Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gbm5v Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-22T23:27:31.826Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Arrhythmias after surgery for complete transposition: Do they matter?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  19 August 2008

John E. Deanfield*
Affiliation:
Thoracic Unit, The Hospital for Sick Children, Great Ormond Street, London
Seamus Cullen
Affiliation:
Thoracic Unit, The Hospital for Sick Children, Great Ormond Street, London
Marc Gewillig
Affiliation:
Thoracic Unit, The Hospital for Sick Children, Great Ormond Street, London
*
Dr. John E. Deanfield Consultant Cardiologist, Thoracic Unit, The Hospital for Sick Children, Great Ormond Street, London WCIN 3JH, United Kingdom

Summary

Concern about long-term complications after intraatrial repair of complete transposition has been used as an argument in favor of “anatomic” repair by the arterial switch operation. Late arrhythmias, including loss of sinus rhythm and the development of supraventricular tachycardias, particularly atrial flutter, are widely reported after intraatrial repair. Despite modifications of technique, the electrophysiologic substrate for arrhythmia results from the extensive atrial surgery required. Arrhythmias occur, even in the “modern surgical era” after both Mustard and Senning operations, are progressive, and appear to be inevitable. The circulation after an intraatrial repair is more vulnerable to the effects of excessive tachycardia, and this may place the patient at risk from sudden cardiac death. Current attempts at individual stratification of risk are disappointing using even aggressive electrophysiologic approaches, and a combined assessment involving hemodynamics is likely to be necessary. The electrophysiologic and arrhythmic consequences of the arterial switch operation have been less extensively researched but, as might be expected, are quite different from those seen after intraatrial repair. The atrial activation sequence is relatively undisturbed, and sinus nodal dysfunction and supraventricular arrhythmia are uncommon. Ventricular extrasystoles are the arrhythmia most consistently found during the short follow-up currently available. In the longer term, myocardial ischemia, hemodynamic disturbances and autonomic imbalance may predispose to late arrhythmia. Current evidence would suggest that the lack of clinically significant arrhythmia and the restoration of the left ventricle to the systemic circulation are significant advantages of the arterial switch operation over intraatrial repair procedures.

Type
Original Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1991

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1.Flinn, CJ, Wolfe, GS, Dick, M, Campbell, RM, Borkat, G, Casta, A, Hordof, AL, Hougen, TJ, Kavey, RE, Kugler, J, Liebman, J, Greenhouse, J, Hees, P. Cardiac rhythm after the Mustard operation for complete TGA. New Eng J Med 1984; 310: 16351638.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2.Gillette, PC, Kugler, JD, Garson, A, Gutgesell, HP, Duff, DF, McNamara, DG. Mechanisms of cardiac arrhythmias after the Mustard operation for TGA. Am J Cardiol 1980; 45: 11251130.Google Scholar
3.Hayes, CJ, Gersony, WM. Arrhythmias after the Mustard operation for TGA: A longterm study. J Am Coll Cardiol 1986; 7: 133137.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
4.Williams, WG, Trusler, GA, Kirklin, JW, Blackstone, EH, Coles, JG, Izukara, T, Freedom, RM. Early and late results of a protocol for simple transposition leading to an atrial switch (Mustard) repair. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1988; 95: 717726.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
5.Southall, DP, Johnston, F, Shinebourne, EA, Johnstone, PGB. 24-hour electrocardiographic study of heart rate and rhythm patterns in population of healthy children. Br Heart J 1981; 45: 281291.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
6.Deanfield, JE, Camm, J, Macartney, F, Cartwright, T, Douglas, J, Drew, J, de Leval, M, Stark, J. Arrhythmia and late mortality after Mustard and Senning operation for transposition of the great arteries: an eight year prospective study. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1988; 96: 569576.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
7.Southall, DP, Keeton, BR, Leanage, R, Lam, L, Joseph, MC, Anderson, RH, Lincoln, CR, Shinebourne, EA. Cardiac rhythm and conduction before and after Mustard's operation for complete TGA. Br Heart J 1980; 32: 2132.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
8.El-Said, GM, Rosenberg, HS, Huilins, CE, Hailman, GL, Cooley, DA, McNamara, DC. Dysrhythmias after Mustard operation for TGA. Am J Cardiol 1972; 30: 526532.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
9.Vetter, VL, Tanner, CS, Horowitz, LN. Electrophysiologic consequences of the Mustard repair of d-transposition of the great arteries. J Am Coil Cardiol 1987; 10: 12651273.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
10.Ullal, RR, Anderson, RH, Lincoln, C. Mustard's operation modified to avoid dysrhythmias and pulmonary and systemic venous obstruction. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1979; 78: 431439.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
11.Scheaut, W, Lin, CY, de la Fuente, D, Arculla, R, Reploglue, R. Avoiding post-operative dysrhythmias and venous obstruction following Mustard's operation. Ann Thorac Surg 1974; 18: 142155.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
12.Byrum, CJ, Bove, EL, Sondheimer, HM, Kavey, REW, Blackman, MS. Hemodynamic and electrophysiologic results of the Senning procedure for TGA. Am J Cardiol 1986; 58: 138142.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
13.Turina, M, Siebenmann, R, Nussbaumer, P, Senning, A. Long-term outlook after atrial correction of transposition of the great arteries. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1988; 95: 828835.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
14.Griffin, M, Cartwright, T, Choi, J, Deanfield, JE. Determinants of cardiac reserve following intra-atrial repair of transposition of the great arteries. Circulation 1987; 7 (Suppl IV): IV 289 (Abstract).Google Scholar
15.Vetter, VL, Tanner, CS. Electrophysiologic consequences of switch repair of d-transposition of the great arteries. J Am Coll Cardiol 1988; 12: 229237.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
16.Martin, RP, Radley-Smith, R, Yacoub, MH. Arrhythmias before and after anatomic correction of transposition of the great arteries. J Am Coll Cardiol 1987; 10: 200204.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
17.Wernovsky, G, Hougen, TJ, Walsh, EP, Sholler, GF, Colan, SD, Sanders, SP, Parness, IA, Keane, JF, Mayer, JE, Jonas, RA, Castañeda, AR, Lang, P. Midterm results after the arterial switch operation for transposition of the great arteries with intact ventricular septum: clinical, hemodynamic, echocardiographic, and electrophysiologic data. Circulation 1988; 77: 13331344.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
18.Sidi, D, Planché, C, Kachanee, J, Brunianx, J, Villain, E, Le Bidois, J, Piechaud, JF, Lacour-Gayet, F. Anatomic correction of simple TGA in 50 neonates. Circulation 1987; 75: 429435.Google Scholar
19.Quaegebeur, JM, Rolmer, J, Ottenkamp, J, Buis, T, Kirklin, JW, Blackstone, EH, Brom, AG. The arterial switch operation: An eight year experience. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1986; 92: 361384.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
20.Vogel, M, Smalihorn, JF, Benson, LN, Gilday, RM, Williams, WG. Assessment of myocardial perfusion during stress and at rest in patients with TGA after arterial repair. Circulation 1987; 76(Suppl IV): IV 265 (Abstract).Google Scholar
21.Paillole, C, Sidi, D, Kachaner, J, Planch, C, Beiot, JP, Villain, E, Lebidois, J, Piechaud, JF, Pedroni, E. Fate of pulmonary artery after anatomic correction of simpie transposition of great arteries in newborn infants. Circulation 1988; 78: 870876.Google Scholar
22.Maeta, GJ, Magiel, NM, Myers, G, Barnett, PS, Schaeed, JW, Weiss, JS, Leisch, M, Singer, DH. Heart rate variability and sudden death secondary to coronary artery disease during ambulatory electrocardiographic monitoring. Am J Cardiol 1987; 60: 8689.Google Scholar
23.Kleiger, RE, Miller, P, Bigger, TJ, Moss, AJ and the Multicenter Post-Infarction Research Group. Decreased heart rate variability and its association with increased mortality after acute myocardiai infarction. Am J Cardiol 1987; 59: 256262.CrossRefGoogle Scholar