Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-tf8b9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-23T00:39:20.029Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Mentorship, learning curves, and balance

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 November 2007

Meryl S. Cohen ,
Jeffrey P. Jacobs ,
James A. Quintessenza ,
Paul J. Chai ,
Harald L. Lindberg ,
Jamie Dickey  and
Ross M. Ungerleider
Meryl S. Cohen*
Affiliation:
The Cardiac Center at The Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States of America
Jeffrey P. Jacobs
Affiliation:
The Congenital Heart Institute of Florida, All Children’s Hospital, Children’s Hospital of Tampa, Cardiac Surgical Associates, University of South Florida, Saint Petersburg and Tampa, Florida, United States of America
James A. Quintessenza
Affiliation:
The Congenital Heart Institute of Florida, All Children’s Hospital, Children’s Hospital of Tampa, Cardiac Surgical Associates, University of South Florida, Saint Petersburg and Tampa, Florida, United States of America
Paul J. Chai
Affiliation:
The Congenital Heart Institute of Florida, All Children’s Hospital, Children’s Hospital of Tampa, Cardiac Surgical Associates, University of South Florida, Saint Petersburg and Tampa, Florida, United States of America
Harald L. Lindberg
Affiliation:
The Congenital Heart Institute of Florida, All Children’s Hospital, Children’s Hospital of Tampa, Cardiac Surgical Associates, University of South Florida, Saint Petersburg and Tampa, Florida, United States of America Rikshospitalet, University of Oslo, Norway and The Congenital Heart Institute of Florida, All Children’s Hospital, Children’s Hospital of Tampa, Cardiac Surgical Associates, University of South Florida, Saint Petersburg and Tampa, Florida, United States of America
Jamie Dickey
Affiliation:
Doernbecher Children’s Hospital, Oregon Health Sciences University
Ross M. Ungerleider
Affiliation:
Doernbecher Children’s Hospital, Oregon Health Sciences University
*
Correspondence to: Meryl S. Cohen MD, Division of Cardiology, The Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia, 34th Street and Civic Center Blvd., Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, 19104, United States of America. Tel: +215 590 2402; Fax: +215 590 5825; E-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Professionals working in the arena of health care face a variety of challenges as their careers evolve and develop. In this review, we analyze the role of mentorship, learning curves, and balance in overcoming challenges that all such professionals are likely to encounter. These challenges can exist both in professional and personal life.

As any professional involved in health care matures, complex professional skills must be mastered, and new professional skills must be acquired. These skills are both technical and judgmental. In most circumstances, these skills must be learned. In 2007, despite the continued need for obtaining new knowledge and learning new skills, the professional and public tolerance for a “learning curve” is much less than in previous decades. Mentorship is the key to success in these endeavours. The success of mentorship is two-sided, with responsibilities for both the mentor and the mentee. The benefits of this relationship must be bidirectional. It is the responsibility of both the student and the mentor to assure this bidirectional exchange of benefit. This relationship requires time, patience, dedication, and to some degree selflessness. This mentorship will ultimately be the best tool for mastering complex professional skills and maturing through various learning curves. Professional mentorship also requires that mentors identify and explicitly teach their mentees the relational skills and abilities inherent in learning the management of the triad of self, relationships with others, and professional responsibilities.

Up to two decades ago, a learning curve was tolerated, and even expected, while professionals involved in healthcare developed the techniques that allowed for the treatment of previously untreatable diseases. Outcomes have now improved to the point that this type of learning curve is no longer acceptable to the public. Still, professionals must learn to perform and develop independence and confidence. The responsibility to meet this challenge without a painful learning curve belongs to both the younger professionals, who must progress through the learning curve, and the more mature professionals who must create an appropriate environment for learning.

In addition to mentorship, the detailed tracking of outcomes is an essential tool for mastering any learning curve. It is crucial to utilize a detailed database to track outcomes, to learn, and to protect both yourself and your patients. It is our professional responsibility to engage in self-evaluation, in part employing voluntary sharing of data. For cardiac surgical subspecialties, the databases now existing for The European Association for CardioThoracic Surgery and The Society of Thoracic Surgeons represent the ideal tool for monitoring outcomes. Evolving initiatives in the fields of paediatric cardiology, paediatric critical care, and paediatric cardiac anaesthesia will play similar roles.

A variety of professional and personal challenges must be met by all those working in health care. The acquisition of learned skills, and the use of special tools, will facilitate the process of conquering these challenges. Choosing appropriate role models and mentors can help progression through any learning curve in a controlled and protected fashion. Professional and personal satisfaction are both necessities. Finding the satisfactory balance between work and home life is difficult, but possible with the right tools, organization skills, and support system at work and at home. The concepts of mentorship, learning curves and balance cannot be underappreciated.

Keywords

Educationprofessionalismpediatric cardiologypediatric cardiac surgery
Type
Original Article
Information
Cardiology in the Young , Volume 17 , Supplement S4 , September 2007 , pp. 164 - 174
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2007

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Jacobs, JP. Caring for patients with congenital cardiac disease – Introduction to Part 6 of the Supplement. Cardiol Young 2005; 15 (Suppl 1): 159–160.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2. Bonchek, LI, Harley, DP, Wilbur, RH, et al. . The STS future planning conference for adult cardiac surgery. Ann Thorac Surg 2003; 76: 2156–2166.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
3. Mayer JE. Threats to the medical profession by the American Medicare System. Presented as a Visiting Professor at the Ninth Annual Anthony RC Dobell Day in Congenital Cardiac Surgery, Montreal Children’s Hospital and McGill University, Montreal, Canada, Monday, December 4, 2006.Google Scholar
4. Waterston, DJ. Treatment of Fallot’s tetralogy in children under 1 year of age. Rozhl Chir 1962; 41: 181–183.Google ScholarPubMed
5. Fontan, F, Baudet, E. Surgical repair of tricuspid atresia. Thorax 1971; 26: 240–248.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
6. Senning, A. Surgical correction of transposition of the great vessels. Surgery 1959; 45: 966–980.Google ScholarPubMed
7. Mustard, WT. Successful twostage correction of transposition of the great vessels. Surgery 1964; 55: 469–472.Google ScholarPubMed
8. Vineberg, A. Treatment of coronary artery insufficiency by implantation of the internal mammary artery into the left ventricular myocardium. J Thorac Surg 1952; 23: 42–54.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
9. Dogliotti, AM, Actis-dato, A, Gentilli, R. Digital and instrumental commissurotomy in mitral stenosis; a study of 2,000 cases. Surgery 1958; 44: 706–717.Google ScholarPubMed
10. Starr, A, Edwards, ML. Mitral replacement: clinical experience with a ball-valve prosthesis. Ann Surg 1961; 154: 726–740.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
11. Blum, M, Panos, A, Lichtenstein, SV, Salerno, TA. Modified Cabrol shunt for control of hemorrhage in repair of type a dissection of the aorta. Ann Thorac Surg 1989; 48: 709–711.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
12. Cabrol, C, Pavie, A, Gandjbakhch, I, et al. . Complete replacement of the ascending aorta with reimplantation of the coronary arteries: new surgical approach. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1981; 81: 309–315. Pmid: 7453242 [pubmed – indexed for medline].CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
13. Povah, AH. Thoracoplasty with temporary extraperiosteal lucite ball plombage. J Thorac Surg 1953; 25: 516–523. No abstract available. Pmid: 13053599 [pubmed – indexed for medline].CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
14. Dobell, ARC, Jain, AK. Catastrophic hemorrhage during redo sternotomy. Ann Thorac Surg 1984; 37: 273–278.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
15. Stark, J, Pacifico, AD. Reoperations in Cardiac Surgery. Springer-Verlag, Telos, 1989.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
16. Jacobs, JP, Iyer, RS, Weston, JS, et al. . Expanded PTFE membrane to prevent cardiac injury during resternotomy for congenital heart disease. Ann Thorac Surg 1996; 62: 1778–1782.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
17. Bielefeld, MR, Bishop, DA, Campbell, DN, Mitchell, MB, Grover, FL, Clarke, DR. Reoperative homograft right ventricular outflow tract reconstruction. Ann Thorac Surg 2001; 71: 482–487.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
18. Mitchell, MB, Campbell, DN, Bishop, DA, Mackenzie, T, Clarke, DR. Surgical options and results of repeated aortic root replacement for failed aortic allografts placed in childhood. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2002; 124: 459–470.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
19. Dearani, JA, Connolly, HM, Martinez Richard, , Fontanet, H, Webb, GD. Caring for adults with congenital cardiac disease: successes and challenges for 2007 and beyond. Cardiol Young 2007; 17: This Supplement.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
20. Dickey, J, Ungerleider, RM. Teamwork: a system’s-based practice. In: Gravlee, GP, Davis, RF, Stammers, A, Ungerleider, RM (eds). Cardiopulmonary Bypass: Principles and Practice. Lippincott, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, 2007.Google Scholar
21. Drucker PF, Managing Oneself. Harvard Business Review: The HMU Guide to Managing People, 2004, p. 2.Google Scholar
22. Goleman, D, Boyatizis, R, McKee, A. Primal Leadership. Harvard Business Press, Boston, 2002.Google Scholar
23. Satir, V, Banmen, J, Gerber, J, Gomori, M. The Satir Model. Science and Behavior Books, Inc., Palo Alto, 1991.Google Scholar
24. Edmondson, A, Bohmer, R, Pisano, G. Speeding up team learning. Harvard Business Review 2001; October: 125–132.Google Scholar
25. Gebhard, F, Brinkman, A. Management of the operation room in a university hospital. Zentralblatt Fur Chirugie 2006; 131: 341–346.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
26. Lingard, L, Espsin, S, Whyte, S, et al. . Communication failures in the operating room: an observational classification of recurrent types and effects. Quality and Safety in Health Care 2004; 13: 330–334.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
27. Losade, M, Heaphy, E. The role of positivity and connectivity in performance of business teams: a nonlinear dynamic model. American Behavioral Scientist 2004; 47: 740–765.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
28. Bull, C, Yates, R, Sarkar, D, Deanfield, J, de Leval, M. Scientific, ethical, and logistical considerations in introducing a new operation: a retrospective cohort study from paediatric cardiac surgery. Brit Med J 2000; 320: 1168–1173.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
29. STS Database. Available at www.sts.org, accessed June 1, 2007.Google Scholar
30. Jacobs, JP, Mavroudis, C, Jacobs, ML, et al. . Lessons learned from the data analysis of the second harvest (1998–2001) of the Society of Thoracic Surgeons (STS) Congenital Heart Surgery Database. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2004; 26: 18–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
31. Jacobs, JP, Maruszewski, B, Tchervenkov, CI, et al. . The current status and future directions of efforts to create a global database for the outcomes of therapy for congenital heart disease. Cardiol Young 2005; 15 (Suppl 1): 190–197.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
32. Jacobs, JP, Lacour-Gayet, FG, Jacobs, ML, et al. . Initial application in the STS congenital database of complexity adjustment to evaluate surgical case mix and results. Ann Thorac Surg 2005; 79: 1635–1649; discussion 1635–1649.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
33. Jacobs, JP, Maruszewski, B. European association for Cardio-thoracic Surgery – Society of Thoracic Surgeons Joint Congenital Heart Surgery Nomenclature and Database Committee. Computerized outcomes analysis for congenital heart disease. Curr Opin Pediatr 2005; 17: 586–591.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
34. Jacobs, JP, Jacobs, ML, Maruszewski, B, et al. . Current status of the European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery and the Society of Thoracic Surgeons Congenital Heart Surgery Database. Ann Thorac Surg 2005; 80: 2278–2283; discussion 2283–2284.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
35. Jacobs, JP, Wernovsky, G, Elliott, MJ. Analysis of outcomes for congenital cardiac disease: can we do better? Cardiol Young 2007; 17: This Supplement.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
36. Mavroudis, C. Ethical forces that shape a career in surgery. Am J Surg 2005; 190: 319–323.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
37. Jacobs, JP, Mavroudis, C, Jacobs, ML, et al. . What is operative mortality? Defining death in a surgical registry database: a report of the STS Congenital Database Taskforce and the Joint EACTSSTS Congenital Database Committee. Ann Thorac Surg 2006; 81: 1937–1941.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
38. Jacobs, JP, Mavroudis, C, Jacobs, ML, et al. . Nomenclature and databases – the past, the present, and the future: a primer for the congenital heart surgeon. Pediatr Cardiol 2007; 28: 105–115. Epub 2007 May 4, May 2007.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
39. Shemin, RJ, Dziuban, SW, Kaiser, LR, et al. . Thoracic surgery workforce: snapshot at the end of the twentieth century and implications for the new millennium. Ann Thorac Surg 2002; 73: 2014–2032.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
40. Jacobs, ML, Mavroudis, C, Jacobs, JP, Tchervenkov, CI, Pelletier, GJ. Report of the 2005 STS Congenital Heart Surgery Practice and Manpower Survey. Ann Thorac Surg 2006; 82: 1152–1159.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
41. Jacobs, JP, Ungerleider, RM, Tchervenkov, CI, et al. . Opinions from the audience response survey at the First Joint Meeting of the Congenital Heart Surgeons’ Society and the European Congenital Heart Surgeons Association. Semin Thorac Cardiovasc Surg Pediatr Card Surg Annu 2005; 8: 198–217.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
42. Wright, AL, Schwindt, LA, Bassford, TL, et al. . Gender differences in academic advancement: patterns, causes, and potential solutions in one US College of Medicine. Acad Med 2003; 78: 500–508.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
43. Carr, PL, Ash, AS, Friedman, RH, et al. . Relation of family responsibilities and gender to the productivity and career satisfaction of medical faculty. Ann Intern Med 1998; 129: 532–538.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
44. Jagsi, R, Guancial, EA, Worobey, CC, et al. . The “gender gap” in authorship of academic medical literature – a 35-year perspective. N Engl J Med 2006; 355: 281–287.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
45. Nonnemaker, L. Women physicians in academic medicine: new insights from cohort studies. N Eng J Med 2000; 342: 399–405.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
46. McGuire, LK, Bergen, MR, Polan, ML. Career advancement for women faculty in a US school of medicine: perceived needs. Acad Med 2004; 79: 319–325.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
47. Fox, G, Schwartz, A, Hart, KM. Work-family balance and academic advancement in medical schools. Acad Psychiatry 2006; 30: 227–234.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
48. Shrier, DK, Shrier, LA, Rich, M, Greenberg, L. Pediatricians leading the way: integrating a career and a family/personal life over the life cycle. Pediatrics 2006; 117: 519–521.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
49. Dickey, J, Ungerleider, RM, Coselli, JS, Conklin, LD, Sade, RM. The surgeon’s work in transition: should surgeons spend more time outside the hospital? Ann Thorac Surg 2004; 77: 1145–1151.Google ScholarPubMed