Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-m6dg7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-19T22:06:57.038Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Novice experience with transcatheter closure of the arterial duct in children, adolescents and adults

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  19 August 2008

Omar Galal ,
Neil Wilson ,
Fadel Al Fadley  and
Carlos Duran
Omar Galal*
Affiliation:
King Faisal Specialist Hospital and Research Centre, Riyadh
Neil Wilson
Affiliation:
King Faisal Specialist Hospital and Research Centre, Riyadh
Fadel Al Fadley
Affiliation:
King Faisal Specialist Hospital and Research Centre, Riyadh
Carlos Duran
Affiliation:
King Faisal Specialist Hospital and Research Centre, Riyadh
*
Dr. Omar Galal, MBC 16King Faisal Specialist Hospital, P0 Box 3354, Riyadh 11211, Saudi Arabia. Tel. 966 1 442 7470; Fax. 966 1 442 7482.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Non-surgical occlusion of the arterial duct (ductus arteriosus) has been shown to be effective. Its limitations are yet to be fully defined. We have attempted to elucidate this issue in the setting of our early experience with the procedure, utilizing the Rashkind double disc occluder. After clinical and echocardiographic evaluation, 56 consecutive patients were studied invasively. In two patients, the patent duct was considered too large for occlusion and in one patient it could not be crossed with the diagnostic catheter. In the remaining 53 patients (95%), an attempt to implant the double disc occluder was made. The mean age of all patients was 7.9 years (range 0.16 year to 29 years). There were 35 females (63%) and 21 males. The mean weight was 24.2 kg (range 6.7 kg–85 kg). In five patients (9.5%), the procedure failed. This was due to pull through of the 17 mm device in three patients. In another patient, because of a very small duct (post surgical ligation), it was not possible to deliver the distal legs of the 12mm device. In the last patient, the device embolized to the left pulmonary artery and was retrieved to the groin. Subsequent replacement was not attempted. In 48/53 patients (90.5%) the device was successfully implanted. Nine cases of the 48 in whom the device was implanted (18.8%) showed complete occlusion at 10 minutes and 22 more (45.8%) five to 24 hours after the procedure. A total of3 1/48 patients (64.5%) were discharged home the day following the procedure with no residual shunt, as judged by color flow Doppler studies. The mean duration of the procedure in all patients was 94 minutes (range 47 to 244). The fluoroscopy time ranged from 3 to 81 minutes with a mean of 17 minutes. Follow-up data (between five days and 18 months) are available in 20/48 patients. Three patients had a clinically detectable residual shunt, with an audible continuous murmur six months after the procedure. All three have undergone complete occlusion using a second device. One more patient showed spontaneous occlusion on follow-up. So far, a total of 35/48 patients (72.9%) have had complete occlusion of the patent duct. We conclude that not all patients with an arterial duct are amenable to occlusion using the Rashkind device. The procedure appears to be safe when performed by a suitably trained novice, nonetheless, and successful implantation can be achieved in over 90% of patients.

Keywords

Patent ductus arteriosuschildrendouble disc umbrella occluder
Type
Original Articles
Information
Cardiology in the Young , Volume 2 , Issue 3 , July 1992 , pp. 285 - 290
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1992

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Gross, RE, Hubbard, JP. Surgical ligation of a patent ductus arteriosus. Report of first successful case. J Am Med Assoc 1939; 112: 729–735.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2. Porstmann, W, Wierny, L, Warnke, H, Gerstberger, G, Romaniuk, PA. Catheter closure of patent ductus arteriosus, 62 cases treated without thoracotomy. Radiol Clin North Am 1971; 9: 203–218.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
3. Rashkind, WJ, Cuaso, CC. Transcatheter closure of patent ductus arteriosus. Pediatr Cardiol 1979; 1: 63–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
4. Bash, SE, Mullins, CE. Insertion of patent ductus arteriosus occluder by transvenous approach: A new technique. Circulation 1984; 70 (Suppl II): II 285.Google Scholar
5. Ali Khan, MA, Mullins, CE, Nihill, MR. Percutaneous catheter closure of the ductus arteriosus in children and young adults. Am J Cardiol 1989; 64: 218–221.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
6. Rashkind, WJ, Mullins, CE, Hellenbrand, WE, Tait, MA. Non surgical closure of patent ductus arteriosus: clinical application of the Rashkind occiuder system. Circulation 1987; 75: 583–592.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
7. Dyck, JD, Benson, LN, Smallhorn, JF, McLaughlin, PR, Freedom, RM, Rowe, RM. Catheter occlusion of the persistently patent ductus arteriosus. Am J Cardiol 1988; 62: 1089–1092.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
8. Rey, C, Piechaud, JF, Bourlon, F. Fermeture du canal arteriel par voie endoluminale. Arch Mal Coeur 1990; 83: 615–619.Google Scholar
9. Swensson, RE, Valdés-Cruz, LM, Sahn, DJ. Real time Doppler color flow mapping for detection of patent ductus arteriosus. J Am Coll Cardiol 1986; 8: 1105–1112.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
10. Pui-Kan, L, Wen-Jen, S, Jui-Sung, H. Doppler echocardiographic flow characteristics of isolated ductus arteriosus: better delineation by color flow mapping. J Am Coll Cardiol 1988; 12: 1285–1291.Google Scholar
11. Wessel, DL, Keane, JF, Parness, I, Lock, JE. Outpatient closure of the patent ductus arteriosus. Circulation 1988; 77: 1068–1071.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
12. Vitiello, R, Benson, L, Musewe, N, Freedom, R. Factors influencing the persistence ofshunting within 24 hours of catheter occlusion of the ductus arteriosus. Br Heart J 1991; 65: 211–212.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
13. Hellenbrand, WE, Mullins, CE. Catheter closure of congenital cardiac defects. Cardiol Clin 1989; 7: 351–368.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
14. Lock, JE, Bass, JL, Lund, G, Rysavy, JA, Lucas, RV JrTranscatheter closure of patent ductus arteriosus in piglets. Am J Cardiol 1985; 55: 826–829.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
15. Jones, JC. Twenty-five years experience with the surgery of patent ductus arteriosus. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1965; 50: 149–165.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed