Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-r5fsc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-22T21:48:02.822Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Children’s contact services: On servicing and respecting children’s identity

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  29 February 2016

Abstract

This article offers a brief notation on the First International Conference on Child Access Services, held in Paris on 4–7 November 1998. The author raises some questions which took shape at the Conference and notes the contrasting representations in different countries of the disciplines involved in establishing and running Child Contact Centres and how these may contribute to the contrast in ideology and philosophy in the setting up and running of these centres and the services they offer. The author’s knowledge of the French contact centre models provides a basis for looking at the establishment of Australian centres, both government and non-government funded. The French centres’ paramount goal to develop respect for the child as a person and uphold his legal position by equipping him with a sense of his history and roots, and by fostering respect between the parents, is seen as a more comprehensible concept than the ambiguous ‘best interest of the child’ goal upheld in Anglo-Saxon countries. Moreover, the length of involvement with families in the French centres is contrasted with the shorter period needed to secure the child’s physical safety. The article concludes with the hope that Australian centres are at the threshold of developing an adjunct facilitative structure that would allow progress within the families referred to them and offers as a parting note some recent American research findings on the profile of families using visitation services and of the providers of such services.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1999

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Attorney General’s Department 1998, Contact services in Australia research and evaluation project. Year One Report, Legal Aid and Family Services, Canberra, February.Google Scholar
Benoit, B. & Cardia-Voneche, L. 1996, Reconstruire les Lien Familiaux, Syros, Paris.Google Scholar
Federation des lieux d’accueil pour l’exercice des droit de visite. Code de Deontologie, 12, rue Gambetta, 64000 Pau.Google Scholar
Maclean, M. & Ekelaar, J. 1997, The Parental Obligation, Hart, Oxford.Google Scholar
Pearson, J., ‘Supervised Visitation: a Profile of Providers’, submitted for publication in Family and Conciliation Courts Review (no date).Google Scholar
Pearson, J., ‘Supervised Visitation: the Families and their Experiences’, submitted for publication in Family and Conciliation Courts Review (no date).Google Scholar
Skene, C. 1998, Fathering as Generativity, Flinders University, Adelaide.Google Scholar