Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-dsjbd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-26T14:59:15.383Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Improving maternal–infant bonding after prenatal diagnosis of CHD

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 August 2018

Piers C. A. Barker*
Affiliation:
Department of Pediatrics, Division of Pediatric Cardiology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA
Gregory H. Tatum
Affiliation:
Department of Pediatrics, Division of Pediatric Cardiology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA
Michael J. Campbell
Affiliation:
Department of Pediatrics, Division of Pediatric Cardiology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA
Michael G. W. Camitta
Affiliation:
Department of Pediatrics, Division of Pediatric Cardiology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA
Angelo S. Milazzo
Affiliation:
Department of Pediatrics, Division of Pediatric Cardiology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA
Christoph P. Hornik
Affiliation:
Duke Clinical Research Institute, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA
Amanda French
Affiliation:
Advanced Practice Nursing, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA
Stephen G. Miller
Affiliation:
Department of Pediatrics, Division of Pediatric Cardiology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA
*
Author for correspondence: P. C. A. Barker, Department of Pediatrics, Division of Pediatric Cardiology, Duke University Medical Center, CHC 1927A, Durham, NC 27710, USA. Tel: 919 684 3574; Fax: 919 681 5903; E-mail: [email protected]

Abstract

Background

Infants with prenatally diagnosed CHD are at high risk for adverse outcomes owing to multiple physiologic and psychosocial factors. Lack of immediate physical postnatal contact because of rapid initiation of medical therapy impairs maternal–infant bonding. On the basis of expected physiology, maternal–infant bonding may be safe for select cardiac diagnoses.

Methods

This is a single-centre study to assess safety of maternal–infant bonding in prenatal CHD.

Results

In total, 157 fetuses with prenatally diagnosed CHD were reviewed. On the basis of cardiac diagnosis, 91 fetuses (58%) were prenatally approved for bonding and successfully bonded, 38 fetuses (24%) were prenatally approved but deemed not suitable for bonding at delivery, and 28 (18%) were not prenatally approved to bond. There were no complications attributable to bonding. Those who successfully bonded were larger in weight (3.26 versus 2.6 kg, p<0.001) and at later gestation (39 versus 38 weeks, p<0.001). Those unsuccessful at bonding were more likely to have been delivered via Caesarean section (74 versus 49%, p=0.011) and have additional non-cardiac diagnoses (53 versus 29%, p=0.014). There was no significant difference regarding the need for cardiac intervention before hospital discharge. Infants who bonded had shorter hospital (7 versus 26 days, p=0.02) and ICU lengths of stay (5 versus 23 days, p=0.002) and higher survival (98 versus 76%, p<0.001).

Conclusion

Fetal echocardiography combined with a structured bonding programme can permit mothers and infants with select types of CHD to successfully bond before ICU admission and intervention.

Type
Original Article
Copyright
© Cambridge University Press 2018 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Rychik, J, Donaghue, DD, Levy, S, et al. Maternal psychological stress after prenatal diagnosis of congenital heart disease. J Pediatr 2013; 162: 302307. e301.Google Scholar
2. Dadlez, NM, Brubaker, SG, Simpson, LL, Yilmaz, B, Williams, IA. Impact of change in delivery practice on neonatal and maternal outcomes in cases of significant congenital heart disease. Congenit Heart Dis 2014; 9: 368372.Google Scholar
3. Bonchek, LI, Starr, A, Sunderland, CO, Menashe, VD. Natural history of tetralogy of Fallot in infancy. Clinical classification and therapeutic implications. Circulation 1973; 48: 392397.Google Scholar
4. Morris, CD, Outcalt, J, Menashe, VD. Hypoplastic left heart syndrome: natural history in a geographically defined population. Pediatrics 1990; 85: 977983.Google Scholar
5. Popat, H, Kluckow, M. Noninvasive assessment of the early transitional circulation in healthy term infants. Neonatology 2012; 101: 166171.Google Scholar
6. Reller, MD, Ziegler, ML, Rice, MJ, Solin, RC, McDonald, RW. Duration of ductal shunting in healthy preterm infants: an echocardiographic color flow Doppler study. J Pediatr 1988; 112: 441446.Google Scholar
7. Schultz, AH, Localio, AR, Clark, BJ, Ravishankar, C, Videon, N, Kimmel, SE. Epidemiologic features of the presentation of critical congenital heart disease: implications for screening. Pediatrics 2008; 121: 751757.Google Scholar
8. de-Wahl Granelli, A, Wennergren, M, Sandberg, K, et al. Impact of pulse oximetry screening on the detection of duct dependent congenital heart disease: a Swedish prospective screening study in 39,821 newborns. BMJ 2009; 338: a3037.Google Scholar
9. Kemper, AR, Mahle, WT, Martin, GR, et al. Strategies for implementing screening for critical congenital heart disease. Pediatrics 2011; 128: e1259e1267.Google Scholar
10. Thangaratinam, S, Brown, K, Zamora, J, Khan, KS, Ewer, AK. Pulse oximetry screening for critical congenital heart defects in asymptomatic newborn babies: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet 2012; 379: 24592464.Google Scholar
11. Ewer, AK, Middleton, LJ, Furmston, AT, et al. Pulse oximetry screening for congenital heart defects in newborn infants (PulseOx): a test accuracy study. Lancet 2011; 378: 785794.Google Scholar
12. Feldman, R, Rosenthal, Z, Eidelman, AI. Maternal-preterm skin-to-skin contact enhances child physiologic organization and cognitive control across the first 10 years of life. Biol Psychiatry 2014; 75: 5664.Google Scholar
13. Moore, ER, Anderson, GC, Bergman, N, Dowswell, T. Early skin-to-skin contact for mothers and their healthy newborn infants. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2012: CD003519.Google Scholar
14. Jaafar, SH, Ho, JJ, Lee, KS. Rooming-in for new mother and infant versus separate care for increasing the duration of breastfeeding. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2016: CD006641.Google Scholar
15. O’Higgins, M, Roberts, IS, Glover, V, Taylor, A. Mother-child bonding at 1 year; associations with symptoms of postnatal depression and bonding in the first few weeks. Arch Womens Ment Health 2013; 16: 381389.Google Scholar
16. Bystrova, K, Ivanova, V, Edhborg, M, et al. Early contact versus separation: effects on mother-infant interaction one year later. Birth 2009; 36: 97109.Google Scholar
17. Donofrio, MT, Levy, RJ, Schuette, JJ, et al. Specialized delivery room planning for fetuses with critical congenital heart disease. Am J Cardiol 2013; 111: 737747.Google Scholar
18. Donofrio, MT, Skurow-Todd, K, Berger, JT, et al. Risk-stratified postnatal care of newborns with congenital heart disease determined by fetal echocardiography. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 2015; 28: 13391349.Google Scholar
19. Divanovic, A, Hor, K, Cnota, J, Hirsch, R, Kinsel-Ziter, M, Michelfelder, E. Prediction and perinatal management of severely restrictive atrial septum in fetuses with critical left heart obstruction: clinical experience using pulmonary venous Doppler analysis. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2011; 141: 988994.Google Scholar
20. Michelfelder, E, Gomez, C, Border, W, Gottliebson, W, Franklin, C. Predictive value of fetal pulmonary venous flow patterns in identifying the need for atrial septoplasty in the newborn with hypoplastic left ventricle. Circulation 2005; 112: 29742979.Google Scholar
21. Punn, R, Silverman, NH. Fetal predictors of urgent balloon atrial septostomy in neonates with complete transposition. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 2011; 24: 425430.Google Scholar
22. Frank, LH, Bradshaw, E, Beekman, R, Mahle, WT, Martin, GR. Critical congenital heart disease screening using pulse oximetry. J Pediatr 2013; 162: 445453.Google Scholar
23. Brosig, CL, Whitstone, BN, Frommelt, MA, Frisbee, SJ, Leuthner, SR. Psychological distress in parents of children with severe congenital heart disease: the impact of prenatal versus postnatal diagnosis. J Perinatol 2007; 27: 687692.Google Scholar
24. Sklansky, M, Tang, A, Levy, D, et al. Maternal psychological impact of fetal echocardiography. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 2002; 15: 159166.Google Scholar
25. Buitelaar, JK, Huizink, AC, Mulder, EJ, de Medina, PG, Visser, GH. Prenatal stress and cognitive development and temperament in infants. Neurobiol Aging 2003; 24 (Suppl 1): S53S60; discussion S67–S58.Google Scholar
26. Sarkar, P, Bergman, K, Fisk, NM, O’Connor, TG, Glover, V. Ontogeny of foetal exposure to maternal cortisol using midtrimester amniotic fluid as a biomarker. Clin Endocrinol (Oxf) 2007; 66: 636640.Google Scholar
27. Chapillon, P, Patin, V, Roy, V, Vincent, A, Caston, J. Effects of pre- and postnatal stimulation on developmental, emotional, and cognitive aspects in rodents: a review. Dev Psychobiol 2002; 41: 373387.Google Scholar
28. Coe, CL, Lulbach, GR, Schneider, ML. Prenatal disturbance alters the size of the corpus callosum in young monkeys. Dev Psychobiol 2002; 41: 178185.Google Scholar
29. Limperopoulos, C, Tworetzky, W, McElhinney, DB, et al. Brain volume and metabolism in fetuses with congenital heart disease: evaluation with quantitative magnetic resonance imaging and spectroscopy. Circulation 2010; 121: 2633.Google Scholar
30. McQuillen, PS, Miller, SP. Congenital heart disease and brain development. Ann N Y Acad Sci 2010; 1184: 6886.Google Scholar
31. Miller, SP, McQuillen, PS, Hamrick, S, et al. Abnormal brain development in newborns with congenital heart disease. N Engl J Med 2007; 357: 19281938.Google Scholar
32. Solberg, O, Dale, MT, Holmstrom, H, Eskedal, LT, Landolt, MA, Vollrath, ME. Long-term symptoms of depression and anxiety in mothers of infants with congenital heart defects. J Pediatr Psychol 2011; 36: 179187.Google Scholar
33. Solberg, O, Gronning Dale, MT, Holmstrom, H, Eskedal, LT, Landolt, MA, Vollrath, ME. Trajectories of maternal mental health: a prospective study of mothers of infants with congenital heart defects from pregnancy to 36 months postpartum. J Pediatr Psychol 2012; 37: 687696.Google Scholar
34. Gronning Dale, MT, Solberg, O, Holmstrom, H, Landolt, MA, Eskedal, LT, Vollrath, ME. Well-being in mothers of children with congenital heart defects: a 3-year follow-up. Qual Life Res 2013; 22: 20632072.Google Scholar
35. Solberg, O, Dale, MT, Holmstrom, H, Eskedal, LT, Landolt, MA, Vollrath, ME. Emotional reactivity in infants with congenital heart defects and maternal symptoms of postnatal depression. Arch Womens Ment Health 2011; 14: 487492.Google Scholar
36. Jaafar, SH, Lee, KS, Ho, JJ. Separate care for new mother and infant versus rooming-in for increasing the duration of breastfeeding. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2012: CD006641.Google Scholar
37. Chu, PY, Li, JS, Kosinski, AS, Hornik, CP, Hill, KD. Congenital heart disease in premature infants 25–32 weeks’ gestational age. J Pediatr 2017; 181: 3741, e31.Google Scholar
38. Anderson, AW, Smith, PB, Corey, KM, et al. Clinical outcomes in very low birth weight infants with major congenital heart defects. Early Hum Dev 2014; 90: 791795.Google Scholar
39. Costello, JM, Polito, A, Brown, DW, et al. Birth before 39 weeks’ gestation is associated with worse outcomes in neonates with heart disease. Pediatrics 2010; 126: 277284.Google Scholar
40. Costello, JM, Pasquali, SK, Jacobs, JP, et al. Gestational age at birth and outcomes after neonatal cardiac surgery: an analysis of the Society of Thoracic Surgeons Congenital Heart Surgery Database. Circulation 2014; 129: 25112517.Google Scholar
41. Taylor, A, Atkins, R, Kumar, R, Adams, D, Glover, V. A new Mother-to-Infant Bonding Scale: links with early maternal mood. Arch Womens Ment Health 2005; 8: 4551.Google Scholar