Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-8ctnn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T13:37:33.706Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Cardiac surgery in adults with high-surgical complexity CHD: results of a network collaborative programme

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  29 August 2017

Vered Gilad Open the ORCID record for Vered Gilad [Opens in a new window] ,
Francesco Santoro ,
Elena Ribera ,
Maria G. Calevo ,
Adriano Cipriani ,
Achille Pasquè  and
Sergio L. Chierchia
Vered Gilad*
Affiliation:
Cardiovascular Department, Istituto Clinico Ligure di Alta Specialità (ICLAS), Rapallo, Italy
Francesco Santoro
Affiliation:
Cardiovascular Department, Giannina Gaslini Institute, Genoa, Italy
Elena Ribera
Affiliation:
Cardiovascular Department, Giannina Gaslini Institute, Genoa, Italy
Maria G. Calevo
Affiliation:
UOSD Epidemiology, Biostatistics and Committees, Giannina Gaslini Institute, Genoa, Italy
Adriano Cipriani
Affiliation:
Cardiovascular Department, Istituto Clinico Ligure di Alta Specialità (ICLAS), Rapallo, Italy
Achille Pasquè
Affiliation:
Cardiovascular Department, Istituto Clinico Ligure di Alta Specialità (ICLAS), Rapallo, Italy
Sergio L. Chierchia
Affiliation:
Cardiovascular Department, Istituto Clinico Ligure di Alta Specialità (ICLAS), Rapallo, Italy
*
Correspondence to: V. Gilad, MD, Cardiovascular Department, Istituto Clinico Ligure di Alta Specialità (ICLAS), 11 Federico Sclopis Street, Genoa, 16147, Italy. Tel: +39 338 872 7012; Fax: +39 0185260973; E-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Background

Adults with CHD often exhibit complex cardiac abnormalities, whose management requires specific clinical and surgical expertise. To enable easier access of these patients to highly specialised care, we implemented a collaborative programme that incorporates medical and surgical specialists belonging to both paediatric and adult cardiovascular institutions.

Objectives

The objective of this study was to review the experience gained and to analyse the surgical outcome of major cardiac surgery.

Methods

We retrospectively reviewed all consecutive patients admitted for major cardiac surgery using our network between January, 2010 and December, 2013. Analysis of surgical outcome was performed in patients selected for major cardiac surgery with cardiopulmonary bypass. Early and late outcomes were evaluated.

Results

Out of a total of 433 inward patients, 86 were selected for surgery. The median age was 25.5 years, –64 patients (74.4%) had previously undergone heart surgery, and –55 patients (64%) had been subjected to at least one sternotomy. Abnormalities of the left ventricular and right ventricular outflow tract were the most frequent (37.2% and 30.2%, respectively), and despite high-surgical complexity only one death occurred (in-hospital mortality 1.1%). On a median follow-up time of 4 years no deaths and no heart-failure events have occurred; one patient underwent further cardiac surgery programmed at the time of discharge.

Conclusions

Low mortality and morbidity rates can be obtained in high-surgical complexity adults with CHD populations when paediatric and adult cardiac specialists operate in the same multidisciplinary environment.

Keywords

AdultCHDcardiac surgeryorganisation model
Type
Original Articles
Information
Cardiology in the Young , Volume 28 , Issue 1 , January 2018 , pp. 101 - 107
Check for updates
Copyright
© Cambridge University Press 2017 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Hoffman, JI, Kaplan, S. The incidence of congenital heart disease. J Am Coll Cardiol 2002; 39: 1890–1900.Google Scholar
2. Van Der Linde, D, Konings, EEM, Slager, MA, et al. Birth prevalence of congenital heart disease worldwide: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Am Coll Cardiol 2011; 58: 2241–2247.Google Scholar
3. Webb, G, Mulder, BJ, Aboulhosn, J, et al. The care of adults with congenital heart disease across the globe: current assessment and future perspective. A position statement from the International Society for Adult Congenital Heart Disease (ISACHD). Int J Cardiol 2015; 195: 326–333.Google Scholar
4. Marelli, AJ, Mackie, AS, Ionescu-Ittu, R, Rahme, E, Pilote, L. Congenital heart disease in the general population: changing prevalence and age distribution. Circulation 2007; 115: 163–172.Google Scholar
5. Marelli, AJ, Ionescu-Ittu, R, Mackie, AS, Guo, L, Dendukuri, N, Kaouache, M. Lifetime prevalence of congenital heart disease in the general population from 2000 to 2010. Circulation 2014; 130: 749–756.Google Scholar
6. Van der Bom, T, Mulder, BJ, Meijboom, FJ, et al. Contemporary survival of adults with congenital heart disease. Heart. 2015; 101: 1989–1995.Google Scholar
7. Zomer, AC, Verheugt, CL, Vaartjes, I, et al. Surgery in adults with congenital heart disease. Circulation 2011; 124: 2195–2201.Google Scholar
8. Baumgartner, H, Bonhoeffer, P, De Groot, NM, et al . ESC guidelines for the management of grown-up congenital heart disease (new version 2010). Eur Heart J 2010; 31: 2915–2957.Google ScholarPubMed
9. Baumgartner, H, Budts, W, Chessa, M, et al. Recommendations for organization of care for adults with congenital heart disease and for training in the subspecialty of ‘Grown-up Congenital Heart Disease’ in Europe: a position paper of the Working Group on Grown-up Congenital Heart Disease of the European Society of Cardiology. Eur Heart J 2014; 35: 686–690.Google Scholar
10. Moons, P, Meijboom, FJ, Baumgartner, H, et al. Structure and activities of adult congenital heart disease programmes in Europe. Eur Heart J 2010; 31: 1305–1310.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
11. Giamberti, A, Chessa, M, Abella, R, et al. Morbidity and mortality risk factors in adults with congenital heart disease undergoing cardiac reoperations. Ann Thorac Surg 2009; 88: 1284–1289.Google Scholar
12. Mascio, CE, Pasquali, SK, Jacobs, JP, Jacobs, ML, Austin, EH 3rd. Outcomes in adult congenital heart surgery: analysis of the Society of Thoracic Surgeons database. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2011; 142: 1090–1097.Google Scholar
13. Mylotte, D, Pilote, L, Ionescu-Ittu, R, et al. Specialized adult congenital heart disease care: the impact of policy on mortality. Circulation 2014; 129: 1804–1812.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
14. Lacour-Gayet, F, Clarke, D, Jacobs, J, et al. The Aristotle score: a complexity-adjusted method to evaluate surgical results. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2004; 25: 911–924.Google Scholar
15. Bojan, M, Gerelli, S, Gioanni, S, Pouard, P, Vouhé, P. Comparative study of the Aristotle comprehensive complexity and the risk adjustment in congenital heart surgery scores. Ann Thorac Surg 2011; 92: 949–956.Google Scholar
16. O’Brien, SM, Jacobs, JP, Clarke, DR, et al. Accuracy of the aristotle basic complexity score for classifying the mortality and morbidity potential of congenital heart surgery operations. Ann Thorac Surg 2007; 84: 2027–2037; discussion 2027–2037.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
17. Bojan, M, Gerelli, S, Gioanni, S, Pouard, P, Vouhé, P. The Aristotle comprehensive complexity score predicts mortality and morbidity after congenital heart surgery. Ann Thorac Surg 2011; 91: 1214–1221.Google Scholar
18. Kendal, DG. Rank Correlation Models, 3rd edn. Charles Griffin, London, 1962.Google Scholar
19. Van Gameren, M, Putman, LM, Takkenberg, JJ, Bogers, AJ. Risk stratification for adult congenital heart surgery. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2011; 39: 490–494.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
20. Hörer, J, Vogt, M, Wottke, M, et al. Evaluation of the Aristotle complexity models in adult patients with congenital heart disease. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2013; 43: 128–134.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
21. Srinathan, SK, Bonser, RS, Sethia, B, Thorne, SA, Brawn, WJ, Barron, WJ. Changing practice of cardiac surgery in adult patients with congenital heart disease. Heart 2005; 91: 207–212.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
22. Berdat, PA, Immer, F, Pfammatter, JP, Carrel, T. Reoperations in adults with congenital heart disease: analysis of early outcome. Int J Cardiol 2004; 93: 239–245.Google Scholar
23. Therrien, J, Siu, SC, Harris, L, et al. Impact of pulmonary valve replacement on arrhythmia propensity late after repair of tetralogy of Fallot. Circulation 2001; 103: 2489–2494.Google Scholar
24. Hallbergson, A, Gauvreau, K, Powell, AJ, Geva, T. Right ventricular remodeling after pulmonary valve replacement: early gains, late losses. Ann Thorac Surg 2015; 99: 660–666.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
25. Geva, T. Indications for pulmonary valve replacement in repaired tetralogy of fallot: the quest continues. Circulation 2013; 128: 1855–1857.Google Scholar
26. Karamlou, T, Diggs, BS, Person, T, Ungerleider, RM, Welke, KF. National practice patterns for management of adult congenital heart disease: operation by pediatric heart surgeons decreases in-hospital death. Circulation 2008; 118: 2345–2352.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed