Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jn8rn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T04:44:22.998Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Divided Loyalties: The German Reich and Austria-Hungary in Austro-German Discussions of War Aims, 1914–1916

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  16 December 2008

Richard W. Kapp
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

In his The Man Without Qualities the Austrian writer Robert Musil examines the declining state patriotism of the Austro-Germans in 1913–1914. He describes a fictional Patriotic Campaign (Parallelaktion) in a land he calls Kakania because the Habsburg ruler was Kaiser (emperor) in Austria and König (king) in Hungary and the state's joint institutions were labeled “k. u. k.” The organizers of this Campaign hoped ostensibly to discover a Kakanian idea or mission for the upcoming celebration of the ruler's seventy-year reign in 1918, but in fact their real objective was to put a stop to the growing enthusiasm of the Austro-Germans for the German Reich. As the head of the Campaign, His Highness the Imperial Liege-Count Leinsdorf put it, he hoped “to win over precisely that section of Kakanians of German descent who felt less allegiance to their country than to the German nation.” This was no easy task as the Austro-Germans were even less loyal to their government than the other peoples of Austria-Hungary. As a result Leinsdorf planned first to gain the support of the other nationalities, “for only when one had been successful in this would all the German circles see themselves compelled to join in, since, it is, of course, much more difficult to hold aloof from something that everyone else is doing than to refuse to be the first to begin.

Type
Articles
Information
Central European History , Volume 17 , Issue 2-3 , June 1984 , pp. 120 - 139
Copyright
Copyright © Conference Group for Central European History of the American Historical Association 1984

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Musil, Robert, The Man Without Qualities, trans. Wilkins, Eithne and Kaiser, Ernst, 3 vols. (London, 1979), 2:262–63.Google Scholar

2. Meyer, Henry Cord, Mitteleuropa in German Thought and Action 1815–1945 (The Hague, 1955), 178.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

3. Taylor, A. J. P., The Habsburg Monarchy 1809–1918 (London, 1948), 242–43.Google Scholar

4. Kann, Robert A., Das Nationalitätenproblem der Habsburgermonarchie, 2 vols. (Graz and Cologne, 1964), 2: 259CrossRefGoogle Scholar. See also his more recent, A History of the Habsburg Empire 1526–1918 (Berkeley, Los Angeles, and London, 1974), 498–500.Google Scholar

5. Katzenstein, Peter J., Disjointed Partners: Austria and Germany since 1815 (Berkeley and Los Angeles, 1976), 127. See also 129Google Scholar.

6. Feldl, Peter, Das Verspielte Reich: Die letzten Tagen Österreich-Ungarns (Vienna and Hamburg, 1968), 46.Google Scholar

7. Ramhardter, Günther, Geschichtswissenschaft und Patriotisms: Österreichische Historiker im Weltkrieg 1914–1918 (Vienna, 1973), 192Google Scholar, writes “Since the beginning of 1915 there was not a single scholar or publicist who would not have spoken out for an indissolubly close alliance with the German Reich”; Sutter, Berthold, “Die politische und rechtliche Stellung der Deutschen in Österreich 1848 bis 1918,” in Die Völker des Reiches, vol. 3Google Scholar, pt. 1 of Die Habsburger Monarchie, ed. Wandruszka, Adam and Urbanitsch, Peter, 3 vols. (Vienna, 1973–1980), 319.Google Scholar

8. Gratz, Gustav and Schüller, Richard, Die Äussere Wirtschaftspolitik Österreich-Ungarns: Mitteleuropäische Pläne (Vienna and New Haven, 1925), 7.Google Scholar

9. May, Arthur J., The Passing of the Hapsburg Monarchy 1914–1918, 2 vols. (Philadelphia, 1966), 1: 146–51Google Scholar; Droz, Jacques, L'Europe Centrale: Évolution Historique de L'idée de Mitteleuropa (Paris, 1960), 214–17.Google Scholar

10. Whiteside, Andrew G., “The Germans as an Integrative Force in Imperial Austria: The Dilemma of Dominance,” Austrian History Yearbook 3, pt. 1 (1967): 175CrossRefGoogle Scholar, for the quotation; Meyer, Mitteleuropa, 178.

11. The data is from Knauer, Oswald, Das österreichische Parlament von 1848 bis 1966 (Vienna, 1969), 20Google Scholar; and Macartney, C. A., The Habsburg Empire 1790–1918 (London, 1969), 795–96Google Scholar. Macartney gives the National Union 104 seats after 1911, but Knauer indicates that the member parties had a total of 105 seats.

12. HStA, NL Gross, carton 4, Gross to Honored Friend, Vienna, Aug. 23, 1914.

13. Ibid., Dobernig to Gross, Waltendorf-Graz, Aug. 28, 1914; Freissler to Gross, Troppau, Aug. 28, 1914; Beurle to Gross, Linz, Sept. 16, 1914.

14. Ibid., carton 2, Dobernig to Gross, Waltendorf-Graz, Dec. 23, 1914, included a copy of a government decree of Dec. 22, 1914. See also Kapp, Richard W., “The Failure of the Diplomatic Negotiations Between Germany and Austria-Hungary for a Customs Union, 1915–1916” (Ph.D. diss., Univ. of Toronto, 1977), 191–95Google Scholar, for an analysis of Sturgkh's policy at this time.

15. Ibid., NL Baernreither, carton 6, vol. 13, Vienna, Sept. 19–20, 1914, for the National Union's discussions on this question.

16. Ibid., for Baernreither's view; see also Class, Heinrich, Wider den Strom: Vom Werden und Wachsen der Opposition im Alien Reich (Leipzig, 1932), 324–26Google Scholar, for the pessimistic appraisal of the Pan-German League's president, who also attended the discussions in September.

17. Ibid., NL Gross, carton 4, has copies of all these plans.

18. Ibid.; see also the critical comments of Redlich, Joseph, Österreichische Regierung und Verwaltung im Weltkriege (Vienna, 1925), 254.Google Scholar

19. Zenker, Ernst, Ein Mann im Sterbenden Österreich (Reichenberg, 1935), 202.Google Scholar

20. PA Bonn, Österreich 83, vol. 1, Erzberger to Foreign Office, Berlin, Sept. 10, 1915, no. A26666.

21. The program is published in Redlich, Regierung, 249–53.

22. PA Bonn, Österreich 83, vol. 1, Erzberger to Foreign Office, Berlin, Sept.10, 1915, for a copy of the minutes of the July meeting; HStA, PA I, carton 980, “Richtlinien zuerst besprochen in der Zusammenkunft in Salzburg am 14. November endgültig vereinbart von dem in Salzburg eingesetzten Ausschuss am 1. Dezember in Berlin.”

23. The parliamentarians revised the statement at another meeting in Salzburg on Sept. 23–24, 1916. It has been published in Molisch, Paul, Briefe zur deutschen Politik in Osterreich von 1848 bis 1918 (Vienna and Leipzig, 1934), 388–89.Google Scholar

24. Payer, Friedrich, Von Bethmann-Hollweg bis Ebert: Erinnerungen und Bilder (Frankfurt a.M., 1923), 261.Google Scholar

25. HStA, NL Gross, carton 4, “Entscheidung gefasst in der Vollversammlung der deutschnationalen und christlich-sozialen Abgeordneten am 9. November 1916.”

26. Ibid., carton 2, “Beschlüsse der Reichskonferenz der deutschen sozialdemokratischen Arbeiterpartei in Österreich,” Mar. 5–26, 1916. Brügel, Ludwig, Geschichte der österreichischen Sozialdemokratie, 5 vols. (Vienna, 1922–1925), 5: 252–53Google Scholar, sees this resolution as a victory for the anti-Mitteleuropa faction in the party.

27. Sutter, “Stellung der Deutschen,” 322, mentions the National Union's unsuccessful attempt to enlist Social Democratic support for Mitteleuropa.

28. HStA, NL Gross, carton 4, Plener to Gross, Vienna, May 4, 1915; Baernreither to Gross, Vienna, Sept. 15, 1915.

29. Ibid., Fuchs to Gross, Vienna, Dec. 22, 1915. Fuchs was the head of the Christian Socials' parliamentary delegation, and told Gross of the contacts with the Center Party in this letter.

30. Ibid., Ad Reg, Fach 34, carton 68, Stürgkh to Burian, Vienna, May 28, 1916, no. Z690, includes copies of both memoranda. Wittek, who had been Austrian prime minister in 1899, stressed that both empires needed to keep a free hand to deal with the unsettled situation after the war.

31. Ibid., Burian to Sturgkh, Vienna, May 20, 1916, no. Z48090/9, included a report on the conference by the Monarchy's consul in Munich, Velics to Burian, Munich, Apr. 26, 1916, no. 1181P. According to Velics the participants did not reach an accord. The Center Party delegates from North Germany favored a full customs union, while the South Germans desired a more modest agreement to reduce tariffs. The Christian Socials, led by Wittek, also opposed the customs union out of concern for Austria-Hungary's independence.

32. Social Democratic Party of Germany, Die Bestrebungen für eine wirtschaftliche Annäherung Deutschlands und Österreich-Ungarns (Berlin, 1916), contains the minutes of the meetingGoogle Scholar. See also David, Eduard, Das Kriegstagebuch des Reichstags-Abgeordneten Eduard David, ed. Miller, Susanne (Düsseldorf, 1966), 151–52, 01 9, 1916.Google Scholar

33. Meyer, Mitteleuropa, 166.

34. HStA, NL Marchet, carton 9, and NL Baernreither, cartons 5–7, and 30, contain abundant materials on the group. Only a few scholars have paid any attention to the circle: Ramhardter, Geschichtswissenschaft, 20–23; Miyake, Masaki, “J. M. Baernreither und ‘Mitteleuropa’: Eine Studie über den Nachlass Baemreither,” Mitteilungen des Österreichischen Staatsarchivs 17–18 (1964–1965): 359–98Google Scholar; Meyer, Mitteleuropa, 180.

35. Ibid., NL Baernreither, carton 6, vol. 13, Vienna, Oct. 17, 1914.

36. Ibid., Vienna, Oct. 10, 1914.

37. Ibid., Berlin, Nov. 7, 1914.

38. Ibid., carton 30, “Exposé über das wirtschaftspolitische Verhältnis der Monarchie zu Deutschland nach dem Kriege.”

39. Ibid., “Denkschrift über das wirtschaftspolitische Verhältnis Österreich-Ungarns zu Deutschland.”

40. Ibid., “Schema der Beratungen,” Apr. 30, 1915; SB, NL Friedjung, Baernreither to Friedjung, Bad Kreuth, Aug. 18, 1915, no. IN163.703.

41. Redlich, Joseph, Schickslsjahre Österreichs 1908–1919: Das Politische Tagebuch Joseph Redlichs, ed. Fellner, Fritz, 2 vols. (Graz and Cologne, 1953–1954), 2: 26, 03 24, 1915.Google Scholar

42. SB, NL Friedjung, Baernreither to Friedjung, Bad Kreuth, Aug. 18, 1915, no. IN163.703.

43. Class, Wider den Strom, 32.

44. Kruck, Alfred, Geschichte des Alldeutschen Verbandes 1890–1939 (Wiesbaden, 1954), 113–15Google Scholar; Fischer, Fritz, Krieg der Illusionen: Die deutsche Politik von 1911 bis 1914 (Düsseldorf, 1969), 740–41.Google Scholar

45. Kruck, Geschichte, 115; HStA, PA III, carton 173, “Bericht über die deutscheösterreichische Besprechung in Berlin am 8. Oktober 1916.”

46. Alldeutsche Blätter, 24 (1914): 384–86Google Scholar; Meyer, Mitteleuropa, 149.

47. Kruck, Geschichte, 116–17.

48. See the report mentioned in n. 45 above.

49. Meyer, Mitteleuropa, 214, 234. See also Alldeutsche Blätter 26 (1916): 21–26.Google Scholar

50. Steinacker, Edmund, Lebenserinnerungen (Munich, 1937), 234–35.Google Scholar

51. PA Bonn, Deutschland 180 Geheim, vol. 1, “Denkschrift aus Deutsch-Österreich,” no. AS5839.

52. SB, NL Friedjung, Sieghart to Friedjung, Vienna, Sept. 6, 1915; Plener to Friedjung, Vienna, Sept. 4, 1915, no. IN163.546; Beck to Friedjung, Vienna, Sept. 27, 1915; Marchet to Friedjung, Waidhofen, Aug. 25, 1915.

53. Ramhardter, Geschichtswissenschaft, 93, citing HStA, NL Marchet, carton 9, Friedjung to Marchet, Sept. 30, 1915. For Conrad's Mitteleuropa plans see Kerner, Robert J., “Austro-Hungarian War Aims in the Winter of 1915–1916 as Revealed by Secret Documents,” Journal of International Relations 10 (1919–1920): 444–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

54. SB, NL Friedjung, Philippovich to Friedjung, Vienna, Dec. 23, 1915, no. IN163. 116.

55. Ibid., Charmatz to Friedjung, Vienna, Sept. 10, 1915, no. IN163.711.

56. Ibid., Baernreither to Friedjung, Bad Kreuth, Aug. 18, 1915, no. IN163.541.

57. PA. Bonn, Deutschland 180 Geheim, vol. 3, Tschirschky to undersecretary (Zimmermann), Vienna, Apr. 3, 1916, no. A7494. Appended to the report was “Aus der Denkschrift eines ungarischen Politikers,” as well as a covering letter from Steinacker to Zimmermann.

58. Ibid., Korodi to Your Excellency (Zimmermann), Gross Möllen bei Köslin, July 12, 1916, no. A52258, includes a copy of Steinacker's, “Bemerkungen zur ‘Denkschrift aus Deutsch-Österreich.’”

59. Ibid., Tschirschky to undersecretary (Zimmermann), Vienna, Apr. 3, 1916, no. A7494, shows that the German ambassador to Vienna did not think the Austro-Hungarian Compromise could be altered along the lines proposed by Kristoffy. Chancellor Bethmann-Hollweg shared this critical view of the circle; see Scherer, André and Grunewald, J., eds., L'Allemagne et les problemes de la paix pendant la première guerre mondiale: Documents extraits des archivs de l'Office allemand des Affaires étrangères, 4 vols. (Paris, 1962–1978), 1: 482–84Google Scholar, Bethmann to Hindenburg, Berlin, Sept. 29, 1916, no. 333.

60. Kapp, “Failure of Negotiations,” 19–23, for the development of both associations before the war.

61. HStA, NL Baernreither, carton 30, “Einige Leitsatze fur die Besprechung über die Deutsch-österreichisch-ungarischen Wirtschaftsbeziehungen,” Lower Austrian Chamber of Commerce, Dec. 10, 1914; carton 20, “Mitteleuropäischer Wirtschaftsverein,” Feb. 4, 1915.

62. Ibid., carton 20, “Verhandlungen der Ausschüsse des Mitteleuropäischen Wirtschaftsvereins in Wien und Budapest am 18. April 1915 in Wien.”

63. Ibid., carton 30, “Vorbesprechung im Hotel Adlon in Berlin am 25. März 1915”; “Sitzung vom 26. März.”

64. The above section is based on the reports of the Neue Freie Presse, June 28, 1915, 9; June 29, 1915, 12–13; June 30, 1915, 8–9.

65. HStA, Ad Reg, Fach 34, carton 67, Hohenlohe to Ballplatz, Berlin, July 27, 1915, no. Z34.451/A; Berliner Tageblatt, July 24, 1915, clipping appended to Hohenlohe report.

66. Das Fremdenblatt, July 20, 1915, 1.

67. See Hohenlohe's report, cited in n. 65 above.

68. HStA, Ad Reg, Fach 34, carton 67, “Entschliessung des Deutsch-Österreichisch-Ungarischen Wirtschafts-verbandes.” Dresden, Nov. 29, 1915, no. ZK 59604.

69. Ibid., carton 68, Thoros to Burian, Dresden, Nov. 30, 1915, no. Z42P.

70. Ibid., carton 97, Vienna, Nov. 20, 1915, no. 11 5742/9, for a copy of the resolution; ibid., PA I, carton 618, Tisza to Burian, Budapest, Nov. 27, 1915, for Tisza's comment. I am indebted to Dr. Thomas Barcsay of Ryerson Polytechnical Institute for the translation from the Hungarian.

71. Kapp, “Failure of Negotiations,” 353–54.

72. HStA, NL Gross, carton 4, Baernreither to Gross, Vienna, Sept. 4, 1915.

73. Meyer, Mitteleuropa, 250; Kapp, “Failure of Negotiations,” 351–61.

74. Jarausch, Konrad, “Illiberalism and Beyond: German History in Search of a Paradigm,” Journal of Modern History 55 (06, 1983): 283CrossRefGoogle Scholar. See also Sheehan, James J., “What is German History?” Journal of Modern History 53 (03, 1981): 1–23.Google Scholar