Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-p9bg8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T12:46:11.780Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Child protection practice with families affected by parental substance use

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  29 February 2016

Erla Hallgrimsdottir ,
Karen Healy  and
Henrietta Foulds
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This paper reports on a study of child protection practice in a non-government child protection organisation in inner Sydney. The purpose of the study was to explore workers ‘perceptions of critical issues in child protection and family support work in families affected by parental substance use. The findings raise issues about prevalence of substance use issues in child protection work, the risks posed to workers in this domain of practice, and the importance of improved co-operation amongst agencies involved with these families affected by parental substance use. Future research directions for improving child protection and family support practice with families affected by parental substance use are considered.

Type
Research Article
Information
Children Australia , Volume 29 , Issue 3 , 2004 , pp. 11 - 15
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2004

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Australian Institute of Health and Welfare (AIHW) (1999) 1998 National Drug Strategy Household Survey: First results. AIHW cat. no. PHE 15, Canberra: AIHW (Drug Statistics Series).Google Scholar
Australian Institute of Health and Welfare (AIHW) (2003) Child protection Australia 2000-1. AIHW cat. no. CWS 16, Canberra: AIHW (Child Welfare Series no. 29).Google Scholar
Campbell, L. (1997) ‘Service to parents who abuse substances: Literature to inform a practice-research initiative’, Children Australia, Vol. 22, No. 2, 26–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Forrester, D. (2000) ‘Parental substance misuse and child protection in a British sample: A survey of children on the Child Protection Register in an Inner London District Office’, Child Abuse Review, Vol. 9, 235–246.Google Scholar
Healy, K. (1998) ‘Participation and child protection: The importance of context’, British Journal of Social Work, 28, 897–914.Google Scholar
Healy, K. & Meagher, G. (2001) ‘Practitioners' perceptions on performance assessment’, Children Australia, Vol. 26, No. 4, 22–28.Google Scholar
Littlechild, B. (1996) ‘The risk of violence and aggression to social work and social care staff’, in Good Practice in Risk Assessment and Risk Management, Kemshall, H. and Pritchard, J. (Eds.), London: Jessica Kingsley Publishers Ltd.Google Scholar
Semidei, J., Radel, L.F. & Nolan, C. (2001) ‘Substance abuse and child welfare: Clear linkages and promising responses’, Child Welfare, Vol. LXXX, No. 2, March/April, 109–127.Google Scholar
Standing Committee on Social Issues (2004) Inquiry into issues related to Redfern/Waterloo, Interim Report, Report 32, Sydney: Legislative Council New South Wales Parliament.Google Scholar
Tomison, A.M. (1996) Child maltreatment and substance abuse, National Child Protection Clearinghouse Discussion Paper: Discussion Paper No. 2, Melbourne: The Australian Institute of Family Studies.Google Scholar