Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dzt6s Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-24T03:22:38.155Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The micro-economics of foster care in South Australia

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  29 February 2016

Abstract

The South Australian foster care system is plagued by problems of both supply and demand. Decreases in the availability of residential care and suitably trained foster carers has led to a shortage of placements to meet current demand. At the same time, increased selectivity in the intake of children into care has led to an over-concentration of more challenging children who either cannot be placed in foster care, or are being placed with the support of significantly higher loadings or payments. In this paper, it is argued that these problems can be understood conceptually using basic micro-economic principles, namely: demand-supply curve analysis, separation of market segments, and supply elasticity. It is argued that the supply of placements has become increasingly price-inelastic due to the nature of demand (the type of child), and that increasing short-term payment rates only serves to magnify the problem by artificially maintaining unsuitable care arrangements. Alternative solutions, such as the introduction of training and professional foster carers, are discussed.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2002

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Barber, J.G. (2001) ‘The slow demise of foster care in South Australia’, British Journal of Social Policy, 30, 115.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barber, J.G., Delfabbro, P.H. & Cooper, L. (2001) ‘Predictors of the unsuccessful transition to foster care’, Journal of Child Psychology and Child Psychiatry, 42, 785790.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bath, H. (1997) ‘Recent trends in out-of-home care of children in Australia’, Children Australia, 22, 48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chamberlain, P. & Reid, J. (1991) ‘Using a specialized foster care community treatment model for children and adolescents leaving the state mental hospital’, Journal of Community Psychology, 19, 266276.3.0.CO;2-5>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Colton, M. & Williams, M. (1997) ‘The nature of foster care: international trends’, Adoption and Fostering, 21, 4449.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Delfabbro, P.H., Barber, J.G. & Cooper, L. (in press) ‘A profile of children entering out-of-home care in South Australia: baseline analyses for a 3 year longitudinal study’, Children and Youth Services Review Google Scholar
Delfabbro, P.H. & Barber, J.G. (submitted) ‘Estimating the economic cost of child abuse and behavioural problems in substitute care’.Google Scholar
Delfabbro, P.H., Barber, J.G. & Cooper, L. (2000) ‘Placement disruption and dislocation in South Australian substitute care’, Children Australia, 25, 1620.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Delfabbro, P.H., Bentham, Y. & Taplin, J.E. (in press) ‘Is it worthwhile? The perceived motivations and benefits of foster-caring in South Australia’, Adoption and Fostering.Google Scholar
Galaway, B., Nutter, R.W. & Hudson, J. (1995) ‘Relationship between discharge outcomes for treatment foster care clients and program characteristics’, Journal of Emotional and Behavioral Disorders, 3, 4654.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reddy, L.A. & Pfeiffer, S.I. (1997) ‘Effectiveness of treatment foster care with children and adolescents: A review of outcome studies’, Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, 36, 581588.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Productivity Commission (1999) Australia's gambling industries. Report No. 10, Ausinfo, Canberra.Google Scholar
Triseliotis, J., Borland, M. & Hill, M. (1998) Delivering foster care, London: British Agencies for Adoption and Fostering.Google Scholar