Hostname: page-component-5cf477f64f-xc2pj Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-03-28T02:16:27.070Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Virtual cardiac models as a teaching tool for cardiac morphology

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 March 2025

Shelby Scola*
Affiliation:
The Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, PA, USA
Ryan Moore
Affiliation:
Cincinnati Children’s Hospital Medical Center, Heart Institute, Cincinnati, OH, USA
Jeffrey Cimprich
Affiliation:
Cincinnati Children’s Hospital Medical Center, Media Lab, Cincinnati, OH, USA
Matthew Nelson
Affiliation:
Cincinnati Children’s Hospital Medical Center, Media Lab, Cincinnati, OH, USA
Albert Chen
Affiliation:
The Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia, Media Lab, Philadelphia, PA, USA
Meryl Cohen
Affiliation:
The Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia, Pediatric Cardiology, Philadelphia, PA, USA
Jill Savla
Affiliation:
The Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia, Pediatric Cardiology, Philadelphia, PA, USA
Lindsay Rogers
Affiliation:
The Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia, Pediatric Cardiology, Philadelphia, PA, USA
*
Corresponding author: Shelby Scola; Email: [email protected]

Abstract

Background:

Understanding complex three-dimensional cardiac structures is the key to knowing CHD. Many learners have limited access to cadaveric specimens, and most alternative teaching modalities are two-dimensional. Therefore, we have developed virtual cardiac models using photogrammetry of actual heart specimens to address this educational need.

Methods:

A descriptive study was conducted at a single institution during a week-long cardiac morphology conference in October 2022 and 2023. Conference attendees viewed virtual cardiac models via laptop screen and virtual reality headset. Learners were surveyed on their opinions of the virtual models and their perceived effectiveness compared to existing educational materials.

Results:

Forty-six learners completed the survey. Participants reported the virtual cardiac models to be more effective than textbook diagrams (60%), and equally or more effective compared to didactic teaching (78%) and specimen videos (78%). Approximately half of participants (54%) found the virtual models to be less effective than hands-on cadaveric specimen inspection. Attitudes towards the virtual specimens were overall positive with most responders finding the tool engaging (87%) and enjoyable (85%). A majority reported that the models deepened their understanding of cardiac morphology (79%) and that they would recommend them to other trainees (87%).

Conclusions:

This study demonstrates that a novel teaching tool, virtual cardiac specimens, is equivalent to or more effective than many current materials for learning cardiac morphology. While they may not replace direct cadaveric specimen review, virtual models are an engaging alternative with the ability to reach a wider audience.

Type
Original Article
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2025. Published by Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Lewis, AB, Martin, GR, Bartz, PJ, et al. Task force 1: pediatric cardiology fellowship training in general cardiology. J Am Coll Cardiol 2015; 66: 677686.Google ScholarPubMed
Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education Program Requirements for Graduate Medical Education in Pediatric Cardiology. 2023. (pp. 25–27). Retrieved 27 Feb 2025 from https://www.acgme.org/globalassets/pfassets/programrequirements/325_pediatriccardiology_2023.pdf.Google Scholar
Rogers, LS, Klein, M, James, J, FitzGerald, M. Assessment of the need for a cardiac morphology curriculum for paediatric cardiology fellows. Cardiol Young 2017; 27: 958966.Google ScholarPubMed
Ryan, E, Poole, C. Impact of virtual learning environment on students’ satisfaction, engagement, recall, and retention. J Med Imaging Radiat Sci 2019; 50: 408415.Google ScholarPubMed
Zhao, J, Xu, X, Jiang, H, et al. The effectiveness of virtual reality-based technology on anatomy teaching: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled studies. BMC Med Educ 2020; 20: 127.Google ScholarPubMed
Yammine, K, Violato, C. A meta-analysis of the educational effectiveness of three-dimensional visualization technologies in teaching anatomy. Anat Sci Educ 2015; 8: 525538.Google ScholarPubMed
Young, D, Real, FJ, Sahay, RD, Zackoff, M. Remote virtual reality teaching: closing an educational gap during a global pandemic. Hosp Pediatr 2021; 11: e258e262.Google ScholarPubMed
Petriceks, AH, Peterson, AS, Angeles, M, Brown, WP, Srivastava, S. Photogrammetry of human specimens: an innovation in anatomy education. J Med Edu Curric Dev 2018; 5: 110.Google ScholarPubMed
Rogers, LS, Cohen, MS. Medical education in pediatric and congenital heart disease: a focus on generational learning and technology in education. Prog Pediatr Cardiol 2020; 59: 101305.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Windram, JD, Neal, A, McMahon, CJ. Evolution in congenital cardiology education: the rise of digital-learning tools. CJC Pediatr Congenit Heart Dis 2022; 2: 93102.Google ScholarPubMed
Seslar, SP, Shepard, CW, Giroud, JM, et al. Archiving working group of the international society for nomenclature of paediatric and congenital heart disease. Lost treasures: a plea for the systematic preservation of cadaveric heart specimens through three-dimensional digital imaging. Cardiol Young 2015; 25: 14571459.Google Scholar
Preece, D, Williams, SB, Lam, R, Weller, R. Let’s get physical”: advantages of a physical model over 3D computer models and textbooks in learning imaging anatomy. Anat Sci Educ 2013; 6: 216224.Google ScholarPubMed
Knowles, M. The Adult Learner: A Neglected Species. 3rd ed. Gulf Publishing, Houston, TX, 1984.Google Scholar
Barnett, C, Barnett, O. “Just-in-time” Clinical Information. Acad Med 1997; 72: 512517.Google Scholar
Eckleberry-Hunt, J, Tucciarone, J. The challenges and opportunities of teaching “generation y”. J Grad Med Educ 2011; 3: 458461.Google ScholarPubMed
Hopkins, L, Hampton, BS, Abbott, JF, et al. To the point: medical education, technology, and the millennial learner. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2018; 218: 188192.Google Scholar
Supplementary material: File

Scola et al. supplementary material 1

Scola et al. supplementary material
Download Scola et al. supplementary material 1(File)
File 13.9 MB
Supplementary material: File

Scola et al. supplementary material 2

Scola et al. supplementary material
Download Scola et al. supplementary material 2(File)
File 276.4 MB