Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-v9fdk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-17T14:08:58.038Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Segregating bodily isomerism or heterotaxy: potential echocardiographic correlations of morphological findings

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 April 2017

Cornelia Tremblay ,
Rohit S. Loomba ,
Peter C. Frommelt ,
Donald Perrin ,
Diane E. Spicer ,
Carl Backer  and
Robert H. Anderson
Cornelia Tremblay
Affiliation:
Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
Rohit S. Loomba*
Affiliation:
Children’s Hospital of Wisconsin, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, Wisconsin, United States of America
Peter C. Frommelt
Affiliation:
Children’s Hospital of Wisconsin, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, Wisconsin, United States of America
Donald Perrin
Affiliation:
Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
Diane E. Spicer
Affiliation:
Department of Pediatric Cardiology, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida, United States of America Johns Hopkins All Children’s Heart Institute, St. Petersburg, Florida, United States of America
Carl Backer
Affiliation:
Ann & Robert H. Lurie Children’s Hospital, Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, Illinois, United States of America
Robert H. Anderson
Affiliation:
Institute of Genetic Medicine, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, United Kingdom
*
Correspondence to: R. S. Loomba, Department of Cardiology, Children’s Hospital of Wisconsin, 9000 Wisconsin Avenue, Milwaukee, WI 53226, United States of America. Tel: 414-266-2082; Fax: 414-266-2000; E-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Background

Bodily isomerism, also referred to as heterotaxy, involves predominantly the thoracic organs, although other organs are usually abnormally positioned. Previously assessed on the basis of splenic anatomy, it is now understood that isomerism is better segregated on the basis of atrial appendage morphology. This allows for anticipation of associated findings. We aimed to assess the accuracy of segregation based on the morphology of the atrial appendages and other structures more easily identified by echocardiography.

Methods

We reviewed postmortem specimens of hearts from the archives at four institutions categorised as obtained from patients with “heterotaxy”. The cardiac structures were analysed using sequential segmental analysis. Non-cardiac structures were also examined if available. Statistical analyses were performed to compare differences in the settings of right as opposed to left isomerism.

Results

Specimens were available from 188 patients. Of these, 57 had left isomerism, and 131 had right isomerism. Atrial appendages were isomeric in all patients. A coronary sinus was found only in left isomerism, whereas a terminal crest, or a Eustachian valve, was found only in right isomerism. Interruption of the inferior caval vein was associated with left isomerism, whereas totally anomalous pulmonary venous connection was associated with right isomerism.

Conclusion

Isomerism is uniformly segregated on the basis of the morphology of the atrial appendages, itself defined by the extent of the pectinate muscles. Other features such as the presence of a coronary sinus and systemic venous return can further help with such segregation of isomerism.

Keywords

Heterotaxyisomerismechocardiographycoronary sinusatrial appendages
Type
Original Articles
Information
Cardiology in the Young , Volume 27 , Issue 8 , October 2017 , pp. 1470 - 1480
Check for updates
Copyright
© Cambridge University Press 2017 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

*

Cornelia Tremblay and Rohit S. Loomba are both first authors on this review with a shared first co-authorship.

References

1. Jacobs, JP, Anderson, RH, Weinberg, PM, et al. The nomenclature, definition and classification of cardiac structures in the setting of heterotaxy. Cardiol Young 2007; 17 (Suppl 2): 1–28.Google Scholar
2. Loomba, RS, Hlavacek, AM, Spicer, DE, Anderson, RH. Isomerism or heterotaxy: which term leads to better understanding? Cardiol Young 2015; 25: 1–7.Google Scholar
3. Ivemark, BI. Implications of agenesis of the spleen on the pathogenesis of conotruncus anomalies in childhood; an analysis of the heart malformations in the splenic agenesis syndrome, with fourteen new cases. Acta Paediatr Suppl 1955; 44: 7–110.Google Scholar
4. Van Mierop, L, Gessner, I, Schliebler, G. Asplenia and polysplenia syndrome. Birth Defects 1972; 1: 74–82.Google Scholar
5. Van Praagh, R, Van Praagh, S. Atrial isomerism in the heterotaxy syndromes with asplenia, or polysplenia, or normally formed spleen: an erroneous concept. Am J Cardiol 1990; 66: 1504–1506.Google Scholar
6. Uemura, H, Ho, SY, Devine, WA, Kilpatrick, LL, Anderson, RH. Atrial appendages and venoatrial connections in hearts from patients with visceral heterotaxy. Ann Thorac Surg 1995; 60: 561–569.Google Scholar
7. Loomba, RS, Pelech, AN, Shah, PH, Anderson, RH. Determining bronchial morphology for the purposes of segregating so-called heterotaxy. Cardiol Young 2015; 26: 1–13.Google ScholarPubMed
8. Loomba, R, Shah, PH, Anderson, RH. Fetal magnetic resonance imaging of malformations associated with heterotaxy. Cureus 2015; 7: e269.Google Scholar
9. Loomba, RS. Importance of appropriate, detailed description in the setting of isomerism. Radiographics 2016; 36: 940–941.Google Scholar
10. Loomba, RS, Shah, PH, Anderson, RH. Radiologic considerations in heterotaxy: the need for detailed anatomic evaluation. Cureus 2016; 8: 1–12.Google Scholar
11. Nagel, BH, Williams, H, Stewart, L, Paul, J, Stumper, O. Splenic state in surviving patients with visceral heterotaxy. Cardiol Young 2005; 15: 469–473.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
12. Loomba, RS, Willes, RJ, Kovach, JR, Anderson, RH. Chronic arrhythmias in the setting of heterotaxy: differences between right and left isomerism. Congenit Heart Dis 2015; 11: 7–18.Google Scholar
13. Loomba, RS, Aggarwal, S, Gupta, N, et al. Arrhythmias in adult congenital patients with bodily isomerism. Pediatr Cardiol 2015; 36: 330–337.Google Scholar
14. Smith, A, Ho, SY, Anderson, RH, et al. The diverse cardiac morphology seen in hearts with isomerism of the atrial appendages with reference to the disposition of the specialised conduction system. Cardiol Young 2006; 16: 437–454.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
15. Teele, SA, Jacobs, JP, Border, WL, Chanani, NK. Heterotaxy syndrome: proceedings from the 10th international PCICS meeting. W J Pediatr Congenit Heart Surg 2015; 6: 616–629.Google Scholar
16. Loomba, RS, Ahmed, MM, Spicer, DE, Backer, CL, Anderson, RH. Manifestations of bodily isomerism. Cardiovasc Pathol, 2016; 25: 173–180.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
17. Anderson, RH, Becker, AE, Freedom, RM, et al. Sequential segmental analysis of congenital heart disease. Pediatr Cardiol 1984; 5: 281–287.Google Scholar
18. Anderson, RH, Shirali, G. Sequential segmental analysis. Ann Pediatr Cardiol 2009; 2: 24–35.Google Scholar
19. Laux, D, Houyel, L, Bajolle, F, Raimondi, F, Boudjemline, Y, Bonnet, D. Problems in the diagnosis of discordant atrioventricular with concordant ventriculo-arterial connections: anatomical considerations, surgical management, and long-term outcome. Cardiol Young 2016; 26: 127–138.Google Scholar
20. Eidem, BW, Cetta, F, O’Leary, PW. Echocardiography in Pediatric and Adult Congenital Heart Disease. Wolters Kluwer Health/Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Philadelphia, 2010.Google Scholar