No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
Professional credibility and public trust in those working with young people
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 29 February 2016
Abstract
As the embarrassment and shame around the ‘resignation’ of our last Governor-General indicates, the abuse of children and young people has become a major public issue. An increasing body of Australian research reveals a history of violence against young people while media reports reveal a history of serious physical and sexual abuse and exploitation of young people by professionals responsible for their care and protection.
Moreover much of this systemic abuse took place in educational and welfare sectors that were and are relatively unregulated in respect to the professionalisation of workers. While there are now formal professional registration processes affecting teachers and psychologists, there is no equivalent for youth workers, social workers or community development workers.
The disclosures of abuse and neglect revealed the suffering and harm experienced by young people, and in turn seriously damaged the professional standing of those working with young people, as well as the public trust traditionally conferred on professions and institutions.
I argue that restoring public trust in the institutions and services where abuse took place, and indeed may still be happening, is an issue of considerable importance.
I critically review the conditions necessary for restoring public trust. Those conditions include improved governance and systematic improvements in the intellectual and professional education of youth workers to ensure that they have the requisite capabilities such as critical insight, advocacy skills and political resolve. The value of establishing a code of professional practice ethics is also considered.
Finally it is argued that advocating for young people's rights is another means of securing their well-being and workers' professional standing. I point out, however, that the rights option is somewhat limited because, although it obligates, it does not specify who owes the obligation, and for this reason rights talk too often remains ineffectual because it's abstracted. I suggest that the identification of obligations is also necessary for securing public trust and young people's well-being because, unlike rights, they specify who is bound and to whom the obligation is owed.
- Type
- Research Article
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2004
References
Argyris, C. & Schön, D. (1974) Theory in practice: Increasing professional effectiveness, San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
Barbalet, J. (1998) Emotion, Social Theory and Social Structure, Melbourne: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Batley, P. (1997) ‘The State's Fiduciary Duty to the Stolen Generation’, in The Stolen Generation: A Legal Issues Paper for Lawyers and Other Advisers, PIAC (ed), Public Interest Law Clearing House, Sydney, pp.50–61.Google Scholar
Bessant, J., Sercombe, H. & Watts, R. (1998) Youth Studies: An Australian Perspective, Melbourne: Addison Wesley Longman.Google Scholar
Briggs, F. (1996) Child Sexual Abuse: Confronting the Problem, Sydney: Allen and Unwin.Google Scholar
Butterworth Australian Legal Dictionary (1997) Nygh, P.E. & Butt, P. (eds), Sydney: Butterworths.Google Scholar
Chew, P. (1995) Report of the Minister of the training of youth workers in Victoria, to the Minister Responsible for Youth Affairs, The Hon Vin Heffernan, OAM, MP, August.Google Scholar
Cohen, S. (2001) States of Denial: Knowing about Atrocities and Suffering, Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Commission of Inquiry into the Abuse of Children in Queensland Institutions (1999) Report of the Commission of Inquiry into the Abuse of Children in Queensland Institutions, (Leneen Forde AC, Chairperson), Brisbane: GOPRINT.Google Scholar
Davidson, P. (2003) How to raise a teenager on $85 a week, paper delivered to the Social Policy Research Centre, University of New South Wales, July, Sydney.Google Scholar
Fukuyama, F. (1996) Trust: The Social Virtues and the Creation of Prosperity, New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
Gaita, R. (1999) A Common Humanity: Thinking about love and truth and justice, Melbourne: Text.Google Scholar
Glassner, B. (1999) The Culture of Fear: Why Americans are afraid of the wrong things, New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Hamilton, E. & Brownell, D. (1973), Youth Workers and Their Education, Youth Workers Association of Victoria, Melbourne.Google Scholar
Hart, R. (1992) Children's participation: From tokenism to participation, International Child Development Centre, UNICEF, Florence.Google Scholar
Matthews, H., Limb, M., Harrison, L. & Taylor, M. (1998/1999) ‘Local places and the political engagement of young people’, Youth and Policy: The Journal of Critical Analysis, 62, pp. 16–31.Google Scholar
Matthews, H., Limb, M. & Taylor, M. (2000) ‘Young people's participation and representation in society’, Geoforum, 30, pp. 135–144.Google Scholar
O'Neil, J. (1994) The Missing Child in Liberal Theory: Towards a Covenant Theory of Family, Community, Welfare and the Civic State, Toronto: University of Toronto Press.Google Scholar
O'Neill, O. (1989) Constructions of Reason: Explorations of Kant's Practical Philosophy, New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Sercombe, H. (1997) ‘The youth work contract: Professionalism and ethics’, Youth Studies Australia, 16(4), pp. 17–21.Google Scholar
Sercombe, H. (1998) ‘Power, ethics and youth work’, Youth Studies Australia, 17(1), pp. 18–23.Google Scholar
Stuart, G. (2001) ‘Are you old enough? Research ethics and young people’, Youth Studies Australia, 20(4), pp.34–39.Google Scholar
Wierenga, A., Wood, A., Trenbath, G., Kelly, J. & Vidakovic, O. (2003) Sharing a new story: Young people in decision-making, Working Paper 23, June, Australian Youth Research Centre, University of Melbourne, Melbourne.Google Scholar
Wood Commission (1997) Royal Commission into the NSW Police Service, Final Report, Volume IvL: The Paedophile Inquiry, NSW Government.Google Scholar