of Social Work and Human Services, James Cook University, Townsville, Queensland4811, Australia
*
Author for correspondence: Frank Ainsworth, Email: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This article examines child protection practice when the Department of Communities and Justice in New South Wales takes the view that an injury to a child is non-accidental. The position taken in this paper is that once a child protection caseworker takes the position that an injury is non-accidental, then a strict liability or absolute liability approach is adopted. In effect, any of the child’s parents or caregivers are identified as persons who may have caused the injury or harm. What follows is the decision that a child must never be restored to the parents or caregivers, unless a person confesses to causing the harm and completes specific child protection counselling. Our concern is with the process of investigation, the reliance on one medical opinion in a context where the parents or caregivers are not in a financial position to obtain a second opinion, the failure to observe the rules of evidence when considering medical opinion, and the manner of substantiation of the non-accidental injury. In addition, we argue that there is a lack of knowledge about the factors that influence a paediatrician’s decision-making and that the guidelines for judicial decision-making derived from case law need to be examined further.

Keywords

Non-accidental injurychild removalstrict liabilityrestorationbest interests of the child
Type
Articles
Information
Children Australia , Volume 45 , Issue 1 , March 2020 , pp. 8 - 13
Copyright
© The Author(s) 2020. Published by Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

References

Australian Law Reform Commission (2015). Traditional rights and freedoms-encroachments by Commonwealth Laws. Final Report.Google Scholar
Bass, C., & Glaser, D. (2014). Early recognition and management of fabricated or induced illness in children. Lancet, 303, 1412–1421.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Camm, Z I., Arbabi, E. M., & Long, W. V. (2012). Presumed NAI with retinal haemorrhages; Findings from a tertiary centre in the UK. Brain Injury, 26(13–14), 1716–1722.Google Scholar
Clarke, N. M. P., Shelton, F. R. M., Taylor, C. C. Khan, T., & Needhirajan, S. (2012). The incidence of factures in children under the age of 24 months – in relation to non- accidental injury. Injury, 43(6), 762–765.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davis, P., Murtagh, U., & Glaser, D. (2018). 40 years of fabricated or induced illness (FII): Where next for paediatricians? Archive of Diseases in Childhood, 104, 110–114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Duerr Berrick, J. (2017). The impossible imperative. Navigating the competing principles of child protection. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Gillingham, P., & Bromfield, L. (2008). Child protection: Risk assessment and blame ideology. Children Australia, 33(1), 18–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hamilton, J.C., & Kouchi, K.A.K. (2018). Factitious disorders and the adjudication of claims of physical and mental injury. Psychological Injury and the Law, 11(1), 9–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hansen, P., & Ainsworth, F. (2007). Parent blaming in child and family services. A matter for concern. Children Australia, 32(2), 29–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Herridge, S. (2019). Fact-finding and risk assessment in NAI cases. Children’s Law News. Retrieved from http://www.childrenscourt.justice.nsw.gov.au/Pages/publications/lawnews/cln-2019.aspx Accessed 10 January 2020.Google Scholar
Joint Child Protection Response. (2018). Available at http://health.nsw.gov.au Accessed 13 March 2020.Google Scholar
Kahneman, D. (2011). Thinking fast and slow. New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux.Google Scholar
Kempe, C. H., Silverman, F. N., Steele, B. F., Droegemueller, W., & Silver, H.K. (1962). The battered child syndrome. Journal of the American Medical Association. 7 July.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kozlowska, K., & Foley, S. (2006). Attachment and risk of future harm: A case of non-accidental brain injury. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Family Therapy, 27(2), 75–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lopez, O.N., Hughes, B.D., Adhikari, D., Williams, K., Radhakrishnan, R.S., & Bowen-Jallow, K.A. (2018). Sociodemographic determinants of non-accidental traumatic injuries in children. American Journal of Surgery, 215, 1037–1041.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Macquarie Concise Dictionary. (2017). Rev 7th ed., 811. Sydney.Google Scholar
Malik, S. S., Malik, S.S., Theobald, P., & Jones, M.D. (2012). Distinguishing fractures from accidental and NAI in children. Journal of Trauma & Treatment, 1(3), Editorial.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Odgers, S. (2012). Uniform evidence law (10th edn.) Sydney: Thompson Reuters.Google Scholar
Sanders, M.J., & Bursch, B. (2019) Psychological treatment of factitious disorder imposed on another/ Munchausen by proxy abuse. Journal of Clinical Psychology in Medical Settings, 27, 139–149. doi: 10.1007/s10880-019-09630-6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tomison, A.M., & Stanley, J. (2001). Social welfare framework: Model of collaborative service delivery in child protection. Unpublished report for the South Australian Department of Human Services.Google Scholar
Tuerkheimer, D. (2014). Flawed convictions. “Shaken baby syndrome” and the inertia of injustice. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vinchion, M. (2017). Shaken baby syndrome: What certainty do we have? Child’s Nervous Systems, 33, 1727–1733.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
NSW Children and Young Persons (Care and Protection) Act 1998.Google Scholar
NSW Evidence Act 1995.Google Scholar
Uniform Civil Procedures (2015), Schedule 7, Expert Witness Code of Conduct, rule 2.Google Scholar
Dasreef Pty Ltd v Hawchar [2011] HCA 21.Google Scholar
Makita (Australia) Pty Ltd v Sprowles (2001) 52 NSWLR 705.Google Scholar
Re Benji & Perry [2018] NSWSC 1750.Google Scholar
(M v M (1988) 166 CLR 69; In the matter of the Steward children, 2019. Bell-Collins Children 2016.Google Scholar
(T v H & Ors [1985] NSWSC, Unreported 19 December 1985 at 18; Bell-Collins Children v Secretary, Department of Family and Community Services (N02) [2016] NSWSC 853 at 32, 159).Google Scholar
(DW & KW v Department of Community Services: Re Sophie No 2 [2008] NSWDC 344 at 67–68).Google Scholar
S-B Children [2009] UKSC 17 (HL) at 8–9.Google Scholar
NSW Children and Young Persons (Care and Protection) Act 1998.Google Scholar
NSW Evidence Act 1995.Google Scholar
Uniform Civil Procedures (2015), Schedule 7, Expert Witness Code of Conduct, rule 2.Google Scholar
Dasreef Pty Ltd v Hawchar [2011] HCA 21.Google Scholar
Makita (Australia) Pty Ltd v Sprowles (2001) 52 NSWLR 705.Google Scholar
Re Benji & Perry [2018] NSWSC 1750.Google Scholar
(M v M (1988) 166 CLR 69; In the matter of the Steward children, 2019. Bell-Collins Children 2016.Google Scholar
(T v H & Ors [1985] NSWSC, Unreported 19 December 1985 at 18; Bell-Collins Children v Secretary, Department of Family and Community Services (N02) [2016] NSWSC 853 at 32, 159).Google Scholar
(DW & KW v Department of Community Services: Re Sophie No 2 [2008] NSWDC 344 at 67–68).Google Scholar
S-B Children [2009] UKSC 17 (HL) at 8–9.Google Scholar