Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7czq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-28T17:26:07.693Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Gerald D. Feldman (1937–2007)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 May 2008

Jonathan R. Zatlin
Affiliation:
Boston University

Extract

Whether it was his prodigious publication rate or the untiring help he extended to his students, the remarkable generosity he showed to colleagues or the anger he occasionally displayed over what he considered to be problematic scholarship, or merely his outsized appetite for good food, Gerry Feldman was a titanic force in the field of German history for more than forty years. His fascination with the past, love of the present, and concern for the future transformed his spacious home in the Oakland hills and his cramped office at the University of California at Berkeley into international destinations for itinerant intellectuals. His writing and his personal relations were infused with an exuberant delight in the most mundane of things and a wry appreciation of life's greatest challenges. With his passing, we have lost a great advocate of transnational scholarly relations, one of the profession's most talented economic historians, and our foremost expert on the Weimar Republic, its antecedents, and the men who dug its grave.

Type
Memorial
Copyright
Copyright © Conference Group for Central European History of the American Historical Association 2008

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Gerald D. Feldman, “A Collapse in Weimar Scholarship,” Central European History 17 (1984): 159–77; David Abraham, “A Reply to Gerald Feldman,” Central European History 17 (1984): 178–244; Feldman, “A Response to David Abraham's ‘Reply,’” Central European History 17 (1984): 245–67; Abraham, “On Professor Feldman's Insistence: Some Closing Remarks,” Central European History 17 (1984): 268–90.