Case report
We present the case of a neonate born at 32 + 4 weeks by planned caesarean section because of intra-uterine growth restriction. Neonatal stabilisation with inflations and ventilations was required to achieve adequate breathing at minute 10 (Apgar-score 3/5/7 at 1–5–10 minutes, respectively). Nasal continuous positive airway pressure was started because of neonatal respiratory distress syndrome, and the patient was stably admitted to the neonatal ICU. Clinical examination revealed an asymmetric intra-uterine growth restriction with a birthweight of 900 g (−2.51 standard deviations) and a head circumference of 28 centimetres (−1.28 standard deviations), a single umbilical artery, and a hypospadias. Single nucleotide polymorphism array and trio-based whole-exome sequencing were normal. An umbilical venous and arterial catheter were inserted according to the Dunn method. Blood could easily be aspirated. After chest and abdominal X-ray suggested correct positioning of both catheter tips (Supplementary Figure S1A-B), total parenteral nutrition was started. At 39 hours of life, the infant developed increasing respiratory distress with bilateral reduced air entry on clinical examination and FiO2 up to 1.0. A chest X-ray showed bilateral opacities (Supplementary Figure S1C). The patient was intubated and mechanically ventilated. Surfactant was administered intratracheally, resulting in temporary stabilisation of the respiratory condition. Within four hours, respiratory distress recurred, with increasing oxygen requirement and haemodynamic compromise. Chest ultrasound revealed bilateral pleural and pericardial effusion, while the umbilical venous catheter tip could not be visualised and blood could no longer be aspirated via the catheter. Because of suspicion of extravasation of total parenteral nutrition through the umbilical venous line, total parenteral nutrition administration was stopped and the catheter removed immediately. Due to impending hypovolemic shock, peripheral venous access was obtained, and a normal saline bolus was administered followed by an emergency pericardiocentesis by subxiphoid approach under ultrasound guidance. During this procedure, 2 mL of a serous bloody fluid was aspirated. Biochemical analysis of the aspirated fluid showed high glucose (1017 mg/dL) and triglycerides (597 mg/dL), confirming the presence of total parenteral nutrition in the pericardial space. The patient’s clinical condition improved after pericardiocentesis with a decrease in tachycardia and normalisation of arterial blood pressure. Echocardiography showed minor residual pericardial effusion but a new intrapericardial thrombus (15 × 8 mm) adjacent to the right ventricle, without haemodynamic compromise (Fig. 1a-b; Supplementary Video S1). The patient was transferred to a paediatric cardiac surgery centre to allow pericardiotomy and thrombus removal, if necessary. Chest ultrasound upon arrival demonstrated stable sizes of the pericardial thrombus and effusion, as well as the pleural effusion. Because of the absence of signs of impending cardiac tamponade and surgical risk associated with a birthweight of 900 g, a conservative approach with close monitoring of vital signs (e.g. continuous arterial blood pressure measurement via arterial umbilical catheter, heart rate, and oxygen saturation) and serial imaging was adopted. Cardiac ultrasound after six hours showed a spontaneous decrease of the pleural effusion and stable size of the pericardial thrombus and effusion. Hence, close monitoring was continued without further interventions. One day after transfer, the pleural and pericardial effusion, as well as the pericardial thrombus, had completely resolved. Four days after initial transfer, the patient was retransferred to our centre. Echocardiography could no longer visualise any residual pericardial thrombus (Fig. 1c). Our patient was successfully weaned from mechanical ventilation and switched back to nasal continuous positive airway pressure and remained haemodynamically stable throughout the rest of his stay in the neonatal ICU.
Discussion
Umbilical venous catheters are commonly used for central venous access in premature and severely ill neonates due to their ease of placement. However, umbilical venous catheters may be associated with important complications in up to 13.3–20.3% of patients, mainly related to incorrect position (e.g. extravasation and cardiac tamponade) and long catheter dwell times (e.g. thrombi, bloodstream infections). Reference Levit, Shabanova and Bizzarro1
In our case, the patient presented with acute respiratory distress approximately two days after umbilical venous catheter placement, and thoracic ultrasound revealed pericardial and bilateral pleural effusions. His clinical deterioration was attributed to incorrect positioning of the umbilical venous catheter. Although catheter tip position appeared to be correct on chest radiography carried out after placement, a meta-analysis demonstrated chest X-ray to be a poor predictor of umbilical venous catheter tip position, when compared to ultrasound (sensitivity 90%, specificity 82%). Reference Cao, Zhang, Yin and Liu2 Nevertheless, even correct initial positioning does not preclude migration of the catheter tip, for example, due to drying and thus shortening of the umbilical cord remnant. A prospective observational study revealed catheter tip migration to occur in almost half of the infants with an umbilical venous catheter in situ. Reference Franta, Harabor and Soraisham3 In our case, umbilical venous catheter tip appeared to have migrated upwards, with the catheter tip projecting above the diaphragm on control chest X-ray on day 2 of life (Supplementary Figure S1C).
A recent meta-analysis showed an incidence of 3.8‰ of central venous catheter-related pericardial effusion, similar to the incidence in a large cohort of umbilical venous catheters. Reference Levit, Shabanova and Bizzarro1,Reference Wang, Wang and Liu4 Pericardial effusion may result from direct perforation of the myocardium during catheter placement, from necrosis of the myocardial wall by repeated contact with the catheter tip in case of catheter malposition or migration or from endothelial osmotic injury. Given the potentially rapid progression to cardiac tamponade, high mortality rates up to 75% in pericardial effusions related to central venous catheters have been reported. Reference Nowlen, Rosenthal, Johnson, Tom and Vargo5 Timely pericardiocentesis has been shown to successfully reduce progression to cardiogenic shock and mortality. Reference Wang, Wang and Liu4 In our case, emergency pericardiocentesis was performed because of haemodynamic instability, yet this was complicated by an intrapericardial thrombus. Although a life-saving procedure, pericardiocentesis can cause life-threatening complications, like intrapericardial haemorrhage or thrombus formation. Reference Kumar, Sinha and Lin6 Several case reports in adults, but not in neonates, have described the appearance of an intrapericardial thrombus as a homogeneous echogenic mass with definite margins in the pericardium on echocardiography after pericardiocentesis, Reference Lin, Jan, Chen, Hou and Kuo7–Reference Schuster and Nanda9 often resulting in haemodynamic instability and need for emergency pericardiotomy. Reference Accadia, Di Maio and Iengo10 Our patient was transferred to a paediatric cardiac surgery centre for potential pericardiotomy and thrombus removal, but was eventually successfully managed conservatively given his stable haemodynamic situation after pericardiocentesis and no further progression of the thrombus on follow-up cardiac ultrasound imaging.
Our case report describes the spontaneous resolution of a pericardiocentesis-related intrapericardial thrombus in a neonate. This rare case highlights that clinically stable paediatric patients suffering from pericardiocentesis-related intrapericardial thrombi can be managed conservatively, thereby avoiding pericardiotomy-related complications. We recommend transferring these patients to a paediatric cardiac surgery centre, allowing rapid chirurgical intervention in case of clinical deterioration. In addition, our case highlights once again the potential complications of umbilical catheters. We recommend follow-up of catheter tip position in case of longer dwell times and a high index of suspicion for catheter-related complications in the event of clinical deterioration.
Supplementary material
The supplementary material for this article can be found at https://doi.org/10.1017/S1047951123004535.
Author contribution
The first draft of the manuscript was written by Joy Crombez, and all authors commented on subsequent versions of the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.
Financial support
This research received no specific grant from any funding agency, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors.
Competing interests
None.
Ethical standards
This article does not contain any studies with human participants or animals performed by any of the authors. Informed consent of the patient’s parents was obtained.