Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-vdxz6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-29T18:42:08.806Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Habsburg Foreign Ministry and Political Reform, 1801–1805

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  16 December 2008

Karl A. Roider Jr
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

On 6 December 1800, a courier galloped through the gates of Vienna, rushed to the Hofburg, the winter palace of the Habsburgs, and presented to Emperor Francis II a bitter message from Archduke John, the emperor's brother and commander of the Austrian armed forces in Germany. The message read that three days earlier the archduke's troops had engaged the French army under Jean Moreau at Hohenlinden, had suffered serious losses, and were falling back to Salzburg with the officers struggling to maintain order in the ranks while they did so. The news was a crushing blow to Francis. In 1799 the Austrians had begun the War of the Second Coalition with high hopes of reversing the years of defeat at the hands of Revolutionary France. Russia and Britain had agreed to cooperate closely with Austria; France seemed weaker than ever domestically; and Napoleon Bonaparte, who had caused Vienna such grief in 1797, was far away in Egypt trying to inflict damage upon the British Empire. But these hopes turned to ashes. Russia abandoned the Coalition after its army suffered serious losses in Switzerland—indeed, in their wake the Russian ruler, Tsar Paul, had thundered so vehemently against what he saw as Austrian treachery that he had broken relations with Vienna—; Britain had been able to provide much needed funds but not more-needed soldiers; and Bonaparte had returned to work his magic on both the French army and the French people. The result was Hohenlinden, Austrian defeat, and in February 1800 the Treaty of Lunéville that ceded to France primary influence in Germany and Italy.

Type
Article
Information
Central European History , Volume 22 , Issue 2 , June 1989 , pp. 160 - 182
Copyright
Copyright © Conference Group for Central European History of the American Historical Association 1989

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Deutsch, Harold C., The Genesis of Napoleonic Imperialism (Cambridge, Mass., 1938), 3–31, 208–360CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Beer, Adolf, “Zur Geschichte der österreichischen Politik in den Jahren 1801 und 1802,” Archiv für österreichische Geschichte 52 (1874): 475–540Google Scholar; Beer, Adolf, “Österreich und Russland in den Jahren 1804 und 1805,” Archiv für österreichische Geschichte 53 (1875): 125–243Google Scholar; Fournier, August, Gentz und Cobenzl: Geschichte der österreichischen Diplomatic in den Jahren 1801–1805 (Vienna, 1880)Google Scholar; Kraehe, Enno, Metternich's German Policy, Volume 1: The Contest with Napoleon, 1799–1814 (Princeton, 1963): 25–43Google Scholar; de Berthier de Sauvigny, Guillaume, Metternich (Paris, 1986), 53–68.Google Scholar

2. Cobenzl to Colloredo, I Sept., 1803 in Fournier, Gentz und Cobenzl, 81–82.

3. Archduke Charles to Francis II, Oct. 1802, in Charles, Archduke, Ausgewählte Schriften (Vienna and Leipzig, 1894), 5: 549–604.Google Scholar

4. Eleonore Liechtenstein wrote that each official's reaction to a proposal was “Hold this as long as I am alive.” Quoted in Criste, Oskar, Erzherzog Carl von Österreich (Vienna and Leipzig, 1912), 2: 188.Google Scholar

5. The archduke's criticisms of Austrian officialdom and his warnings for the future represented one of several jeremiads at this time from both internal and external observers. About the time that Archduke Charles submitted his lengthy report, the British ambassador, Sir Arthur Paget, remarked that not just lesser Austrian officials but the greater ones as well seemed inadequate for their tasks. “In the management of both internal and foreign Politics I have no hesitation in thinking that His Imperial Majesty's present Ministers have manifested the grossest incapacity.” Paget to Lord Hawkesbury, 3 Nov. 1802, London, Public Record Office, FO7, 66.

6. Francis II to Colloredo, 18 Sept. 1801, Vienna, Haus-Hof-und Staatsarchiv, Staatskanzlei, Vorträge, Karton 162 (henceforth referred to as Vienna, HHSA, SK).

7. Metternich shared this view. Kraehe, , Mettemkh's German Policy, 1: 28.Google Scholar

8. Colloredo to Cobenzl, 14 Apr. 1802, Vienna, HHSA, Grosse Korrespondenz, 451.

9. Cobenzl to Colloredo, 16 June 1802, Ibid., 458.

10. Ibid.

11. Cobenzl to Colloredo, 2 July 1802, Ibid., Colloredo, in what one must interpret as an inadvertent stroke of self-criticism, replied to Cobenzl that it was more like 2,000 documents rather than 1,300 that the emperor had not acted upon. Colloredo to Cobenzl, 3 July 1802, Ibid., 451. One official commented: “If the quantity of material written could serve as the measure of effectiveness of an administration, ours would be the best in Europe, because in no state is more written than in ours.” Quoted in Criste, , Erzherzog Carl, 2: 187.Google Scholar

12. Cobenzl to Colloredo, 4 July 1802, Vienna, HHSA, Grosse Korrespondenz, 458.

13. For example, see Johnson, Hubert C., Frederick the Great and His Officials (New Haven, 1975), 18–20, 159–61.Google Scholar

14. Cobenzl to Colloredo, 8 July 1802, Vienna, HHSA, Grosse Korrespondenz, 458.

15. Quoted in Criste, , Erzherzog Carl, 3: 196.Google Scholar

16. Beer, Adolf, Die Finanzen Österreichs im XIX. Jahrhundert (Prague, 1877), 8.Google Scholar

17. Ibid., 390.

18. Cobenzl to Colloredo, 17 Aug. 1802, Vienna, HHSA, Grosse Korrespondenz, 459.

19. Zichy to Francis II, 16 June 1803, Vienna, HHSA, SK, Staatskanzlei ad Hofkammer, 236.

20. Cobenzl to Colloredo, 19 June 1803, Ibid., Grosse Korrespondenz, 461.

21. Colloredo to Cobenzl, 20 June 1803, Ibid., 453. In his tenth bulletin to the Grand Army, Napoleon called the Austrian troops “paper soldiers” because they were paid in paper currency that was worth but little. Tenth Bulletin of the Grand Army, 22 Oct. 1805, in Bonaparte, Napoleon, Correspondance (Paris, 1863), 11: 351.Google Scholar

22. Wessenberg to Francis II, July 1803, Vienna, HHSA, SK, Staatskanzlei ad Hofkammer, 236.

23. Cobenzl to Colloredo, 10 Aug. 1803, Vienna, HHSA, Grosse Korrespondenz, 461.

24. Cobenzl to Colloredo, 7 Sept. 1803, Ibid., 462. Krones, F. R., Zur Geschkhte Österreichs im Zeitalter der französischen Kriege und der Revolution, 1792–1816 (Gotha, 1886), 31Google Scholar; Mayr, Josef Karl, Wien im Zeitalter Napoleons (Vienna, 1940), 68.Google Scholar

25. Fournier, Gentz und Cobenzl, 116.

26. Cobenzl to Colloredo, 23 July 1803, Vienna, HHSA, Grosse Korrespondenz, 461.

27. Vienna, Kriegsarchiv, Nachlass Meyer von Heldenfeld, B/857–80.

28. Rothenberg, Gunther, Napoleon's Great Adversaries: The Archduke Charles and the Austrian Army, 1792–1814 (Bloomington, Ind., 1982), 69.Google ScholarCriste, , Erzherzog Carl, 2: 220.Google Scholar

29. Cobenzl to Colloredo, 17 Aug. 1802, Vienna, HHSA, Grosse Korrespondenz, 459.

30. Cobenzl to Colloredo, 18 June 1802, Ibid., 458.

31. Paget to Hawkesbury, 21 Jan. 1803, London, Public Record Office, FO7, 67.

32. Cobenzl to Colloredo, 22 May 1803, Vienna, HHSA, Grosse Korrespondenz, 461.

33. Ibid.

34. Wertheimer, Eduard, Geschichte Österreichs und Ungarns im ersten Jahrzehnt des 19. Jahrhunderts (Leipzig, 1884), 1: 170–79.Google Scholar

35. Colloredo to Cobenzl, 29 June 1802, Vienna, HHSA, Grosse Korrespondenz, 451.

36. Cobenzl to Colloredo, 27 June 1802, Ibid., 458.

37. Cobenzl to Colloredo, 13 July 1805, Ibid., 467.

38. The French ambassador noted that Francis preferred to live in “domestic obscurity” rather than face the major issues of his own reign. Jean-Baptiste Champagny to Talleyrand, 11 Nov. 1803, Paris, Archives du ministère des affairs étrangères, correspondances politiques, Autriche, 374.

39. Cobenzl to Colloredo, 25 July 1805, Vienna, HHSA, Grosse Korrespondenz, 467.

40. Cobenzl to Colloredo, 17 Aug. 1802, Ibid., 459.

41. Cobenzl to Colloredo, 22 May 1803, Ibid., 461.

42. Cobenzl to Colloredo, 1 Sept. 1803, in Fournier, Gentz und Cobenzl, 81–82.

43. Cobenzl to Colloredo, 21 Jan. 1804, Ibid., 86.

44. Colloredo to Cobenzl, 20 Nov. 1803, Vienna, HHSA, Grosse Korrespondenz, 453.

45. Cobenzl to Colloredo, 30 July 1805, Ibid., 455.

46. Colloredo to Cobenzl, 27 Mar. 1805, Ibid., 455.

47. von Aretin, Karl Otmar Freiherr, Vom Deutschen Reich zum Deutschen Bund (Göttingen, 1980), 130.Google Scholar