Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7czq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-26T19:57:37.776Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Remembering the ‘forgotten’ Australians: The Care Leavers of Australia Network and the Senate Inquiry into Institutional and Out-of-home Care

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  29 February 2016

Philip Mendes
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This study examines the findings of the recent Community Affairs Reference Committee report into institutional and out-of-home care. Attention is drawn to the key role played by the Care Leavers of Australia Network (CLAN) in pushing the concerns of older care leavers onto the public agenda, successfully lobbying for the Senate Inquiry, and providing services and supports to care leavers.

The report highlighted the historical failure of state authorities to protect the well-being of children and young people placed in alternative care. Many of those children have subsequently experienced significant emotional and psychological problems, the results of which include psychiatric illness, depression, suicide, substance abuse, illiteracy, impaired relationship skills and marriage breakdown, and incarceration.

The report also has contemporary implications. In order to achieve better outcomes for care leavers in the future, we need to ensure that child welfare services are adequately funded, employ properly trained and qualified professional staff, promote a gradual and functional transition from dependence to independence, and ensure accountability to external bodies including consumer groups.

Type
Research Article
Information
Children Australia , Volume 30 , Issue 1 , 2005 , pp. 4 - 10
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2005

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Barrowclough, N. (2000) ‘Orphans of the living’, Good Weekend, 14 October, 22–28.Google Scholar
CARC see Community Affairs References Committee.Google Scholar
CLAN see Care Leavers of Australia Network.Google Scholar
Care Leavers of Australia Network Newsletter (2000–2005), Numbers 1–25.Google Scholar
Care Leavers of Australia Network (2003) CLAN Membership Brochure, Sydney.Google Scholar
Community Affairs References Committee (2004) Forgotten Australians: A report on Australians who experienced institutional or out-of-home care as children. Commonwealth of Australia, Canberra.Google Scholar
Forde, L. (1999) Commission of Inquiry into Abuse of Children in Queensland Institutions, Queensland Government, Brisbane.Google Scholar
Gawenda, M. (2004) ‘Forgotten Australians remembered at last’, Age, 2 September.Google Scholar
Halliday, C. (2004) ‘Who cares?’, Sunday Age, 4 July.Google Scholar
Harrison, S. (2004) ‘Submission to Inquiry into Children in Institutional Care’, Canberra.Google Scholar
Hughes, G. & Ryle, G. (1997a) ‘Third Catholic order accused of child abuse’, Age, 19 May.Google Scholar
Hughes, G. & Ryle, G. (1997b) ‘Hormone tests on teenage girls referred to inquiry’, Age, 27 June.Google Scholar
Karvelas, P. & Banks, A. (2004) ‘Abused kids must get formal sorry’, Age, 31 August.Google Scholar
Lewis, S. (2004) ‘Abuse a tale of enduring shame’, Australian, 9 August.Google Scholar
Mendes, P. (1998) ‘Consumer groups in child protection: Enhancing the accountability of the system’, Children Australia, 23(2), 33–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mitchell, C. (2004) ‘Saying sorry will not help children now’, Australian, 1 September.Google Scholar
Murray, A. (2003) ‘Proposed Senate Inquiry’, 4 March.Google Scholar
Penglase, J. (2004a) ‘Survivors of care abuse get their chance to be heard’, Care Leavers of Australia Network Press Release, January.Google Scholar
Penglase, J. (2004b) ‘Forgotten Australians: the report of the Senate Inquiry into Children in Institutional Care’, Developing Practice, 11:32–37.Google Scholar
Roberts, J. (2004) ‘Scarred for life by the sisters of little mercy’, Australian, 1 September 2004.Google Scholar
Ryle, G. & Hughes, G. (1997a) ‘State wards call for help over abuse’, Age, 16 April.Google Scholar
Ryle, G. & Hughes, G. (1997b) ‘Children pinned to beds to stop them getting up’, Age, 21 April.Google Scholar
Ryle, G. & Hughes, G. (1997c) ‘State wards accuse second Catholic order’, Age, 5 May.Google Scholar
Ryle, G. & Hughes, G. (1997d) ‘Wards to ask for admission of fault’, Age, 12 May.Google Scholar
Ryle, G. & Hughes, G. (1997e) ‘Babies used in experiments’, Age, 10 June.Google Scholar
Ryle, G. & Hughes, G. (1997f) ‘Counselling offer to state wards used in trials’, Age, 13 August.Google Scholar
Senate Hansard transcript (2004), 30 August.Google Scholar
Shaw, M. (1997) ‘Former wards to sue state over neglect, abuse’, Age, 19 November.Google Scholar
Szego, J. (2003) ‘Senate vote for inquiry into abuse’, Age, 6 March.Google Scholar
Tasmanian Ombudsman (2004) Review of claims of abuse from adults in state care as children, Ombudsman Tasmania, Hobart.Google Scholar
Wroe, D. (2004) ‘Abused children report brings senators to tears’, Australian, 31 August.Google Scholar
Yallop, R. (2004a) ‘The children nobody loved’, Australian, 1 September.Google Scholar
Yallop, R. (2004b) ‘Lost sheep who accepted church’s apology’, Australian, 29 September.Google Scholar
Zwartz, B. (2004) ‘Uniting Church says sorry for abuse’, Age, 28 September.Google Scholar