Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-vdxz6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-26T15:52:56.512Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The systemic right ventricle in congenitally corrected transposition of the great arteries is different from the right ventricle in dextro-transposition after atrial switch: a cardiac magnetic resonance study

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 June 2012

Matthias Grothoff ,
Antje Fleischer ,
Hashim Abdul-Khaliq ,
Janine Hoffmann ,
Lukas Lehmkuhl ,
Christian Luecke  and
Matthias Gutberlet
Matthias Grothoff*
Affiliation:
Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University of Leipzig – Heart Center, Struempellstr. 39, 04289 Leipzig, Germany
Antje Fleischer
Affiliation:
Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University of Leipzig – Heart Center, Struempellstr. 39, 04289 Leipzig, Germany
Hashim Abdul-Khaliq
Affiliation:
Department of Congenital Heart Disease/Pediatric Cardiology, University Saarland, Kirrberger Str. Gebäude 9, 66421 Homburg/Saar, Germany
Janine Hoffmann
Affiliation:
Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University of Leipzig – Heart Center, Struempellstr. 39, 04289 Leipzig, Germany
Lukas Lehmkuhl
Affiliation:
Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University of Leipzig – Heart Center, Struempellstr. 39, 04289 Leipzig, Germany
Christian Luecke
Affiliation:
Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University of Leipzig – Heart Center, Struempellstr. 39, 04289 Leipzig, Germany
Matthias Gutberlet
Affiliation:
Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University of Leipzig – Heart Center, Struempellstr. 39, 04289 Leipzig, Germany
*
Correspondence to: Dr M. Grothoff, MD, Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University of Leipzig – Heart Center, Struempellstr. 39, 04289 Leipzig, Germany. Tel: +49 341 865 1702; Fax: +49 341 865 1803; E-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Background

Patients with a congenitally corrected transposition of the great arteries show an increasing incidence of cardiac failure with age. In other systemic right ventricles, such as in dextro-transposition after atrial switch, excessive hypertrophy is a potential risk factor for impaired systolic function. In this trial, we sought to compare systemic function and volumes between patients with congenitally corrected transposition and those with dextro-transposition after atrial switch by using cardiac magnetic resonance imaging.

Methods and Results

A total of 19 patients (nine male) with congenitally corrected transposition and 31 patients (21 male) with dextro-transposition after atrial switch were studied using a 1.5-Tesla scanner. Cine steady-state free-precession sequences in standard orientations were acquired for volumetric and functional imaging. Patient parameters were compared with those of a group of 25 healthy volunteers. Although patients with congenitally corrected transposition were older, they presented with higher right ventricular ejection fractions (p = 0.04) compared with patients with dextro-transposition. Patients with congenitally corrected transposition showed a weak negative correlation between age at examination and systemic ejection fraction (r = −0.18, p = 0.04) but no correlation between right ventricular myocardial mass index and ejection fraction. There was no significant difference in the right ventricular end-diastolic volumes between both patient groups.

Conclusion

Although patients with congenitally corrected transposition had a longer pressure load of the systemic right ventricle, ventricular function was better compared with that in patients with dextro-transposition after atrial switch. The results suggest that the systemic ventricles might have partly different physiologies. One difference could be the post-operative situation after atrial switch, which results in impaired atrial contribution to ventricular filling.

Keywords

Congenitally corrected transposition of the great arteriescc-TGAsystemic right ventricleright ventricular failure
Type
Original Article
Information
Cardiology in the Young , Volume 23 , Issue 2 , April 2013 , pp. 239 - 247
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2012 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Connelly, MS, Liu, PP, Williams, WG, Webb, GD, Robertson, P, McLaughlin, PR. Congenitally corrected transposition of the great arteries in the adult: functional status and complications. J Am Coll Cardiol 1996; 27: 1238–1243.Google Scholar
2. Presbitero, P, Somerville, J, Rabajoli, F, Stone, S, Conte, MR. Corrected transposition of the great arteries without associated defects in adult patients: clinical profile and follow up. Br Heart J 1995; 74: 57–59.Google Scholar
3. Rutledge, JM, Nihill, MR, Fraser, CD, Smith, OE, McMahon, CJ, Bezold, LI. Outcome of 121 patients with congenitally corrected transposition of the great arteries. Pediatr Cardiol 2002; 23: 137–145.Google Scholar
4. Graham, TP Jr, Bernard, YD, Mellen, BG, et al. Long-term outcome in congenitally corrected transposition of the great arteries: a multi-institutional study. J Am Coll Cardiol 2000; 36: 255–261.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
5. Voskuil, M, Hazekamp, MG, Kroft, LJ, et al. Postsurgical course of patients with congenitally corrected transposition of the great arteries. Am J Cardiol 1999; 83: 558–562.Google Scholar
6. Beauchesne, LM, Warnes, CA, Connolly, HM, Ammash, NM, Tajik, AJ, Danielson, GK. Outcome of the unoperated adult who presents with congenitally corrected transposition of the great arteries. J Am Coll Cardiol 2002; 40: 285–290.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
7. Dimas, AP, Moodie, DS, Sterba, R, Gill, CC. Long-term function of the morphologic right ventricle in adult patients with corrected transposition of the great arteries. Am Heart J 1989; 118: 526–530.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
8. Prieto, LR, Hordof, AJ, Secic, M, Rosenbaum, MS, Gersony, WM. Progressive tricuspid valve disease in patients with congenitally corrected transposition of the great arteries. Circulation 1998; 98: 997–1005.Google Scholar
9. Van Praagh, R, Papagiannis, J, Grunenfelder, J, Bartram, U, Martanovic, P. Pathologic anatomy of corrected transposition of the great arteries: medical and surgical implications. Am Heart J 1998; 135: 772–785.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
10. Hauser, M, Bengel, FM, Hager, A, et al. Impaired myocardial blood flow and coronary flow reserve of the anatomical right systemic ventricle in patients with congenitally corrected transposition of the great arteries. Heart 2003; 89: 1231–1235.Google Scholar
11. Hornung, TS, Kilner, PJ, Davlouros, PA, Grothues, F, Li, W, Gatzoulis, MA. Excessive right ventricular hypertrophic response in adults with the mustard procedure for transposition of the great arteries. Am J Cardiol 2002; 90: 800–803.Google Scholar
12. Grothoff, M, Spors, B, Abdul-Khaliq, H, et al. Pulmonary regurgitation is a powerful factor influencing QRS duration in patients after surgical repair of tetralogy of Fallot. A magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) study. Clin Res Cardiol 2006; 95: 643–649.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
13. Gutberlet, M, Abdul-Khaliq, H, Grothoff, M, et al. [Evaluation of left ventricular volumes in patients with congenital heart disease and abnormal left ventricular geometry. Comparison of MRI and transthoracic 3-dimensional echocardiography]. Rofo 2003; 175: 942–951.Google Scholar
14. Gutberlet, M, Hoffmann, J, Kunzel, E, et al. [Preoperative and postoperative imaging in patients with transposition of the great arteries]. Radiologe 2011; 51: 15–22.Google Scholar
15. Beerbaum, P, Barth, P, Kropf, S, et al. Cardiac function by MRI in congenital heart disease: impact of consensus training on interinstitutional variance. J Magn Reson Imaging 2009; 30: 956–966.Google Scholar
16. Grothoff, M, Hoffmann, J, Lehmkuhl, L, et al. Time course of right ventricular functional parameters after surgical correction of tetralogy of Fallot determined by cardiac magnetic resonance. Clin Res Cardiol 2011; 100: 343–350.Google Scholar
17. Winter, MM, Bernink, FJ, Groenink, M, et al. Evaluating the systemic right ventricle by CMR: the importance of consistent and reproducible delineation of the cavity. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson 2008; 10: 40.Google Scholar
18. Mosteller, RD. Simplified calculation of body-surface area. N Engl J Med 1987; 317: 1098.Google Scholar
19. Bos, JM, Hagler, DJ, Silvilairat, S, et al. Right ventricular function in asymptomatic individuals with a systemic right ventricle. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 2006; 19: 1033–1037.Google Scholar
20. Warnes, CA. Transposition of the great arteries. Circulation 2006; 114: 2699–2709.Google Scholar
21. Greenbaum, RA, Ho, SY, Gibson, DG, Becker, AE, Anderson, RH. Left ventricular fibre architecture in man. Br Heart J 1981; 45: 248–263.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
22. Ohuchi, H, Beighley, PE, Dong, Y, Zamir, M, Ritman, EL. Microvascular development in porcine right and left ventricular walls. Pediatr Res 2007; 61: 676–680.Google Scholar
23. Derrick, G, Cullen, S. Transposition of the great arteries. Curr Treat Options Cardiovasc Med 2000; 2: 499–506.Google Scholar
24. Tulevski, II, Lee, PL, Groenink, M, et al. Dobutamine-induced increase of right ventricular contractility without increased stroke volume in adolescent patients with transposition of the great arteries: evaluation with magnetic resonance imaging. Int J Card Imaging 2000; 16: 471–478.Google Scholar
25. Babu-Narayan, SV, Goktekin, O, Moon, JC, et al. Late gadolinium enhancement cardiovascular magnetic resonance of the systemic right ventricle in adults with previous atrial redirection surgery for transposition of the great arteries. Circulation 2005; 111: 2091–2098.Google Scholar
26. van der Zedde, J, Oosterhof, T, Tulevski, II, Vliegen, HW, Mulder, BJ. Comparison of segmental and global systemic ventricular function at rest and during dobutamine stress between patients with transposition and congenitally corrected transposition. Cardiol Young 2005; 15: 148–153.Google Scholar
27. Benson, LN, Burns, R, Schwaiger, M, et al. Radionuclide angiographic evaluation of ventricular function in isolated congenitally corrected transposition of the great arteries. Am J Cardiol 1986; 58: 319–324.Google Scholar
28. Giardini, A, Lovato, L, Donti, A, et al. Relation between right ventricular structural alterations and markers of adverse clinical outcome in adults with systemic right ventricle and either congenital complete (after Senning operation) or congenitally corrected transposition of the great arteries. Am J Cardiol 2006; 98: 1277–1282.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
29. Hornung, TS, Bernard, EJ, Jaeggi, ET, Howman-Giles, RB, Celermajer, DS, Hawker, RE. Myocardial perfusion defects and associated systemic ventricular dysfunction in congenitally corrected transposition of the great arteries. Heart 1998; 80: 322–326.Google Scholar
30. Sedmera, D. Form follows function: developmental and physiological view on ventricular myocardial architecture. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2005; 28: 526–528.Google Scholar
31. Sedmera, D, McQuinn, T. Embryogenesis of the heart muscle. Heart Fail Clin 2008; 4: 235–245.Google Scholar
32. Tseng, WY, Wedeen, VJ, Reese, TG, Smith, RN, Halpern, EF. Diffusion tensor MRI of myocardial fibers and sheets: correspondence with visible cut-face texture. J Magn Reson Imaging 2003; 17: 31–42.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed