No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
Commentary on the required skills for ambulatory cardiac care in the young: is training necessary?*
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 16 December 2015
Abstract
Extensive supplemental training exists for many subspecialty disciplines within fellowship training for paediatric cardiology in the United States of America. These disciplines, or domains, such as echocardiography, cardiac intensive care, interventional cardiology, and electrophysiology, allow for initial exposure and training during the basic 3 years of fellowship, plus mandate a 4th year of advanced training; however, ambulatory cardiology has no in-depth or additional training beyond the basic clinical exposure during fellowship training. Ambulatory cardiology is not included in the recommended scheduling of the various domains of cardiology training. This document reviews the reasons to consider augmenting the depth and breadth of training in ambulatory paediatric cardiology.
- Type
- Original Articles
- Information
- Copyright
- © Cambridge University Press 2015
Footnotes
*
Presented at the Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia Cardiology 2015: 18th Annual Update on Pediatric and Congenital Cardiovascular Disease: “Challenges and Dilemmas”, Scottsdale, Arizona, United States of America, Wednesday February 11, 2015 – Sunday, February 15, 2015.
References
1.Graham, TP, Beekman, RH. ACCF/AHA/AAP Recommendations for Training in Pediatric Cardiology: A report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association/American College of Physicians task force on clinical competence (ACC/AHA/AAP writing committee to develop training recommendations for pediatric cardiology). J Am Coll Cardiol 2005; 46: 1378–1403.Google Scholar
2.Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education. Report of the ACGME Work Group on Resident Duty Hours. Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education, Chicago, Illinois, 2002.Google Scholar
3.The ACGME. Duty Hour Standards. Enhancing quality of care, supervision, and resident professional development, 2011. Retrieved February 12, 2015, from http://www.acgme.org/acgmeweb/Portals/0/PDFs/jgme-monograph[1].pdf.Google Scholar
4.Frias, PA, Oster, M, Daley, PA, Boris, JR. Outpatient echocardiography in the evaluation of innocent murmurs in children: utilization benchmarking. Cardiol Young 2015; 23: 1–7.Google Scholar
5.Smythe, JF, Teixeira, OH, Vlad, P, Demers, PP, Feldman, W. Initial evaluation of heart murmurs: are laboratory tests necessary? Pediatrics 1990; 86: 497–500.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
6.Swenson, JM, Fischer, DR, Miller, SA, Boyle, GJ, Ettedgui, JA, Beerman, LB. Are chest radiographs and electrocardiograms still valuable in evaluating new pediatric patients with heart murmurs or chest pain? Pediatrics 1997; 99: 1–3.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
7.Newburger, JW, Rosenthal, R, Williams, RG, Fellows, K, Miettinen, OS. Noninvasive tests in the initial evaluation of heart murmurs in children. N Engl J Med 1983; 308: 61–64.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
8.Conn, RD, O’Keefe, JH. Cardiac physical diagnosis in the digital age: an important but increasingly neglected skill (from stethoscopes to microchips). Am J Cardiol 2009; 104: 590–595.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
9.Mangione, S, Nieman, LZ, Gradely, E, Kay, D. The teaching and practice of cardiac auscultation during internal medicine and cardiology training. A nationwide survey. Ann Intern Med 1993; 119: 47–54.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
10.Lewis AB, Martin GR, Bartz PJ, et al. Task Force 1: Pediatric Cardiology Fellowship Training in General Cardiology. J Am Coll Cardiol 2015; 66: 677–686.CrossRefGoogle Scholar