¹ For the purposes of this article, the modern period begins in 1750 for Britain and in 1789 for the continental countries. British history includes Britain, Ireland, and the British Empire. Modern Russian history includes the Russian Empire and the former Soviet Union. Modern French history includes the French Empire. Modern German history includes German-speaking central Europe, including Habsburg history.

² The AHA table includes all historians of a national history, not just historians of the modern era. The category of Germany in the AHA table covers historians who have self-identified as historians of Germany, but not those who have self-identified only as historians of Austria, the Austro-Hungarian Empire, or central Europe. If German history is viewed more capaciously (as it is in this article), the AHA numbers may well be low.

³ In compiling this database, I included only advertisements for tenure-track positions in history departments in the United States. In addition, to get a more accurate count of the true number of jobs filled (as opposed to listings), I deleted a job advertisement if a virtually identical position was advertised by the same institution within the next four years. Given that advertised jobs are sometimes canceled or otherwise go unfilled, this was intended to avoid counting the same job twice. Unfortunately, I was unable to locate job postings listed between October 1969 and November 1971. During that period, the AHA published a separate Professional Register Bulletin; see “The Professional Register,” AHA Newsletter 8, no.1 (1969): 16Google Scholar. This publication is not listed in any catalog of serials. It also does not appear to be in the papers of the American Historical Association housed in the Library of Congress.

⁴ Krieger, Leonard, “European History in America,” in History, ed. Higham, John (Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall, 1965), 243.Google Scholar

⁵ Palmer, R. R., “A Century of French History in America,” French Historical Studies 14 (1985): 163.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

⁶ Byrnes, Robert F., A History of Russian and East European Studies in the United States: Selected Essays (Lanham, MD: University Press of America, 1994), 21.Google Scholar

⁷ Stern, Fritz, “German History in America, 1884–1984,” Central European History 19, no. 2 (1986): 135.Google Scholar

⁸ Krieger, “European History,” 266.

⁹ Ibid., 263–4.

¹⁰ For differing views on the origins of the Western Civilization course, see Allardyce, Gilbert, “The Rise and Fall of the Western Civilization Course,” American Historical Review 87, no. 3 (1982): 695–725Google Scholar; and Segal, Daniel A., “‘Western Civ’ and the Staging of History in American Higher Education,” American Historical Review 105, no. 3 (2000): 770–805.Google Scholar

¹¹ Haskins, Charles H., “European History and American Scholarship,” American Historical Review 28, no. 2 (1923): 218–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

¹² Pinkney, David H., “American Historians on the European Past,” American Historical Review 86, no. 1 (1981): 2.Google Scholar

¹³ Higby, Chester P., “The Present Status of Modern European History in the United States,” Journal of Modern History 1, no. 1 (1929): 5–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

¹⁴ Stern, “German History,” 150.

¹⁵ McNeill, William H., “A Birthday Note,” Journal of Modern History 51, no. 1 (1979): 1–3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

¹⁶ Higby, “The Present Status,” 8.

¹⁷ McNeill, “A Birthday Note,” 3.

¹⁸ Krieger, “European History,” 269.

¹⁹ Ibid., 269.

²⁰ McClelland, Charles E., “German Intellectual History,” Central European History 19, no. 2 (1986): 171.Google Scholar

²¹ Freeland, Richard M., “The World Transformed: A Golden Age for American Universities, 1945–1970,” in A History of Higher Education, ed. Goodchild, Lester F. and Wechsler, Harold S., 2nd ed. (Boston: Pearson Custom Publishing, 1997), 590–93Google Scholar; and Geiger, Roger L., “Demography and Curriculum: The Humanities in American Higher Education from the 1950s through the 1980s,” in The Humanities and the Dynamics of Inclusion since World War II, ed. Hollinger, David A. (Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press, 2006), 56–57.Google Scholar

²² Trow, Martin A., “American Higher Education: Past, Present, and Future,” in A History of Higher Education, ed. Goodchild and Wechsler, 572.Google Scholar

²³ Gleason, Abbott, “Russian and Soviet Studies in the United States,” in The Modern Encyclopedia of Russian and Soviet History, vol. 32, ed. Wieczynski, Joseph L. (Gulf Breeze, FL: Academic International Press, 1983), 47Google Scholar; Katz, Barry M., Foreign Intelligence: Research and Analysis in the Office of Strategic Services 1942–1945 (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1989), 9–10CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Stern, “German History,” 157; and Winks, Robin W., Cloak & Gown: Scholars in the Secret War, 1939–1961 (New York: Morrow, 1987), 85.Google Scholar

²⁴ Katz, Foreign Intelligence, 94, 166, 190–91.

²⁵ Report of the Harvard Committee, General Education in a Free Society (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1945), 213–16.Google Scholar

²⁶ Ibid., 213–16.

²⁷ Bender, Thomas, “Politics, Intellect, and the American University, 1945–1995,” Daedalus 126, no. 1 (1997): 5.Google Scholar

²⁸ Ibid., 4–5; Downs, Laura Lee and Gerson, Stéphane, “Introduction,” in Why France? American Historians Reflect on an Enduring Fascination, ed. Downs, Laura Lee and Gerson, Stéphane (Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 2007), 9Google Scholar; Geiger, “Demography,” 57.

²⁹ Allardyce, “The Rise and Fall,” 695.

³⁰ Wellemeyer, J. F. Jr., “Survey of United States Historians, 1952, and a Forecast,” American Historical Review 61, no. 2 (1956): 340, 344.Google Scholar

³¹ Perkins, Dexter and Snell, John L., The Education of Historians in the United States (New York: McGraw-Hill, 1962), 31.Google Scholar

³² Pinkney, “American Historians,” 3.

³³ Woods, Randall Bennett, “Fulbright Internationalism,” Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science 491 (1987): 28.Google Scholar

³⁴ Wellemeyer, “Survey,” 343–4.

³⁵ Haynes, Douglas M., “White Lies: The British Past in Post-War America,” The History Teacher 31, no. 1 (1997): 96–97.Google Scholar

³⁶ Cannadine, David, “British History: Past, Present—And Future?,” Past & Present 116 (1987): 174.Google Scholar

³⁷ Michael Wolff's phrase, quoted in Vernon, James, “Historians and the Victorian Studies Question: Response,” Victorian Studies 47, no. 2 (2005): 273.Google Scholar

³⁸ McNeill, William H., “What's Happening to European History in the United States?,” Proceedings of the American Philosophical Society 123, no. 6 (1979): 341.Google Scholar

³⁹ Pinkney, “American Historians,” 6.

⁴⁰ Clark, J. C. D., “The Strange Death of British History? Reflections on Anglo-American Scholarship,” The Historical Journal 40, no. 3 (1997): 791.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

⁴¹ Katz, Foreign Intelligence, 139.

⁴² Ibid., 160.

⁴³ Byrnes, A History, 122.

⁴⁴ Ibid., 121.

⁴⁵ Ibid., 130, 213.

⁴⁶ Emmons, Terence, “Russia Then and Now in the Pages of the American Historical Review and Elsewhere: A Few Centennial Notes,” American Historical Review 100, no. 4 (1995): 1142.Google Scholar

⁴⁷ Engerman, David C., Know Your Enemy: The Rise and Fall of America's Soviet Experts (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2009), 7.Google Scholar

⁴⁸ In 1925, American medievalists founded the Medieval Academy of America and the journal Speculum. McNeill, “A Birthday Note,” 1.

⁴⁹ Engerman, Know Your Enemy, 38.

⁵⁰ Ibid., 38–39.

⁵¹ Ibid., 3.

⁵² Bonnell, Victoria E. and Breslauer, George W., “Soviet and Post-Soviet Area Studies,” in The Politics of Knowledge: Area Studies and the Disciplines, ed. Szanton, David (Berkeley, CA: University of California Press, 2004), 223–4.Google Scholar

⁵³ Gleason, “Russian and Soviet Studies,” 51.

⁵⁴ Engerman, Know Your Enemy, 7.

⁵⁵ See ibid., 156–64.

⁵⁶ Emmons, “Russia Then and Now,” 1144–5.

⁵⁷ Ibid., 1146.

⁵⁸ See Engerman, Know Your Enemy, 286–308.

⁵⁹ Emmons, “Russia Then and Now,” 1147.

⁶⁰ McNeill, “What's Happening?,” 341.

⁶¹ Barkin, Kenneth D., “German Émigré Historians in America: The Fifties, Sixties, and Seventies,” in An Interrupted Past: German-Speaking Refugee Historians in the United States after 1933, ed. Lehmann, Hartmut and Sheehan, James J. (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1991), 153–4.Google Scholar

⁶² Berghahn, Volker, “Deutschlandbilder 1945–1965. Angloamerikanische Historiker und moderne deutsche Geschichte,” in Deutsche Geschichtswissenschaft nach dem Zweiten Weltkrieg (1945–1965), ed. Schulin, Ernst (Munich: Oldenbourg, 1989), 251.Google Scholar

⁶³ On the older generation of refugee historians, see Epstein, Catherine, A Past Renewed: A Catalog of German-Speaking Refugee Historians in the United States after 1933 (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1993)Google Scholar; and Lehmann and Sheehan, eds., An Interrupted Past.

⁶⁴ McNeill, “What's Happening?,” 342.

⁶⁵ Popkin, Jeremy D., “The American Historian of France and the ‘Other,’” in Objectivity and Its Other, ed. Natter, Wolfgang, Schatzki, Theodore R., and Jones, John Paul III (New York: Guilford Press, 1995), 98.Google Scholar

⁶⁶ See Philipp Stelzel, “Rethinking Modern German History: Critical Social History as a Transatlantic Enterprise, 1945–1989” (Ph.D. diss., University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, 2010).

⁶⁷ Krieger, “European History,” 303.

⁶⁸ This was in contrast to German historians in Germany, who long viewed German exceptionalism in a positive light.

⁶⁹ Stern, “German History,” 160.

⁷⁰ Steven Aschheim and Jeffrey Herf have argued that the intellectual preoccupations of Stern and Mosse (as well as Peter Gay and Walter Laqueur) paved the way for historians of Germany to look at the Holocaust as the defining moment in German history. See Aschheim, Steven E., Beyond the Border: The German-Jewish Legacy Abroad (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2007), 49Google Scholar; and Herf, Jeffrey, “How the Culture Wars Matter: Liberal Historiography, German History, and the Jewish Catastrophe,” in Higher Education Under Fire: Politics, Economics, and the Crisis of the Humanities, ed. Bérubé, Michael and Nelson, Cary (New York: Routledge, 1995), 152.Google Scholar

⁷¹ Smith, Helmut Walser, “The Vanishing Point of German History: An Essay on Perspective,” History & Memory 17, nos. 1/2 (2005): 283.Google Scholar

⁷² See the description of a class with the refugee historian Hans Rosenberg in Hilberg, Raul, The Politics of Memory: The Journey of a Holocaust Historian (Chicago: Ivan R. Dee, 1996): 58–59.Google Scholar

⁷³ Aschheim, Beyond the Border, 60.

⁷⁴ Novick, Peter, The Holocaust in American Life (Boston: Houghton Mifflin, 1999), 103–23.Google Scholar

⁷⁵ Berghahn, Volker and Maier, Charles S., “Modern Europe in American Historical Writing,” in Imagined Histories: American Historians Interpret the Past, ed. Molho, Anthony and Wood, Gordon (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1998), 394.Google Scholar

⁷⁶ See the website of the American Council of Learned Societies, http://www.acls.org/societies/societies.aspx?sid=ef4ab5cb-ee16-dc11-9d54-000c2903e717 (accessed August 4, 2011).

⁷⁷ Berenson, Edward and Green, Nancy L., “The Society for French Historical Studies: The Early Years,” French Historical Studies 28, no. 4 (2005): 581.Google Scholar

⁷⁸ In 2012, CGCEH changed its name to the Central European History Society (CEHS). For a short history of the CGCEH, see the CEHS website, https://www.centraleuropeanhistory.org (accessed September 14, 2012).

⁷⁹ Sylvain Quatravaux, Embassy of France, to author, July 25, 2011.

⁸⁰ “NACBS Report on the State and Future of British Studies in North America (1999),” posted at http://www.nacbs.org/archive/nacbs-report-on-the-state-and-future-of-british-studies/ (accessed September 20, 2012); and the “External Funding” section of the website of the North American Conference on British Studies, http://www.nacbs.org/prizes/external-funding/ (accessed September 20, 2012).

⁸¹ AHA Newsletter 1, no. 1 (1962).Google Scholar

⁸² The remaining seventy-six jobs were a smattering of openings in southern history (Italy, Spain), Balkan history, or combinations of countries (France/Germany, Britain/Russia, and so on).

⁸³ “Jobs for Historians and the Role of the AHA: Two Comments Delivered at the Annual Meeting,” AHA Newsletter 10, no. 2 (1972): 20.Google Scholar

⁸⁴ Ibid., 19.

⁸⁵ Geiger, “Demography,” 65.

⁸⁶ American Historical Association, Survey of the Historical Profession: Academia 1981–82 Summary Report (Washington, D.C.: AHA, 1984), 5.Google Scholar

⁸⁷ McNeill, William H., “Modern European History,” in Kammen, Michael, ed., The Past Before Us: Contemporary Historical Writing in the United States (Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 1980): 97.Google Scholar

⁸⁸ Vernon, James, “The Local, the Imperial, and the Global: Repositioning Twentieth-Century Britain and the Brief Life of its Social Democracy,” Twentieth Century British History 21, no. 3 (2010): 406.Google Scholar

⁸⁹ Novick, Peter, That Noble Dream: The “Objectivity Question” and the American Historical Profession (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1988), 440.Google Scholar

⁹⁰ “NACBS Report.”

⁹¹ Berenson, Edward, “France, a Political Romance,” in Why France?, ed. Downs and Gerson, 138.Google Scholar

⁹² Chapman, Herrick, “Choosing History, Discovering France,” in Why France?, ed. Downs and Gerson, 156.Google Scholar

⁹³ Hunt, Lynn, “Fantasy Meets Reality: A Midwesterner Goes to Paris,” in Why France?, ed. Downs and Gerson, 63.Google Scholar

⁹⁴ Gordon, Bertram M., “The Decline of a Cultural Icon: France in American Perspective,” French Historical Studies 22, no. 4 (1999): 625.Google Scholar

⁹⁵ Smith, Leonard V., “Writing at the Margins,” in Why France?, ed. Downs and Gerson, 180.Google Scholar

⁹⁶ Pinkney, David H., “The Dilemma of the American Historian of Modern France,” French Historical Studies 1, no. 1 (1958): 11–25Google Scholar; and Pinkney, David H., “The Dilemma of the American Historian of Modern France Reconsidered,” French Historical Studies 9 (1975): 170–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

⁹⁷ Palmer, “A Century of French History,” 171–72.

⁹⁸ Kuisel, Richard F., “American Historians in Search of France: Perceptions and Misperceptions,” French Historical Studies 19, no. 2 (1995): 312–14.Google Scholar

⁹⁹ Popkin, “The American Historian,” 103.

¹⁰⁰ Pinkney, David H., “Time to Bury the Pinkney Thesis?,” French Historical Studies 17, no. 1 (1991): 219–23.Google Scholar

¹⁰¹ Sewell, William H. Jr., Logics of History: Social Theory and Social Transformation (Chicago: The University of Chicago Press, 2005), 23.Google Scholar

¹⁰² Popkin, “The American Historian,” 104.

¹⁰³ Kselman, Thomas, “Catholic Connections, Jewish Relations, French Religion,” in Why France?, ed. Downs and Gerson, 116.Google Scholar

¹⁰⁴ Sewell, Jr., Logics, 40.

¹⁰⁵ Ibid., 51.

¹⁰⁶ On historians of Russia not following the “linguistic turn,” see Emmons, “Russia Then and Now,” 1148.

¹⁰⁷ Herf, “How the Cultural Wars Matter,” 155.

¹⁰⁸ Cannadine, “British History,” 184.

¹⁰⁹ Hunt, Lynn, “French History in the Last Twenty Years: The Rise and Fall of the Annales Paradigm,” Journal of Contemporary History 21, no. 2 (1986): 220.Google Scholar

¹¹⁰ Schaeper, Thomas J., “French History as Written on Both Sides of the Atlantic: A Comparative Analysis,” French Historical Studies 17, no. 1 (1991): 236.Google Scholar

¹¹¹ Ibid., 236.

¹¹² Smith, Michael S., “French History in the College Curriculum: Survey Results,” French Historical Studies 17, no. 1 (1991): 226, 230.Google Scholar

¹¹³ Jarausch, Konrad H., “German Social History: American Style,” Journal of Social History 19, no. 2 (1985): 354.Google Scholar

¹¹⁴ Ibid., 350.

¹¹⁵ McClelland, “German Intellectual History,” 164–5.

¹¹⁶ Jarausch, “German Social History,” 354.

¹¹⁷ Novick, The Holocaust, 209.

¹¹⁸ Haynes, Stephen R., “Holocaust Education at American Colleges and Universities: A Report on the Current Situation,” Holocaust and Genocide Studies 12, no. 2 (1998): 288.Google Scholar

¹¹⁹ Littell, Marcia Sachs, “Breaking the Silence: A History of Holocaust Education in America,” in Remembrance, Repentance, Reconciliation: The 25th Anniversary Volume of the Annual Scholars' Conference on the Holocaust and the Churches, ed. Tobler, Douglas F. (Lanham, MD: University Press of America, 1998), 197.Google Scholar

¹²⁰ Ibid., 197–8.

¹²¹ By 1980, estimates of the number of Holocaust courses ranged from “over 700” to “approximately 140.” S. Haynes, “Holocaust Education,” 283, 287–8.

¹²² Engel, David, Historians of the Jews and the Holocaust (Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press, 2010), 34.Google Scholar

¹²³ Fallace, Thomas D., “The Origins of Holocaust Education in American Public Schools,” Holocaust and Genocide Studies 20, no. 1 (2006): 84.Google Scholar

¹²⁴ Haynes, “Holocaust Education,” 302.

¹²⁵ Ibid., 302.

¹²⁶ Ibid., 284.

¹²⁷ Engel, Historians, 23.

¹²⁸ Ibid., 32.

¹²⁹ Since 1981, twenty-three job ads in modern European history asked for expertise in the Holocaust. Of these, fourteen were in German history, one in Jewish history, two in German-Jewish history, and six made no reference to a national history.

¹³⁰ On the popularity of Holocaust courses, see Engel, Historians, 19; and Haynes, “Holocaust Education,” 286, 299.

¹³¹ Engel, Historians, 239 note 92.

¹³² See H. W. Smith, “The Vanishing Point,” 269–95.

¹³³ Ibid., 288.

¹³⁴ See Stone, Dan, “Beyond the ‘Auschwitz Syndrome’: Holocaust Historiography after the Cold War,” Patterns of Prejudice 44, no. 5 (2010): 454–68.Google Scholar

¹³⁵ Robert B. Townsend, “Job Market Sagged Further in 2009–10,” Perspectives on History (January 2011), at http://www.historians.org/perspectives/issues/2011/1101/1101new1.cfm (accessed August 15, 2011).

¹³⁶ Kevin M. Sweeney to David Ratner, March 16, 1999, personal collection of author.

¹³⁷ “NACBS Report.”

¹³⁸ Ibid.

¹³⁹ Ibid.

¹⁴⁰ Ibid.

¹⁴¹ Ibid.

¹⁴² Pedersen, Susan, “Money, Space, and Time: Reflections on Graduate Education,” part of “Roundtable: Twentieth-Century British History in North America,” Twentieth Century British History 21, no. 3 (2010): 387.Google Scholar

¹⁴³ Bonnell and Breslauer, “Soviet and Post-Soviet Area Studies,” 231.

¹⁴⁴ Ibid., 227.

¹⁴⁵ Engerman, Know Your Enemy, 335.

¹⁴⁶ Emmons, “Russia Then and Now,” 1145–6.

¹⁴⁷ From the Editors, “Ten Years after the ‘Remarkable Decade,’” Kritika: Explorations in Russian and Eurasian History 12, no. 4 (2011): 770Google Scholar. See the full issue for an overview of recent historiographical developments in Russian/Soviet history. For a similar overview published in 2001, see Kritika 2, no. 2 (2001).Google Scholar

¹⁴⁸ Engerman, Know Your Enemy, 335.

¹⁴⁹ Ibid., 333, 431 note 1.

¹⁵⁰ Stone, “Beyond the ‘Auschwitz Syndrome,’” 466–7.

¹⁵¹ Goldstein, Jan, “The Future of French History in the United States: Unapocalyptic Thoughts for the New Millennium,” French Historical Studies 24, no. 1 (2001): 5.Google Scholar

¹⁵² See Gordon, “The Decline of a Cultural Icon,” 625–51.

¹⁵³ Ibid., 625–6.

¹⁵⁴ Evans, Richard J., Cosmopolitan Islanders: British Historians and the European Continent (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2009), 16–17Google Scholar. For a debate about this work, see these essays in Contemporary European History 20, no. 3 (2011)Google Scholar: Peter Baldwin, “Smug Britannia: The Dominance of (the) English in Current History Writing and Its Pathologies,” 351–66; Richard J. Evans, “Response to Baldwin,” 367–76; and Peter Baldwin, “Response to Evans, 377–80.

¹⁵⁵ On the alleged success of the attack on Eurocentrism, see Gräser, Marcus, “World History in a Nation-State: The Transnational Disposition in Historical Writing in the United States,” Journal of American History 95, no. 4 (2009): 1043.Google Scholar

¹⁵⁶ Because the AHA did not begin job advertisements until 1962 and many institutions did not advertise with it, the documented number of available positions in the 2000s exceeded that of the 1960s (see Table 3).

¹⁵⁷ Townsend, Robert B., “Decline of the West or the Rise of the Rest? Data from 2010 Shows Rebalancing of Field Coverage in Departments,” Perspectives on History 49, no. 6 (2011)Google Scholar at http://www.historians.org/perspectives/issues/2011/1109/1109pro1.cfm (accessed September 19, 2012).

¹⁵⁸ Ibid.

¹⁵⁹ Ibid.

¹⁶⁰ Ibid.

¹⁶¹ Ibid.

¹⁶² Ibid.

¹⁶³ Pedersen, “Money,” 384–5.

¹⁶⁴ Goldstein, “The Future of French History,” 3.

¹⁶⁵ Pedersen, “Money,” 389.

¹⁶⁶ Spiegel, Gabrielle M., “The Case for History and the Humanities,” Perspectives on History 46, no. 1 (2008): 3–4.Google Scholar