Published online by Cambridge University Press: 16 December 2008
1. Bryce, James, The Holy Roman Empire (London, 1866), p. 131.Google Scholar
2. Hartung, Fritz, Deutsche Verfassungsgeschichte vom 15. Jahrhundert bis zur Gegenwart, 5th ed. (Stuttgart, 1950), p. 42.Google Scholar
3. Neumann, Robert G., European and Comparative Government, 3rd ed. (New York, 1960) p. 374Google Scholar, quoting Loewenstein, Karl, “Government and Politics in Germany,” in Shotwell, James T., ed., Governments of Continental Europe (New York, 1940), p. 285.Google Scholar
4. Benecke.
5. James A. Vann, in his introduction to Vann and Rowan, argues that the recent signing of the Grundvertrag between the Federal Republic of Germany and the German Democratic Republic also contributed to the conceptual change taking place among historians, in that it shows that a united all-German state, far from being normative, was a short-lived phenomenon in German history.
6. Vann, James A., “The Economic Policies of the Swabian Kreis, 1664–1715,” Vann and Rowan, p. 108.Google Scholar
7. Carol M. Rose, “Empire and Territories at the End of the Old Reich,” ibid., especially pp. 61–63 and notes 1 and 3.
8. Ibid., pp. 73–74.
9. Walker, Mack, German Home Towns: Community, State, and General Estate, 1648–1871 (Ithaca, N.Y., 1971).Google Scholar
10. Benecke.
11. Vann, p. 57.
12. James Allen Vann, “The Economic Policies of the Swabian Kreis, 1664–1715,” in Vann and Rowan.
13. Harms Gross, “The Holy Roman Empire in Modern Times: Constitutional Reality and Legal Theory,” ibid.
14. Gerhard Benecke, “The Westphalian Circle, the County of Lippe, and Imperial Currency Control,” ibid.
15. Walker, Mack, pp. 119–33.Google Scholar
16. Duggan, Lawrence, “The Church as an Institution of the Reich,” in Vann and Rowan.Google Scholar
17. Blanning, p. 3.
18. Soliday.