Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-8bhkd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-05T22:24:32.219Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Barriers to permanency planning: What the literature suggests

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  29 February 2016

Kerry Brydon
Kerry Brydon*
Affiliation:
Department of Social Work, Monash University, PO Box 197, Caulfield East, Vic 3145, Email: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Early studies concerned with permanency planning identified that many children remained in care for prolonged periods of time, in the absence of clearly defined plans for their long-term future. The studies also highlighted concern that multiple placements have a deleterious impact on children. As a consequence, permanency planning frameworks were developed to address the problems of welfare drift, the essence of permanency planning being timely decision-making and concurrent planning. However, there appear to be some systemic issues impacting on the application of the permanency planning framework. There also remains a policy preference for family preservation, which adversely affects permanency planning. The need is to conceptualise permanency planning as existing along a continuum of planning options for children, co-existing with family preservation models.

Type
Research Article
Information
Children Australia , Volume 29 , Issue 3 , 2004 , pp. 16 - 21
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2004

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Auditor-General (1996) Protecting Children: The role of the Department of Human Services, Special Report No 43, June, Victorian Government Printer.Google Scholar
Barbell, K. & Freundlich, M. (2001) Foster Care Today, Casey Family Programs, Washington D.C. www.casey.org/cnc/publications.htm. Accessed 3 September 2002.Google Scholar
Berry, M. (1991) ‘The Assessment of Imminence of Risk of Placement: Lessons from a family preservation program’, Children and Youth Services Review, Vol. 13, 239–256.Google Scholar
Bishop, S.J., Murphy, J.M., Jellinek, M.S., Quinn, D. & Poitrast, F.G. (1992) ‘Protecting Seriously Mistreated Children: Time delays in a Court sample’, Child Abuse and Neglect, Vol. 16, 465–474.Google Scholar
Carter, J. (2000) Report of the Community Care Review, Department of Human Services.Google Scholar
Cashmore, J., Dolby, R. & Brennan, D. (1994) Systems Abuse: Problems and solutions, New South Wales Child Protection Council, February.Google Scholar
Child Welfare & Legislation Review Committee (1984) Equality and Social Justice for Children, Families and Communities, Victorian Government Printer.Google Scholar
Children and Young Persons Act 1989, Victorian Government Printer.Google Scholar
Colon, F. (1978) ‘Family Ties and Child Placement’, Family Welfare, Vol. 17, 289–312.Google ScholarPubMed
Community Services Victoria (1985) The Development of a Permanent Care Program for Children in Victoria: Discussion paper, Extended Family Care Branch, Community Services Victoria, November.Google Scholar
Epstein, L. & Heymann, I. (1967) ‘Some Decisive Processes in Adoption Planning for Older Children’, Child Welfare, January, 5–9.Google Scholar
Farmer, E. (1996) ‘Family Reunification with High Risk Children: Lessons from research’, Children and Youth Services Review, Vol. 18, Nos. 4/5, 403–423.Google Scholar
Fein, E. & Maluccio, A.N. (1984) ‘Children Leaving Home: Outcomes of permanency planning’, Child Abuse and Neglect, Vol. 8, 425–431.Google Scholar
Fernandez, E. (1996) Significant Harm: Unravelling child protection decisions and substitute care careers of children, Avegate.Google Scholar
Freundlich, M. & Wright, L. (2003) Post Permanency Services, Casey Family Programs. www.casey.org/cnc/policy_issues/post_permanency_services.pdf. Accessed 12 July 2003.Google Scholar
Gelles, R. (1996) The Story of David: How preserving families can cost lives, Basic Books.Google Scholar
Health & Community Services (1994) Protecting Children: Standards and procedures for protective workers, Protection and Care Branch, Health and Community Services, August.Google Scholar
Jellinek, M.S., Little, M., Benedict, K., Murphy, J.M., Pagano, M., Poitrast, F. & Quinn, D. (1995) ‘Placement Outcomes of 206 Severely Maltreated Children in the Boston Juvenile Court System: A 7.5 year follow up’, Child Abuse and Neglect, Vol. 19, No 9, 1051–1064.Google Scholar
Jones, David P.H. (1987) ‘Untreatable Families’, Child Abuse and Neglect, Vol. 11, 409–420.Google Scholar
Katz, L. (1990) ‘Effective Permanency Planning for Children in Foster Care’, Social Work, May, 220–226.Google Scholar
Katz, L. (1999) ‘Concurrent Planning: Benefits and pitfalls’, Child Welfare, Vol. LXXVIII, 71–87.Google Scholar
Lindsey, D., Martin, S. & Doh, J. (2002) “The Failure of Intensive Casework Services to Reduce Foster Placements: An examination of family preservation studies’, Children and Youth Services Review, Vol. 24, Nos. 9/10, 743–775.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maas, H.S. (1969) ‘Children in Long Term Foster Care’, Child Welfare, Vol. XLVIII No 6, 321-333 & 346.Google Scholar
Maas, H.S. & Engler, R. (1959) Children in Need of Parents, Columbia University Press, New York.Google Scholar
Maluccio, A.N., Fein, E., Hamilton, J., Klier, J. & Ward, D. (1980) ‘Beyond Permanency Planning’, Child Welfare, Vol. LIX No 9, 515–530.Google Scholar
Maluccio, A.N., Fein, E. & Olmstead, K. (1986) Permanency Planning for Children: Concepts and methods, Tavistock Publications, London.Google Scholar
Pelton, L.H. (1991) ‘Beyond Permanency Planning: Re-structuring the child welfare system’, Social Work, Vol. 36 no 4, 337–343.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scott, D. (2001) Report on Permanent Care Program, Consultants Report to Department of Human Services, September.Google Scholar
Sheehan, R. (2001) Magistrate's Decision Making in Child Protection Cases, Avegate.Google Scholar
Steinhauer, P.D. (1991) The Least Detrimental Alternative: A systematic guide to case planning and decision making for children in care, University of Toronto Press.Google Scholar
Thomas, N. & Beckett, C. (1994) ‘Are Children Still Waiting? Recent developments and the impact of the Children's Act 1989’, Adoption and Fostering, Vol. 18, 8–16.Google Scholar