No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
Marriage or Profession? Marriage and Profession? Marriage Patterns Among Highly Successful Women of Jewish Descent and Other Women in Nineteenth- and Twentieth-Century German-Speaking Central Europe
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 04 February 2021
Abstract
This study analyzes the marriage patterns of five hundred highly successful women in modern German-speaking Central Europe. Among the women at the very top of their professions, women of Jewish descent were more likely than non-Jewish women to marry while they pursued their careers. The results of our quantitative study—67.6 percent of women of Jewish descent married versus 51.6 percent of non-Jewish women—provide a unique body of data that complements and contributes to other research that identifies distinctive aspects of Central European Jewish life patterns: the high number of Jewish women university students, the importance of women of Jewish descent in a number of fields, and Jewish families as early adopters of a modern family form with a small number of children and intensive investment in each child.
- Type
- Article
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © The Author(s), 2021. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of Central European History Society of the American Historical Association
Footnotes
Lisa Fetheringill Zwicker would like to thank the undergraduate researchers who assisted in gathering data for this project, including Maddie Kindig, Brandon German, Abagail Hill, Nathan Fritz, Sarah Bull, Sydney Rohr, and her coauthor, Jason Rose, who began working on this project when he was an undergraduate at Indiana University, South Bend. In addition, she would like to thank Eric Kurlander, Elizabeth Drummond, and Heikki Lempa for stimulating ideas and conversations about how best to work with undergraduates in research projects, as well as Deborah Hertz and Lisa Silverman for sharing their knowledge about the history of central European Jewish women. Margaret Lavinia Anderson spurred a rethinking of the article that helped clarify important points and made comments on many specific aspects. The two peer-reviewers’ comments led to important changes. Finally, the author gratefully acknowledges the assistance of Maureen Kennedy at the Indiana University, South Bend library as well as the Alexander von Humboldt Foundation, the Leo Baeck Institute, Indiana University New Frontiers program (now renamed as the Indiana University Presidential Arts and Humanities Program), and the Indiana University, South Bend faculty summer fellowship program for financial support that made the research for this article possible.
References
1 Fürth, Henriette, “Kulturideale und Frauentum. Eine zeitgemäße Betrachtung,” Deutschland: Monatsschrift für die gesamte Kultur 7 (October 1905–March 1906), 202–10Google Scholar.
2 Fürth, Henriette, “Mutterschaft und Beruf,” Neue Generation 4, no. 3 (March 1908), 100Google Scholar.
3 Fürth, “Kulturideale und Frauentum,” 212; Beuys, Barbara, Die neuen Frauen. Revolution im Kaiserreich 1900–1914 (Berlin: Insel Verlag, 2015), 94–99Google Scholar, 164–70, 200–02, 210–16; Fassmann, Irmgard Maya, Jüdinnen in der deutschen Frauenbewegung 1865–1919 (Hildesheim: Olms, 1996), 270–88Google Scholar; Epple, Angelika, ed., Henriette Fürth und die Frauenbewegung im deutschen Kaiserreich. Eine Sozialbiographie (Pfaffenweiler: Centaurus, 1996)Google Scholar.
4 Of our study subjects, at least seven women of Jewish descent and eight other women self-identified as lesbians, had romantic relationships with women, or had life-long partnerships with women that may or may not have been romantic or sexual.
5 Altmann-Gottheiner, Elisabeth, “Mitglieder des engeren Bundesvorstandes,” in Jahrbuch des Bundes Deutscher Frauenverine für 1917 (Berlin: ReInk, 1917), 11Google Scholar.
6 Kaplan, Marion A., The Making of the Jewish Middle Class: Women, Family, and Identity in Imperial Germany (New York: Oxford University Press, 1991), 173Google Scholar.
7 Otte, Marline, Jewish Identities in German Popular Entertainment, 1890–1933 (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2006), 286CrossRefGoogle Scholar.
8 Freidenreich, Harriet Pass, Female, Jewish, and Educated: The Lives of Central European University Women (Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 2002)Google Scholar, 255n18.
9 Dr. Hanns Dorn, “Die Entwicklung der Frauenerwerbsarbeit in Deutschland,” Staatsbürger 21 (November 1911): 945–46; Ulla Knapp, Frauenarbeit in Deutschland, vol. 2 (Munich: Minerva Publikation, 1984), table A3, 643.
10 Freidenreich, Female, Jewish, and Educated, 108–10, 132; Peters, Dietlinde, Mütterlichkeit im Kaiserreich. Die bürgerliche Frauenbewegung und der soziale Beruf der Frau (Bielefeld: Kleine Verlag, 1984)Google Scholar; Reagin, Nancy, Sweeping the German Nation: Domesticity and National Identity in Germany 1870–1945 (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2007)Google Scholar; Sachsse, Christoph, Mütterlichkeit als Beruf. Sozialarbeit, Sozialreform und Frauenbewegung, 1871–1929 (Frankfurt/Main: Suhrkamp, 1986)Google Scholar.
11 Gertrud Bäumer, “Materialistische Irrtümer in der Frauenbewegung,” Die Frau 7, no. 13 (April 1906), 420.
12 Beuys, Die neuen Frauen. Revolution im Kaiserreich 1900–1914, 201.
13 Especially Freidenreich, Female, Jewish, and Educated; Monika Richarz, Stella P. Rosenfeld, Sidney Rosenfeld, and Leo Baeck Institute, ed., Jewish Life in Germany: Memoirs from Three Centuries (Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 1991). For women's history in this period see Ann Taylor Allen, Feminism and Motherhood in Germany, 1800–1914 (New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press, 1991); Harriet Anderson, Utopian Feminism: Women's Movements in Fin-de-siècle Vienna (New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 1992); Rosemarie Beier, Frauenarbeit und Frauenalltag im Deutschen Kaiserreich (Frankfurt/Main: Campus, 1983); Rosemary Betterton, “Women Artists, Modernity, and Suffrage Cultures in Britain and Germany 1890–1920,” in Women Artists, Modernism, ed. Katy Deepwell (Manchester, NY: Manchester University Press, 2005); Emily Bilski, Jewish Women and Their Salons: The Power of Conversation (New York: Jewish Museum, 2005); Ilse Brehmer and Karin Ehrich, Mütterlichkeit als Profession? Lebensläufe deutscher Pädagoginnen in der ersten Hälfte dieses Jahrhunderts, vol. 2 (Pfaffenweiler: Centaurus-Verlagsgesellschaft, 1993); John C. Fout, ed., German Women in the Nineteenth Century (New York: Holmes & Meier, 1984); Ute Frevert, Women in German History: From Bourgeois Emancipation to Sexual Liberty, trans. Stuart McKinnon-Evans (Oxford: Berg Publishers, 1993); Karin Hausen, Frauen suchen ihre Geschichte: Historische Studien zum 19. und 20. Jahrhundert (München: Beck, 1983); Marion Kaplan and Deborah Dash Moore, Gender and Jewish History (Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 2011), Patricia M. Mazón, Gender and the Modern Research University: The Admission of Women to German Higher Education, 1865–1914 (Stanford: Stanford University Press, 2003).
14 Catherine L. Dollard, Surplus Woman: Unmarried in Imperial Germany, 1871–1918 (New York: Berghahn Books, 2009), 25–39.
15 Wladimir Andronikow, Margarete v. Wrangell. Das Leben einer Frau 1876–1932 (Munich: Deuerlische, 1936).
16 Freidenreich, Female, Jewish, and Educated, xx, table 7, 211.
17 Jutta Dick and Maria Sassenberg, ed., “Apolant, Jenny,” in Jüdische Frauen im 19. und 20. Jahrhundert (Reinbeck bei Hamburg: Rowohlt, 1993), 21.
18 Till van Rahden, Jews and Other Germans: Civil Society, Religious Diversity, and Urban Politics in Breslau, 1860–1925 (Madison: University of Wisconsin Press, 2008), 8–9.
19 Fritz Stern, Five Germanys I Have Known: A History & Memoir (New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux, 2007), 23.
20 Geoffrey H. Beale, “Charlotte Auerbach, 1899–1994,” entry in Encyclopedia, Jewish Women's Archive (https://jwa.org/encyclopedia/article/auerbach-charlotte).
21 Freidenreich, Female, Jewish, and Educated, 218–19.
22 Freidenreich, Female, Jewish, and Educated, 209; Volker R. Berghahn, Imperial Germany, 1871–1914 (Oxford: Berghahn Books, 1994), 325.
23 Ute Gerhard, “The Women's Movement in Germany in an International Context,” in Women's Emancipation Movements in the Nineteenth Century: A European Perspective, ed. Sylvia Paletschek and Bianka Pietrow-Ennker (Stanford: Stanford University Press, 2004), 112–13.
24 Gerhard, “The Women's Movement in Germany,” 112
25 Stampfer, Shaul, “Remarriage among Jews and Christians in Nineteenth-Century Eastern Europe,” Jewish History 3, no. 2 (1988): 92, 98CrossRefGoogle Scholar.
26 David M. Feldman, Marital Relations, Birth Control, and Abortion in Jewish Law (New York: Schocken Books, 1974), 297.
27 Lowenstein, Steven M., “Ashkenazic Jewry and the European Marriage Pattern: A Preliminary Survey of Jewish Marriage Age,” Jewish History 8, no. 1/2 (1994): 162CrossRefGoogle Scholar. For Jews in Russian Poland and the Pale of Settlement, Lowenstein sees a pattern of early marriage with little difference between the ages of brides and bridegrooms until the last quarter of the nineteenth century.
28 Stampfer, “Remarriage among Jews and Christians in Nineteenth-Century Eastern Europe,” 110n56.
29 Gshur, Binyamin and Okun, Barbara S., “Generational Effects on Marriage Patterns: Jewish Immigrants and Their Descendants in Israel,” Journal of Marriage and Family 65, no. 2 (May 1, 2003): 287–301CrossRefGoogle Scholar (https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-3737.2003.00287).
30 Charles A. Frazee, “The Origins of Clerical Celibacy in the Western Church,” Church History 57 (1988): 108–26.
31 Margaret Lavinia Anderson, “The Limits of Secularization: On the Problem of the Catholic Revival in 19th Century Germany,” Historical Journal 38, no. 3 (September 1995): 653; Helmut Walser Smith, German Nationalism and Religious Conflict: Culture, Ideology, Politics (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1995), 94; Maria Anna Zumholz, “Das Weib soll nicht gelehrt seyn.” Konfessionell geprägte Frauenbilder, Frauenbildung und weibliche Lebensentwürfe von der Reformation bis zum frühen 20. Jahrhundert (Münster: Aschendorff Verlag, 2016), 421.
32 Hermann Goltz and Axel Meißner, ed., Deutschland, Armenien und die Türkei 1895–1925, Teil 3, Thematisches Lexikon zu Personen, Institutionen, Orten, Ereignisse (Munich: K. G. Saur, 2004), 167; we thank Margaret Lavina Anderson for suggesting this reference.
33 Rahel Straus, Wir lebten in Deutschland. Erinnerungen einer deutschen Jüdin 1880–1933 (Stuttgart: Deutsche Verlags-Anstalt, 1962), 85.
34 Kaplan, The Making of the Jewish Middle Class, 85–89, 93–98, 153–57, 170; Freidenreich, Female, Jewish, and Educated, 108.
35 Bärbel Kuhn, Familienstand Ledig: Ehelose Frauen und Männer im Bürgertum (1850–1914) (Cologne: Böhlau, 2000), 2; see also the tables in Dollard, Surplus Woman, 219–46; Usiel P. Schmelz, “Die demographische Entwicklung der Juden in Deutschland von der Mitte des 19. Jahrhunderts bis 1933,” Zeitschrift für Bevölkerungswissenschaft 1 (1982): 43.
36 “Eheschließungen im Jahre 1905 in Deutschland,” Zeitschrift für Demographie und Statistik der Juden (May 1907): 79.
37 “Eheschließungen im Jahre 1905 in Deutschland,” 79; Kaplan, The Making of the Jewish Middle Class, 267–68n109.
38 Kuhn, Familienstand Ledig, 2; see also the tables in Dollard, Surplus Woman, 219–46; Schmelz, “Die demographische Entwicklung der Juden in Deutschland von der Mitte des 19. Jahrhunderts bis 1933,” 43; John Hajnal, “European Marriage Patterns in Perspective: The Uniqueness of the European Pattern,” in Population in History, ed. D. V. Glass, D. E. C. Eversley (London: Arnold, 1965), 104; for criticism of John Hajnal's interpretations of the unique western European demographic model, see Jack Goody, “Comparing Family Systems in Europe and Asia: Are There Different Sets of Rules?” Population and Development Review 22, no. 1 (1996): 1–20 (https://doi.org/10.2307/2137684).
39 It should be noted that these numbers come from Germany as well as the majority of our study subjects, but some study subjects also were from Austria and Switzerland.
40 William Chamberlin Hunt, Marriage and Divorce. 1867–1906 (Washington, DC: United States Bureau of the Census, U.S. Government Printing Office, 1909), 453; “Die Ehescheidungsbewegung in Preußen in den Jahren 1895–1905,“ Zeitschrift für Demographie und Statistik der Juden 12 (December 1907): 187.
41 Helen Boak, Women in the Weimar Republic (New York: Manchester University Press, 2013), 222; Dirk Blasius, Ehescheidung in Deutschland 1794–1945 (Göttingen: Vandenhoeck et Ruprecht, 1987).
42 Kaplan, Marion A., Between Dignity and Despair: Jewish Life in Nazi Germany (New York: Oxford University Press, 1999), 87–93CrossRefGoogle Scholar.
43 Kaplan, The Making of the Jewish Middle Class, 42–45, 62–63.
44 Kaplan, The Making of the Jewish Middle Class, 171; Freidenreich, Female, Jewish, and Educated, 108.
45 Anne von Kalinowski, Als wir noch Lausbuben waren. Berühmte und prominente Erzählen (München: Gütersloh Bertelsmann, 1966), 46–47.
46 Charlotte Berend-Corinth, Als ich ein Kind war (Hamburg: Stromverlag, 1950), 163.
47 Kaplan, The Making of the Jewish Middle Class, 51.
48 “Kurz, Selma,” Großes Sängerlexikon, ed. Karl-Josef Kutsch and Leo Riemens (Berlin: De Gruyter, 2004), 2554; Beatrix Borchard, “Kurz, Selma,” Jüdische Frauen im 19. und 20. Jahrhundert, ed. Jutta Dick and Maria Sassenberg (Reinbeck bei Hamburg: Rowohlt, 1993), 226–27.
49 Yuri Slezkine, The Jewish Century (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2011), 11, 31–35, 52–60, 107.
50 Slezkine, The Jewish Century, 107.
51 Michael Schulte, Berta Zuckerkandl. Salonière, Journalistin, Geheimdiplomatin (Zurich: Atrium, 2006), 28.
52 Peters, Mütterlichkeit im Kaiserreich, 63; Stoehr, Irene, “‘Organisierte Mütterlichkeit.’ Zur Politik der deutschen Frauenbewegung um 1900,” in Frauen suchen ihre Geschichte, ed. Hausen, Karin (Munich: C. H. Beck Verlag, 1983), 232Google Scholar.
53 Hellstedt, Leone McGregor, Women Physicians of the World: Autobiographies of Medical Pioneers (New York: McGraw-Hill, 1978), 109–10Google Scholar.
54 “Fanny Moser,” Biographical Dictionary of Women in Science. ed. Marilyn Ogilvie and Joy Harvey (New York: Routledge, 2000), 920.
55 Stefoff, Rebecca, Women of the World: Women Travelers and Explorers (New York: Oxford University Press, 1992)Google Scholar.
56 Nagler-Springmann, Sibylle, “‘Ihr Leben hatte sie der Wissenschaft verschreiben. Professorin im Schatten ihres Lehrers. Ruth Beutler (1897–1959),” in Bedrohlich gescheit. Ein Jahrhundert Frauen und Wissenschaft in Bayern, ed. Haentzschel, Hiltrud and Hadumod Bussmann, Von (Munich: C. H. Beck, 1997)Google Scholar.
57 Brabec, F. H., Engel, and Söding, , “Rose Stoppel. 26.12.1874 bis 20.1.1970,” Berichte der Deutschen Botanischen Gesellschaft 84 (1971): 351–61Google Scholar.
58 Italiaander, Rolf, Drei deutsche Fliegerinnen (Berlin: Weise, 1940), 43–71Google Scholar.
59 Holdenried, Michaela, Geschriebenes Leben. Autobiographik von Frauen (Berlin: Erich Schmidt, 1995), 239Google Scholar.
60 Claire Cain Miller, “The Motherhood Penalty vs. the Fatherhood Bonus,” New York Times, September 6, 2014.
61 Lowenstein, Steven M., “Jewish Intermarriage and Conversion in Germany and Austria,” Modern Judaism 25, no. 1 (2005): 24CrossRefGoogle Scholar.
62 Lauterer, Heide-Marie, “Marie Baum und der Heidelberger Freundeskreis,” in Marianne Weber. Beiträge zu Werk und Person, ed. Meurer, Bärbel (Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck, 2004), 105Google Scholar.
63 In contrast to Germany, where no legal barriers stood between marriages of Jews and non-Jews, in Austria, Jews and non-Jews were not allowed to marry legally; one partner was expected to declare himself or herself “konfessionslos.” Lowenstein, “Jewish Intermarriage and Conversion,” 24.
64 Dissertations by Aeleah Soine and Martina Cucchiara shed light on the work of these important and too often unheralded women. See Aeleah Soine, “From Nursing Sisters to a Sisterhood of Nurses: German Nurses and Transnational Professionalization, 1836–1918,” (PhD diss., University of Minnesota, 2009); Martina Cucchiara, “‘Bitter Times’: Catholic Sisters in Hitler's Germany and under Allied Occupation, 1933–1949” (PhD diss., University of Notre Dame, 2011).