Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dk4vv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T14:44:03.804Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Infective endocarditis on an occluder closing an atrial septal defect

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  19 August 2008

A. M. Bullock
Affiliation:
Department of Cardiology, Royal Children’s Hospital, Melbourne, Australia
S. Menahem*
Affiliation:
Department of Cardiology, Royal Children’s Hospital, Melbourne, Australia
J. L. Wilkinson
Affiliation:
Department of Cardiology, Royal Children’s Hospital, Melbourne, Australia
*
Prof. S. Menahem, Department of Cardiology, Royal Children's Hospital, Flemington Road, Parkville, Victoria, 3056, Australia. Tel: 613 9345 5718; Fax: 613 9345 6001

Abstract

Closure of atrial septal defects be means of intravenous catheterisation has been undertaken using a variety of devices as an alternative to surgical closure.1–5 We describe the first case, to the best of our knowledge, of infective endocarditis complicating a successful transcatheter closure. This highlights the potential risk of this procedure, and emphasises the need for appropriate antibiotic prophylaxis until complete endothelialization of the device has occurred.

Type
Brief Reports
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1999

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1.Sideris, EB, Sideris, SE, Thanopoulos, BD, Ehly, RL, Fowlkes, JPTransvenous aerial septal defect occlusion by the buttoned device. Am J Card 1990; 66(20): 15341536.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2.Rao, PS, Wilson, AD, Levy, JM, Gupta, VK, Chopra, PS. Role of ‘buttened’ double-disc device in the management of atrial sep tal defects. Am Heart J 1992; 123: 191200.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
3.Das, GS, Voss, G, Jarvis, G, Wyche, K, Gunther, R, Wilson, REExperimental atrial septal defect closure with a new, tran-scatheter, self-centering device. Circulation 1993; 88(4 pt 1): 17541764.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
4.Rome, JJ, Keane, JF, Perry, SB, Spevak, PJ, Lock, JE. Doubleumbrella closure of atrial defects. Initial clinical applications. Circulation 1990; 82(3): 751758.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
5.Rao, PS, Sideris, EB, Hausdorf, G, et al. International experience with secundum atrial septal defect occlusion by the buttoned device. Am Heart J 1994; 128(5): 10221035.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
6.Bjornstad, PG, Masura, E, Therlow, E, Simervlik, B, Michelsen, SS, Tomnessen, TI, Interventional closure of atrial septal defects with the Amplatzer device. First clinical experience. Cardiol Young 1997; 7: 277283.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
7.Murphy, JG, Gersh, BJ, McGoon, MD, et al. Long-term out come after surgical repair of isolated atrial septal defect. Follow-up at 27–32 years (see comments). N Engl J Med 1990; 323(24): 16451650CrossRefGoogle Scholar
8.McNamara, DG, Latson, LA. Long-term follow-up of patients with malformations for which definitive surgical repair has been available for 25 years or more. Am J Cardiol 1982; 50(3): 560568.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
9.Dajanri, AS, Taubert, KA. Infective endocarditis. In: Emmanouilides, GC, Riemenschneider, TA, Allen, HD and Gutgesell, HP (eds) ‘Moss and Adams’: Heart Disease in Infants, Children, and Adolescents including the Fetus and Young Adult‘. 2nd edition, Williams and Wilkins, Baltimore, Md: 1995; 15411553.Google Scholar
10.Dajanri, AS, Tauber, KA, Wilson, W, et al. Prevention of bacterial endocarditis. Recommendations by the American Heart Association. JAMA 1997; 227: 17941801.Google Scholar