Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-vdxz6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-23T01:38:21.507Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Body mass index and age are associated with ventricular end-diastolic pressure in adults with a Fontan circulation

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  07 October 2021

Mary Howell*
Affiliation:
Division of Pediatric Cardiology, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA
William E. Anderson
Affiliation:
Center for Outcomes Research and Evaluation, Atrium Health, Charlotte, NC, USA
Jorge Alegria
Affiliation:
Sanger Heart and Vascular Institute, Charlotte, NC, USA
Joseph Paolillo
Affiliation:
Sanger Heart and Vascular Institute, Charlotte, NC, USA Levine Children’s Hospital, Charlotte, NC, USA
Matthew C. Schwartz
Affiliation:
Sanger Heart and Vascular Institute, Charlotte, NC, USA Levine Children’s Hospital, Charlotte, NC, USA
*
Author for correspondence: M. Howell, MD, Division of Pediatric Cardiology, University of Utah, 769 E Barrows Ave, Salt Lake City, UT 84106, USA. Tel: (914)414-5883. E-mail: [email protected]

Abstract

Introduction:

Systemic ventricular end-diastolic pressure is an important haemodynamic variable in adult patients with Fontan circulation. Risk factors associated with elevated end-diastolic pressure have not been clearly identified in this population.

Methods:

All patients > 18 years with Fontan circulation who underwent cardiac catheterisation at our centre between 1/08 and 3/19 were included. Relevant patient variables were extracted. Univariate and multivariate general linear models were analysed to identify variables associated with end-diastolic pressure.

Results:

Forty-two patients were included. Median age was 24.0 years (20.9–29.0) with a body mass index of 23.7 kg/m2 (21.5–29.7). 10 (23.8%) patients had a systemic right ventricle. The median (Interquartile range) and mean pulmonary artery pressure were 11.0 mmHg (9.0–12.0) and 16.0 mmHg (13.0–18.0), respectively. On univariate analysis, end-diastolic pressure was positively associated with body mass index (p < 0.01), age > 25 years (p = 0.04), symptoms of heart failure (p < 0.01), systemic ventricular systolic pressure (p = 0.03), pulmonary artery mean pressure (p < 0.01), and taking diuretics (p < 0.01) or sildenafil (p < 0.01). End-diastolic pressure was negatively associated with aortic saturation (p < 0.01). On multivariate analysis, end-diastolic pressure was positively associated with age ≥ 25 years (p < 0.01), and body mass index (p = 0.04).

Conclusions:

In a cohort of adult patients with Fontan circulation undergoing catheterisation, end-diastolic pressure was positively associated with age ≥ 25 years and body mass index on multivariate analysis. Maintaining a healthy body mass index may offer haemodynamic benefit in adults with Fontan physiology.

Type
Original Article
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2021. Published by Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Miranda, WR, Hagler, DJ, Taggart, NW, Borlaug, BA, Connolly, HM, Egbe, AC. Elevated ventricular filling pressures and long-term survival in adults post-Fontan. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 2020; 95: 803809.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Miranda, WR, Borlaug, BA, Hagler, DJ, Connolly, HM, Egbe, AC. Haemodynamic profiles in adult Fontan patients: associated haemodynamics and prognosis. Eur J Heart Fail 2019; 21: 803809.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Harrell, FE Jr. Regression Modeling. Springer International Publishing, Strategies, 2016.Google Scholar
Budts, W, Ravekes, WJ, Danford, DA, Kutty, S. Diastolic heart failure in patients with the Fontan circulation: a review. JAMA Cardiol 2020; 5: 590597.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mori, M, Hebson, C, Shioda, K, et al. Catheter-measured hemodynamics of adult Fontan circulation: associations with adverse event and end-organ dysfunctions. Congenit Heart Dis 2016; 11: 589597.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Innelli, P, Sanchez, R, Marra, F, Esposito, R, Galderisi, M. The impact of aging on left ventricular longitudinal function in healthy subjects: a pulsed tissue Doppler study. Eur J Echocardiogr 2008; 9: 241249.Google ScholarPubMed
Wang, YC, Liang, CS, Gopal, DM, et al. Preclinical systolic and diastolic dysfunctions in metabolically healthy and unhealthy obese individuals. Circ Heart Fail 2015; 8: 897904.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Powell, AW, Wittekind, SG, Alsaied, T, et al. Body composition and exercise performance in youth with a Fontan circulation: a bio-impedance based study. J Am Heart Assoc 2020; 9: e018345.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
OʼByrne, ML, McBride, MG, Paridon, S, Goldmuntz, E. Association of habitual activity and body mass index in survivors of congenital heart surgery: a study of children and adolescents with tetralogy of Fallot, transposition of the great arteries, and Fontan palliation. World J Pediatr Congenit Heart Surg 2018; 9: 177184.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ohuchi, H, Negishi, J, Miike, H, et al. Positive pediatric exercise capacity trajectory predicts better adult Fontan physiology rationale for early establishment of exercise habits. Int J Cardiol 2019; 274: 8087.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wellnitz, K, Harris, IS, Sapru, A, Fineman, JR, Radman, M. Longitudinal development of obesity in the post-Fontan population. Eur J Clin Nutr 2015; 69: 11051108.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gewillig, M, Brown, SC. The Fontan circulation after 45 years: update in physiology. Heart 2016; 102: 10811086.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Schwartz, MC, Karunanandaa, A, Anderson, WE, et al. Identification of patient variables that are associated with ventricular end-diastolic pressure before the bidirectional Glenn operation. Cardiol Young 2021, 17. DOI 10.1017/S1047951121000810.Google ScholarPubMed
Schwartz, MC, Brock, MA, Nykanen, D, DeCampli, W. Risk factors for an elevated ventricular end-diastolic pressure prior to the Fontan operation. Pediatr Cardiol 2018; 39: 315323.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed