Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-94fs2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-03T00:16:40.617Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Serious Work for a New Europe: The Congress of Vienna after Two Hundred Years

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 June 2015

Katherine B. Aaslestad
Katherine B. Aaslestad*
Affiliation:
West Virginia University
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Given the current challenges to European unity, in particular Russian aggression in Ukraine and dissent in the European Union over economic policy toward Greece, Europeans should remember that, two hundred years ago, they celebrated together a long-awaited peace, as their statesmen collaborated on a lasting settlement to solve territorial questions and ensure international stability. Revisiting the Congress of Vienna, however, is not an exercise in nostalgia. New works on the Congress underscore the critical international stakes in 1814 and 1815, following two decades of war and revolution, and reveal the complexity of the negotiations, political goals, and the unsettled nature of postwar Europe. The Congress was so successful in solving the existential problems of Europe that Europeans would not fight a comparable war against each other for another century—until the Great War in 1914. The challenges that Europe faced in the twentieth century suggest, in fact, that the type of collaborative diplomacy developed at the Vienna Congress remains essential to limit conflict.

Type
Review Essays
Information
Central European History , Volume 48 , Issue 2 , June 2015 , pp. 225 - 237
Copyright
Copyright © Central European History Society of the American Historical Association 2015 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Ghervas, Stella, “Three Lessons of Peace: From the Congress of Vienna to the Ukraine Crisis,” UN Chronicle 51, no. 3 (Dec. 2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar, http://unchronicle.un.org/article/three-lessons-peace-congress-vienna-ukraine-crisis/.

2 Several conferences took place in 2014 and 2015, including “The Congress of Vienna and Its Global Dimension,” University of Vienna, 2014; “Vienna 1815: The Making of a European Security Culture,” Royal Netherlands Academy of Arts and Sciences, Amsterdam, 2014; “The Power of Peace: New Perspectives on the Congress of Vienna (1814–1815),” Cambridge, MA, Harvard University, 2014; and “The Congress of Vienna 1814–1815: Making Peace after Global War,” New York City, Columbia University, 2015. Some academic conferences held in 2015 have panels devoted to the Congress, including the annual conference of the Consortium on the Revolutionary Era and the annual conference of the German Studies Association. UN Chronicle, the magazine of the United Nations, dedicated the Dec. 2014 volume Conference Diplomacy 1815–2015 to the bicentennial of the Congress of Vienna; see http://unchronicle.un.org/issue/conference-diplomacy/.

3 Webster, Charles, The Congress of Vienna, 1814–1815 (London: Bell, 1919/1950)Google Scholar; Nicolson, Harold, The Congress of Vienna: A Study in Allied Unity, 1812–1822 (New York: Harcourt Brace, 1946)Google Scholar; Kissinger, Henry, A World Restored: Metternich, Castlereagh and the Problem of Peace (London: Houghton Mifflin, 1957)Google Scholar; Schroeder, Paul W., The Transformation of European Politics, 1763–1848 (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1994)Google Scholar.

4 Webster, Charles, The Foreign Policy of Lord Castlereagh, 1812–1815 (London: G. Bell and Sons, 1931)Google Scholar; Grimsted, Patricia, The Foreign Ministers of Alexander I (Berkeley: University of California Press, 1969)Google Scholar; Palmer, Alan, Alexander I: Tsar of War and Peace (London: Weidenfeld and Nicolson, 1974)Google Scholar; Kraehe, Enno E., Metternich's German Policy, vol. 2, The Congress of Vienna (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1983)Google Scholar; Zawadzki, W. H., A Man of Honour: Adam Czartoryski as a Statesman of Russia and Poland, 1795–1831 (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1993)CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Sked, Alan, Metternich and Austria: An Evaluation (Houndsmill, Basingstoke, Hampshire: Palgrave Macmillan, 2008)Google Scholar.

5 See the essays by Schroeder, Paul W., Kraehe, Enno E., Gruner, Wolf D., and Jarvis, Robert in the special forum “Did the Vienna System Rest on a Balance of Power?,” American Historical Review 97, no. 3 (June 1992): 683–735CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

6 Schroeder, Transformation, 580.

7 Schroeder, Paul W., “Did the Vienna System Rest on a Balance of Power?,” American Historical Review 97, no. 3 (June 1992): 694CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

8 Jarvis, Robert, “A Political Science Perspective on the Balance of Power and the Concert,” American Historical Review 97, no. 3 (June 1992): 716–24CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Osiander, Andreas, The States System of Europe, 1640–1990 (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1994)CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Ikenberry, G. John, After Victory: Institutions, Strategic Restraint and the Rebuilding of Order after Major Wars (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2001)Google Scholar.

9 See also Hundt, Michael, Die minderächtigen deutschen Staaten auf dem Wiener Kongress (Mainz: Philipp von Zabern, 1996)Google Scholar; Schroeder, Paul W., “The Lost Intermediaries: The Impact of 1870 on the European States System,” International History Review 6, no. 1 (February 1984): 1–27CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

10 Duchhardt, Heinz, Gleichgewicht der Kräfte, Convenance, europäisches Konzert. Friedenskongresse u. Friedensschlüsse vom Zeitalter Ludwigs XIV. bis zum Wiener Kongress (Darmstadt: Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellschaft, 1976)Google Scholar; Duchhardt, Heinz, Stein. Eine Biographie, 2nd ed. (Münster: Aschendorff, 2010)Google Scholar; Gruner, Wolf D., Die deutsche Frage. Ein Problem der europäischen Geschichte seit 1800 (Munich: Beck, 1985)Google Scholar; Idem, Deutschland mitten in Europa. Aspekte und Perspektiven der deutschen Frage in Geschichte und Gegenwart(Hamburg: Kramer, 1992)Google Scholar.

11 Reinhard Stauber is currently leading an international research team on the Congress of Vienna; see http://www.wiener-kongress.at/index.php/de/.

12 Spaulding, R. Mark, “Anarchy, Hegemony, Cooperation: International Control of the Rhine, 1789–1848,” Consortium on Revolutionary Europe, 1750–1850: Selected Papers (1999): 456–63Google Scholar.

13 For recent work on political culture, see Teune, Jonas, “Revolution wegtanzen! Die Hintergründe der Feierlichkeiten auf dem Wiener Kongress, 1814–15,” Archiv für Kulturgeschichte 94, no. 1 (2012): 177–200Google Scholar; Stauber, Reinhard, Kerschbaumer, Florian, and Koschier, Marion, eds., Mächtepolitik und Friedenssicherung. Zur politischen Kultur Europas im Zeichen des Wiener Kongresses (Berlin: LIT Verlag, 2014)Google Scholar.

14 See Giloi, Eva, Monarchy, Myth, and Material Culture in Germany: 1750–1950 (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2011)Google Scholar; Teune, “Revolution wegtanzen!”

15 Hagemann, Karen, “Männlicher Muth und Teutsche Ehre.” Nation, Militär und Geschlecht zur Zeit der Antinapoleonischen Kriege Preußens (Paderborn: Schöningh, 2002)Google Scholar; Sluga, Glenda, “On the Historical Significance of the Presence, and Absence, of Women at the Congress of Vienna, 1812–1822,” L'Homme 25, no. 2 (2014): 49–62Google Scholar.

16 Aaslestad, Katherine B., “Citizenship in Action: Hanseatic Women's Wartime Associations,” in Gender in Urban Europe: Sites of Political Activity and Citizenship, 1750–1900, ed. Cowman, Krista, Koefoed, Nina Javette, and Sjögren, Åsa Karlsson (New York: Routledge, 2014), 124–40Google Scholar; Hagemann, Karen, “Female Patriots: Women, War and the Nation in the Period of the Prussian-German Anti-Napoleonic Wars,” Gender & History 16, no. 2 (2004): 396–424CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

17 Sluga, Glenda, “Madame de Staël and the Transformation of European Politics, 1812–17,” International History Review 37, no. 1 (2015): 142–66CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Sluga, “On the Historical Significance of Women,” 57–60.

18 For a recent example, see Hemstad, Ruth, “Like a Herd of Cattle”: Parliamentary and Public Debates regarding the Cession of Norway, 1813–1814 (Oslo: Akademisk Publisering, 2014)Google Scholar.

19 Prutsch, Markus J., Making Sense of Constitutional Monarchism in Post-Napoleonic France and Germany (Houndmills, Basingstoke, Hampshire: Palgrave Macmillan, 2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar. See also Müssig, Ulrike, “Reconsidering Constitutional Formation: Research Challenges of Comparative Constitutional History,” Giornale di Storia Costituzionale/Journal of Constitutional History 27 (2014):  107–31Google Scholar.

20 Planert, Ute, Der Mythos vom Befreiungskrieg. Frankreichs Kriege und der deutsche Süden. Alltag, Wahrnehmung, Deutung, 1792–1841 (Paderborn: Schöningh, 2007)Google Scholar; Aaslestad, Katherine B., Place and Politics: Local Identity, Civic Culture, and German Nationalism in North Germany during the Revolutionary Era (Leiden: Brill, 2005)Google Scholar; Levinger, Matthew, Enlightened Nationalism: The Transformation of Prussian Political Culture, 1806–1848 (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2002)Google Scholar.

21 Duchhardt, Heinz and Wischmeyer, Johannes, eds., Der Wiener Kongress – eine kirchenpolitische Zäsur? (Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht, 2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

22 Timms, Edward calls this the “particularist solution”; see his “The Pernicious Rift: Metternich and the Debate about Jewish Emancipation at the Congress of Vienna,” Leo Baeck Institute Yearbook 46, no. 1 (2001): 8, 10CrossRefGoogle Scholar. See also Hundt, Michael, “Die Vertretung der jüdischen Gemeinden Lübecks, Bremens und Hamburgs auf dem Wiener Kongress,” Blätter für Deutsche Landesgeschichte 130 (1994): 142–90Google Scholar.