Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-94fs2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-05T10:59:17.520Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The different surgical impact of the superior cavoatrial incision in children and adults

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 December 2020

Lamia Ait-Ali ,
Antonio Ravaglioli Open the ORCID record for Antonio Ravaglioli [Opens in a new window] ,
Pierluigi Festa ,
Alessandro Tamburrini ,
Chiara Marrone ,
Magdalena Cuman ,
Cecilia Farnetani ,
Vitali Pak ,
Mario Chiavarelli  and
Duccio Federici
Lamia Ait-Ali
Affiliation:
Department of cardiology, Institute of Clinical Physiology, CNR, Massa, Italy
Antonio Ravaglioli*
Affiliation:
Division of Pediatric Cardiac Surgery, Department of cardiac surgery, Fondazione G. Monasterio, Massa, Italy
Pierluigi Festa
Affiliation:
Division of Pediatric Cardiology, Department of cardiology, Fondazione G. Monasterio, Massa, Italy
Alessandro Tamburrini
Affiliation:
Division of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Department of cardiac surgery, UHS, Southampton, UK
Chiara Marrone
Affiliation:
Division of Pediatric Cardiology, Department of cardiology, Fondazione G. Monasterio, Massa, Italy
Magdalena Cuman
Affiliation:
Division of Pediatric Cardiology, Department of cardiology, Fondazione G. Monasterio, Massa, Italy
Cecilia Farnetani
Affiliation:
Division of Cardiac Surgery, Department of cardiac surgery, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Senese, Siena, Italy
Vitali Pak
Affiliation:
Division of Pediatric Cardiac Surgery, Department of cardiac surgery, Fondazione G. Monasterio, Massa, Italy
Mario Chiavarelli
Affiliation:
Division of Cardiac Surgery, Department of cardiac surgery, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Senese, Siena, Italy
Duccio Federici
Affiliation:
Division of Pediatric Cardiac Surgery, Department of cardiac surgery, Fondazione G. Monasterio, Massa, Italy
*
Author for correspondence: Antonio Ravaglioli, Division of Pediatric Cardiac Surgery, Department of cardiac surgery, Fondazione Toscana Gabriele Monasterio, Via Aurelia Sud, 54100, Massa, Italy. Tel: +39 3713921328; Fax: 0585 483524. E-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Introduction:

The single- and double-patch repairs are undoubtedly the most commonly used techniques for the surgical management of partial anomalous pulmonary venous connection associated with sinus venosus atrial septal defect. The aim of this study was to retrospectively compare early and long-term surgical outcomes in paediatric and adult patients, focusing in particular on the occurrence of ectopic atrial rhythm.

Material and methods:

Seventy patients (male: 38, 54.2%) underwent surgical repair for partial anomalous pulmonary venous connection with sinus venosus atrial septal defect. Forty-nine patients (70%) underwent surgical repair in paediatric age (<16 years old), while 21 of (30%) patients were operated in adulthood. Thirty patients (42.8%) underwent single-patch repair and 39 patients (55.7%) underwent double-patch repair. In only one patient, the Warden procedure was performed (1.4%). Median follow-up time was 52 months (IQ 15.1–113).

Results:

The type of surgical technique didn’t affect the incidence of ectopic atrial rhythm (26.6% in single-patch group and 25.6% in double-patch groups, p = 0.9). At long-term follow-up, ectopic atrial rhythm, as an expression of sinoatrial node disturbance, was however significantly more frequent in the paediatric population (28.8% paediatric group and 4.7% adult group, p = 0.02).

Conclusions:

The higher incidence of ectopic atrial rhythm in children is probably related to the closer position of the sinus node to the superior cavoatrial incision, which makes irreversible iatrogenic traumatism more likely to occur. Surgical techniques that avoid any manipulation on the superior cavoatrial junction should, therefore, be preferred for children undergoing partial anomalous pulmonary venous connection repair.

Keywords

Double-patch repairpartial anomalous pulmonary venous connection repairectopic atrial rhythmpaediatric population
Type
Original Article
Information
Cardiology in the Young , Volume 31 , Issue 5 , May 2021 , pp. 751 - 755
Check for updates
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2020. Published by Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

Lamia Ait Ali and Antonio Ravaglioli contributed equally to this work.

References

DeLeon, SY, Freeman, JE, Ilbawi, MN, et al. Surgical techniques in partial anomalous pulmonary veins to the superior vena cava. Ann Thorac Surg 1993; 55: 1222–1226.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Aboukhoudir, F, Aboukhoudir, I, Pansieri, M, Khennine, B, Hirsch, JL, Rekik, S. Partial anomalous pulmonary venous return in a 64-year-old woman. Ann Cardiol Angiol (Paris) 2015; 64: 394–398.10.1016/j.ancard.2015.09.033CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kim, C, Cho, YH, Lee, M, et al. Surgery for partial anomalous pulmonary venous connection: modification of the Warden procedure with a right atrial appendage flap. Korean J Throrac Cardiovasc Surg 2014; 47: 94–99.10.5090/kjtcs.2014.47.2.94CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Aguilar Jiménez, JM, Torres, EG, Arlati, F, Comas, J, Illas, JV. Unnoticed bilateral partial pulmonary vein connection. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2015; 149: e40–e42.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Szychta, W, Cerin, G, Popa, BA, et al. Atypical abnormal pulmonary vein drainage with atrial septal defect: surgical treatment. Echocardiography 2015; 32: 1040–1043.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Iyer, AP, Somanrema, K, Pathak, S, Manjiunath, PY, Pradhan, S, Krishman, S. Comparative study of single- and double-patch techniques for sinus venous atrial septal defect with partial anomalous pulmonary venous connection. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2007; 133: 656–659.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Van De Woestijne, PC, Verberkmoes, N, Bogers, AJ. Partial anomalous pulmonary venus connection (including scimitar syndrome). Multimed Man Cardiothorac Surg 2013; 2013: mmt001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kottayl, BP, Dharan, BS, Menon, S, et al. Anomalous pulmonary venous connection to superior vena cava: warden technique. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2011; 39: 388–391.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gustafson, RA. Cavo-atrial anastomosis technique for partial anomalous pulmonary venous connection to the superior vena cava: the Warden procedure. Oper Tech Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2006; 11: 22–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hongu, H, Yamagishi, M, Maeda, Y, et al. Double-decker repair for partial anomalous pulmonary venous return into the superior vena cava. J Thorac cardiovasc Surg 2019; 157: 1970–1977.10.1016/j.jtcvs.2019.01.057CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Okonta, KE, Agarwal, V. Does Warden procedure reduce sinus node dysfunction after surgery for partial anomalous pulmonary venous connection? Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg 2012; 14: 839–842.10.1093/icvts/ivs038CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Said, SM, Burkhart, HK, Schaff, HV, et al. Single-patch, 2-patch and caval division techniques for repair of partial anomalous pulmonary venous connection: does it matter? J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2012; 143: 896–903.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Stewart, RD, Baillard, F, Kelle, AM, Backer, CL, Young, L, Mavroudis, C. Evolving surgical strategy for sinus venous atrial septal defect: effect on sinus node function and late venous obstruction. Ann Thorac Surg 2007; 84: 1651–1655.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jashinski, C, Cussig, C, Fonseca, E, Brukner, T, Kark, M, Loukanov, T. A wide comparison of techniques for repair of PAPVC: one institution’s 20-year experience. Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2020; 68: 15–23.Google Scholar
Lin, H, Yan, J, Wang, Q, et al. Outcome of the Warden procedure for partial anomalous pulmonary venous drainage. Pediatr Cardiol 2020; 41: 134–140.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Buz, S, Alexi-Meskishvili, V, Villavivencio-Lorini, F, et al. Analysis of arrhythmias after correction of partial anomalous pulmonary venous connection. Ann Thorac Surg 2009; 87: 580–583.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed