Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-lnqnp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T05:39:14.846Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Indications for cardiovascular magnetic resonance in children with congenital and acquired heart disease: an expert consensus paper of the Imaging Working Group of the AEPC and the Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance Section of the EACVI

Part of: The Association for European Paediatric and Congenital Cardiology (AEPC)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 March 2015

E.R. Valsangiacomo Buechel ,
L. Grosse-Wortmann ,
S. Fratz ,
J. Eichhorn ,
S. Sarikouch ,
G.F. Greil ,
P. Beerbaum ,
C. Bucciarelli-Ducci ,
B. Bonello  and
L. Sieverding
...Show all authors
E.R. Valsangiacomo Buechel*
Affiliation:
Division of Paediatric Cardiology, Department of Paediatrics and Children’s Research Centre, University Children’s Hospital Zurich, Steinwiesstrasse 75, 8032 Zurich, Switzerland
L. Grosse-Wortmann
Affiliation:
The Labatt Family Heart Centre, Department of Paediatrics, The Hospital for Sick Children, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
S. Fratz
Affiliation:
Department of Paediatric Cardiology and Congenital Heart Disease, Deutsches Herzzentrum München, Klinikum an der Technischen Universität München, Munich, Germany
J. Eichhorn
Affiliation:
Department of Paediatric, Klinikum Leverkusen, Leverkusen, Germany
S. Sarikouch
Affiliation:
Department of Cardiothoracic, Transplantation, and Vascular Surgery, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany
G.F. Greil
Affiliation:
Division of Imaging Sciences and Biomedical Engineering, Rayne Institute, St Thomas’ Hospital, London, UK Department of Congenital Heart Disease, Evelina Children’s Hospital, London, UK
P. Beerbaum
Affiliation:
Department of Paediatric Cardiology and Paediatric Intensive Care Medicine, Children’s Hospital, Hannover Medical University, Hannover, Germany
C. Bucciarelli-Ducci
Affiliation:
Department of Cardiology, Bristol Heart Institute, NIHR Bristol Cardiovascular Biomedical Research Unit, Bristol and Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance Unit, Royal Brompton Hospital, NIHR Brompton Cardiovascular Biomedical Research Unit, National Heart and Lung Institute, Imperial College, London, UK
B. Bonello
Affiliation:
Division of Cardiology, Timone Children’s Hospital, Aix-Marseille University, Marseille, France
L. Sieverding
Affiliation:
Department of Paediatric Cardiology, University Children’s Hospital, Tuebingen, Germany
J. Schwitter
Affiliation:
Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Cardiology and Cardiac MR Center, University Hospital of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland
W.A. Helbing
Affiliation:
Department of Paediatrics, Division of Paediatric Cardiology and Radiology, Erasmus University Medical Centre, Sophia Children’s Hospital, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
*
*Correspondence to: Tel: +41 44 266 7339; Fax: +41 44 266 7981; E-mail: [email protected], [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This article provides expert opinion on the use of cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) in young patients with congenital heart disease (CHD) and in specific clinical situations. As peculiar challenges apply to imaging children, paediatric aspects are repeatedly discussed. The first section of the paper addresses settings and techniques, including the basic sequences used in paediatric CMR, safety, and sedation. In the second section, the indication, application, and clinical relevance of CMR in the most frequent CHD are discussed in detail. In the current era of multimodality imaging, the strengths of CMR are compared with other imaging modalities. At the end of each chapter, a brief summary with expert consensus key points is provided. The recommendations provided are strongly clinically oriented. The paper addresses not only imagers performing CMR, but also clinical cardiologists who want to know which information can be obtained by CMR and how to integrate it in clinical decision-making.

Keywords

Expert consensus paperCongenital heart diseaseCardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging
Type
Review Article
Information
Cardiology in the Young , Volume 25 , Issue 5 , June 2015 , pp. 819 - 838
Check for updates
Copyright
The article has been co-published with permission in European Heart Journal - Cardiovascular Imaging and Cardiology in the Young. All rights reserved in respect of Cardiology in the Young. © The Authors 2015, For European Heart Journal - Cardiovascular Imaging, © The Author 2015. 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

Published on behalf of the European Society of Cardiology. All rights reserved. & The Author 2015.

References

1. Nieminen, HP, Jokinen, EV, Sairanen, HI. Causes of late deaths after pediatric cardiac surgery: a population-based study. J Am Coll Cardiol 2007; 50: 1263–1271.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
2. Kilner, PJ, Geva, T, Kaemmerer, H, Trindade, PT, Schwitter, J, Webb, GD. Recommendations for cardiovascular magnetic resonance in adults with congenital heart disease from the respective working groups of the European Society of Cardiology. Eur Heart J 2010; 31: 794–805.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
3. Fratz, S, Chung, T, Greil, G, et al. Guidelines and protocols for cardiovascular magnetic resonance in children and adults with congenital heart disease: SCMR expert consensus group on congenital heart disease. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson 2013; 15: 51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
4. Fratz, S, Hess, J, Schuhbaeck, A, et al. Routine clinical cardiovascular magnetic resonance in paediatric and adult congenital heart disease: patients, protocols, questions asked and contributions made. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson 2008; 10: 46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
5. Tsai-Goodman, B, Geva, T, Odegard, KC, Sena, LM, Powell, AJ. Clinical role, accuracy, and technical aspects of cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging in infants. Am J Cardiol 2004; 94: 69–74.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
6. Helbing, WA, Mertens, L, Sieverding, L. Recommendations from the Association for European Paediatric Cardiology for training in congenital cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging. Cardiol Young 2006; 16: 410–412.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
7. Plein, S, Schulz-Menger, J, Almeida, A, et al. Training and accreditation in cardiovascular magnetic resonance in Europe: a position statement of the working group on cardiovascular magnetic resonance of the European Society of Cardiology. Eur Heart J 2011; 32: 793–798.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
8. Finn, JP, Nael, K, Deshpande, V, Ratib, O, Laub, G. Cardiac MR imaging: state of the technology. Radiology 2006; 241: 338–354.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
9. Garg, R, Powell, AJ, Sena, L, Marshall, AC, Geva, T. Effects of metallic implants on magnetic resonance imaging evaluation of Fontan palliation. Am J Cardiol 2005; 95: 688–691.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
10. Holmqvist, C, Larsson, EM, Stahlberg, F, Laurin, S. Contrast-enhanced thoracic 3D-MR angiography in infants and children. Acta Radiol 2001; 42: 50–58.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
11. Meng, H, Grosse-Wortmann, L. Gadolinium in pediatric cardiovascular magnetic resonance: what we know and how we practice. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson 2012; 14: 56.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
12. Masui, T, Katayama, M, Kobayashi, S, et al. Gadolinium-enhanced MR angiography in the evaluation of congenital cardiovascular disease pre and postoperative states in infants and children. J Magn Reson Imaging 2000; 12: 1034–1042.3.0.CO;2-A>CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
13. Valsangiacomo Buechel, E, DiBernardo, S, Bauersfeld, U, Berger, F. Contrastenhanced magnetic resonance angiography of the great arteries in patients with congenital heart disease: an accurate tool for planning catheter-guided interventions. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging 2005; 21: 313–322.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
14. Kellenberger, CJ, Yoo, S-J, Buechel, ERV. Cardiovascular MR imaging in neonates and infants with congenital heart disease. Radiographics 2007; 27: 5–18.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
15. Macgowan, CK, Al-Kwifi, O, Varodayan, F, Yoo, SJ, Wright, GA, Kellenberger, CJ. Optimization of 3D contrast-enhanced pulmonary magnetic resonance angiography in pediatric patients with congenital heart disease. Magn Reson Med 2005; 54: 207–212.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
16. Geva, T, Greil, GF, Marshall, AC, Landzberg, M, Powell, AJ. Gadolinium-enhanced 3-dimensional magnetic resonance angiography of pulmonary blood supply in patients with complex pulmonary stenosis or atresia: comparison with X-ray angiography. Circulation 2002; 106: 473–478.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
17. Greil, GF, Powell, AJ, Gildein, HP, Geva, T. Gadolinium-enhanced three-dimensional magnetic resonance angiography of pulmonary and systemic venous anomalies. J Am Coll Cardiol 2002; 39: 335–341.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
18. Goyen, M, Laub, G, Ladd, ME, et al. Dynamic 3D MR angiography of the pulmonary arteries in under four seconds. J Magn Reson Imaging 2001; 13: 372–377.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
19. Piccini, D, Monney, P, Sierro, C, et al. Respiratory self-navigated postcontrast whole-heart coronary MR angiography: initial experience in patients. Radiology 2014; 270: 378–386.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
20. Sorensen, TS, Korperich, H, Greil, GF, et al. Operator independent isotropic three-dimensional magnetic resonance imaging for morphology in congenital heart disease: a validation study. Circulation 2004; 110: 163–169.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
21. Razavi, RS, Hill, DL, Muthurangu, V, et al. Three-dimensional magnetic resonance imaging of congenital cardiac anomalies. Cardiol Young 2003; 13: 461–465.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
22. Fenchel, M, Greil, GF, Martirosian, P, et al. Three-dimensional morphological magnetic resonance imaging in infants and children with congenital heart disease. Pediatr Radiol 2006; 36: 1265–1272.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
23. Su, JT, Chung, T, Muthupillai, R, et al. Usefulness of real-time navigator magnetic resonance imaging for evaluating coronary artery origins in pediatric patients. Am J Cardiol 2005; 95: 679–682.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
24. Tangcharoen, T, Bell, A, Hegde, S, et al. Detection of coronary artery anomalies in infants and young children with congenital heart disease by using MR imaging. Radiology 2011; 259: 240–247.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
25. Buechel, EV, Kaiser, T, Jackson, C, Schmitz, A, Kellenberger, CJ. Normal right and left ventricular volumes and myocardial mass in children measured by steady state free precession cardiovascular magnetic resonance. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson 2009; 11: 19.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
26. Sarikouch, S, Peters, B, Gutberlet, M, et al. Sex-specific pediatric percentiles for ventricular size and mass as reference values for cardiac MRI: assessment by steady-state free-precession and phase contrast MRI flow. Circ Cardiovasc Imaging 2010; 3: 65–76.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
27. Robbers-Visser, D, Boersma, E, Helbing, WA. Normal biventricular function, volumes, and mass in children aged 8 to 17 years. J Magn Reson Imaging 2009; 29: 552–559.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
28. Fratz, S, Schuhbaeck, A, Buchner, C, et al. Comparison of accuracy of axial slices versus short-axis slices for measuring ventricular volumes by cardiac magnetic resonance in patients with corrected tetralogy of Fallot. Am J Cardiol 2009; 103: 1764–1769.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
29. Sarikouch, S, Koerperich, H, Boethig, D, et al. Reference values for atrial size and function in children and young adults by cardiac MR: a study of the German competence network congenital heart defects. J Magn Reson Imaging 2011; 33: 1028–1039.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
30. Mooij, CF, de Wit, CJ, Graham, DA, Powell, AJ, Geva, T. Reproducibility of MRI measurements of right ventricular size and function in patients with normal and dilated ventricles. J Magn Reson Imaging 2008; 28: 67–73.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
31. Beerbaum, P, Barth, P, Kropf, S, et al. Cardiac function by MRI in congenital heart disease: impact of consensus training on interinstitutional variance. J Magn Reson Imaging 2009; 30: 956–966.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
32. Powell, AJ, Maier, SE, Chung, T, Geva, T. Phase-velocity cine magnetic resonance imaging measurement of pulsatile blood flow in children and young adults: in vitro and in vivo validation. Pediatr Cardiol 2000; 21: 104–110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
33. Buechel, ER, Balmer, C, Bauersfeld, U, Kellenberger, CJ, Schwitter, J. Feasibility of perfusion cardiovascular magnetic resonance in paediatric patients. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson 2009; 11: 51.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
34. Taylor, A, Dymarkowski, S, Hamaekers, P, et al. Magnetic resonance coronary angiography and late-enhancement myocardial imaging in children with arterial switch operation for transposition of the great arteries. Radiology 2005; 234: 542–547.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
35. Chiribiri, A, Bettencourt, N, Nagel, E. Cardiac magnetic resonance stress testing: results and prognosis. Curr Cardiol Rep 2009; 11: 54–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
36. Robbers-Visser, D, Jan Ten Harkel, D, Kapusta, L, et al. Usefulness of cardiac magnetic resonance imaging combined with low-dose dobutamine stress to detect an abnormal ventricular stress response in children and young adults after Fontan operation at young age. Am J Cardiol 2008; 101: 1657–1662.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
37. Harris, MA, Johnson, TR, Weinberg, PM, Fogel, MA. Delayed-enhancement cardiovascular magnetic resonance identifies fibrous tissue in children after surgery for congenital heart disease. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2007; 133: 676–681.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
38. Bergersen, L, Gauvreau, K, Lock, JE, Jenkins, KJ. A risk adjusted method for comparing adverse outcomes among practitioners in pediatric and congenital cardiac catheterization. Congen Heart Dis 2008; 3: 230–240.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
39. Mehta, R, Lee, KJ, Chaturvedi, R, Benson, L. Complications of pediatric cardiac catheterization: a review in the current era. Catheter Cardiovasc Interven 2008; 72: 278–285.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
40. Bacher, K, Bogaert, E, Lapere, R, De Wolf, D, Thierens, H. Patient-specific dose and radiation risk estimation in pediatric cardiac catheterization. Circulation 2005; 111: 83–89.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
41. Beekman, RP, Hoorntje, TM, Beek, FJA, Kuijten, RH. Sedation for children undergoing magnetic resonance imaging: efficacy and safety of rectal thiopental. Eur J Pediatr 1996; 155: 820–822.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
42. Odegard, KC, DiNardo, JA, Tsai-Goodman, B, Powell, AJ, Geva, T, Laussen, PC. Anaesthesia considerations for cardiac MRI in infants and small children. Pediatr Anesth 2004; 14: 471–476.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
43. Dorfman, AL, Odegard, KC, Powell, AJ, Laussen, PC, Geva, T. Risk factors for adverse events during cardiovascular magnetic resonance in congenital heart disease. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson 2007; 9: 793–798.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
44. Sarikouch, S, Schaeffler, R, Körperich, H, Dongas, A, Haas, N, Beerbaum, P. Cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging for intensive care infants: safe and effective? Pediatr Cardiol 2009; 30: 146–152.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
45. Committee on D. Guidelines for monitoring and management of pediatric patients during and after sedation for diagnostic and therapeutic procedures. Pediatrics 1992; 89: 1110–1115.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
46. Picano, E, Vañó, E, Rehani, MM, et al. The appropriate and justified use of medical radiation in cardiovascular imaging: a position document of the ESC associations of cardiovascular imaging, percutaneous cardiovascular interventions and electrophysiology. Eur Heart J 2014; 35: 665–672.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
47. Knuuti, J, Bengel, F, Bax, JJ, et al. Risks and benefits of cardiac imaging: an analysis of risks related to imaging for coronary artery disease. Eur Heart J 2014; 35: 633–638.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
48. Shellock, FG, Spinazzi, A. MRI safety update 2008: part 2, screening patients for MRI. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2008; 191: 1140–1149.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
49. Chaljub, G, Kramer, LA, Johnson, RFI, Johnson, RFJ, Singh, H, Crow, WN. Projectile cylinder accidents resulting from the presence of ferromagnetic nitrous oxide or oxygen tanks in the MR suite. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2001; 177: 27–30.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
50. Food and Drug Administration, Center for Devices and Radiological Health. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Criteria for Significant Risk Investigations of Magnetic Resonance Diagnostic Devices. Food and Drug Administration, Hampton, Virginia USA, 2003.Google Scholar
51. Levine, GN, Gomes, AS, Arai, AE, et al. American Heart Association Committee on Diagnostic and Interventional Cardiac Catheterization; American Heart Association Council on Clinical Cardiology; American Heart Association Council on Cardiovascular Radiology and Intervention. Safety of magnetic resonance imaging in patients with cardiovascular devices: an American Heart Association scientific statement from the Committee on Diagnostic and Interventional Cardiac Catheterization, Council on Clinical Cardiology, and the Council on Cardiovascular Radiology and Intervention: endorsed by the American College of Cardiology Foundation, the North American Society for Cardiac Imaging, and the Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance. Circulation 2007; 116: 2878–2891.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
52. Bhachu, DS, Kanal, E. Implantable pulse generators (pacemakers) and electrodes: safety in the magnetic resonance imaging scanner environment. J Magn Reson Imaging 2000; 12: 201–204.3.0.CO;2-G>CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
53. Rod Gimbel, J, Bello, D, Schmitt, M, et al. Randomized trial of pacemaker and lead system for safe scanning at 1.5 Tesla. Heart Rhythm 2013; 10: 685–691.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
54. Shellock, FG, Spinazzi, A. MRI safety update 2008: part 1, MRI contrast agents and nephrogenic systemic fibrosis. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2008; 191: 1129–1139.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
55. Leiner, T, Kucharczyk, W. NSF prevention in clinical practice: summary of recommendations and guidelines in the United States, Canada, and Europe. J Magn Reson Imaging 2009; 30: 1357–1363.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
56. Thomsen, HS. Nephrogenic systemic fibrosis: history and epidemiology. Radiol Clin North Am 2009; 47: 827–831.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
57. Eichhorn, J, Fink, C, Delorme, S, Ulmer, H. Rings, slings and other vascular abnormalities. Ultrafast computed tomography and magnetic resonance angiography in pediatric cardiology. Z Kardiol 2004; 93: 201–208.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
58. Eichhorn, JG, Krissak, R, Rudiger, HJ, et al. Compliance of the normal-sized aorta in adolescents with Marfan syndrome: comparison of MR measurements of aortic distensibility and pulse wave velocity. Rofo 2007; 179: 841–846.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
59. Kellenberger, C. Aortic arch malformations. Pediatr Radiol 2010; 40: 876–884.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
60. Greil, GF, Kramer, U, Dammann, F, et al. Diagnosis of vascular rings and slings using an interleaved 3D double-slab FISP MR angiography technique. Pediatr Radiol 2005; 35: 396–401.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
61. Kaiser, T, Kellenberger, CJ, Albisetti, M, Bergsträsser, E, Valsangiacomo Buechel, ER. Normal values for aortic diameters in children and adolescents—assessment in vivo by contrast-enhanced CMR-angiography. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson 2008; 10: 56.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
62. Konen, E, Merchant, N, Provost, Y, McLaughlin, PR, Crossin, J, Paul, NS. Coarctation of the aorta before and after correction: the role of cardiovascular MRI. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2004; 182: 1333–1339.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
63. Riquelme, C, Laissy, JP, Menegazzo, D, et al. MR imaging of coarctation of the aorta and its postoperative complications in adults: assessment with spin-echo and cine-MR imaging. Magn Reson Imaging 1999; 17: 37–46.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
64. Prince, MR, Narasimham, DL, Jacoby, WT, et al. Three-dimensional gadolinium-enhanced MR angiography of the thoracic aorta. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1996; 166: 1387–1397.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
65. Oshinski, JN, Parks, WJ, Markou, CP, et al. Improved measurement of pressure gradients in aortic coarctation by magnetic resonance imaging. J Am Coll Cardiol 1996; 28: 1818–1826.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
66. Caputo, GR, Kondo, C, Masui, T, et al. Right and left lung perfusion: in vitro and in vivo validation with oblique-angle, velocity-encoded cine MR imaging. Radiology 1991; 180: 693–698.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
67. Knobel, Z, Kellenberger, CJ, Kaiser, T, Albisetti, M, Bergstrasser, E, Buechel, ER. Geometry and dimensions of the pulmonary artery bifurcation in children and adolescents: assessment in vivo by contrast-enhanced MR-angiography. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging 2011; 27: 385–396.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
68. Roman, KS, Kellenberger, CJ, Farooq, S, MacGowan, CK, Gilday, DL, Yoo, SJ. Comparative imaging of differential pulmonary blood flow in patients with congenital heart disease: magnetic resonance imaging versus lung perfusion scintigraphy. Pediatr Radiol 2005; 35: 295–301.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
69. Roman, KS, Kellenberger, CJ, Macgowan, CK, et al. How is pulmonary arterial blood flow affected by pulmonary venous obstruction in children? A phase-contrast magnetic resonance study. Pediatr Radiol 2005; 35: 580–586.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
70. Kellenberger, CJ, Macgowan, CK, Roman, KS, et al. Hemodynamic evaluation of the peripheral pulmonary circulation by cine phase-contrast magnetic resonance imaging. J Magn Reson Imaging 2005; 22: 780–787.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
71. Valsangiacomo, ER, Hornberger, LK, Barrea, C, Smallhorn, JF, Yoo, SJ. Partial and total anomalous pulmonary venous connection in the fetus: two-dimensional and Doppler echocardiographic findings. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2003; 22: 257–263.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
72. Grosse-Wortmann, L, Al-Otay, A, Goo, HW, et al. Anatomical and functional evaluation of pulmonary veins in children by magnetic resonance imaging. J Am Coll Cardiol 2007; 49: 993–1002.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
73. Riesenkampff, EM, Schmitt, B, Schnackenburg, B, et al. Partial anomalous pulmonary venous drainage in young pediatric patients: the role of magnetic resonance imaging. Pediatr Cardiol 2009; 30: 458–464.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
74. Goo, HW, Al-Otay, A, Grosse-Wortmann, L, Wu, S, Macgowan, CK, Yoo, SJ. Phase contrast magnetic resonance quantification of normal pulmonary venous return. J Magn Reson Imaging 2009; 29: 588–594.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
75. Valsangiacomo, ER, Barrea, C, Macgowan, CK, Smallhorn, JF, Coles, JG, Yoo, SJ. Phase contrast MR assessment of pulmonary venous blood flow in children with surgically repaired pulmonary veins. Pediatr Radiol 2003; 33: 607–613.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
76. Beerbaum, P, Korperich, H, Barth, P, Esdorn, H, Gieseke, J, Meyer, H. Noninvasive quantification of left-to-right shunt in pediatric patients: phase-contrast cine magnetic resonance imaging compared with invasive oximetry. Circulation 2001; 103: 2476–2482.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
77. Valente, A, Sena, L, Powell, A, Del Nido, P, Geva, T. Cardiac magnetic resonance imaging evaluation of sinus venosus defects: comparison to surgical findings. Pediatr Cardiol 2007; 28: 51–56.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
78. Powell, AJ, Tsai-Goodman, B, Prakash, A, Greil, GF, Geva, T. Comparison between phase-velocity cine magnetic resonance imaging and invasive oximetry for quantification of atrial shunts. Am J Cardiol 2003; 91: 1523–1525.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
79. Grosse-Wortmann, LL, Windram, J, Yoo, SJ. Magnetic resonance imaging and computed tomography. In Baker E, Anderson R, Penny D, Redington A, Rigby M, Wernowsky G (eds), Paediatric Cardiology, 2nd ed, Philadelphia, Churchill Livingstone Elsevier; 2009: p363–p378.Google Scholar
80. Gatzoulis, MA, Balaji, S, Webber, SA, et al. Risk factors for arrhythmia and sudden cardiac death late after repair of tetralogy of Fallot: a multicentre study. Lancet 2000; 356: 975–981.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
81. Rebergen, SA, Chin, JG, Ottenkamp, J, van der Wall, EE, de Roos, A. Pulmonary regurgitation in the late postoperative follow-up of tetralogy of Fallot. Volumetric quantitation by nuclear magnetic resonance velocity mapping. Circulation 1993; 88 (5 Pt 1): 2257–2266.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
82. Wald, RM, Redington, AN, Pereira, A, et al. Refining the assessment of pulmonary regurgitation in adults after tetralogy of Fallot repair: should we be measuring regurgitant fraction or regurgitant volume? Eur Heart J 2009; 30: 356–361.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
83. Sarikouch, S, Koerperich, H, Dubowy, K-O, et al. Impact of gender and age on cardiovascular function late after repair of tetralogy of Fallot: percentiles based on cardiac magnetic resonance. Circ Cardiovasc Imaging 2011; 4: 703–711.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
84. Kang, IS, Redington, AN, Benson, LN, et al. Differential regurgitation in branch pulmonary arteries after repair of tetralogy of Fallot: a phase-contrast cine magnetic resonance study. Circulation 2003; 107: 2938–2943.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
85. Voser, EM, Kellenberger, CJ, Buechel, ER. Effects of pulmonary regurgitation on distensibility and flow of the branch pulmonary arteries in tetralogy of Fallot. Pediatr Cardiol 2013; 34: 1118–1124.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
86. Oosterhof, T, van Straten, A, Vliegen, HW, et al. Preoperative thresholds for pulmonary valve replacement in patients with corrected tetralogy of Fallot using cardiovascular magnetic resonance. Circulation 2007; 116: 545–551.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
87. Kutty, S, Kuehne, T, Gribben, P, et al. Ascending aortic and main pulmonary artery areas derived from cardiovascular magnetic resonance as reference values for normal subjects and repaired tetralogy of Fallot. Circ Cardiovasc Imaging 2012; 5: 644–651.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
88. Geva, T, Vick, GW III, Wendt, RE, Rokey, R. Role of spin echo and cine magnetic resonance imaging in presurgical planning of heterotaxy syndrome. Comparison with echocardiography and catheterization. Circulation 1994; 90: 348–356.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
89. Prakash, A, Torres, AJ, Printz, BF, Prince, MR, Nielsen, JC. Usefulness of magnetic resonance angiography in the evaluation of complex congenital heart disease in newborns and infants. Am J Cardiol 2007; 100: 715–721.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
90. Hong, YK, Park, YW, Ryu, SJ, et al. Efficacy of MRI in complicated congenital heart disease with visceral heterotaxy syndrome. J Comput Assist Tomogr 2000; 24: 671–682.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
91. Kersting-Sommerhoff, BA, Diethelm, L, Stanger, P, et al. Evaluation of complex congenital ventricular anomalies with magnetic resonance imaging. Am Heart J 1990; 120: 133–142.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
92. Newman, B, Feinstein, JA, Cohen, RA, et al. Congenital extrahepatic portosystemic shunt associated with heterotaxy and polysplenia. Pediatr Radiol 2010; 40: 1222–1230.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
93. Gewillig, M. The Fontan circulation. Heart 2005; 91: 839–846.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
94. Fogel, MA, Weinberg, PM, Chin, AJ, Fellows, KE, Hoffman, EA. Late ventricular geometry and performance changes of functional single ventricle throughout staged Fontan reconstruction assessed by magnetic resonance imaging. J Am Coll Cardiol 1996; 28: 212–221.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
95. Fogel, MA. Cardiac magnetic resonance of single ventricles. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson 2006; 8: 661–670.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
96. Prakash, A, Khan, MA, Hardy, R, Torres, AJ, Chen, JM, Gersony, WM. A new diagnostic algorithm for assessment of patients with single ventricle before a Fontan operation. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2009; 138: 917–923.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
97. Brown, DW, Gauvreau, K, Powell, AJ, et al. Cardiac magnetic resonance versus routine cardiac catheterization before bidirectional Glenn anastomosis in infants with functional single ventricle: a prospective randomized trial. Circulation 2007; 116: 2718–2725.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
98. Grosse-Wortmann, L, Al-Otay, A, Yoo, SJ. Aortopulmonary collaterals after bidirectional cavopulmonary connection or Fontan completion: quantification with MRI. Circ Cardiovasc Imaging 2009; 2: 219–225.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
99. Robbers-Visser, D, Kapusta, L, van Osch-Gevers, L, et al. Clinical outcome 5 to 18 years after the Fontan operation performed on children younger than 5 years. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2009; 138: 89–95.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
100. Beghetti, M, Gow, RM, Haney, I, Mawson, J, Williams, WG, Freedom, RM. Pediatric primary benign cardiac tumors: a 15-year review. Am Heart J 1997; 134: 1107–1114.Google Scholar
101. Kiaffas, MG, Powell, AJ, Geva, T. Magnetic resonance imaging evaluation of cardiac tumor characteristics in infants and children. Am J Cardiol 2002; 89: 1229–1233.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
102. O’Donnell, DH, Abbara, S, Chaithiraphan, V, et al. Cardiac tumors: optimal cardiac MR sequences and spectrum of imaging appearances. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2009; 193: 377–387.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
103. Beroukhim, RS, Prakash, A, Buechel, ER, et al. Charac-terization of cardiac tumors in children by cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging: a multicenter experience. J Am Coll Cardiol 2011; 58: 1044–1054.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
104. Weinsaft, JW, Kim, HW, Shah, DJ, et al. Detection of left ventricular thrombus by delayed-enhancement cardiovascular magnetic resonance prevalence and markers in patients with systolic dysfunction. J Am Coll Cardiol 2008; 52: 148–157.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
105. Hoffmann, U, Globits, S, Schima, W, et al. Usefulness of magnetic resonance imaging of cardiac and paracardiac masses. Am J Cardiol 2003; 92: 890–895.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
106. Wilkinson, JD, Landy, DC, Colan, SD, et al. The pediatric cardiomyopathy registry and heart failure: key results from the first 15 years. Heart Fail Clin 2010; 6: 401–413; vii.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
107. Gagliardi, MG, Bevilacqua, M, Di Renzi, P, Picardo, S, Passariello, R, Marcelletti, C. Usefulness of magnetic resonance imaging for diagnosis of acute myocarditis in infants and children, and comparison with endomyocardial biopsy. Am J Cardiol 1991; 68: 1089–1091.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
108. Karamitsos, TD, Francis, JM, Myerson, S, Selvanayagam, JB, Neubauer, S. The role of cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging in heart failure. J Am Coll Cardiol 2009; 54: 1407–1424.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
109. Beerbaum, P, Sarikouch, S, Laser, KT, Greil, G, Burchert, W, Korperich, H. Coronary anomalies assessed by whole-heart isotropic 3D magnetic resonance imaging for cardiac morphology in congenital heart disease. J Magn Reson Imaging 2009; 29: 320–327.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
110. Vashist, S, Singh, GK. Acute myocarditis in children: current concepts and manage-ment. Curr Treat Options Cardiovasc Med 2009; 11: 383–391.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
111. Grosse-Wortmann, L, Roche, SL, Yoo, SJ, Seed, M, Kantor, P. Early changes in right ventricular function and their clinical consequences in childhood and adolescent dilated cardiomyopathy. Cardiol Young 2010; 20: 418–425.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
112. Mavrogeni, S, Papavasiliou, A, Spargias, K, et al. Myocardial inflammation in Duchenne muscular dystrophy as a precipitating factor for heart failure: a prospective study. BMC Neurol 2010; 10: 33.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
113. Olivotto, I, Maron, BJ, Appelbaum, E, et al. Spectrum and clinical significance of systolic function and myocardial fibrosis assessed by cardiovascular magnetic resonance in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy. Am J Cardiol 2010; 106: 261–267.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
114. Barker, PC, Pasquali, SK, Darty, S, et al. Use of cardiac magnetic resonance imaging to evaluate cardiac structure, function and fibrosis in children with infantile Pompe disease on enzyme replacement therapy. Mol Genet Metab 2010; 101: 332–337.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
115. Marin-Rodriguez, C, Ossaba-Velez, S, Maroto Alvaro, E, Sanchez-Alegre, ML. Lack of MR late-enhancement in left ventricular non-compaction in infants and young children. Radiologia 2010; 52: 138–143.Google ScholarPubMed
116. Alhabshan, F, Smallhorn, JF, Golding, F, Musewe, N, Freedom, RM, Yoo, SJ. Extent of myocardial non-compaction: comparison between MRI and echocardiographic evaluation. Pediatr Radiol 2005; 35: 1147–1151.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
117. Pepe, A, Positano, V, Santarelli, MF, et al. Multigeneous distribution of myocardial iron overload. J Magn Reson Imaging 2006; 23: 662–668.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
118. Fogel, MA, Weinberg, PM, Harris, M, Rhodes, L. Usefulness of magnetic resonance imaging for the diagnosis of right ventricular dysplasia in children. Am J Cardiol 2006; 97: 1232–1237.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
119. Yoo, SJ, Grosse-Wortmann, L, Hamilton, RM. Magnetic resonance imaging assessment of arrhythmogenic right ventricular cardiomyopathy/dysplasia in children. Korean Circ J 2010; 40: 357–367.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
120. Marcus, FI, McKenna, WJ, Sherrill, D, et al. Diagnosis of arrhythmogenic right ventricular cardiomyopathy/dysplasia: proposed modification of the Task Force Criteria. Eur Heart J 2010; 31: 806–814.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
121. Kostolny, M, Tsang, V, Nordmeyer, J, et al. Rescue surgery following percutaneous pulmonary valve implantation. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2008; 33: 607–612.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
122. Greil, GF, Seeger, A, Miller, S, et al. Coronary magnetic resonance angiography and vessel wall imaging in children with Kawasaki disease. Pediatr Radiol 2007; 37: 666–673.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
123. Brenner, DJ, Hall, EJ. Computed tomography—an increasing source of radiation exposure. N Engl J Med 2007; 357: 2277–2284.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
124. Greil, GF, Desai, MY, Fenchel, M, et al. Reproducibility of free-breathing cardiovascular magnetic resonance coronary angiography. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson 2007; 9: 49–56.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
125. Schwitter, J, Wacker, CM, van Rossum, AC, et al. MR-IMPACT: comparison of perfusion-cardiac magnetic resonance with single-photon emission computed tomography for the detection of coronary artery disease in a multicentre, multivendor, randomized trial. Eur Heart J 2008; 29: 480–489.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
126. Schwitter, J, Wacker, CM, Wilke, N, et al. Superior diagnostic performance of perfusion-cardiovascular magnetic resonance versus SPECT to detect coronary artery disease: the secondary endpoints of the multicenter multivendor MR-IMPACT II (magnetic resonance imaging for myocardial perfusion assessment in coronary artery disease trial). J Cardiovasc Magn Reson 2012; 14: 61.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
127. Kim, RJ, Fieno, DS, Parrish, TB, et al. Relationship of MRI delayed contrast enhancement to irreversible injury, infarct age, and contractile function. Circulation 1999; 100: 1992–2002.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
128. Rathod, RH, Prakash, A, Powell, AJ, Geva, T. Myocardial fibrosis identified by cardiac magnetic resonance late gadolinium enhancement is associated with adverse ventricular mechanics and ventricular tachycardia late after Fontan operation. J Am Coll Cardiol 2010; 55: 1721–1728.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
129. Babu-Narayan, SV, Goktekin, O, Moon, JC, et al. Late gadolinium enhancement cardiovascular magnetic resonance of the systemic right ventricle in adults with previous atrial redirection surgery for transposition of the great arteries. Circulation 2005; 111: 2091–2098.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed