Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gvvz8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-24T14:14:02.511Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Staphylococcus lugdunensis sepsis and endocarditis in a newborn following lotus birth

Part of: Infectious

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 August 2018

Benjamin R. Ittleman  and
Joanne S. Szabo
Benjamin R. Ittleman*
Affiliation:
Department of Pediatrics, Arkansas Children’s Hospital, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, AR, USA
Joanne S. Szabo
Affiliation:
Department of Pediatrics, Arkansas Children’s Hospital, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, AR, USA Division of Neonatology, Arkansas Children’s Hospital, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, AR, USA
*
Author for correspondence: B. R. Ittleman, MD, Arkansas Children’s Hospital, 1 Children’s Way, Slot 512-19a, Little Rock, AR 72202, USA. Tel: 501 364 1874; Fax: 501 364 3196. E-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

A term newborn, who underwent lotus birth, developed Staphylococcus lugdunensis sepsis and endocarditis on the 1st day of life. This case reports an uncommon pathogen known to cause destructive endocarditis in the adult and paediatric populations, causing endocarditis in a neonate. We speculate that lotus birth, an atypical birthing practice, may have contributed to the development of this infection.

Keywords

Staphylococcus lugdunensissepsisendocarditisneonatelotus birth
Type
Brief Report
Information
Cardiology in the Young , Volume 28 , Issue 11 , November 2018 , pp. 1367 - 1369
Copyright
© Cambridge University Press 2018 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Fleurette, J, Bes, M, Brun, Y, et al. Clinical isolates of Staphylococcus lugdunensis and S. schleiferi: bacteriological characteristics and susceptibility to antimicrobial agents. Res Microbiol 1989; 140: 107–118.Google Scholar
2. Sabe, M, Shrestha, N, Gordon, S, Menov, V. Staphylococcus lugdunensis: a rare but destructive cause of coagulase-negative staphylococcus infective endocarditis. Eur Heart J Acute Cardiovasc Care 2014; 3: 275–280.Google Scholar
3. Klotchko, A, Wallace, M, Licitra, C, Sieger, B. Staphylococcus lugdunensis: an emerging pathogen. South Med J 2011; 104: 509–514.Google Scholar
4. Zinkernagel, AS, Zinkernagel, MS, Elzi, MV, et al. Significance of Staphylococcus lugdunensis bacteremia: report of 28 cases and review of literature. Infection 2008; 36: 314–321.Google Scholar
5. Anguera, I, Del Río, A, Miró, JM, et al. Staphylococcus lugdunensis infective endocarditis: description of 10 cases and analysis of native valve, prosthetic valve, and pacemaker lead endocarditis clinical profiles. Heart 2005; 91: e10.Google Scholar
6. Liu, PY, Huang, YF, Tang, CW, et al. Staphylococcus lugdunensis infective endocarditis: a literature review and analysis of risk factors. J Microbiol Immunol Infect 2010; 43: 478–484.Google Scholar
7. Sato, M, Kubota, N, Horiuchi, A, et al. Frequency, clinical manifestations, and outcomes of Staphylococcus lugdunensis bacteremia in children. J Infect Chemother 2016; 22: 298–302.Google Scholar
8. Tee, WS, Soh, SY, Lin, R, Loo, LH. Staphylococcus lugdunensis carrying the mecA gene causes catheter-associated bloodstream infection in premature neonate. J Clin Microbiol 2003; 41: 519–520.Google Scholar
9. Hayakawa, I, Hataya, H, Yamanouchi, H, et al. Neonatal Staphylococcus lugdunensis urinary tract infection. Pediatr Int 2015; 57: 783–785.Google Scholar
10. Sotutu, V, Carapetis, J, Wilkinson, J, et al. The “surreptitious Staphylococcus”: Staphyloccoccus lugdunensis endocarditis in a child. Pediatr Infect Dis J 2002; 21: 984–986.Google Scholar
11. Guillaume, MP, Dubos, F, Godart, F. Staphylococcus lugdunensis endocarditis in children. Cardiol Young 2017; 27: 784–787.Google Scholar
12. Jones, RM, Jackson, MA, Ong, C, Loftland, GK. Endocarditis caused by Staphylococcus lugdunensis . Pediatr Infect Dis J 2002; 21: 265–268.Google Scholar
13. Chaparro, J, Murphy, E, Davis, C, et al. Chest pain and shortness of breath in a previously healthy teenager. J Pediatric Infect Dis Soc 2015; 4: 171–173.Google Scholar
14. Lin, YT, Hsieh, KS, Chen, YS, et al. Infective endocarditis in children without underlying heart disease. J Microbiol Immunol Infect 2013; 46: 121–128.Google Scholar
15. Tamdy, A, El Louali, F, Ounzar, M, et al. Multiple mycotic aneurysms reveal Staphylococcus lugdunensis endocarditits in a young patient. Heart Lung 2011; 40: 352–357.Google Scholar
16. Murillo, J, McMahon, C, Starr, J. Large vegetations in Staphylococcus lugdunensis endocarditis. Heart Lung 2008; 37: 479–480.Google Scholar
17. Franzin, L, Scolfaro, C, Cabodi, D, et al. Legionella pneumonphila pneumonia in a newborn after water birth: a new mode of transmission. Clin Infect Dis 2001; 33: 103–104.Google Scholar
18. Kaushik, M, Bober, B, Eisenfeld, L, et al. Case report of Haemophilus parainfluenza sepsis in a newborn infant following water birth and a review of literature. AJP Rep 2015; 5: 188–192.Google Scholar
19. Thoeni, A, Zech, N, Moroder, L, et al. Review of 1600 water births. Does water birth increase the risk of neonatal infection? J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med 2005; 17: 357–361.Google Scholar
20. Buckley, S. Lotus birth: a ritual for our times. Midwifery Today Int Midwife 2003; 67: 36–38.Google Scholar
21. Weisberger, M. “Lotus Birth”: what experts say about cutting the cord, 2017. Retrieved August 1, 2017, from http://www.livescience.com.Google Scholar
22. Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists. RCOG statement on umbilical non-severance or “lotus birth,” 2013. Retrieved August 17, 2017, from https://www.rcog.org.uk/en/news/rcog-statement-on-umbilical-non-severance-or-lotus-birth.Google Scholar
23. Tricarico, A, Bianco, V, Di Biase, AR, et al. Lotus birth associated with idiopathic neonatal hepatitis. Pediatr Neonatol 2017; 58: 281–282.Google Scholar