No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
Rights and realities in the permanency debate
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 29 February 2016
Abstract
An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
- Type
- Permanent family placement for children unable to live with their birth families: Challenges and controversies
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2000
References
Barth, R., Courtney, M., Berrick, J. & Albert, V (1994) From Child Abuse to Permanency Planning: Child Welfare Services Pathways and Placements, New York: Aldine de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Bullock, R., Little, M. & Millham, S. (1993) ‘The research background to the law on parental access to children in care’, Journal of Social Welfare and Family Law, vol. 2.Google Scholar
Gilligan, R. (1999) ‘Enhancing the resilience of children and young people in public care by mentoring their talents and interests’, Child and Family Social Work, Vol 4, pp. 187–196.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gilligan, R. (1997) ‘Beyond permanence? The importance of resilience in child placement practice and planning’, Adoption and Fostering, Vol. 21(1), pp. 12–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jackson, S. & Thomas, N. (1999) On the Move Again? What Works in Creating Stability for Looked After Children, Essex: Bamardos.Google Scholar
O’Connor, T. & Rutter, M., and the English and Romanian Adoptees Study Team (2000) ‘Attachment disorder behaviour following severe deprivation: extension and longitudinal follow-up’, Journal of the American Academy of Child Adolescent Psychiatry, 39(6), pp. 703–712.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Smith, A. (1997) ‘How do we ensure the ‘best interests’ of children in out-of-home care? Messages from research’, Childrenz Issues, Vol 1(1), pp. 23–27.Google Scholar
Thompson, R. (2000) ‘The legacy of early attachments’, Child Development, vol 71(1), pp. 145–152.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed