Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7czq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-23T11:11:23.775Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Mid-term follow-up study of neonatal isolated aberrant right subclavian artery

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 June 2018

Sheng-Ling Jan ,
Ming-Chih Lin  and
Sheng-Ching Chan
Sheng-Ling Jan*
Affiliation:
Division of Pediatric Cardiology, Children’s Medical Center, Taichung Veterans General Hospital, Taichung, Taiwan Department of Pediatrics, School of Medicine, National Yang-Ming University, Taipei, Taiwan Department of Pediatrics, School of Medicine, Kaohsiung Medical University, Kaohsiung, Taiwan
Ming-Chih Lin
Affiliation:
Division of Pediatric Cardiology, Children’s Medical Center, Taichung Veterans General Hospital, Taichung, Taiwan Department of Pediatrics, School of Medicine, National Yang-Ming University, Taipei, Taiwan
Sheng-Ching Chan
Affiliation:
Department of Nursing, Ta-Jen University, Pingtung County, Taiwan
*
Author for correspondence: S.-L. Jan, MD, PhD, Division of Pediatric Cardiology, Children’s Medical Center, Taichung Veterans General Hospital, 1650 Taiwan Boulevard Sect. 4, Taichung 40705, Taiwan. Tel: +886 4 23741259; Fax: +886 4 23741359; E-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Background

Aberrant right subclavian artery is the most common congenital aortic arch anomaly. There are a few reports concerning the clinical manifestations and follow-up of this CHD detected by echocardiographic screening.

Methods

A total of 1737 full-term neonates, with a male-to-female ratio of 900:837, received echocardiographic screening. Neonates with or without isolated aberrant right subclavian artery were studied during infancy.

Results

Among the 1737 cases, a total of 15 (0.86%) female-predominant neonates, with a male-to-female ratio of 6:9, had isolated aberrant right subclavian artery. They were compared with 20 age- and gender-matched normal neonates. There were no significant differences in maternal age, gestational age, or para gravity between the two groups, except for birth size (birth length- and weight-for-age percentiles, p = 0.006 and 0.045, respectively), which was smaller in the aberrant right subclavian artery group. Although there were no significant differences in developmental history, gastrointestinal, or respiratory symptoms, neonates with aberrant right subclavian artery had a higher incidence of mild developmental delay and feeding difficulty than normal infants (21 versus 0%, p = 0.061; 36 versus 20%, p = 0.264, respectively). The growth rates of body length and weight during infancy were not significantly different between the two groups.

Conclusions

Echocardiography can be applied as a first-line investigation in the diagnostic work-up for aberrant right subclavian artery. Neonates with aberrant right subclavian artery had a smaller size at birth, although growth rates were not significantly different from those of normal infants. This study does not support an active surgical policy for asymptomatic infants with isolated aberrant right subclavian artery. A larger study and longer follow-up of affected infants is recommended.

Keywords

Aberrant right subclavian arteryarteria lusoriaCHDechocardiographyinfant
Type
Original Article
Information
Cardiology in the Young , Volume 28 , Issue 8 , August 2018 , pp. 1024 - 1030
Check for updates
Copyright
© Cambridge University Press 2018 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

Cite this article: Jan S.-L., Lin M.-C., Chan S.-C. (2018) Mid-term follow-up study of neonatal isolated aberrant right subclavian artery. Cardiology in the Young28: 1024–1030. doi: 10.1017/S1047951118000872

References

1. Kir, M, Saylam, GS, Karadas, U, et al. Vascular rings: presentation, imaging strategies, treatment, and outcome. Pediatr Cardiol 2012; 33: 607–617.Google Scholar
2. Bull, PG, Denck, H. Aberrant right subclavian artery. Eur J Vasc Surg 1994; 8: 757–760.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
3. Morrow, WR, Huhta, JC. Aortic arch and pulmonary artery anomalies. In Garson A, Bricker JT, Fisher DJ, Neish SR, (eds.) The Science and Practice of Pediatric Cardiology. Williams & Wilkins, Baltimore, 1998, pp. 1347–1381.Google Scholar
4. Weinberg, PM. Aortic arch anomalies. In Allen HD, Clark EB, Gutgesell HP, Driscoll DJ, (eds.) Moss and Adams’ Heart Disease in Infants, Children, and Adolescents. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Philadelphia, 2001, pp. 707–735.Google Scholar
5. Backer, CL, Mavroudis, C, Rigsby, CK, et al. Trends in vascular ring surgery. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2005; 129: 1339–1347.Google Scholar
6. Edwards, JE. Malformations of the aortic arch system manifested as “vascular rings”. Lab Invest 1953; 2: 56–75.Google Scholar
7. Tanaka, A, Milner, R, Ota, T. Kommerell’s diverticulum in the current era: a comprehensive review. Gen Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2015; 63: 245–259.Google Scholar
8. Natsis, K, Didagelos, M, Gkiouliava, A, et al. The aberrant right subclavian artery: cadaveric study and literature review. Surg Radiol Anat 2017; 39: 559–565.Google Scholar
9. Harcke, HT, Walter, RS. Ultrasound screening for dysplasia of the hip. Pediatrics 1995; 95: 799–800.Google Scholar
10. Tudehope, DI, Lamont, AC. Neonatal cranial ultrasound screening for intraventricular haemorrhage. J Paediatr Child Health 1998; 34: 112–113.Google Scholar
11. Sung, RY, So, LY, Ng, HK, et al. Echocardiography as a tool for determining the incidence of congenital heart disease in newborn babies: a pilot study in Hong Kong. Int J Cardiol 1991; 30: 43–47.Google Scholar
12. Jan, SL, Hwang, B, Fu, YC, et al. Echocardiographic prediction of arterial duct closure in neonates. Int J Cardiovacular Imaging 2004; 20: 255–262.Google Scholar
13. Ho, CL, Jan, SL, Lin, MC, et al. A follow-up study of neonatal interatrial shunt with echocardiography until twelve to fifteen months of age. Pediatr Neonatol 2008; 49: 234–239.Google Scholar
14. Atanasova, D, Markov, D, Pavlova, E. Aberrant right subclavian artery (ARSA) – a new ultrasound marker for chromosomal fetal abnormalities. Akush Ginekol (Sofiia) 2015; 54: 12–17.Google Scholar
15. Scala, C, Leone Roberti Maggiore, U, Candiani, M, et al. Aberrant right subclavian artery in fetuses with Down syndrome: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2015; 46: 266–276.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
16. Rembouskos, G, Passamonti, U, De Robertis, V, et al. Aberrant right subclavian artery (ARSA) in unselected population at first and second trimester ultrasonography. Prenat Diagn 2012; 32: 968–975.Google Scholar
17. Polguj, M, Chrzanowski, Ł, Kasprzak, JD, et al. The aberrant right subclavian artery (arteria lusoria): the morphological and clinical aspects of one of the most important variations—a systematic study of 141 reports. Scientific World Journal 2014; 2014: 292734.Google Scholar
18. Molz, G, Burri, B. Aberrant subclavian artery (arteria lusoria): sex differences in the prevalence of various forms of the malformation. Evaluation of 1378 observations. Virchows Arch A Pathol Anat Histol 1978; 380: 303–315.Google Scholar
19. Jan, SL, Lin, SJ, Fu, YC, et al. Effect of exercise on asymptomatic children with isolated aberrant subclavian artery. Acta Cardiol 2010; 65: 231–237.Google Scholar
20. Turner, A, Gavel, G, Coutts, J. Vascular rings-presentation, investigation, and outcome. Eur J Pediatr 2005; 164: 266–270.Google Scholar