Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-dsjbd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-26T11:21:20.016Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Quality of life of patients with atrial septal defect following percutaneous closure

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  19 September 2013

Nihan Kahya Eren ,
Ali H. Kırdök ,
Barış Kılıçaslan ,
Uğur Kocabaş ,
Barış Düzel ,
Rida Berilgen ,
Cem Nazli  and
Oktay Ergene
Nihan Kahya Eren*
Affiliation:
Department of Cardiology, Izmir Katip Celebi University Ataturk Education and Research Hospital, Izmir, Turkey
Ali H. Kırdök
Affiliation:
Department of Cardiology, Manisa Soma State Hospital, Manisa, Turkey
Barış Kılıçaslan
Affiliation:
Department of Cardiology, Izmir Tepecik Education and Research Hospital, Izmir, Turkey
Uğur Kocabaş
Affiliation:
Department of Cardiology, Izmir Katip Celebi University Ataturk Education and Research Hospital, Izmir, Turkey
Barış Düzel
Affiliation:
Department of Cardiology, Izmir Katip Celebi University Ataturk Education and Research Hospital, Izmir, Turkey
Rida Berilgen
Affiliation:
Department of Cardiology, Izmir Katip Celebi University Ataturk Education and Research Hospital, Izmir, Turkey
Cem Nazli
Affiliation:
Department of Cardiology, Izmir Katip Celebi University Ataturk Education and Research Hospital, Izmir, Turkey
Oktay Ergene
Affiliation:
Department of Cardiology, Izmir Katip Celebi University Ataturk Education and Research Hospital, Izmir, Turkey
*
Correspondence to: N. Kahya Eren, İnönü cad. No:252/17, Hatay, Konak, Izmir, Turkey. Tel: +905336646531; Fax: +9002322431530; E-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Introduction

Quality of life has become an important outcome measure in addition to mortality and morbidity in patients with congenital heart disease. Atrial septal defect is a common congenital heart disease, and transcatheter atrial septal defect closure has become an accepted treatment modality. The aim of this study is to assess the quality of life of patients with atrial septal defect who underwent percutaneous closure.

Materials and methods

We examined the quality of life of 69 patients with atrial septal defect and 69 healthy controls matched according to age, sex, educational level, and economic, marital, and employment status. Quality of life was investigated using the Turkish version of Short Form-36.

Results

The mean age of the patients was 39.7 ± 14.2 and 26% were male. The quality of life assessment was performed at a mean follow-up time of 18.0 ± 13.8 months after the intervention. The mean scores of the domains of the Short Form-36, namely, physical functioning, role functioning, social functioning, mental health, vitality, pain, and general health, were similar in patients with atrial septal defect who underwent percutaneous closure and the control group.

Conclusion

Adult patients who underwent percutaneous atrial septal defect closure perceive their quality of life to be as good as their healthy counterparts.

Keywords

Atrial septal defectadultscongenitalquality of life
Type
Original Articles
Information
Cardiology in the Young , Volume 25 , Issue 1 , January 2015 , pp. 42 - 46
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2013 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Campbell, M. Natural hisyory of atrial septal defect. Br Heart J 1970; 32: 820–826.Google Scholar
2. Du, ZD, Hijazi, ZM, Kleinman, CS, Silverman, NH, Larntz, K, Amplatzer Investigators.. Comparison between transcatheter and surgical closure of secundum atrial septal defect in children and adults: results of a multicenter nonrandomized trial. J Am Coll Cardiol 2002; 39: 1836–1844.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
3. Thomson, JD, Aburawi, EH, Watterson, KG, Van Doorn, C, Gibbs, JL. Surgical and transcatheter (Amplatzer) closure of atrial septal defects: a prospective comparison of results and cost. Heart 2002; 87: 466–469.Google Scholar
4. World Health Organization. The constitution of the World Health Organization. WHO Chron 1947; 1: 29.Google Scholar
5. Testa, MA, Simonson, DC. Assesment of quality-of-life outcomes. N Engl J Med 1996; 334: 835–840.Google Scholar
6. Lane, DA, Lip, GY, Millane, TA. Quality of life in adults with congenital heart disease. Heart 2002; 88: 71–75.Google Scholar
7. Moons, P, Van Deyk, K, De Bleser, L, et al. Quality of life and health status in adults with congenital heart disease: a direct comparison with healthy counterparts. Eur J Cardiovasc Prev Rehabil 2006; 3: 407–413.Google Scholar
8. Moons, P, Van Deyk, K, Marquet, K, et al. Individual quality of life in adults with congenital heart disease: a paradigmshift. Eur Heart J 2005; 26: 298–307.Google Scholar
9. Jefferies, JL, Noonan, JA, Keller, BB, Wilson, JF, Griffith, C III. Quality of life and social outcomes in adults with congenital heart disease living in rural areas of Kentucky. Am J Cardiol 2004; 94: 263–266.Google Scholar
10. Simko, LC, McGinnis, KA. What is the perceived quality of life of adults with congenital heart disease and does it differ by anomaly? J Cardiovasc Nurs 2005; 20: 206–214.Google Scholar
11. Ware, JE, Sherbourne, CD. The MOS 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36). I. Conceptual framework and item selection. Med Care 1992; 30: 473–483.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
12. Kamphuis, M, Ottenkamp, J, Vliegen, HW, et al. Health related quality of life and health status in adult survivors with previously operated complex congenital heart disease. Heart 2002; 87: 356–362.Google Scholar
13. Fteropoulli, T, Stygall, J, Cullen, S, Deanfield, J, Newman, SP. Quality of life of adult congenital heart disease patients: a systematic review of the literature. Cardiol Young 2013; 6: 1–13.Google Scholar
14. Kocyigit, H, Aydemir, Ö, Fisek, G, Ölmez, N, Memi, A. The validity and reliability of Turkish version of the Short Form 36 (SF-36). Turkish J Drugs Therap 1999; 12: 102–106.Google Scholar
15. Spies, C, Timmermanns, I. Schräder RTranscatheter closure of secundum atrial septal defects in adults with the Amplatzer septal occluder: Intermediate and long-term results. Clin Res Cardiol 2007; 96: 340–346.Google Scholar
16. Fischer, G, Stieh, J, Uebing, A, Hoffmann, U, Morf, G, Kramer, HH. Experience with transcatheter closure of secundum atrial septal defects using the Amplatzer septal occluder: a single centre study in 236 consecutive patients. Heart 2003; 89: 199–204.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
17. Moons, P, Van Deyk, K, De Geest, S, Gewillig, M, Budts, W. Is the severity of congenital heart disease associated with the quality of life and perceived health of adult patients? Heart 2005; 91: 1193–1198.Google Scholar
18. Cohen, M, Daniela, M, Yalonetsky, S, Gagin, R, Lorber, A. Psychological functioning and health-related quality of life (HRQoL) in older patients following percutaneous closure of the secundum atrial septal defect (ASD). Arch Gerontol Geriatr 2010; 50: e5–e8.Google Scholar
19. Swenson, JR, Clinch, JJ. Assessment of quality of life in patients with cardiac disease: the role of psychosomatic medicine. J Psychosom Res 2000; 48: 405–415.Google Scholar
20. Kovacs, AH, Sears, SF, Saidi, AS. Biopsychosocial experiences of adults with congenital heart disease: review of the literature. Am Heart J 2005; 150: 193–201.Google Scholar
21. Hemingway, H, Nicholson, A, Stafford, M, Roberts, R, Marmot, M. The impact of socioeconomic status on health functioning as assessed by the SF-36 questionnaire: the Whitehall II Study. Am J Public Health 1997 ; 87: 1484–1490.Google Scholar
22. Vigl, M, Niggemeyer, E, Hager, A, Schwedler, G, Kropf, S, Bauer, U. The importance of socio-demographic factors for the quality of life of adults with congenital heart disease. Qual Life Res 2011; 20: 169–177.Google Scholar
23. Van De Bruaene, A, Buys, R, Vanhees, L, Delcroix, M, Moons, P, Budts, W. Cardiopulmonary exercise testing and SF-36 in patients with atrial septal defect type. J Cardiopulm Rehabil Prev 2011; 31: 308–315.Google Scholar
24. Immer, FF, Althaus, SM, Berdat, PA, Saner, H, Carrel, TP. Quality of life and specific problems after cardiac surgery in adolescents and adults with congenital heart diseases. Eur J Cardiovasc Prev Rehabil 2005; 12: 138–143.Google Scholar
25. Vigl, M, Niggemeyer, E, Hager, A, Schwedler, G, Kropf, S, Bauer, U. The importance of socio-demographic factors for the quality of life of adults with congenital heart disease. Qual Life Res 2011; 20: 169–177.Google Scholar