Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-s2hrs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-09T06:23:57.412Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Children with disabilities in child and family welfare services

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 May 2014

Gaye Mitchell
Gaye Mitchell*
Affiliation:
OzChild Children Australia Inc., Victoria, Australia
*
address for correspondence: Gaye Mitchell, OzChild, P.O. Box 1312, South Melbourne, Victoria, Australia. E-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

There is a lack of research data about children with disabilities across the range of child and family welfare services. The study reported in this paper explored the extent and nature of disabilities in children in a variety of programmes within OzChild, an Australian welfare agency. Caseworkers and teachers working with children at the beginning of 2012 considered all children receiving services from their programmes. Of these 475 children, 200 were identified as having a disability. This article presents data on these 200 children and recommendations for improving outcomes for them. A major finding was that disability added further layers of complexity to already complex child–carer/family situations presenting to under-resourced practitioners and programmes. There was an extensive variety of disabilities across all programme areas, and varying proportions across programmes ranging from 29 per cent in kinship care and family services to 44 per cent of children in foster care. Data were suggestive of problems with some diagnoses, and the need for further research in these areas. The need to address questions of causation of environmentally based disability through preventative programmes, and a more targeted approach to families with multiple and complex needs were indicated. Lack of respite care was jeopardising some placements of children with severe disability. Lack of educational achievement and participation in social, cultural and recreational activities were identified, as were inequities in funding across different programme areas – all of which resulted in some children with disabilities continuing to be substantially disadvantaged. These data led to the generation of recommendations for changes to practice, programme and policy to improve outcomes for children.

Keywords

childrenchild and family welfaredisabilityfoster carefamily serviceskinship care
Type
Articles
Information
Children Australia , Volume 39 , Issue 2 , June 2014 , pp. 107 - 118
Copyright
Copyright © The Authors 2014 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Australian Bureau of Statistics. (2009). 4446.0 Disability, Australia, 2009. ABS website: Autralian Bureau of Statistics. Retrieved from http://www.abs.gov.au/ausstats/[email protected]/Latestproducts/4446.0Main%20Features42009?opendocument&tabname=Summary&prodno=4446.0&issue=2009&num=&view&equalsGoogle Scholar
Australian Bureau of Statistics. (2012). 4102.0 Australian social trends June 2012: Children with a disability. Australian Bureau of Statistics. Retrieved from http://www.abs.gov.au/AUSSTATS/[email protected]/Lookup/4102.0Main+Features30Jun+2012Google Scholar
Baker, C. (2011). Permanence and stability for disabled looked after children. Retrieved from http://lx.iriss.org.uk/content/permanence-and-stability-disabled-looked-after-children-iriss-insights-no11Google Scholar
Bath, H. (2008). Residential care in Australia, Part I: Service trends, the young people in care, and needs-based responses. Children Australia, 33 (2), 6–17.Google Scholar
Burge, P. (2007). Prevalence of mental disorders and associated service variables among Ontario children who are permanent wards. Canadian Journal of Psychiatry. Revue Canadienne de Psychiatrie, 52 (5), 305–314.Google Scholar
Burns, B. J., Phillips, S. D., Wagner, H. R., Barth, R. P., Kolko, D. J., Campbell, Y., & Landsverk, J. (2004). Mental health need and access to mental health services by youths involved with child welfare: A national survey. Journal of the American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry, 43 (8), 960–970.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Casanueva, C. E., Cross, T. P., & Ringeisen, H. (2008). Developmental needs and individualized family service plans among infants and toddlers in the child welfare system. Child Maltreatment, 13 (3), 245–258.Google Scholar
Chambers, M. (2010). Assessment of children coming into care: processes, pitfalls and partnerships. Clinical Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 15 (4), 511–527.Google Scholar
Create Foundation. (2012). Supporting children and young people with a disability living in out-of-home care in Australia: Literature review (pp. 1–53). Brisbane, Queensland, Australia: Create Foundation.Google Scholar
Delfabbro, P., Osborn, A., & Barber, J. G. (2005). Beyond the continuum: New perspectives on the future of out-of-home care in Australia. Children Australia, 30 (2), 11–18.Google Scholar
Dunne, E. G., & Kettler, L. J. (2006). Social and emotional issues of children in kinship foster care and stressors on kinship carers: A review of the Australian and international literature. Children Australia, 31 (2), 22–29.Google Scholar
Emerson, E. (2007). Poverty and people with intellectual disabilities. Mental Retardation and Developmental Disabilities Research Reviews, 13, 107–113.Google Scholar
Emerson, E., Madden, R., Graham, H., Llewellyn, G., Hatton, C., & Robertson, J. (2011). The health of disabled people and the social determinants of health. Public Health, 125, 145–147.Google Scholar
Hillen, T., Gafson, L., Drage, L., & Conlan, L.-M. (2012). Assessing the prevalence of mental health disorders and mental health needs among preschool children in care in England. Infant Mental Health Journal, 33 (4), 411–420.Google Scholar
Kerker, B. D., & Dore, M. M. (2006). Mental health needs and treatment of foster youth: Barriers and opportunities. American Journal of Orthopsychiatry, 76 (1), 138–147.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Leslie, L. K., Gordon, J. N., Meneken, L., Premji, K., Michelmore, K. L., & Ganger, W. (2005). The physical, developmental, and mental health needs of young children in child welfare by initial placement type. Journal of Developmental and Behavioral Pediatrics, 26 (3), 177–185.Google Scholar
Leslie, L. K., Hurlburt, M. S., Landsverk, J., Rolls, J. A., Wood, P. A., & Kelleher, K. J. (2003). Comprehensive assessments for children entering foster care: A national perspective. Pediatrics, 112 (1), 134–142.Google Scholar
Lightfoot, E., Hill, K., & LaLiberte, T. (2011). Prevalence of children with disabilities in the child welfare system and out of home placement: An examination of administrative records. Children and Youth Services Review, 33 (11), 2069–2075.Google Scholar
Mendes, P., Snow, P., & Broadley, K. (2013). Young people with a disability leaving state care: Issues, challenges, and directions. Phase One Report. Social Inclusion and Social Policy Research Unit, Department of Social Work, Monash University, and School of Psychology and Psychiatry, Monash UniversityGoogle Scholar
Mitchell, G., & Campbell, L. (2011). The social economy of excluded families. Child and Family Social Work 16 (4), 422–433.Google Scholar
National People with Disabilities and Carer Council. (2009). SHUT OUT: The experience of people with disabilities and their families in Australia (pp. 1–90). Canberra: Commonwealth of Australia.Google Scholar
Pitman, T., Martin, S., & Mitchell, G. (2013). OzChild feedback on the rules for the National Disability Insurance Scheme. Melbourne: OzChild.Google Scholar
Sawyer, M. G., Carbone, J. A., Searle, A. K., & Robinson, P. (2007). The mental health and wellbeing of children and adolescents in home-based foster care. Medical Journal of Australia, 186 (4), 181–184.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sen, A. K. (2001). Development as freedom (paperback ed.). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Slayter, E., & Springer, C. (2011). Child welfare-involved youth with intellectual disabilities: Pathways into and placements in foster care. Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities, 49 (1), 1–13.Google Scholar
Spencer, N., & Baldwin, N. (2005). Economic, cultural and social contexts of neglect. In Taylor, J. & Daniel, B. (Eds.), Child neglect: Practice issues for health and social care (pp. 26–42). London: Jessica Kingsley.Google Scholar
Taggart, L., Cousins, W., & Milner, S. (2007). Young people with learning disabilities living in state care: Their emotional, behavioural and mental health status. Child Care in Practice, 13 (4), 401–416.Google Scholar
Taket, A., Crisp, B. R., Nevill, A., Graham, M., & Barter-Godfrey, S. (2009). Theorising social exclusion. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Tarren-Sweeney, M., & Hazell, P. (2006). Mental health of children in foster and kinship care in New South Wales, Australia. Journal of Paediatrics and Child Health, 42 (3), 89–97.Google Scholar
Tierney, L. (1976). Excluded families. Ann Arbor, Michigan: University Microfilms.Google Scholar
Üstün, B., & Kennedy, C. (2009). What is ‘functional impairment’? Disentangling disability from clinical significance. World Psychiatry, 8 (2), 82–85.Google Scholar
Victorian Government. (2006). Disability Act 2006. Victoria: Victorian Government. Retrieved from http://www.legislation.vic.gov.au/Domino/Web_Notes/LDMS/PubStatbook.nsf/f932b66241ecf1b7ca256e92000e23be/0B82C05270E27961CA25717000216104/$FILE/06-023a.pdfGoogle Scholar
Wise, S., Pollock, S., Mitchell, G., Argus, C., & Farquhar, P. (2010). Care-system impacts on academic outcomes: Research Report. Melbourne: Anglicare Victoria and Wesley Mission Victoria.Google Scholar
World Health Organisation. (2012). Disability. Report by the Secretariat to the 132 session of the Executive Board. Geneva: World Health Organisation.Google Scholar