Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7czq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-23T04:11:44.076Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Paediatric cardiac assistance in developing and transitional countries: the impact of a fourteen year effort*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 June 2008

William M. Novick ,
Gregory L. Stidham ,
Tom R. Karl ,
Robert Arnold ,
Darko Anić ,
Sri O. Rao ,
Victor C. Baum ,
Kathleen E. Fenton  and
Thomas G. Di Sessa
William M. Novick*
Affiliation:
Department of Surgery and, University of Tennessee Health Sciences Centre, Memphis, Tennessee, United States of America Department of Pediatrics, University of Tennessee Health Sciences Centre, Memphis, Tennessee, United States of America International Children’s Heart Foundation, Memphis, Tennessee, United States of America
Gregory L. Stidham
Affiliation:
Department of Pediatrics, University of Tennessee Health Sciences Centre, Memphis, Tennessee, United States of America International Children’s Heart Foundation, Memphis, Tennessee, United States of America
Tom R. Karl
Affiliation:
Division of Pediatric Cardiothoracic Surgery, University of California-San Francisco, United States of America International Children’s Heart Foundation, Memphis, Tennessee, United States of America
Robert Arnold
Affiliation:
Division of Pediatric Cardiology, Alder Hey Children’s Hospital, Liverpool, United Kingdom International Children’s Heart Foundation, Memphis, Tennessee, United States of America
Darko Anić
Affiliation:
Department of Cardiac Surgery, KBC-Rijeka, Croatia International Children’s Heart Foundation, Memphis, Tennessee, United States of America
Sri O. Rao
Affiliation:
International Children’s Heart Foundation, Memphis, Tennessee, United States of America
Victor C. Baum
Affiliation:
Departments of Anesthesia, Pediatrics and the Cardiovascular Research Centre, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, Virginia, United States of America International Children’s Heart Foundation, Memphis, Tennessee, United States of America
Kathleen E. Fenton
Affiliation:
International Children’s Heart Foundation, Memphis, Tennessee, United States of America
Thomas G. Di Sessa
Affiliation:
Department of Pediatrics, University of Kentucky, Lexington, Kentucky, United States of America International Children’s Heart Foundation, Memphis, Tennessee, United States of America
*
Correspondence to: William M. Novick, University of Tennessee Health Sciences Centre, 1750 Madison Avenue, Suite 100, Memphis, TN 38104, USA. Tel: (1)-901 869 4243; Fax: (1) 901 432 4243; E-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Background

Paediatric cardiac services are poorly developed or totally absent in underdeveloped countries. Institutions, foundations and interested individuals in those nations in which sophisticated paediatric cardiac surgery is practised have the ability to alleviate this problem by sponsoring paediatric cardio-surgical missions to provide care, and train local caregivers in developing, transitional, and third world countries. The ultimate benefit of such a programme is to improve the surgical abilities of the host institution. The purpose of this report is to present the impact of our programme over a period of 14 years.

Methods

We specifically reviewed our database of patients from our missions, our team lists, surgical results, and the number and type of personnel trained in the institutions that we have assisted. In order for the institution to be entered into the study, the foundation had to provide at least 2 months of training. In addition, the institution had to respond to a simple questionnaire concerning the number and types of surgery performed at their facility before and after intervention by the foundation.

Results

We made 140 trips to 27 institutions in 19 countries, with 12 of the visited institutions qualifying for inclusion. Of these, 9 institutions reported an increase in the number and complexity of cases currently being performed in their facility since the team intervened. This goal had not been accomplished in 3 institutions. The reasons for failure included the economic situation of the country, hospital and national politics, personality conflicts, and continued lack of hardware and disposables.

Conclusions

Paediatric cardiac service assistance can improve local services. A significant commitment is required by all parties involved.

Keywords

Congenital heart diseaseinternational medicinenon-governmental aid organizations
Type
Original Article
Information
Cardiology in the Young , Volume 18 , Issue 3 , June 2008 , pp. 316 - 323
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2008

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

*

The presentation on which this work is based was given at the Inaugural Meeting of the World Society for Pediatric and Congenital Heart Surgery, held in Washington, District of Columbia, May 3 and 4, 2007

References

1.Cohen, AJ, Tamir, A, Houri, S, et al. Save a child’s heart: we can and we should. Ann Thorac Surg 2001; 71: 462–468.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2.Pezzella, AT. International Aspects of Cardiac Surgery. Ann Thorac Surg 1998; 65: 903–904.Google ScholarPubMed
3.McGrath, LB. Establishing a pediatric cardiac surgical unit in the Commonwealth of Independent States (formerly the Soviet Union) [Letter]. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1992; 104: 1758–1759.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
4.Novick, WM, Stidham, GL, Karl, TR, et al. Are we improving after 10 years of humanitarian paediatric cardiac assistance? Cardiol Young 2005; 15: 379–384.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
5.Jenkins, KJ, Gauvreau, K, Newberger, JW, Spray, TL, Moller, JH, Iezzoni, LI. Consensus-based method for risk adjustment for surgery for congenital heart disease. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2002; 123: 110–118.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
6.Welke, KF, Shen, I, Ungerleider, RM. Current assessment of mortality rates in congenital heart surgery. Ann Thorac Surg 2006; 82: 164–171.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
7.Jenkins, KJ, Gauvreau, K. Centre-specific differences in mortality: preliminary analyses using the Risk Adjustment in Congenital Heart Surgery (RACHS-1) method. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2002; 124: 97–104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
8.Eze, JC, Ezemba, M. Open-heart surgery in Nigeria. Tex Heart Inst J 2007; 34: 8–10.Google ScholarPubMed
9.Livesay, JJ. Cardiovascular disease in Africa. Tex Heart Inst J 2007; 34: 6–7.Google ScholarPubMed
10.Placci, A, Begic, H, Loroni, L, Picchio, FM, Gargiulo, G, Casanova, R. International collaboration in congenital heart disease treatment. Pedijatrija Danas 2006; 2: 221–223.Google Scholar
11.Begic, H, Tahirovic, H, Meshovic-Dinarevic, S, Ferkovic, V, Atic, N, Latifagic, A. Epidemiological and clinical aspects of congenital heart disease in children in Tuzla canton, Bosnia-Hercegovina. Eur J Pediatr 2003; 162: 191–193.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
12.Borst, JG. The hammer, the sickle, and the scalpel: a cardiac surgeon’s view of Eastern Europe. Ann Thorac Surg 2000; 69: 1655–1662.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
13.Kalangos, A. “Hearts for all”: a humanitarian association for the promotion of cardiology and cardiac surgery in developing countries [Correspondence]. Ann Thorac Surg 2002; 73: 341.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
14.Novick, WM. Academic cardiac surgery in Croatia: perspective through the eyes of an international collaborator. Croat Med J 2004; 45: 382–386.Google ScholarPubMed
15.Neirotti, R. Paediatric cardiac surgery in less privileged parts of the world. Card Young 2004; 14: 341–346.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
16.Williams, WG. Surgical outcomes in congenital heart disease: expectations and realities. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2005; 27: 937–944.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
17.Pezzella, AT. Global expansion of cardiac surgery in the new millennium. Asian Cardiovasc Thorac Ann 2001; 9: 253–256.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
18.Wolfberg, AJ. Volunteering overseas- lessons from surgical brigades. New Engl J Med 2006; 354: 443–445.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
19.Larrazabal, LA, Jenkins, KJ, Gauvreau, K, et al. Improving congenital heart surgery in a developing country: The Guatemala experience. Circulation 2007; 116: 1882–1887.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
20.Anyanwu, AC, Treasure, T. Unrealistic expectations arising from mortality data reported in the cardiothoracic journals. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2002; 123: 16–20.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
21.Mavroudis, C, Jacobs, JP. Congenital heart disease outcome analysis: methodology and rationale. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2002; 123: 6–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
22.Turley, K, Verrier, ED. Intermediate results from the period of the congenital heart surgeons transposition study; 1985 to 1989. Ann Thorac Surg 1995; 60: 505–510.Google Scholar
23.Blackstone, EH. Comparing apples and oranges. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2002; 123: 8–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
24.Yacoub, MH. Establishing pediatric cardiovascular services in the developing world: a wake-up call. Circulation 2007; 116: 1876–1878.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
25.Shekerdemian, LS, Penny, DJ, Novick, W. Early extubation after surgical repair of tetralogy of Fallot. Cardiol Young 2000; 10: 636–637.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
26.Novick, WM, Sandoval, N, Lazorhysynets, VV, et al. Flap valve double patch closure of ventricular septet defects in children with increased pulmonary vascular resistance. Ann Thorac Surg 2005; 79: 21–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
27.Novick, WM, Anić, D, Ivančan, V, Di Sessa, TG. International pediatric cardiac assistance in Croatia: Results of the 10 year program. Croat Med J 2004; 45: 389–395.Google ScholarPubMed