Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-tf8b9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-26T18:11:42.488Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Comparison of two-dimensional and three-dimensional echocardiographic strain in children with CHD

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 May 2017

Bethany L. Wisotzkey ,
Brian D. Soriano  and
Sujatha Buddhe
Bethany L. Wisotzkey
Affiliation:
Department of Pediatrics, Division of Pediatric Cardiology, Seattle Children’s Hospital, Seattle, Washington, United States of America
Brian D. Soriano
Affiliation:
Department of Pediatrics, Division of Pediatric Cardiology, Seattle Children’s Hospital, Seattle, Washington, United States of America
Sujatha Buddhe*
Affiliation:
Department of Pediatrics, Division of Pediatric Cardiology, Seattle Children’s Hospital, Seattle, Washington, United States of America
*
Correspondence to: S. Buddhe, MD, MS, Department of Pediatrics, Division of Pediatric Cardiology, Seattle Children’s Hospital, 4800 Sand Point Way NE, Seattle, WA 98105, United States of America. Tel: +1 206 987 1083; Fax: +1 206 987 3839; E-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Background

In CHD, three-dimensional strain analysis may overcome limitations of Doppler and two-dimensional strain of the left ventricle. The aims of this study were to evaluate feasibility and reproducibility of three-dimensional longitudinal, circumferential, and radial systolic strain by three-dimensional speckle-tracking echocardiography compared with two-dimensional echocardiography.

Methods

Patients with CHD, biventricular circulation with a systemic left ventricle, and who had two- and three-dimensional imaging performed on the same day from 2010 to 2014 were included. Quantitative two- and three-dimensional strain analyses were performed (two-dimensional cardiac performance analysis version 1.2 and four-dimensional left ventricular analysis version 3.1). Intra- and inter-observer variabilities were calculated on 25 studies.

Results

A total of 30 patients, including 19 (61%) males, with a median age of 3.6 years (0.1–22 years) were included. The mean fractional shortening was 34.6±5.3%, and the mean ejection fraction was 62.0±6.4%. Measurement of two- and three-dimensional strain was feasible in >95% of segments. Good correlation was observed between longitudinal and circumferential strain (r=0.92, p⩽0.001 and r=0.87, p⩽0.001), but not radial strain (r=0.29, p=0.2). Intra- and inter-observer agreements were better for three-dimensional compared with two-dimensional strain, and better for both two- and three-dimensional longitudinal and circumferential strains compared with radial strain.

Conclusion

Left ventricular three-dimensional strain analysis is feasible in children with CHD. The reproducibility of longitudinal and circumferential strain by three-dimensional analyses is better. Further longitudinal studies are warranted for the potential clinical application of this new technology.

Keywords

CHD3D speckle-tracking imagingstrainechocardiogram
Type
Original Articles
Information
Cardiology in the Young , Volume 27 , Issue 8 , October 2017 , pp. 1557 - 1565
Check for updates
Copyright
© Cambridge University Press 2017 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Brown, J, Jenkins, C, Marwick, TH. Use of myocardial strain to assess left ventricular function: a comparison with cardiac magnetic resonance and 3-dimensional echocardiography. Am Heart J 2009; 157: 102.e1–5.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
2. Koestenberger, M, Friedberg, MK, Ravekes, W, Nests, E, Hansmann, G. Non-invasive imaging for congenital heart disease: recent innovations in transthoracic echocardiography. J Clin Exp Cardiolog 2012; (Suppl 8): 2.Google ScholarPubMed
3. Ammar, KA, Paterick, TE, Khandheria, BK, et al. Myocardial mechanics: understanding and applying three-dimensional speckle tracking echocardiography in clinical practice. Echocardiography 2012; 29: 861–872.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
4. Luis, SA, Yamada, A, Khandheria, BK, et al. Use of three-dimensional speckle-tracking echocardiography for quantitative assessment of left ventricular function: a comparative study to three-dimensional echocardiography. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 2014; 27: 285–291.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
5. Nesser, HJ, Mor-Avi, V, Gorissen, W, et al. Quantification of left ventricular volumes using three-dimensional echocardiographic speckle tracking: comparison with MRI. Eur Heart J 2009; 30: 1565–1573.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
6. Li, CM, Li, C, Bai, WJ, et al. Value of three-dimensional speckle-tracking in detecting left ventricular dysfunction in patients with aortic valvular diseases. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 2013; 26: 1245–1252.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
7. Urbano-Moral, JA, Arias-Godinez, JA, Ahmad, R, et al. Evaluation of myocardial mechanics with three-dimensional speckle tracking echocardiography in heart transplant recipients: comparison with two-dimensional speckle tracking and relationship with clinical variables. Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging 2013; 14: 1167–1173.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
8. Zhou, Z, Ashraf, M, Hu, D, et al. Three-dimensional speckle-tracking imaging for left ventricular rotation measurement: an in vitro validation study. J Ultrasound Med 2010; 29: 903–909.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
9. Seo, Y, Ishizu, T, Enomoto, Y, et al. Validation of 3-dimensional speckle tracking imaging to quantify regional myocardial deformation. Circ Cardiovasc Imaging 2009; 2: 451–459.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
10. Seo, Y, Ishizu, T, Aonuma, K. Current status of 3-dimensional speckle tracking echocardiography: a review from our experiences. J Cardiovasc Ultrasound 2014; 22: 49–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
11. Zhang, L, Gao, J, Xie, M, et al. Left ventricular three-dimensional systolic strain by real-time three-dimensional speckle-tracking in children: feasibility, reproducibility, maturational changes, and normal ranges. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 2013; 26: 853–859.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
12. Altman, M, Bergerot, C, Aussoleil, A, et al. Assessment of left ventricular systolic function by deformation imaging derived from speckle tracking: a comparison between 2D and 3D echo modalities. Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging 2014; 15: 316–323.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
13. Urbano-Moral, JA, Patel, AR, Maron, MS, Arias-Godinez, JA, Pandian, NG. Three-dimensional speckle-tracking echocardiography: methodological aspects and clinical potential. Echocardiography 2012; 29: 997–1010.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
14. Jenkins, C, Bricknell, K, Hanekom, L, Marwick, TH. Reproducibility and accuracy of echocardiographic measurements of left ventricular parameters using real-time three-dimensional echocardiography. J Am Coll Cardiol 2004; 44: 878–886.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
15. Jenkins, C, Leano, R, Chan, J, Marwick, TH. Reconstructed versus real-time 3-dimensional echocardiography: comparison with magnetic resonance imaging. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 2007; 20: 862–868.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
16. Kaku, K, Takeuchi, M, Tsang, W, et al. Age-related normal range of left ventricular strain and torsion using three-dimensional speckle-tracking echocardiography. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 2014; 27: 55–64.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
17. Mor-Avi, V, Jenkins, C, Kühl, HP, et al. Real-time 3-dimensional echocardiographic quantification of left ventricular volumes: multicenter study for validation with magnetic resonance imaging and investigation of sources of error. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging 2008; 1: 413–423.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
18. Lopez, L, Colan, SD, Frommelt, PC, et al. Recommendations for quantification methods during the performance of a pediatric echocardiogram: a report from the Pediatric Measurements Writing Group of the American Society of Echocardiography Pediatric and Congenital Heart Disease Council. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 2010; 23: 465–495; ; quiz 576–7.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
19. Bland, JM, Altman, DG. Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. Lancet 1986; 1: 307–310.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
20. Koestenberger, M. Transthoracic echocardiography in children and young adults with congenital heart disease. ISRN Pediatr 2012; 2012: 753481.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
21. Abraham, TP, Nishimura, RA. Myocardial strain: can we finally measure contractility? J Am Coll Cardiol 2001; 37: 731–734.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
22. Cheng, S, Larson, MG, McCabe, EL, et al. Reproducibility of speckle-tracking-based strain measures of left ventricular function in a community-based study. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 2013; 26: 1258–1266.e2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
23. Forsey, J, Friedberg, MK, Mertens, L. Speckle tracking echocardiography in pediatric and congenital heart disease. Echocardiography 2013; 30: 447–459.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
24. Saha, SK, Kiotsekoglou, A, Toole, RS, et al. Value of two-dimensional speckle tracking and real time three-dimensional echocardiography for the identification of subclinical left ventricular dysfunction in patients referred for routine echocardiography. Echocardiography 2012; 29: 588–597.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
25. Luis, SA, Yamada, A, Khandheria, BK, et al. Use of three-dimensional speckle-tracking echocardiography for quantitative assessment of left ventricular function: a comparative study to three-dimensional echocardiography. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 2014; 27: 285–291.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
26. MacIver, DH, Adeniran, I, Zhang, H. Left ventricular ejection fraction is determined by both myocardial strain and wall thickness. Int J Cardiol Heart Vasc 2015; 7: 113–118.Google ScholarPubMed
27. Kraigher-Krainer, E, Shah, AM, Gupta, DK, et al. Impaired systolic function by strain imaging in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction. J Am Coll Cardiol 2014; 63: 447–456.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
28. Seo, Y, Ishizu, T, Atsumi, A, Kawamura, R, Aonuma, K. Three-dimensional speckle tracking echocardiography. Circ J 2014; 78: 1290–1301.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
29. Serri, K, Reant, P, Lafitte, M, et al. Global and regional myocardial function quantification by two-dimensional strain: application in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy. J Am Coll Cardiol 2006; 47: 1175–1181.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
30. Maréchaux, S. Speckle-tracking strain echocardiography: any place in routine daily practice in 2014? Arch Cardiovasc Dis 2013; 106: 629–634.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
31. Saito, K, Okura, H, Watanabe, N, et al. Comprehensive evaluation of left ventricular strain using speckle tracking echocardiography in normal adults: comparison of three-dimensional and two-dimensional approaches. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 2009; 22: 1025–1030.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
32. Gayat, E, Ahmad, H, Weinert, L, Lang, RM, Mor-Avi, V. Reproducibility and inter-vendor variability of left ventricular deformation measurements by three-dimensional speckle-tracking echocardiography. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 2011; 24: 878–885.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
33. Badano, LP, Cucchini, U, Muraru, D, Al Nono, O, Sarais, C, Iliceto, S. Use of three-dimensional speckle tracking to assess left ventricular myocardial mechanics: inter-vendor consistency and reproducibility of strain measurements. Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging 2013; 14: 285–293.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed