1. On the Great War see Bartov, Omer, Murder in Our Midst: The Holocaust, Industrial Killing and Representation (New York, 1669)Google Scholar, esp. chs. 1 and 2. On nuclear holocaust, see Lifton, Robert Jay, Death in Life: Survivors of Hiroshima (New York, 1967)Google Scholar and Weart, Spencer, Nuclear Fear: A History of Images (Cambridge and London, 1988).Google Scholar

2. Hilberg, Raul, The Destruction of the European Jews (Chicago, 1961);Google ScholarArendt, Hannah, Eichmann in Jerusalem: A Report on the Banality of Evil (New York, 1963);Google ScholarRubenstein, Richard, The Cunning of History (New York, 1975).Google Scholar

3. Bauman, , Modernity and the Holocaust (Ithaca, 1989), viii, xiii–xiv, 18.Google Scholar

4. Pinson, Koppel, Modern Germany (New York, 1954).Google Scholar

5. Goldhagen, Daniel Jonah, Hitler's Willing Executioners: Ordinary Germans and the Holocaust (New York, 1996).Google Scholar

6. See Brubaker, Rogers, The Limits of Rationality: An Essay on the Social and Moral Thought of Max Weber (London, 1984), esp. 49–60.Google Scholar

7. For one philosopher/s efforts to expand beyond instrumental retionality and set criteria for judgment of the rationality of ends, see Nozick, Robert, The Nature of Rationality (Princeton, 1993).Google Scholar see also Quentin Gibson, , The Logic of Social Enquiry (London, 1906), esp. 156–57;Google Scholar and Newton-Smith, W.H., The Rationality of Science (London, 1981).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

8. Rich, Norman, Hitler's War Aims: Ideology, the Nazi State and the Course of Expansion (New York, 1973), 248–50;Google ScholarHildebrand, Klaus, Deutsche Aussenpolitik 1933–1945: Kalkül oder Dogma? (Stuttgart, 1971), 122–25;Google ScholarHildebrand, , Das Dritte Reich (Munich, 1979), 70–71.Google Scholar

9. E.g., Hitler, Adolf, Mein Kampf 352nd–354th edition (Munich, 1938), 329–62, 629–30.Google Scholar In an extended passage of quotations from Hitler, Michael Burleigh and Wolfgang Wippermann remark that for Hitler “the Jew” contained religious overtones of absolute evil, political overtones of treason, sexual overtones of prurient eroticism, medical overtones of hygienic danger, and cultural overtones of value conflict. They come to the conclusion that “Hitler's racism was neither original nor without inner contradictions.” They prefer to stress, however, that he lent authority to “pre-existing scientific, political, and publicistic forays into an ethical void” inhabited by physicians, academics, health officials, etc. The Racial State: Germany, 1933–1945 (Cambridge, 1991), 40–43.Google Scholar

10. Breitman, Richard, The Architect of Genocide: Himmler and the Final Solution (New York, 1991).Google Scholar Himmler was certainly a dedicated bureaucrat, but Breitman also offers glimpses of his mystical streak (p. 35) and fascination with Ghengis Khan (39–43). His plans for conquest and resettlement of the East were romantically gargantuan. See Dwork, Deborah and van Pelt, Robert Jan, Auschwitz: 1270 to the Present (New York, 1996).Google Scholar

11. Fest, Joachim, The Face of the Third Reich: Portraits of the Nazi Leadership (New York, 1907), 139.Google Scholar

12. Breitman, Architect of Genocide, 58–61.

13. Perhaps inhibited by the sensationalism of movies of the Raiders of the Lost Ark genre, perhaps just by the secularism endemic in university life, or perhaps by the code of rationalism inherent in analysis of any phenomenon, academics are reluctant to accept that many Nazi leaders were completely serious about their commitments to the Aryan cults and other seemingly bizarre apocalyptic sects. Nevertheless, testimony and actions by these leaders are quite unequivocal. E.g., see Angebert, Jean-Michel [Michel Bertrand and Jean Angelini], The Occult and the Third Reich, trans. Sumberg, Lewis A.M. (New York, 1974).Google Scholar For a recent, more scholarly overview, see Goodrick-Clarke, Nicholas, The Occult Roots of Nazism (New York, 1992).Google Scholar

14. LaCapra, Dominick, Representing the Holocaust: History, Theory, Trauma (Ithaca and London, 1994), 101.Google Scholar

15. LaCapra, Representing, 105.

16. Goldhagen, Hitler's Willing Executioners, 190–91.

17. Ibid.

18. Buchanan, R. A., The Power of the Machine: The Impact of Technology from 1700 to the Present (New York, 1992), 3–4.Google Scholar

19. Pacey, Arnold, The Culture of Technology (Cambridge, Mass., 1983), 5–6.Google Scholar

20. Ibid.

21. Pacey, Culture of Technology, 126 and again, 177–78.

22. This fact is lamented by many students and scholars of technology. See Leo Marx, “The Idea of ‘Technology’ and Postmodern Pessimism,” and Staudenmeier, John M., “Rationality and Contingency in the History of Technology,” in Smith, Merritt Roe and Marx, Leo, eds. Does Technology Drive History? (Cambridge, MA, 1994), 237–57 and 259–73 respectively.Google Scholar For a very good discussion of the usages of the terms technology and engineering, see Mitcham, Carl, Thinking Through Technology: The Path between Engineering and Philosophy (Chicago, 1994), 143–60.Google Scholar

23. Heidegger, Martin, The Question Concerning Technology and Other Essays, trans. Lovitt, William (New York, 1977), 12, 14.Google Scholar On Heidegger's notion of truth as something to be wrested from nature, see duBois, Page, Torture and Truth (New York, 1991), 127–40.Google Scholar

24. Heidegger, Question, 23.

25. See Zimmerman, Michael, Heidegger/s Confrontation with Modernity: Technology, Politics, Art (Bloomington, 1990), esp. 124–31.Google Scholar

26. See Florman, Samuel, Blaming Technology: The Irrational Search for Scapegoats (New York, 1981);Google ScholarFlorman, , The Civilized Engineer (New York, 1987);Google Scholar and Nye, David E., American Technological Sublime (Cambridge, MA, 1994).Google Scholar

27. For example, Jonas, Hans, Das Prinzip Verantwortung: Versuch einer Ethik fü die technologische Zivilisation (Frankfurt, 1981).Google Scholar

28. See Bramwell, Anna, Ecology in the 20th Century: A History (New Haven and London, 1989), 183–94.Google Scholar

29. On technological systems, see Hughes, Thomas P., Networks of Power: Electrification in Western Society, 1880–1930 (Baltimore and London, 1983), esp. 1–17.Google Scholar

30. David Beetham has observed that bureaucracy is such a complex phenomenon that perception of it depends upon the perspective from which it is viewed, thus “to construct a conceptual map of definitions of bureaucracy is to chart the relationship between the social sciences themselves.” Bureaucracy, 2nd ed. (Minneapolis, 1996), 86.Google Scholar

31. This structuring relates both to bureaucrats and to those interacting with the bureaucratic system. The conduct of both is rendered as calculable performance, a resource to be consumed. See Dean, Mitchell, “Putting the technological into government,” History of the Human Sciences 9, no. 3 (1996): 47–68;CrossRefGoogle ScholarMiller, Peter and Rose, Nikolas, “Governing Economic Life,” Economy and Society 19, no. 1 (02 1990): 1–31.Google Scholar

32. Slavery has varied greatly over the centuries, and discussions of its features often revolve around much-disputed issues of ownership, property, the question of the status of the slave as human, etc. The notion of “unilateral disposal” by the master seems most pertinent here, since victims in the Holocaust were not owned in any legal sense by SS and other figures who could use and dispose of them at will. See Finley, M. I., Ancient Slavery and Modern Ideology (New York, 1980), 72–80;Google ScholarPatterson, Orlando, Slavery and Social Death: A Comparative Study (Cambridge, MA, 1982), 1–34;Google ScholarDavis, David Brion, Slavery and Human Progress (New York, 1984);Google Scholar and Blackburn, Robin, The Making of New World Slavery: From the Baroque to the Modern, 1492–1800 (London and New York, 1997).Google Scholar

33. See Hannaford, Ivan, Race: The History of an Idea in the West (Baltimore, 1996), 187–276.Google Scholar

34. Rawlins, Gregory J. E., Slaves of the Machine: The Quickening of Computer Technology (Cambridge, MA, 1997), 63–64.Google Scholar

35. Ibid., 67. Software engineering is becoming a significant field. On design strategies, styles and architectures, see, e.g., Salzman, Harold and Rosenthal, Stephen, Software by Design: Shaping Technology and the Workplace (New York, 1994);Google Scholar and Shaw, Mary and Garlan, David, Software Architecture: Perspectives on an Emerging Discipline (Upper Saddle River, NJ, 1996).Google Scholar

36. Mosse, George, Toward the Final Solution: A History of European Racism (New York, 1978), 77–112.Google Scholar On the development of racial science and hygiene in Germany, see Weindling, Paul, Health, Race and German Politics Between National Unification and Nazism 1870–1945 (Cambridge, 1989);Google Scholar and Weingart, Peter, Kroll, Jürgen and Bayertz, Kurt, Rasse, Blut und Gene: Geschichte der Eugenik und Rassenhygiene in Deutschland (Frankfurt am Main, 1992).Google Scholar

37. Barkan, Elazar, The Retreat of Scientific Racism: Changing Concepts of Race in Britain and the United States Between the World Wars (Cambridge, 1992).Google Scholar

38. For accounts of slave labor in the camps, see Friedrich, Otto, The Kingdom of Auschwitz (New York, 1994);Google ScholarLevi, Primo, Survival in Auschwitz, trans. Woolf, Stuart (New York, 1993);Google ScholarTillion, Germaine, Ravensbrueck, trans. Satterwhite, Gerald (Garden City, NY, 1975);Google ScholarWiesel, Elie, Night, trans. Rodway, Stella (Toronto, 1982).Google Scholar See also the discussion in Rubenstein, The Cunning of History, 36–47. Wolfgang Sofsky is not convinced that slavery is the proper term for experiences in the concentration camps, for there was no real labor value to prisoners being worked to death. He prefers to speak of “terror labor” rather than “slave labor.” See his, The Order of Terror: The Concentration Camp, trans. Templer, William (Princeton, 1997), 169–72.Google Scholar But the counterargument is that the labor of prisoners in the camp system was virtually nil, because the supply was so great. My own sense is that slavery as a system was subordinated to racism as a system, driving down the utility value of slave labor for other than economic reasons.

39. On these figures, see Burleigh, Michael, Death and Deliverance: ‘Euthanasia’ in Germany, 1900–1945 (Cambridge, 1994);Google Scholar and Friedlander, Henry, The Origins of Nazi Genocide: From Euthanasia to the Final Solution (Chapel Hill and London, 1995).Google Scholar

40. Gellately, Robert, The Gestapo and German Society: Enforcing Racial Policy, 1933–1945 (New York, 1990);CrossRefGoogle ScholarKuehl, Stefan, The Nazi Connection: Eugenics, American Racism, and German National Socialism (New York, 1994).Google Scholar

41. Proctor, Robert, Racial Hygiene: Medicine under the Nazis (Cambridge, 1988);Google ScholarWeindling, Paul, Health, Race and German Politics Between National Unification and Nazism, 1870–1945 (Cambridge, 1989).Google Scholar Not all German eugenicists were racists. See Weiss, Sheila Faith, Race Hygiene and National Efficiency: The Eugenics of Wilhelm Schallmayer (Berkeley and Los Angeles, 1987);Google Scholar and Weindling, Paul, “Understanding Nazi Racism: Precursors and Perpetrators,” in Burleigh, Michael, ed., Confronting the Nazi Past: New Debates on Modern German History (New York, 1996), 66–83.Google Scholar

42. For the incremental increase of measures of persecution against the Jews remaining in Germany after 1940, see Klemperer, Victor, Ich will Zeugnis ablegen bis zum letzten (Berlin, 1995), vol. 2.Google Scholar

43. Mueller, Ingo, Furchtbare Juristen: Die unbewältigte Vergangenheit unserer Justiz (Munich, 1987)Google Scholar, trans. as Hitler's Justice: The Courts of the Third Reich (Cambridge, 1991).Google Scholar

44. Burleigh and Wippermann, The Racial State, 201–41.

45. For the details of these developments, see Baeumer-Schleinkofer, Änne, NS-Biologie und Schule, trans. Beckhaus, Neil as Nazi Biology and Schools (Frankfurt, 1995).Google Scholar

46. Ibid., 66–67.

47. See esp. Burleigh, Death and Deliverance, 183–219; and Roth, Karl-Heinz, “Filmpropaganda für die Vernichtung der Geisteskranken und Behinderten im ‘Dritten Reich,’” in Reform und Gewissen: “Euthanasie” im Dienst des Fortschritts, Beiträge zur nationsozialistischen Gesundheitsund Sozialpolitik 2 (Berlin, 1985), 125–93.Google Scholar

48. See Ulfried Geuter, Die Professionalisierung der deutschen Psychologie im Nationalsozialismus (Frankfurt am Main, 1984).Google Scholar

49. Sofsky, The Order of Terror, esp. 173–84.

50. Dwork and van Pelt, Auschwitz.

51. “Technological systems, even after prolonged growth and consolidation, do become autonomous; they acquire momentum. They have a mass of technical and organizational components; they possess direction or goals; and they display a rate of growth suggesting velocity. A high level of momentum often causes observers to assume that a technological systems,” in Bijker, Wiebe E., et al. , The Social Construction of Technological Systems (Cambridge and London, 1987), 78.Google Scholar

52. Mueller-Hill, Benno, Tödliche Wissenschaft (Reinbek bei Hamburg, 1984), trans. Fraser, George R.as Murderous Science: Elimination by Scientific Selection of Jews, Gypsies, and Others, Germany 1933–1945 (Oxford, 1988);Google ScholarMacrakis, Kristie, Surviving the Swastika: Scientific Research in Nazi Germany (New York and Oxford, 1993);Google Scholar and Deichmann, Ute, Biologen unter Hitler (Frankfurt am Main, 1992), trans. Dunlap, Thomas as Biologists under Hitler (Cambridge, 1996).Google Scholar

53. Castoriadis, Cornelius, “Reflections on Racism,” Thesis Eleven 32 (1992): 8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar