Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t8hqh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-26T10:25:01.612Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Is there still a role for cardiac autopsy in 2007?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 November 2007

Vera Demarchi Aiello ,
Diane Debich-Spicer  and
Robert H. Anderson
Vera Demarchi Aiello*
Affiliation:
Laboratory of Pathology, Heart Institute (InCor), University of São Paulo Medical School, Sao Paulo, Brazil
Diane Debich-Spicer
Affiliation:
University of Florida, Department of Pediatrics (Cardiology), Gainesville, Florida, United States of America
Robert H. Anderson
Affiliation:
Cardiac Unit, Institute of Child Health, University College, London, United Kingdom
*
Correspondence to: Vera Demarchi Aiello MD, Laboratory of Pathology, Heart Institute (InCor), University of São Paulo Medical School, Av. Dr Enéas C. Aguiar, 44, São Paulo – SP, 05403-000, Brazil. Tel: +55 11 30695252; Fax: +55 11 30695279; E-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Concerns have emerged in recent years with regard to the role to be played by the pathologist in reaching a final diagnosis. When considering the field of the congenitally malformed heart, it is true that the richness of detail now provided by imaging techniques is truly amazing. Alongside these developments, there has also been a significant decline in the number of autopsies performed in tertiary medial centres around the World. In this review, we consider some of the factors that have contributed to this decrease in autopsies, and review the reasons why strong steps should be taken to reverse this trend.

When considering the reasons for the decline in autopsies, there can be little doubt that the scandal devolving on inappropriate retention of organs, which came to light in the United Kingdom, but which had reverberations throughout the World, contributed in no small way to the reticence of families to grant appropriate permission to conduct a post-mortem examination. It is sincerely hoped that the changes in practise that followed these revelations will stop, and indeed reverse, this unfortunate decline. The inappropriate retention of organs came into the public domain in an attempt to emphasise the value of the autopsy in clinical practise, research, and education. All of these good reasons for performing the autopsy remain.

From the stance of education, we emphasise the importance of retaining existing archives, which have long since proved their value. From the stance of improving clinical practise, we reiterate that the attitude of the morphologist, working side-by-side with the clinician or surgeon, has always been fundamental in expanding this aspect of knowledge. We recognise, nonetheless, that performance of the autopsy still carries financial considerations. In this respect, when considering the congenitally malformed heart, we stress the option of having the pathologist working in harness with an experienced cardiac morphologist, or alternatively with a properly trained pathologist’s assistant. In terms of training, we show how, with the advantage of a few simple rules, it becomes an easy matter to describe and analyse the congenitally malformed heart. Thereafter, having reviewed means of increasing the number of autopsies, and discussing new techniques, we complete our review with a detailed account of the fetal, perinatal, and paediatric autopsy in the patients with a congenitally malformed heart, taking particular account of the role to be played by the properly trained pathologist’s assistant.

Keywords

Medical educationcongenital heart defectspost-mortem examination
Type
Original Article
Information
Cardiology in the Young , Volume 17 , Supplement S4 , September 2007 , pp. 97 - 103
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2007

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Burton, JL, Underwood, JC. Necropsy practice after the “organ retention scandal”: requests, performance, and tissue retention. J Clin Pathol 2003; 56: 537–541.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
2. The Royal College of Pathologists of Australasia Autopsy Working Party. The decline of the hospital autopsy: a safety and quality issue for healthcare in Australia. Med J Aust 2004; 180: 281–285.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
3. O’Grady, G. Death of the teaching autopsy. BMJ 2003; 327: 802–803.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
4. Redfern, M, Keeling, JW, Powell, E. The Royal Liverpool Children’s Inquiry Report. 2001 The Stationary Office, Norwich, United Kingdom.Google Scholar
5. Kennedy, I. The Report of the Public Inquiry into children’s heart surgery at the Bristol Royal Infirmary 1984–1995. Learning from Bristol. 2001 The Stationary Office, Norwich, United Kingdom.Google Scholar
6. Charlton, R. Autopsy and medical education: a review. J R Soc Med 1994; 87: 232–236.Google ScholarPubMed
7. Burton, JL. The autopsy in modern undergraduate medical education: a qualitative study of uses and curriculum considerations. Med Educ 2003; 37: 1073–1081.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
8. Shojania, KG, Burton, EC, McDonald, KM, Goldman, L. Changes in rates of autopsy-detected diagnostic errors over time: a systematic review. JAMA 2003; 289: 2849–2856.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
9. Sutherland, GR, Godman, MJ, Smallhorn, JF, Guiterras, P, Anderson, RH, Hunter, S. Ventricular septal defects. Two dimensional echocardiographic and morphological correlations. Br Heart J 1982; 47: 316–328.Google ScholarPubMed
10. Silverman, NH, Zuberbuhler, JR, Anderson, RH. Atrioventricular septal defects: cross-sectional echocardiographic and morphologic comparisons. Int J Cardiol 1986; 13: 309–331.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
11. Bharati, S, Lev, M. The course of the conduction system in single ventricle with inverted (L-) loop and inverted (L-) transposition. Circulation 1975; 51: 723–730.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
12. Anderson, RH, Ho, SY, Becker, AE. The surgical anatomy of the conduction tissues. Thorax 1983; 38: 408–420.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
13. Akiba, T, Becker, AE. Disease of the left ventricle in pulmonary atresia with intact ventricular septum. The limiting factor for long-lasting successful surgical intervention? J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1994; 108: 1–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
14. Binotto, MA, Higuchi M, L, Aiello, VD. Left ventricular remodeling in hearts with tricuspid atresia: morphologic observations and possible basis for ventricular dysfunction after surgery. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2003; 126: 1026–1032.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
15. Salih, C, McCarthy, KP, Ho, SY. The fibrous matrix of ventricular myocardium in hypoplastic left heart syndrome: a quantitative and qualitative analysis. Ann Thorac Surg 2004; 77: 36–40.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
16. McManus, BM, Wilson, JE, Struve, LC. Manpower deficiencies in cardiovascular pathology. Implications for medical care of cardiovascular diseases. Arch Pathol Lab Med 1993; 117: 584–588.Google ScholarPubMed
17. Van Praagh, R, David, I, Wright, GB, Van Praagh, S. Large RV plus small LV is not single LV. Circulation 1980; 61: 1057–1058.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
18. Keeton, BR, Macartney, FJ, Hunter, S, et al. . Univentricular heart of right ventricular type with double or common inlet. Circulation 1979; 59: 403–411.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
19. Anderson, RH, Ho, SY. Continuing Medical Education. Sequential segmental analysis – description and catergorization for the millenium. Cardiol Young 1997; 7: 98–116.Google Scholar
20. Anderson, RH. Nomenclature and classification: sequential segmental analysis. In: Moller, JH, Hoffman, JIE (eds.). Pediatric Cardiovascular Medicine. Churchill Livingstone, New York, 2000, pp 263–274.Google Scholar
21. Van Praagh, R. The segmental approach to diagnosis in congenital heart disease. In: Bergsma, D (ed.). Birth defects original article series, vol. VIII, No. 5. The National Foundation – March of Dimes. Williams and Wilkins, Baltimore, 1972, pp 4–23.Google Scholar
22. Van Mierop, LHS, Gessner, IH, Schlieber, GL. Asplenia and polysplenia syndromes. In: Bergsma, D (ed.). Birth Defects, original article series, 8. Williams and Wilkins, Baltimore, 1972, pp 74–82.Google Scholar
23. O’Grady, G. The Breakfast Club: case study of a teaching-autopsy curriculum. Med Teach 2004; 26: 377–378.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
24. Jackowski, C, Schweitzer, W, Thali, M, et al. . Virtopsy: postmortem imaging of the human heart in situ using MSCT and MRI. Forensic Sci Int 2005; 149: 11–23.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
25. Elder, DE, Zuccollo, JM. Autopsy after death due to extreme prematurity. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed 2005; 90: F270–F272.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
26. Gross descriptions, management duties challenge pathologists’ assistants. ASCP Pathology Today; July 2006; 10.Google Scholar
27. Gilbert-Barness, E, Debich-Spicer, D. Embryo and fetal pathology, An atlas with ultrasound correlation. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2004.Google Scholar
28. Gilbert-Barness, E, Debich-Spicer, D. Handbook of pediatric autopsy pathology. Humana Press; 2005.CrossRefGoogle Scholar