Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2plfb Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-26T00:16:37.363Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Fascism and the Führerprinzip: The Austrian Example

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  16 December 2008

Bruce F. Pauley
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Although Gilbert Allardyce's recent article in the American Historical Review is useful in reminding us of “What Fascism Is Not,” even he recognizes the Führerprinzip, or leadership principle, as one of the few ideas common to all fascist movements in Europe during the interwar years. The fascists had little difficulty in deciding what they were against: “Marxism,” liberalism, parliamentarianism, individualism, and often, but not always, Judaism. They could also agree that they favored such vague and general ideas as a “‘new world,’ love of power and the dramatic appeal of youth, elite consciousness and mass influence, revolutionary ardor and veneration of tradition.” They were ultranationalistic and hoped to reunite their socially divided people into “people's communities.” In common with many nonfascist regimes they limited civil liberties and tolerated the existence of only one, all-encompassing political party. They stressed emotion and sentiment over reason, action instead of words, violence in place of peace.

Type
Articles
Information
Central European History , Volume 12 , Issue 3 , September 1979 , pp. 272 - 296
Copyright
Copyright © Conference Group for Central European History of the American Historical Association 1979

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 84 (Apr. 1979): 367–81.

2 Ibid., p. 378. See also Carsten, F. L., The Rise of Fascism (Berkeley and Los Angeles, 1971), p. 231Google Scholar; Nolte, Ernst, Three Faces of Fascism: Action Française, Italian Fascism, National Socialism (New York, 1966), p. 456.Google Scholar On the Führerprinzip in Norway see Hayes, Paul M., “Quisling's Political Ideas,” in Walter, Laqueur and Mosse, George L., eds., International Fascism (New York, 1966), p. 148Google Scholar; for Italy see Finer, Herman, Mussolini's Italy (New York 1965), pp. 287–308Google Scholar; for England see Skidelsky, R., “Great Britain,” in Woolf, S. J., ed., European Fascism (New York, 1969), p. 231Google Scholar, and Jones, J. R., “England,” in Hans, Rogger and Eugen, Weber, eds., The European Right (Berkeley and Los Angeles, 1966), p. 65Google Scholar; for Belgium see Jean Stengers, “Belgium,” ibid., pp. 161–62; for Finland see Cassels, Alan, Fascism (New York, 1975), p. 228.Google Scholar

3 Nolte, Three Faces of Fascism, p. 456.

4 Linz, Juan J., “Some Notes toward a Comparative Study of Fascism in Sociological Perspective,” in Walter, Laqueur, ed., Fascism: A Reader's Guide: Analyses, Interpretations, Bibliography (Berkeley and Los Angeles, 1976), p. 13Google Scholar; Zeev Sternhill, “Fascist Ideology,” ibid., p. 347.

5 Rath, R. John, “The First Austrian Republic—Totalitarian, Fascist, Authoritarian, or What?” in Rudolf, Neck and Adam, Wandruszka, eds., Beiträge zur Zeitgeschichte: Festschrift Ludwig Jedlicka zum 60. Geburtstag (St. Pölten, 1976), p. 179.Google Scholar

6 Nyomarkay, Joseph L., “Factionalism in the National Socialist German Workers' Party, 1925–26: The Myth and Reality of the ‘Northern Faction,’” in Turner, Henry A. Jr., ed., Nazism and the Third Reich (New York, 1972), p. 34.Google Scholar

7 Ibid., p. 39; Robert Koehl, “Feudal Aspects of National Socialism,” in Turner, ed., Nazism and the Third Reich, p. 158.

8 S. J. Woolf, “Introduction,” in Woolf, ed., European Fascism, p. 11.

9 National Archives, captured German documents. Microfilm Publication T-120, reel 2889, frame E454209. Memorandum by [Kurt] Rieth of a conversation with Hitler in Berlin on February 9, 1934. Hereafter abbreviated as NA, T-1207/2889/E454209.

10 Botz, Gerhard, “Faschismus und Lohnabhängige in der Ersten Republik,” Österreich in Geschichte und Literatur (Mar.-Apr. 1977), 113.Google Scholar

11 Mein Kampf (Boston, 1943), p. 587. See also Orlow, Dietrich, The History of the Nazi Party: 1919–1933 (Pittsburgh, 1969), pp. 15, 136–38.Google Scholar

12 Smelser, Ronald M., “Nazis without Hitler: The DNSAP and the First Republic” (paper delivered to the American Historical Association, Atlanta, Georgia, Dec. 1975), pp. 2, 13, 19–20.Google Scholar

13 The True Believer: Thoughts on the Nature of Mass Movements (New York, 1951), p. 112.

14 “Afterthoughts,” in Rogger and Weber, eds., The European Right, pp. 582, 585.

15 On the history of the Heimwehr see Edmondson, C. Earl, The Heimwehr and Austrian Politics, 1918–1936 (Athens, Ga., 1978)Google Scholar, and Pauley, Bruce F., Hahnenschwanz und Hakenkreuz: Steirischer Heimatschutz und österreiehischer Nationalsozialismus, 1918–1934 (Vienna, 1972).Google Scholar

16 Interview with Dr. Walter Pfrimer, Judenburg, Styria, July 2, 1964.

17 Kerekes, Lajos, “Akten zu den geheimen Verbindungen zwischen der Bethlen-Regierung und der österreichischen Heimwehrbewegung,” Acta Historica 11 (1965): 299.Google Scholar

18 Kondert, Reinhart, “The Rise and Early History of the Austrian ‘Heimwehr’ Movement” (Ph.D. diss., Rice University, 1972), p. 29.Google Scholar

19 Whiteside, Andrew G., The Socialism of Fools: Georg von Schönerer and Austrian Pan-Germanism (Berkeley and Los Angeles, 1975), pp. 113, 230–31.Google Scholar

20 Deutsche Arbeiter-Presse (Vienna), Jan. 20, 1920, pp. 1–2. Hereafter referred to as DAP.

21 Messerer, Ingeborg, “Die Frontkämpfervereinigung Deutsch-Österreichs: Ein Beitrag zur Geschichte der Wehrverbände in der Republik Österreich” (Ph.D. diss., University of Vienna, 1964), p. 53.Google Scholar

22 Sepp Kogelnik, , ed., Österreichisches Heimatschutz-Jahrbuch 1933 (Graz, 1934), p. 81Google Scholar; Berger, Barbara, “Ernst Rüdiger Fürst Starhemberg: Versuch einer Biographie” (Ph.D. diss., University of Vienna, 1967), p. 45.Google Scholar

23 Bundesarchiv (Koblenz, Germany), Sammlung Schumacher, 305 II. Letter of Josef Müller to the Organisationsleitung of the NSDAP in Munich, Apr. 21, 1927, pp. 2–3, 8–9.

24 DAP, Aug. 21, 1926, p. 1.

25 Sammlung Schumacher, 302 I. Article by an unidentified writer entitled “Hitler oder Schulzpartei,” written about mid-1932, p. 2; DAP, Mar. 11, 1930, p. 1.

26 Messerer, “Frontkämpfervereinigung,” pp. 118–19.

27 (Vienna, 1930), p. 27.

28 Ludwig Jedlicka, “The Austrian Heimwehr,” in Laqueur and Mosse, eds., International Fascism, p. 139.

29 Bärnthaler, Imgard, Die Vaterländische Front: Geschichte und Organisation (Vienna, 1971), pp. 56, 58Google Scholar; Carsten, F. L., Fascist Movements in Austria from Schönerer to Hitler (London, 1977), p. 238.Google Scholar

30 Messerer, “Frontkämpfervereinigung,” p. 24.

31 Carsten, Fascist Movements in Austria, p. 59; Tagblatt Archive (Arbeiterkammer, Vienna), folder entitled “Heimwehr/Steiermark,” excerpt from Der Abend (Vienna), Sept. 18, 1929.

32 Edmondson, C. Earl, “The Heimwehr and Austrian Polities” (Ph.D. diss., Duke University, 1966), pp. 167, 169.Google Scholar

33 Kondert, “Rise and Early History of the Heimwehr,” pp. 64, 91; Carsten, Fascist Movements in Austria, p. 180.

34 Interview with Dr. Karl Maria Stepan, Graz, June 30, 1964; interview with Walter Pfrimer, July 2, 1964.

35 For details see Pauley, Hahnenschwanz und Hakenkreuz, pp. 107–26, 140–43, 159–96.

36 Starhemberg, Ernst Rüdiger, Memoiren (Vienna, 1971), pp. 20–21Google Scholar; Gedye, G. E. R., Fallen Bastions (London, 1939), p. 49Google Scholar; Speer, Albert, Inside the Third Reich (New York, 1970), pp. 185–86.Google Scholar

37 NA, T-120/2842/E45572. Landesleitung Österreich. Report dated Apr. 12, 1934.

38 Jagschitz, Gerhard, Der Putsch: Die Nationalsozialisten 1934 in Österreich (Graz, 1976), pp. 55–56.Google Scholar

39 NA, T-120/28927/E45572. Landesleitung Österreich. Report dated Apr. 12, 1934; Carsten, Fascist Movements in Austria, pp. 219–22, 275.

40 Edmondson, “The Heimwehr and Austrian Politics,” p. 382.

41 Bullock, Malcolm, Austria 1918–1938: A Story of Failure (London, 1939), pp. 217–18.Google Scholar

42 Hartmann, Mitzi [pseud.], Austria Still Lives (London, 1938), p. 19Google Scholar; Kohn, Hans, “AEIOU: Some Reflections on the Meaning and Mission of Austria,” Journal of Modern History 11 (Dec. 1939): 237.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

43 Rath, “The First Austrian Republic,” p. 180; see also Linz, “Some Notes,” p. 9.

44 Kerekes, “Akten zu den geheimen Verbindungen,” p. 338. Aufzeichnung des ungarischen Regierungsbeauftragten über seine Besprechung mit dem Heimwehr Führer Pabst. Vienna, Jan. 25, 1931.

45 Sammlung Schumacher, 305 II. NSDAP circular letter, May 31, 1927, p. 1.

46 Ibid., p. 2. See also Kele, Max, Nazis and Workers: National Socialist Appeals to German Labor (Chapel Hill, N.C., 1972), pp. 133–34.Google Scholar

47 Numerous letters were written to Strasser by leading Austrian Nazis pleading with him to appoint a strong Austrian leader. See, for example, in the Sammlung Schumacher, 305 I. Letters of Hans Krebs to Strasser, Mar. 18, 1930, and Alfred Proksch to the Reichsleitung, Mar. 26, 1930.

48 Ibid., unidentified writer in Innsbruck to the Reichsleitung, Sept. 27, 1930.

49 Berlin Document Center, Personalakten, Alfred Proksch folder. Letter of Proksch to the USCHLA of the NSDAP in Munich, Mar. 10, 1931, p. 3. Hereafter referred to as BDC. See also Carsten, Fascist Movements in Austria, p. 149.

50 Sammlung Schumacher, 305 I. Letter of Alfred Proksch to the Reichsleitung, Mar. 22, 1930.

51 Ibid., 305 II. “Exposé” of Leo Haubenberger (Vienna), Mar. 30, 1930.

52 Theo, Habicht, ed., Das Dienstbuch der NSDAP: Österreichs Hitlerbewegung (Wels, 1932), pp. 20, 82Google Scholar; Volz, Hans, Daten der Geschichte der NSDAP (Berlin, 1943), pp. 108–9.Google Scholar

53 Jagschitz, Gerhard, “Bundeskanzler Engelbert Dollfuss,” in Ludwig, Jedlicka and Rudolf, Neck, eds., Vom Justizpalast zum Heldenplatz: Studien und Dokumentationen 1927 bis 1938 (Vienna, 1975), p. 152Google Scholar; Eichstadt, Ulrich, Von Dollfuss zu Hitler: Geschichte des Anschlusses Österreichs (Wiesbaden, 1955), p. 73.Google Scholar

54 Jagschitz, Der Putsch, p. 74.

55 NA, T-120/2836/E452732. Note (by Reith) about a conversation with the Reichskanzler, Berlin, Feb. 10, 1934.

56 von Papen, Franz, Der Wahrheit eine Gasse (Munich, 1952), p. 383.Google Scholar

57 United States Department of State, Documents on German Foreign Policy, 1918–1945, Ser. C, 3 (Washington, 1959): 293–94. Memorandum by an Official of Department II (Hüffer), Aug. 7, 1934. Hereafter abbreviated as DGFP, C, 3.

58 Ibid., p. 299. The Führer and Chancellor to Ministers Hess and Goebbels, Herr von Papen, and the Office of the Secret State Police. Aug. 8, 1934.

59 Office of the United States Chief Counsel for the Prosecution of Criminality, Axis, Nazi Conspiracy and Aggression, 3 (Washington, 1946): 589Google Scholar, doc. 812-PS. Letter of Rainer to Buerckel, July 6, 1939. Hereafter referred to as NCA.

60 Hübener, Karl-Rudolf, “Illegale österreichische Presse von 1933 bis 1938” (Ph.D. diss., University of Vienna, 1969), pp. 14–15.Google Scholar

61 NA, T–120/900/5653513. Report by Muff on the Austrian situation.

62 Ibid., E453008. Unsigned article written in Vienna on Mar. 11, 1935, entitled “Notes about the Political Situation in Austria.”

63 Langoth, Franz, Kampf um Österreich: Erinnenmgen eines Politikers (Wels, 1951), p. 100Google Scholar; Rosar, Wolfgang, Deutsche Gemeinschaft: Seyss-Inquart und der Anschluss (Vienna, 1972), p. 113.Google Scholar

64 Luža, Radomfr, Austro-German Relations in the Anschluss Era (Princeton, N.J., 1975), p. 29.Google Scholar

65 DGFP, D, 1: 299. Memorandum [by Altenburg], Berlin, Sept. 22, 1936.

66 Memoirs (London, 1952), p. 384.

67 DGFP, D, 1: 362. The German Ambassador in Austria to the Führer and Chancellor, Vienna, Dec. 2, 1936.

68 Der Wahrheit eine Gasse, p. 445.

69 Ibid., p. 392.

70 Papen, Memoirs, p. 395.

71 BDC, Personalakten, Seyss-Inquart folder, personal declaration; Rosar, Deutsche Gemeinschaft, pp. 22–24. See also Pauley, Bruce F., The Habsburg Legacy, 1867–1939 (New York, 1972), pp. 17–18, 29.Google Scholar

72 BDC, Personalakten, Seyss-Inquart folder, personal declaration.

73 Documentation Center of the Austrian Resistance Movement (Vienna), doc. 1460. Unpublished ms by Persche, Alfred entitled “Hauptmann Leopold: Der Abschnitt 1936–1938 der Geschichte der nationalsozialistischen Machtergreifung in Österreich” (ca. 1947), pp. 135, 246Google Scholar; Zernatto, Guido, Die Wahrheit über Österreich (New York, 1939), p. 178.Google Scholar

74 Seyss-Inquart's views can be found in his essay entitled “The Austrian Question,” NCA, 5: 966–67, 970–71, doc. 3254-PS. For Leopold's opinions see Persche, “Hauptmann Leopold,” pp. 220–21.

75 DGFP, D, 1: 464. Memorandum [by Keppler] of a conversation with Foreign Minister Baron von Neurath on Oct. 1, 1937.

76 United States Department of State, Foreign Relations of the United States: Diplomatic Papers, 1938 (Washington) 1: 386. The Chargé in Austria (Wiley) to the Secretary of State, Vienna, Jan. 29, 1938.

77 DGFP, D, 1: 540–41. Memorandum [by Keppler] of the Reception by the Führer on the Afternoon of Feb. 21, 1938, in the Presence of Field Marshal Göring.

78 Macartney, C. A. and Palmer, A. W., Independent Eastern Europe: A History (New York, 1966), p. 372.Google Scholar

79 Gehl, Jürgen, Austria, Germany, and the Anschluss, 1931–38 (New York, 1963), pp. 186–87.Google Scholar

80 NCA, 5: 982, doc. 3254-PS. Seyss-Inquart, “The Austrian Question.”

81 NCA, 3: 594, doc. 812-PS. Letter of Rainer to Buerckel, July 6, 1939.

82 Gehl, Austria, Germany, and the Anschluss, p. 192.

83 Jaszi, Oscar, The Dissolution of the Habsburg Monarchy (Chicago, 1961), pp. 31–32.Google Scholar