Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-q99xh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T13:47:43.939Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Fusion imaging for guidance of pulmonary arteriovenous malformation embolisation with minimal radiation and contrast exposure

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 March 2024

Catalina Vargas-Acevedo Open the ORCID record for Catalina Vargas-Acevedo [Opens in a new window] ,
Ernesto Mejia ,
Jenny E. Zablah  and
Gareth J. Morgan Open the ORCID record for Gareth J. Morgan [Opens in a new window]
Catalina Vargas-Acevedo
Affiliation:
Department of Pediatric Cardiology, University of Colorado, The Heart Institute, Children’s Hospital Colorado, Aurora, CO, USA
Ernesto Mejia
Affiliation:
Department of Pediatric Cardiology, University of Colorado, The Heart Institute, Children’s Hospital Colorado, Aurora, CO, USA
Jenny E. Zablah
Affiliation:
Department of Pediatric Cardiology, University of Colorado, The Heart Institute, Children’s Hospital Colorado, Aurora, CO, USA
Gareth J. Morgan*
Affiliation:
Department of Pediatric Cardiology, University of Colorado, The Heart Institute, Children’s Hospital Colorado, Aurora, CO, USA
*
Corresponding author: G. J. Morgan; Email: [email protected]
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Hereditary haemorrhagic telangiectasia is an inherited disorder characterised by vascular dysplasia that leads to the development of arteriovenous malformations. Pulmonary arteriovenous malformations occur in approximately 30% of patients with haemorrhagic telangiectasia. Given the complex characteristics of haemorrhagic telangiectasia lesions, the application of three-dimensional fusion imaging holds significant promise for procedural guidance and decrease in contrast and radiation dosing. We reviewed all patients who underwent transcatheter approach for pulmonary arteriovenous malformation occlusion with fusion image guidance from June 2018 to September 2023 from a single centre. A total of nine cases with haemorrhagic telangiectasia and transcatheter occlusion of pulmonary arteriovenous malformations using fusion imaging were identified. Five (56%) were male, mean age at procedure was 15.7 years (10–28 years) and mean number of pulmonary arteriovenous malformations intervened was three per patient (1–7). Two of the cases were complex repeat embolisations. The mean fluoroscopy time was 40.6 min (10.7–68.8 min), with mean contrast dose of 28.8 mL (11–60 mL; mean of 0.51 mL/kg) and mean radiation dose of 66.3 mGy (25.6–140 mGy; mean of 40.5 mGy/m2). There were no complications reported during the procedures, with no additional interventions necessary. Fusion imaging in pulmonary arteriovenous malformations embolisation for patients with haemorrhagic telangiectasia is feasible and has the potential to reduce contrast and radiation doses. To our knowledge, we describe the lowest radiation and contrast doses per patient using fusion imaging technology reported in the literature to date.

Keywords

pulmonary artery embolisationfusion imaginghereditary haemorrhagic telangiectasia
Type
Original Article
Information
Cardiology in the Young , Volume 34 , Issue 7 , July 2024 , pp. 1451 - 1455
Check for updates
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2024. Published by Cambridge University Press

Hereditary haemorrhagic telangiectasia is characterised by vascular dysplasia that leads to the development of arteriovenous malformations that are commonly found in the liver, brain, gastrointestinal tract, and lungs. Reference Garg, Khunger, Gupta and Kumar1,Reference Azad, Miranda and Sparacino2 These vascular anomalies pose a substantial risk of bleeding, contributing to the chronic anaemia frequently observed in affected individuals. Among the various manifestations of haemorrhagic telangiectasia, pulmonary arteriovenous malformations occur in approximately 30% of patients with haemorrhagic telangiectasia. Reference Azad, Miranda and Sparacino2 The presence of pulmonary arteriovenous malformations, which bypass the pulmonary capillary bed, increases the risk of embolic events and can cause low oxygen saturations, necessitating transcatheter closure to prevent complications. Reference Rajesh, Sajeer, Nair, Haridasan, Sajeev and Krishnan3–Reference Muhammad, Rauf, Shahid, Iqbal, Haq and Zafar5

Recent studies that support the use of three-dimensional fusion imaging in procedural guidance, with pre-procedural advanced imaging datasets (CT or MRI), suggest that it decreases contrast dose and radiation exposure and results in shorter procedural times. Reference Nobre, Oliveira-Santos, Paiva, Costa and Gonçalves6–Reference Garnier, Curado and Grancher9 CT or MRI fusion with fluoroscopy requires three preparatory steps: segmentation, planning and image registration, to facilitate the live procedural guidance. Reference Ehret, Alkassar and Dittrich10–Reference Zablah and Morgan12 In pulmonary arteriovenous malformations, inherent challenges posed by vascular tortuosity, intricate and distal locations, and often multiple lesions, lend themselves to the application of three-dimensional fusion imaging procedural guidance. This technology could enhance the precision of transcatheter pulmonary arteriovenous malformationtreatment and minimise contrast dose, limit radiation exposure, and decrease procedural time. Here, we report our experience with the use of fusion imaging technology to guide percutaneous intervention of pulmonary arteriovenous malformations in patients with haemorrhagic telangiectasia using minimal radiation and contrast.

Methods and settings

Retrospective reviews of all patients with evidence of pulmonary arteriovenous malformations who underwent transcatheter approach for vessel occlusion from June 2018 to September 2023 were reviewed. All procedures were performed at Children’s Hospital Colorado and all the cases reviewed used fusion imaging. Patients were referred for pulmonary arteriovenous malformation occlusion after review at the institution’s multi-disciplinary vascular anomaly clinic. Outcome measures included angiographic results, procedural time, radiation doses, contrast volume, complications, and need for reintervention. Variables are reported as numbers and percentages for qualitative values and mean (range) for quantitative values. The study protocol was submitted and approved by institutional review board.

Description of procedure

Cross-sectional imaging acquired prior to the catheterisation as part of the routine diagnostic work-up is post-processed and segmented to facilitate interventional planning and live guidance during the case. As per current protocol in our institution, all patients were screened using computed tomographic angiogram. The segmentation is carried out by the interventionalist prior to the procedure. Pulmonary arteriovenous malformations indicated for transcatheter closure are identified and marked on Phillips VesselNavigator™ (Philips, Amsterdam, Netherlands) and projected on fluoroscopy (Fig. 1a,b). After obtaining vascular access, and under fusion image guidance, a diagnostic catheter such as a 4-Fr Terumo glide catheter is fed through branch pulmonary arteries and into each of the previously identified arteriovenous malformations (Fig. 1c,d). The catheter is advanced and hand angiography is used to confirm the position of the arteriovenous malformation. Depending on the size and characteristics of each vessel, either a Medtronic Microvascular Plug (MVP™) is used with or without additional coils (Medtronic Concerto® coil system, (Medtronic Inc., Dublin, Ireland) or Penumbra Ruby® coil system (Penumbra, Alameda, CA, USA)). For small vessels coils are used alone (Image 1E and 1D). Angiography is used to confirm adequate occlusion of the vessel.

Figure 1. VesselNavigatorTM images during pulmonary arteriovenous malformation embolisation. VesselNavigatorTM images during pulmonary arteriovenous malformation embolisation. a : Segmentation of cardiac and vascular structures and selection of vessels for embolisation (Patient #9). b : Limited segmentation of selected vessels. c : Using live fusion guidance, a 4Fr Glide catheter is fed into the previously identified pulmonary arteriovenous malformation (right lower lobe pulmonary arteriovenous malformation in patient #8). d and e : Embolisation coils are fed into a previously identified pulmonary arteriovenous malformation(Left lower lobe in patient #8).

Results

Between 2018 and 2023, a total of nine cases with haemorrhagic telangiectasia and transcatheter occlusion of pulmonary arteriovenous malformations using fusion imaging were identified with five (56%) males. Two of the patients were referred for complex repeat procedures resulting from incomplete or failed occlusion of pulmonary arteriovenous malformation’s during previous attempts. The mean age at diagnosis of haemorrhagic telangiectasia was 12.9 years (3–27 years) and the mean age at procedure was 15.7 years (10–28 years). The mean weight at procedure was 56.2 kg (37.6–77 kg). Seven patients (78%) had evidence of endoglin mutation. All patients had normal cardiac anatomies, and no patients showed evidence of pulmonary hypertension. Other related findings included gastrointestinal and intracranial arteriovenous malformations and mucosal telangiectasias with epistaxis, as expected per their diagnosis. The mean number of pulmonary arteriovenous malformations indicated for intervention was three per patient (1–7).

Devices used during the procedure included Medtronic Concerto® coils and Penumbra Ruby® coils. In larger pulmonary arteriovenous malformations, Medtronic MVP™ was used alone or in addition to coils. The mean number of devices implanted per case was 4.2 (1–9). The mean fluoroscopy time was 40.6 min (10.7–68.8 min), with a mean total contrast dose of 28.8 mL (11–60 mL), indexed contrast dose of 0.51 mL/kg (0.25–0.88 mL/kg), a mean radiation dose of 66.3 mGy (25.6–140 mGy), and indexed dose of 40.5 mGy/m2 (15.8–80.5 mGy/m2). There were no complications reported during the procedures, with no additional interventions necessary. When we exclude the two complex redo patients, the mean radiation dose was 55.5 mGy (mean of 34.4 mGy/m2), mean fluoroscopy time of 36.5 minutes, and a mean contrast dose of 26.6 ml (mean of 0.47 ml/kg).

Table 1 represents all demographic, clinical characteristics, and procedural results for each patient.

Table 1. Patient characteristics

PAVM = pulmonary arteriovenous malformation; GI = gastrointestinal tract; Coll = collateral; LUL = left upper lobe; LLL = left lower lobe; RUL = right upper lobe; RML = right middle lobe; RLL = right lower. lobe; MVP = microvascular plug; HHT = haemorrhagic telangiectasia.

Patient #1 and patient #9 were reinterventions of previous incompletely embolised vessels.

Discussion

Haemorrhagic telangiectasia is a chronic disease that needs multi-disciplinary management and follow-up with multiple radiographic imaging modalities used on a regular basis resulting in an overall radiation burden which places these patients in a higher risk group for radiation-induced malignancies. Reference Cevallos, Armstrong and Glatz13–Reference Miglioretti, Johnson and Williams15 Transcatheter closure of pulmonary arteriovenous malformations is a well described and accepted therapy. Reference Garg, Khunger, Gupta and Kumar1,Reference Muhammad, Rauf, Shahid, Iqbal, Haq and Zafar5 The lesions are usually multiple, very distal in the lung parenchyma, and have complex morphology, which can make transcatheter embolisation a long and challenging procedure. This is further complicated by the need for multiple angiograms, which are challenging to interpret given numerous overlapping pulmonary branches on fluoroscopy.

In our experience, the added value of fusion imaging technology in these procedures is as follows. Firstly, as part of procedural planning, to determine the correct angiographic angles of interrogation and the size of the vessels involved, thus, narrowing the scope of devices that need to be available. This in itself can aid planning and reduce case time and complexity. Second, the initial diagnostic angiographic imaging is likely reduced due to the use of VesselNavigatorTM live guidance images superimposed on fluoroscopy. Thirdly, the combination of these features can lead to less contrast volume, fluoroscopy, and cine-angiographic image acquisition. As expected with our limited patient population, and the lack of a control group, we have a limited ability to demonstrate statistical superiority of fusion imaging over standard two-dimensional imaging. Nonetheless, this expected benefit has been previously demonstrated in other interventional procedures such as transcatheter pulmonary valve replacement, pulmonary vein stenosis, as well as other oncological and vascular interventions, showing a significant decrease in contrast dose and procedural duration. Reference Markelj, Tomaževič, Likar and Pernuš8,Reference Ehret, Alkassar and Dittrich10,Reference Goreczny, Moszura and Dryzek11

The first report to our knowledge, of the use of fusion imaging technology specific for pulmonary arteriovenous malformations embolisation, was recently published and showed a significant decrease in contrast dose when compared to standard two-dimensional imaging in this single centre (118.3 mL versus 285.3 mL; p < 0.002) but with no statistically significant difference found in procedural duration (19.5 min versus 31.4 min p = 0.054) Reference Garnier, Curado and Grancher9 . In our series, predominantly paediatric, which inherently increases complexity of interventional procedures, we report a mean contrast dose of 28.8 mL (11–60 mL, 0.51 mL/kg), far lower (approx. 20%) than that reported by Garnier et al. (118.3 mL, range 50–300 mL) with a 29% higher mean number pulmonary arteriovenous malformations treated per patient in our series (3 versus 2.33). The same is true for radiation dose, where we report a mean of 66.3 mGy (25.6–140 mGy and an indexed mean dose of 40.5mGy/m2) compared to 599.9 mGy. When excluding patients with reintervention of previously embolised pulmonary arteriovenous malformation, the mean radiation dose was even lower at 55.6 mGy (34.4 mGy/m2). Nevertheless, we show a longer mean fluoroscopy time of 40.6 min (10.7–68.8 min) compared to the extremely low 19.5 min (range 8–44 min) reported by Garnier. This may be partially explained by the higher number of treated lesions per case. However, despite the longer fluoroscopy time, it is important to note that the total and indexed radiation doses are significantly lower than those reported elsewhere. Thus, we consider this a technique with minimal radiation and contrast exposure important in a predominantly paediatric population.

The most significant advantage to the use of fusion imaging technology for embolisation of pulmonary arteriovenous malformations seems to be related to the dose of contrast and radiation. However, we must highlight the importance of using fusion imaging for pre-procedural case planning, to generate angiographic angles and select occlusion devices, which can further decrease the use of contrast and radiation dose as well as optimising efficiency and resource utilisation in these and other patients. We report a contrast and radiation dose far below that previously reported in the literature, likely due to our use of customised low radiation and contrast protocols, which are made feasible by the reliance on overlay fusion imaging. Reference Zablah, Rodriguez, Leahy and Morgan16 The recognition that haemorrhagic telangiectasia patients require recurring ionising radiation-based diagnostic and intervention procedures for various arteriovenous malformations behoves us to minimize contrast and radiation dose to help preserve renal function and decrease lifetime radiation-based complications. Reference Nobre, Oliveira-Santos, Paiva, Costa and Gonçalves6,Reference Goreczny, Morgan, McLennan, Rehman and Zablah7,Reference Garnier, Curado and Grancher9

Conclusions

Fusion imaging in pulmonary arteriovenous malformations embolisation for paediatric and young adult patients with haemorrhagic telangiectasia is feasible and has the potential of reducing contrast and radiation doses. Further studies are necessary to clearly establish this association.

Limitations

This is a single-centre experience with retrospective analysis. Due to the small group of patients, no subgroup analyses were conducted to measure outcomes.

Acknowledgements

None.

Financial support

None.

Competing interests

None.

References

Garg, N, Khunger, M, Gupta, A, Kumar, N. Optimal management of hereditary hemorrhagic telangiectasia. J Blood Med 2014; 5: 191. DOI: 10.2147/JBM.S45295.Google ScholarPubMed
Azad, F, Miranda, CJ, Sparacino, GM. Pulmonary arteriovenous malformation in a rare case of hereditary hemorrhagic telangiectasia. Cureus 2022; 14(12): e32365. DOI: 10.7759/cureus.32365.Google Scholar
Rajesh, GN, Sajeer, K, Nair, A, Haridasan, V, Sajeev, CG, Krishnan, MN. Device closure of pulmonary arteriovenous malformation using Amplatzer vascular plug II in hereditary hemorrhagic telangiectasia. Indian Heart J 2015; 67: 455–458.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tau, N, Atar, E, Mei-Zahav, M, et al. Amplatzer vascular plugs versus coils for embolization of pulmonary arteriovenous malformations in patients with hereditary hemorrhagic telangiectasia. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol 2016; 39: 1110–1114.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Muhammad, A, Rauf, Z, Shahid, J, Iqbal, J, Haq, TU, Zafar, U. Endovascular embolisation of pulmonary arteriovenous malformation using amplatzer vascular plugs. Cureus 2022; 14(4): e24214. DOI: 10.7759/cureus.24214.Google ScholarPubMed
Nobre, C, Oliveira-Santos, M, Paiva, L, Costa, M, Gonçalves, L. Fusion imaging in interventional cardiology PALAVRAS-CHAVE. Rev Port Cardiol 2020; 39: 463–473.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goreczny, S, Morgan, GJ, McLennan, D, Rehman, R, Zablah, JE. Comparison of fusion imaging and two-dimensional angiography to guide percutaneous pulmonary vein interventions. Kardiol Pol 2022; 80: 476–478.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Markelj, P, Tomaževič, D, Likar, B, Pernuš, F. A review of 3D/2D registration methods for image-guided interventions. Med Image Anal 2012; 16: 642–661.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Garnier, M, Curado, A, Grancher, A, et al. Fusion imaging for pulmonary artery embolization: impact on fluoroscopy duration and contrast agent exposure. Br J Radiol 2023; 96(1151): 20220815. DOI: 10.1259/bjr.20220815.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ehret, N, Alkassar, M, Dittrich, S, et al. A new approach of three-dimensional guidance in paediatric cath lab: segmented and tessellated heart models for cardiovascular interventions in CHD. Cardiol Young 2018; 28: 661–667.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Goreczny, S, Moszura, T, Dryzek, P, et al. Three-dimensional image fusion guidance of percutaneous pulmonary valve implantation to reduce radiation exposure and contrast dose: a comparison with traditional two-dimensional and three-dimensional rotational angiographic guidance. Neth Heart J 2017; 25: 91–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zablah, JE, Morgan, GJ. Innovations in congenital interventional cardiology. Pediatr Clin North Am 2020; 67: 973–993.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cevallos, PC, Armstrong, AK, Glatz, AC, et al. Radiation dose benchmarks in pediatric cardiac catheterization: a prospective multi-center C3PO-QI study. Catheter Cardio Interv 2017; 90: 269–280.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kleinerman, RA. Cancer risks following diagnostic and therapeutic radiation exposure in children. Pediatr Radiol 2006; 36: 121–125.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Miglioretti, DL, Johnson, E, Williams, A, et al. The use of computed tomography in pediatrics and the associated radiation exposure and estimated cancer risk. JAMA Pediatr 2013; 167: 700–707.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zablah, JE, Rodriguez, SA, Leahy, R, Morgan, GJ. Novel minimal radiation approach for percutaneous pulmonary valve implantation. Pediatr Cardiol 2021; 42: 926–933.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Figure 0

Figure 1. VesselNavigatorTM images during pulmonary arteriovenous malformation embolisation. VesselNavigatorTM images during pulmonary arteriovenous malformation embolisation. a: Segmentation of cardiac and vascular structures and selection of vessels for embolisation (Patient #9). b: Limited segmentation of selected vessels. c: Using live fusion guidance, a 4Fr Glide catheter is fed into the previously identified pulmonary arteriovenous malformation (right lower lobe pulmonary arteriovenous malformation in patient #8). d and e: Embolisation coils are fed into a previously identified pulmonary arteriovenous malformation(Left lower lobe in patient #8).

Figure 1

Table 1. Patient characteristics