Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-v9fdk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-05T10:46:41.658Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Reproductive health conversations in adolescents with CHD

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 February 2021

Shannon M. Lyon*
Affiliation:
Division of Pediatric Cardiology, Department of Pediatrics, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN, USA
Amy J. Katz
Affiliation:
Division of Adolescent Medicine, Department of Pediatrics, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN, USA
Anne G. Farrell
Affiliation:
Division of Pediatric Cardiology, Department of Pediatrics, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN, USA
Marcia L. Shew
Affiliation:
Division of Adolescent Medicine, Department of Pediatrics, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN, USA
*
Author for correspondence: Dr S. M. Lyon, Division of Pediatric Cardiology, Department of Pediatrics, Indiana University School of Medicine, 705 Riley Hospital Drive, RR 127, Indianapolis, IN46202, USA. Tel: +1 434 962 6400; Fax: 617-730-0600. E-mail: [email protected]

Abstract

Background:

Reproductive issues as related to CHD must be discussed in the clinic and at home. Providers can ensure that correct information is imparted to the adolescent and encourage mothers to provide support and guidance to the adolescent. The level to which these conversations occur is unknown.

Methods:

A survey distributed to female adolescent/mother dyads assessed self-reported conversations with the healthcare provider and between each other about reproductive health topics. A clinician survey was completed to assess CHD diagnosis, risk of hormonal contraception, and pregnancy risk.

Results:

Among 91 dyads, 33.0% of adolescents and 42.9% of mothers reported discussing recurrence risk of CHD with the provider. In regard to the cardiac lesion affecting a baby, 30.7% of adolescents and 28.7% of mothers reported discussing this with a provider. Significantly less adolescents and mothers reported discussing the risks of hormonal contraception and pregnancy with a provider. In assessing conversations between adolescents and mothers, only 44.2% of adolescents and 52.3% of mothers reported discussing with each other the safety of using birth control and 46.5% of adolescents and 64.0% of mothers reported discussing the safety of pregnancy.

Conclusions:

Adolescents with CHD and their mothers report low rates of reproductive health-related conversations with the healthcare provider, and mothers report low rates of having these conversations with their daughters. These topics should be discussed at each appointment with the cardiologist and must be encouraged to continue at home.

Type
Original Article
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2021. Published by Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

van der Linde, D, Konings, EE, Slager, MA, et al. Birth prevalence of congenital heart disease worldwide: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Am Coll Cardiol 2011; 58: 22412247.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hoffman, JI, Kaplan, S. The incidence of congenital heart disease. J Am Coll Cardiol 2002; 39: 18901900.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
van der Bom, T, Bouma, BJ, Meijboom, FJ, Zwinderman, AH, Mulder, BJ. The prevalence of adult congenital heart disease, results from a systematic review and evidence based calculation. Am Heart J 2012; 164: 568575.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Yang, HL, Chen, YC, Wang, JK, Gau, BS, Moons, P. An evaluation of disease knowledge in dyads of parents and their adolescent children with congenital heart disease. J Cardiovasc Nurs 2013; 28: 541549.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Reid, GJ, Webb, GD, Barzel, M, McCrindle, BW, Irvine, MJ, Siu, SC. Estimates of life expectancy by adolescents and young adults with congenital heart disease. J Am Coll Cardiol 2006; 48: 349355.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
DeMaria, AL, Rivera, S, Ramos-Ortiz, J, et al. 'It’s just a very personal thing': contraceptive influences and decision making among women living in Italy. Eur J Contracept Reprod Health Care 2019; 24: 198205.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Khurana, A, Bleakley, A. Young adults’ sources of contraceptive information: variations based on demographic characteristics and sexual risk behaviors. Contraception 2015; 91: 157163.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Freake, H, Barley, V, Kent, G. Adolescents’ views of helping professionals: a review of the literature. J Adolesc 2007; 30: 639653.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Street, RL Jr., Makoul, G, Arora, NK, Epstein, RM. How does communication heal? Pathways linking clinician-patient communication to health outcomes. Patient Educ Couns 2009; 74: 295301.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kessels, RP. Patients’ memory for medical information. J R Soc Med 2003; 96: 219222.Google ScholarPubMed
Whitfield, C, Jomeen, J, Hayter, M, Gardiner, E. Sexual health information seeking: a survey of adolescent practices. J Clin Nurs 2013; 22: 32593269.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Meschke, LL, Bartholomae, S, Zentall, SR. Adolescent sexuality and parent-adolescent processes: promoting healthy teen choices. J Adolesc Health 2002; 31 (Suppl 6): 264279.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Richards, NK, Crockett, E, Morley, CP, Levandowski, BA. Young women’s reproductive health conversations: roles of maternal figures and clinical practices. PLoS One 2020; 15: e0228142.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Yigit, R, Kanik, A, Ozcan, A, Yuzer, S. Nurses’ approaches towards sexuality of adolescent patients in Turkey. J Clin Nurs 2007; 16: 638645.Google ScholarPubMed
East, LJ, Orchard, TR. Somebody else’s job: experiences of sex education among health professionals, parents and adolescents with physical disabilities in southwestern Ontario. Sex Disabil 2014; 32: 335350.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miller, KS, Kotchick, BA, Dorsey, S, Forehand, R, Ham, AY. Family communication about sex: what are parents saying and are their adolescents listening? Fam Plann Perspect 1998; 30: 218222.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ramchandani, K, Morrison, P, Gold, MA, Akers, AY. Messages about abstinence, delaying sexual debut and sexual decision-making in conversations between mothers and young adolescents. J Pediatr Adolesc Gynecol 2018; 31: 107115.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hinze, A, Kutty, S, Sayles, H, Sandene, EK, Meza, J, Kugler, JD. Reproductive and contraceptive counseling received by adult women with congenital heart disease: a risk-based analysis. Congenit Heart Dis 2013; 8: 2031.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Stout, KK, Daniels, CJ, Aboulhosn, JA, et al. 2018 AHA/ACC guideline for the management of adults with congenital heart disease: a report of the American college of cardiology/American heart association task force on clinical practice guidelines. Circulation 2019; 139: e698e800.Google Scholar
WHO. Guidelines approved by the guidelines review committee. In: (ed). Medical Eligibility Criteria for Contraceptive Use. World Health Organization, Geneva, 2015: 116120.Google Scholar
Curtis, KM, Jamieson, DJ, Peterson, HB, Marchbanks, PA. Adaptation of the World Health Organization’s medical eligibility criteria for contraceptive use for use in the United States. Contraception 2010; 82: 39.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Thorne, S, MacGregor, A, Nelson-Piercy, C. Risks of contraception and pregnancy in heart disease. Heart 2006; 92: 15201525.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Elkayam, U, Goland, S, Pieper, PG, Silverside, CK. High-risk cardiac disease in pregnancy: part I. J Am Coll Cardiol 2016; 68: 396410.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Balci, A, Sollie-Szarynska, KM, van der Bijl, AG, et al. Prospective validation and assessment of cardiovascular and offspring risk models for pregnant women with congenital heart disease. Heart 2014; 100: 13731381.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cowan, JR, Ware, SM. Genetics and genetic testing in congenital heart disease. Clin Perinatol 2015; 42: 373393.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Deng, LX, Gleason, LP, Awh, K, et al. Too little too late? Communication with patients with congenital heart disease about challenges of adult life. Congenit Heart Dis 2019; 14: 534540.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sable, C, Foster, E, Uzark, K, et al. Best practices in managing transition to adulthood for adolescents with congenital heart disease: the transition process and medical and psychosocial issues: a scientific statement from the American Heart Association. Circulation 2011; 123: 14541485.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Warnes, CA, Williams, RG, Bashore, TM, et al. ACC/AHA 2008 guidelines for the management of adults with congenital heart disease: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (writing committee to develop guidelines on the management of adults with congenital heart disease). Circulation 2008; 118: e714e833.Google Scholar
Frederick, NN, Campbell, K, Kenney, LB, Moss, K, Speckhart, A, Bober, SL. Barriers and facilitators to sexual and reproductive health communication between pediatric oncology clinicians and adolescent and young adult patients: the clinician perspective. Pediatr Blood Cancer 2018; 65: e27087.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Britto, MT, Garrett, JM, Dugliss, MA, Johnson, CA, Majure, JM, Leigh, MW. Preventive services received by adolescents with cystic fibrosis and sickle cell disease. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med 1999; 153: 2732.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kazmerski, TM, Prushinskaya, OV, Hill, K, et al. Sexual and reproductive health of young women with cystic fibrosis: a concept mapping study. Acad Pediatr 2019; 19: 307314.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Parry, RA, Sayner, R, Davis, SA, Beznos, BY, Carpenter, DM, Sleath, BL. Communication about contraception with adolescent females with asthma in pediatric visits. J Pediatr Adolesc Gynecol 2020; 33: 372376.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hargrove, A, Penny, DJ, Sawyer, SM. Sexual and reproductive health in young people with congenital heart disease: a systematic review of the literature. Pediatr Cardiol 2005; 26: 805811.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed