No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
Crimes, Punishments, and Justice in Sentencing: Justice has to be seen to be believed for the inaudible and invisible child victim of crime
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 29 February 2016
Abstract
An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. As you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.
![Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'](https://static.cambridge.org/content/id/urn%3Acambridge.org%3Aid%3Aarticle%3AS1035077200013377/resource/name/firstPage-S1035077200013377a.jpg)
- Type
- Not the last word: point and counterpoint
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1992
References
Fitzmaurice, C. and Pease, K. (1986) The Psychology of Judicial Sentencing, Manchester: Manchester University Press.Google Scholar
Fox, R.G. (1991) ‘Order Out of Chaos: Victoria’s New Maximum Penalty Structure’ Monash University Law Review
17 (1): 106–131.Google Scholar
Goddard, C.R. (1988) ‘A Child Sexual Abuse Police Tracking Project: A Hospital-based Study for the Law Reform Commission of Victoria’, Sexual Offences Against Children: Research Reports, Melbourne: Government Printer, pp. 61–185.Google Scholar
Goddard, C.R. and Hiller, P.C. (1989) ‘Tracking Child Sexual Abuse’ Legal Services Bulletin
14 (1): 25–28.Google Scholar
Magazanik, M. (1992) ‘Sex and Violence: How the Court Got Them Confused’ The Age, 7 January.Google Scholar
Rowland, J. and Agencies (1992) ‘Sometimes police work is brutal’ The Australian, 1 May.Google Scholar