Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-dlnhk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-23T04:08:56.649Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The effect of age and gender on the electrocardiogram in children

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 December 2007

Evren Semizel*
Affiliation:
Cardiology Unit, Department of Pediatrics, Uludag University, Faculty of Medicine, Bursa, Turkey
Bülent Öztürk
Affiliation:
Department of Pediatrics, Uludag University, Faculty of Medicine, Bursa, Turkey
Ozlem M. Bostan
Affiliation:
Cardiology Unit, Department of Pediatrics, Uludag University, Faculty of Medicine, Bursa, Turkey
Ergün Cil
Affiliation:
Cardiology Unit, Department of Pediatrics, Uludag University, Faculty of Medicine, Bursa, Turkey
Bülent Ediz
Affiliation:
Department of Biostatistics, Uludag University, Faculty of Medicine, Bursa, Turkey
*
Correpondence to: Evren Semizel, Uludag University, Faculty of Medicine, Department of Pediatric Cardiology, Bursa, Turkey. Tel: +90 224 2950450; Fax: +90 224 4428694; E-mail: [email protected]

Abstract

Our aim was to determine, using a computer program for measurement and analysis, the effects, if any, of age and gender on the electrocardiographic measurements in a large cohort of Turkish children. We analyzed standard simultaneous 12-lead electrocardiograms from 2241 healthy Turkish children, aged from 1 day to 16 years, to calculate limits of normality of a variety of electrocardiographic measurements for 12 age groups. Cinically significant differences were shown to exist, and the results compared with previously established normal limits. Differences were demonstrated for gender in measurements of both amplitude and duration, particularly in the adolescent period. We have provided tables and figures showing age and gender-dependent means and upper limits of normal electrocardiographic parameters for the important leads.

Type
Original Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2008

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Bacquer, D, Backer, G, Kornitzer, M. Prevelances of ECG findings in large population based samples of men and women. Heart 2000; 84: 633635.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2. Davignon, A, Rautaharju, P, Boiselle, E, Soumis, F, Megelas, M, Chougette, A. Normal ECG standards for infants and children. Pediatr Cardiol 1979/80; 1: 123131.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
3. Macfarlane, PW, Coleman, EN, Pomphrey, EO, McLaughlin, S, Houstin, A, Aitchison, T. Normal limits of the high-fidelty pediatric ECG. Preliminary observation. J Electrocardiol 1989; 22: 162168.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
4. Macfarlane, PW, Mclaughlin, SC, Devine, B, Yang, TF. Effects of age, sex, and race on ECG interval measurements. J Electrocardiol 1994; 27: 1419.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
5. Pearl, W. Effects of gender, age, and heart rate on QT intervals in children. Pediatr Cardiol 1996; 17: 135136.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
6. Tutar, HE, Ocal, B, Imamoglu, A, Atalay, S. Dispersion of QT and QTc interval in healthy children, and effects of sinus arrhythmia on QT dispersion. Heart 1998; 80: 7779.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
7. Rijnbeek, PR, Witsenbeurg, M, Schrama, E, Hess, J, Kors, A. New normal limits for the paediatric electrocardiogram. Eur Heart J 2001; 22: 702711.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
8. Bazett, HC. Analysis of the time-relations of electrocardiograms. Heart 1918; 7: 353370.Google Scholar
9. Park, MK, Guntheroth, G. How to read pediatric ECGs. Mosby-Year Book Inc., St Louis, 1992.Google Scholar
10. LaMonte, CS, Freiman, AH. The electrocardiogram after mastectomy. Circulation 1965; 32: 746754.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
11. Strong, WB, Downs, TD, Liebman, J, Liebowitz, R. The normal adolescent electrocardiogram. Am Heart J 1972; 83: 115128.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed