Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7fkt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-23T10:25:52.096Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

How badly do we need instruction in paediatric cardiac anatomy?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 March 2017

Robert H. Anderson
Robert H. Anderson*
Affiliation:
Institute of Genetic Medicine, Newcastle University, London, United Kingdom
*
Correspondence to: Professor R. H. Anderson, Institute of Genetic Medicine, Newcastle University, 60 Earlsfield Road, London SW18 3DN, United Kingdom. Tel: +44 20 8870 4368; E-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'

Keywords

Morphologyarchivesnomenclatureembryology
Type
Article Commentaries
Information
Cardiology in the Young , Volume 27 , Issue 5 , July 2017 , pp. 967 - 970
Check for updates
Copyright
© Cambridge University Press 2017 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Rogers, LS, Klein, M, James, J, FitzGerald, M. Assessment of the need for a cardiac morphology curriculum for pediatric cardiology fellows. Cardiol Young, 2017; doi: 10.1017/S1047951116002481.Google Scholar
2. Ezon, DS, Goldberg, JF, Kyle, WB. Atlas of Congenital Heart Disease Nomenclature. Ezon Educational Services, Houston, 2015.Google Scholar
3. Van Praagh, R. The segmental approach to diagnosis in congenital heart disease. In: Bergsma D (ed.). Birth Defects Original Article Series, VIII, no. 5. The National Foundation – March of Dimes, Williams and Wilkins, Baltimore, 1972: 4–23.Google Scholar
4. Shinebourne, EA, Macartney, FJ, Anderson, RH. Sequential chamber localization: the logical approach to diagnosis in congenital heart disease. Br Heart J 1976; 38: 327–340.Google Scholar
5. Van Praagh, R. Nomenclature and classification: morphologic and segmental approach to diagnosis. In: Moller JH, Hoffman JIE, (eds). Pediatric Cardiovascular Medicine. Churchill Livingstone, New York, 2000: 275–288.Google Scholar
6. Anderson, RH, Ho, SY. Continuing medical education. Sequential segmental analysis – description and catergorization for the millenium. Cardiol Young 1997; 7: 98–116.Google Scholar
7. Becker, AE, Anderson, RH. Cardiac embryology: a help or hindrance in understanding congenital heart disease?. In Nora JJ, Takao A, (eds). Congenital Heart Disease: Causes and Processes. Futura Publishing Co, Mount Kisco, NY, 1984: 339–358.Google Scholar
8. Jacobs, ML, Anderson, RH. Nomenclature of the functionally univentricular heart. Cardiol Young 2006; 16 (Suppl 1): 3–8.Google Scholar
9. Loomba, RS, Hlavacek, AM, Spicer, DE, Anderson, RH. Isomerism or heterotaxy: which term leads to better understanding? Cardiol Young 2015; 25: 1037–1043.Google Scholar