Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-fscjk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T12:07:58.317Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Improving safety for children with cardiac disease

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 November 2007

Ravi R. Thiagarajan ,
Geoffrey L. Bird ,
Karen Harrington ,
John R. Charpie ,
Richard C. Ohye ,
James M. Steven ,
Michael Epstein  and
Peter C. Laussen
Ravi R. Thiagarajan*
Affiliation:
Cardiac Intensive Care Unit, Children’s Hospital Boston, Boston Massachusetts, United States of America
Geoffrey L. Bird
Affiliation:
Cardiac Intensive Care Unit, Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States of America
Karen Harrington
Affiliation:
Pediatric Intensive Care Unit, CHU Sainte-Justine, Montreal, Canada
John R. Charpie
Affiliation:
Pediatric Cardiothoracic Intensive Care Unit & Department of Cardiac Surgery, C. S. Mott Children’s Hospital, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, United States of America
Richard C. Ohye
Affiliation:
Pediatric Cardiothoracic Intensive Care Unit & Department of Cardiac Surgery, C. S. Mott Children’s Hospital, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, United States of America
James M. Steven
Affiliation:
Cardiac Intensive Care Unit, Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States of America
Michael Epstein
Affiliation:
All Children’s Hospital, St. Petersburg, Florida, United States of America
Peter C. Laussen
Affiliation:
Cardiac Intensive Care Unit, Children’s Hospital Boston, Boston Massachusetts, United States of America
*
Correspondence to: Ravi R. Thiagarajan MBBS, MPH, Department of Cardiology, Children’s Hospital Boston, 300, Long wood Avenue, Boston, MA 02115, USA. Tel: +617 355 7866; Fax: +617 713 3808; E-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The complexity of the modern systems providing health care presents a unique challenge in delivering care of the required quality in a safe environment. Issues of safety have been thrust into the limelight because of adverse events highly publicized in the general media.

In the United States of America, improving the safety and quality in health care has been set forth as a priority for improvements in the 21st century in the report from the Institute of Medicine. Many measures have now been initiated for improving the safety of patients at hospital, regional, and national level, and through initiatives sponsored by governments and private organizations. In this review, we summarize known concepts and current issues on the safety of patients, and their applicability to children with congenital cardiac disease. Prior to examining the issues of medical error and safety, it is important to define the terminology.

An error is defined as the failure of a planned action to be completed as intended, also known as an execution error, or the use of a wrong plan to achieve an aim, this representing a planning error. An active error is an error that occurs at the level of the frontline operator, and the effects of which are felt immediately. A latent error is an error in the design, organization, training and maintenance, that leads to operator errors, and the effects of which are typically dormant in the system for lengthy periods of time. Latent errors may cause harm given the right circumstances and environment.

An adverse event is defined as an injury resulting from medical intervention. A preventable adverse event is an adverse event that occurs due to medical error. Negligent adverse events are a subset of preventable adverse events where the care provided did not meet the standard of care expected of that practitioner.

The study of improving the delivery of safe care for our patients is a rapidly growing field. Important components for development of programmes to improve the safety of patients include the leadership for the programme, the implementation of process design based on human limitations, the promotion of teamwork and function, the anticipation of unexpected events, and the creation of a learning environment.

Much is yet to be learned about the risk and incidence of adverse events during hospitalization of children with congenital cardiac disease. Errors due to human factors, such as poor communication, poor coordination, and suboptimal team work, have shown to be important causes of adverse outcomes in children undergoing cardiac surgery, and should be a focus for improvement. Future research on evaluating causes and prevention of medical errors and adverse events in this population at high risk, and consuming high resources, is essential.

Issues of inadequate safeguards for patients have been prominent in the media, and have been highlighted in reports from the Institute of Medicine. Our review discusses research on the causes of medical error, and proposes concepts to design successful programmes to improve safety for the patients on a local level.

Keywords

Human errorsystems approachpersons approacheducation
Type
Original Article
Information
Cardiology in the Young , Volume 17 , Supplement S4 , September 2007 , pp. 127 - 132
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2007

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Leape, LL, Woods, DD, Hatlie, MJ, Kizer, KW, Schroeder, SA, Lundberg, GD. Promoting patient safety by preventing medical error. JAMA 1998; 280: 1444–1447.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
2. Kohn, LT, Corrigan, JM, Donaldson, MS (eds). Glossary and Acronyms. To Err is Human. Building a Safer Health System. National Academy Press, Washington, D.C., 2000, pp 210–213.Google Scholar
3. Leape, LL, Brennan, TA, Laird, N, et al. . The nature of adverse events in hospitalized patients. Results of the Harvard Medical Practice Study II. N Engl J Med 1991; 324: 377–384.Google ScholarPubMed
4. Brennan, TA, Leape, LL, Laird, NM, et al. . Incidence of adverse events and negligence in hospitalized patients. Results of the Harvard Medical Practice Study I. N Engl J Med 1991; 324: 370–376.Google Scholar
5. Thomas, EJ, Studdert, DM, Burstin, HR, et al. . Incidence and types of adverse events and negligent care in Utah and Colorado. Med Care 2000; 38: 261–271.Google Scholar
6. Errors in Health Care. Kohn LT, Corrigan JM, Donaldson MS (eds). To Err is Human. Building a Safer Health System. National Academy Press, Washington, D.C., 2000, pp 26–48.Google Scholar
7. A New Health System for the 21st Century. In: Briere, R (ed). Crossing The Quality Chasm. National Academy Press, Washington, D.C., 2001, pp 23–38.Google Scholar
8. Why Do Errors Happen? Kohn LT, Corrigan JM, Donaldson MS (eds). To Err is Human. Building a Safer Health System. National Academy Press, Washington, D.C., 2000, pp 49–68.Google Scholar
9. Bion, J, Hart, GK, Khan, Z. Preventing Iatrogenic Complications Angus, DC, Carlet, J (eds). Surviving Intensive Care. Springer, New York, 2003, pp 257–286.Google Scholar
10. Reason, J. The contribution of latent human failures to the breakdown of complex systems. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 1990; 327: 475–484.Google Scholar
11. Sharek, PJ, Classen, D. The incidence of adverse events and medical error in pediatrics. Pediatr Clin North Am 2006; 53: 1067–1077.Google Scholar
12. Woods, D, Thomas, E, Holl, J, Altman, S, Brennan, T. Adverse events and preventable adverse events in children. Pediatrics 2005; 115: 155–160.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
13. Miller, MR, Zhan, C. Pediatric patient safety in hospitals: a national picture in 2000. Pediatrics 2004; 113: 1741–1746.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
14. Sharek, PJ, Horbar, JD, Mason, W, et al. . Adverse events in the neonatal intensive care unit: development, testing, and findings of an NICU-focused trigger tool to identify harm in North American NICUs. Pediatrics 2006; 118: 1332–1340.Google Scholar
15. Catchpole, KR, Giddings, AE, de Leval, MR, et al. . Identification of systems failures in successful paediatric cardiac surgery. Ergonomics 2006; 49: 567–588.Google Scholar
16. Carthey, J, de Leval, MR, Reason, JT. The human factor in cardiac surgery: errors and near misses in a high technology medical domain. Ann Thorac Surg 2001; 72: 300–305.Google Scholar
17. Rossi, AF, Seiden, HS, Gross, RP, Griepp, RB. Oxygen transport in critically ill infants after congenital heart operations. Ann Thorac Surg. Mar 1999; 67: 739–744.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
18. Connor, JA, Gauvreau, K, Jenkins, KJ. Factors associated with increased resource utilization for congenital heart disease. Pediatrics 2005; 116: 689–695.Google Scholar
19. de Leval, MR, Carthey, J, Wright, DJ, Farewell, VT, Reason, JT. Human factors and cardiac surgery: a multicenter study. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2000; 119: 661–672.Google Scholar
20. Reason, J. Human error: models and management. BMJ 2000; 320: 768–770.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
21. Weick, KE. Sense and reliability. A conversation with celebrated psychologist Karl E. Weick. Interview by Diane L. Coutu. Harv Bus Rev 2003; 81: 84–90, 123.Google Scholar
22. Pronovost, PJ, Berenholtz, SM, Goeschel, CA, et al. . Creating high reliability in health care organizations. Health Serv Res 2006; 41: 1599–1617.Google Scholar
23. Stevens, P, Matlow, A, Laxer, RM. Blueprint for patient safety. Pediatr Clin North Am 2006; 53: 1253–1267.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
24. Horbar, JD, Plsek, PE, Leahy, K. NIC/Q 2000: establishing habits for improvement in neonatal intensive care units. Pediatrics 2003; 111: e397–410.Google Scholar
25. Pronovost, P, Needham, D, Berenholtz, S, et al. . An intervention to decrease catheter-related bloodstream infections in the ICU. N Engl J Med 2006; 355: 2725–2732.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
26. Fortescue, EB, Kaushal, R, Landrigan, CP, et al. . Prioritizing strategies for preventing medication errors and adverse drug events in pediatric inpatients. Pediatrics 2003; 111: 722–729.Google Scholar
27. Joint Commission Sentinel Event Root Cause Database: http://www.jointcommission.org/NR/rdonlyres/FA465646-5F5F-4543-AC8F-E8AF6571E372/0/root_cause_se.jpgGoogle Scholar
28. Sexton, JB, Thomas, EJ, Helmreich, RL. Error, stress and teamwork in medicine and aviation: cross sectional surveys. BMJ 2000; 320: 745–749.Google Scholar
29. Makary, MA, Sexton, JB, Freischlag, JA, et al. . Operating room teamwork among physicians and nurses: teamwork in the eye of the beholder. J Am Coll Surg 2006; 202: 746–752.Google Scholar
30. Thomas, EJ, Sexton, JB, Helmreich, RL. Discrepant attitudes about teamwork among critical care nurses and physicians. Crit Care Med 2003; 31: 956–959.Google Scholar
31. Salas, E, Wilson, KA, Burke, CS, Priest, HA. Using simulation-based training to improve patient safety: what does it take? Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf 2005; 31: 363–371.Google Scholar
32. Allan, CK, Beke, DM, Kappus, LJ, Laussen, PC, Thiagarajan, RR. Simulation-based crisis resource management program in a pediatric cardiac intensive care unit improves participants self-perception of resuscitation skills. J Am Coll Cardiol 2007; 49: 297A.Google Scholar