Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-g8jcs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-26T10:18:49.288Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Outcome of, and risk factors for, second degree atrioventricular block in children

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  19 August 2008

Elizabeth Villain ,
Damien Bonnet ,
Conceicão Trigo ,
Laurence Iserin ,
Daniel Sidi  and
Jean Kachaner
Elizabeth Villain*
Affiliation:
From the Service de Cardiologie Pédiatrique, Hôpital Necker/Enfants-Malades, Paris
Damien Bonnet
Affiliation:
From the Service de Cardiologie Pédiatrique, Hôpital Necker/Enfants-Malades, Paris
Conceicão Trigo
Affiliation:
From the Service de Cardiologie Pédiatrique, Hôpital Necker/Enfants-Malades, Paris
Laurence Iserin
Affiliation:
From the Service de Cardiologie Pédiatrique, Hôpital Necker/Enfants-Malades, Paris
Daniel Sidi
Affiliation:
From the Service de Cardiologie Pédiatrique, Hôpital Necker/Enfants-Malades, Paris
Jean Kachaner
Affiliation:
From the Service de Cardiologie Pédiatrique, Hôpital Necker/Enfants-Malades, Paris
*
Dr. Elizabeth Villain, Service de Cardiologie Pédiatrique, Hôpital Necker/Enfants-malades, 149 Rue de Sévres, 75743 Paris cedex 15, France. Tel. 1 44 49 43 51; Fax. 1 44 49 43 40.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Second degree atrioventricular block is uncommon in children. In order to evaluate its outcome, and to find early prognostic factors, we reviewed the history and evolution of 21 children with this arrhythmia discovered on their surface electrocardiogram. Twenty-four-hour monitoring displayed variations in the conduction patterns in almost all children, from long PR interval to complete heart block alternating in the same patient. At follow-up (nine months to 19 years), 13 children (62%) had received implantation of a pacemaker because of progression either to complete atrioventricular block or to severe ventricular bradycardia. Atrioventricular conduction improved on exercise in 11 children, but this did not predict a favorable outcome since four of them required pacing. In contrast, deterioration during sinus acceleration in four patients predicted further aggravation. A supra-Hisian location of the block did not protect against the occurrence of syncope in the two patients who underwent His recordings. Finally, the outcome was not linked to age at diagnosis. Second degree atrioventricular block, therefore, should be considered a serious disease because of its trend to worsen towards complete block and/or severe complications. Close follow-up, including repeated 24-hour monitoring, is the most effective way to unmask such a progression and to avoid its clinical consequences.

Keywords

Congenital heart blocksecond degreebradycardiapacemaker
Type
Original Manuscripts
Information
Cardiology in the Young , Volume 6 , Issue 4 , October 1996 , pp. 315 - 319
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1996

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1.Meytes, I, Kaplinsky, E, Yahini, J, Hanne-Paparo, N, Neufeld, HN. Wenckebach A-V block: a frequent feature following heavy physical training. Am Heart J 1975; 90: 426–430.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2.Dreifus, LS, Fisch, C, Griffin, JC, Gillette, PC, Mason, JW, Parsonnet, V. Guidelines for implantation of cardiac pacemakers and antiarrhythmia devices. J Am Coll Cardiol 1991; 18: 1–13.Google ScholarPubMed
3.Southall, DP, Johnston, F, Shinebourne, EA, Johnston, PGB. 24-hour electrocardiographic study of heart rate and rhythm patterns in a population of healthy children. Br Heart J 1981; 45:281–291.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
4.Scott, O, William, GJ, Fiddler, GI. Results of 24-hour ambulatory monitoring of electrocardiogram in 131 healthy boys aged 10 to 13 years. Br Heart J 1980; 44: 304–308.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
5.Gegel, RG, Tucker, L, Szer, I. Postnatal progression from second to third degree heart block in neonatal lupus syndrome. J Pediatr 1988; 113: 1049–1052.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
6.Frohn-Mulder, IM, Meilof, JF, Szatmari, A, Stewart, PA, Swaak, TJ, Hoss, J. Clinical significance of maternal anti-Ro/SS-A antibodies in children with isolated heart block. J Am Coll Cardiol 1994; 23: 1677–1681.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
7.Mahoney, LT, Marwin, WJ, Atkins, DL, Clark, EB, Lauer, RM. Pacemaker management for acute onset of heart block in childhood. J Pediatr 1985; 107: 207–211.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
8.Lightfoot, PR, Sesse, L, Mandel, WJ, Hayakawa, H. His bundle electrograms in healthy adolescents with persistent second degree A-V block. Chest 1973; 63: 358–362.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
9.Levy, S, Danis, C, Broustet, IP, Clementy, J, Blanc, M, Gérard, R, Bricaud, H. Blocs auriculo-ventriculaires idiopathiques du sujet jeune. Intéret de l'épreuve d'effort et de l'épreuve à l'atropine pour la localisation du trouble conductif. Arch Mal Coeur 1982; 75: 11–20.Google Scholar
10.Kelly, DT, Brodsky, SJ, Krovetz, LJ. Mobitz II atrioventricular block in children. J Pediatr 1971; 79: 972–976.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
11.Gray, R, Kaushik, VS, Mandel, WJ. Wenckebach phenomenon occurring in the distal conducting system in a young adult. Br Heart J 1976; 38: 204–206.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
12.Young, D, Eisenberg, R, Fish, B, Fisher, JD. Wenckebach atrioventricular block (Mobitz type I) in children and adolescents. Am J Cardiol 1977; 40: 393–399.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed