Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7fkt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-23T06:57:37.155Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Estimation of patent ductus arteriosus diameters by colour Doppler echocardiography in children

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  16 July 2010

Hamid Amoozgar ,
Manochehr Soltani  and
Siros Cheriki
Hamid Amoozgar*
Affiliation:
Division of Pediatric Cardiology, Department of Pediatrics, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran
Manochehr Soltani
Affiliation:
Division of Pediatric Cardiology, Department of Pediatrics, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran
Siros Cheriki
Affiliation:
Division of Pediatric Cardiology, Department of Pediatrics, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran
*
Correspondence to: H. Amoozegar, MD, Department of Pediatrics, Nemazee Hospital, Shiraz, Iran. Tel: 0098 711 6474298; Fax:0098 711 6474298; E-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Objective

To investigate whether accurate estimation of the diameter of the patent ductus arteriosus can be obtained by colour Doppler echocardiography.

Methods

The minimum and maximum diameters of the patent ductus arteriosus were measured by colour Doppler echocardiography and compared with its angiographic size.

Results

We studied 40 patients, aged between 4 months and 18 years. The measured pulmonary side diameter in echocardiography was 33.6% larger than that in angiography, and the aortic side was 7.8% smaller. We found a correlation between the measurements of the minimum and maximum size of the patent ductus arteriosus (r = 48.8 and 52.6) by colour Doppler echocardiography and angiographic findings, respectively.

Conclusion

Colour Doppler echocardiography significantly overestimates the minimum size of the patent ductus arteriosus; therefore, reconsideration of the respective size is suggested.

Keywords

Angiographycongenital cardiac diseasecolour Dopplerductus arteriosussize estimation
Type
Original Articles
Information
Cardiology in the Young , Volume 20 , Issue 6 , December 2010 , pp. 648 - 653
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2010

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Moore, JW, George, L, Kirkpatrick, SE, et al. . Percutaneous closure of the small patent ductus arteriosus using occluding spring coils. J Am Coll Cardiol 1994; 23: 759–765.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
2. Rao, PS. Coil occlusion of patent ductus arteriosus. J Invasive cardiol 2001; 13: 36–38.Google ScholarPubMed
3. Atiq, M, Aslam, N, Kazmi, KA. Transcatheter closure of small to large patent ductus arteriosus with different devices: queries and challenges. J Invasive cardiol 2007; 19: 295–298.Google ScholarPubMed
4. Lin, CC, Hsieh, KS, Huang, TC. Closure of large patent ductus arteriosus in infants. Am J Cardiol 2009; 103: 857–861.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
5. Santoro, G, Gaio, G, Carrozza, M, Palladino, MT, Russo, MG, Calabro, R. Large patent ductus arteriosus closure with multiple controlled-release coils. Int J of Cardiol 2007; 116: 425–426.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
6. Wong, JA, Shim, D, Khoury, PR, Meyer, R. Validation of color Doppler measurements of minimum patent ductus significance for coil embolization. Am Heart J 1988; 136: 714–717.Google Scholar
7. Nakajima, T, Ogawa, M, Sano, T, Matsushita, T, Kayatani, F, Yabbuchi, H. Doppler echocardiographic estimation of pressured gradients. Pediatr Cardiol Cardiac Surg 1990; 5: 373–383.Google Scholar
8. Turner, DR, Forbes, TJ, Epstein, ML, Wincent, JA. Early reopening and recanalization after successful coil occlusion of the patent ductus arteriosus. Am Heart J 2002; 143: 889–893.Google Scholar
9. Torres, A, Srivastava, S, Parness, I, Bridges, ND. Echocardiography predictors of failure in patients undergoing coil occlusion of patent ductus arteriosus. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 2003; 16: 1063–1067.Google Scholar
10. Ewert, P. Challenges encountered during closure of patent ductus arteriosus. Pediatr Cardiol 2005; 26: 224–229.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
11. Hijazi, ZM, Geggle, RL. Results of antegrade transcatheter closure of patent ductus arteriosus using single or multiple Gianturco coils immediate and short term results. Am J Cardiol 1994; 74: 925–929.Google Scholar
12. Shcneider, M, Hildebrandt, N, Schweigl, T, Wehner, M. Transthoracic echocardiographic measurement of patent ductus arteriosus in dogs. J Vet Intern Med 2007; 21: 251–257.Google Scholar
13. Azhar, AS, Abd El-Azim, AA, Habib, HS. Transcatheter closure of patent ductus arteriosus: Evaluating the effect curve on the outcome. Ann Pediatr Cardiol 2009; 2: 36–40.Google Scholar
14. Bland, JM, Altman, DG. Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. Lancet 1986; 1: 307–310.Google Scholar
15. Sahn, DJ, Allen, HD. Real-time cross-sectional echocardiographic imaging and measurement of the patent ductus arteriosus in infants and children. Circulation 1978; 58: 343–354.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
16. Ramaciotti, C, Lemler, MS, Moake, L, Zellers, TM. Comprehensive assessment of patient ductus arteriosus by echocardiography before transcatheter closure. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 2002; 15: 1154–1159.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
17. Hiraishi, S, Horiguchi, Y, Fujino, N. Two-dimentional and Doppler echocardiographic assessment of variably shaped ductus arteriosus by the parasternal approach. Pediatr Cardiol 1991; 12: 6–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar