Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-lnqnp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T05:47:20.684Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Biventricular morphology in adults born with a ventricular septal defect

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  30 August 2018

Marie Maagaard ,
Johan Heiberg ,
Filip Eckerström ,
Benjamin Asschenfeldt Open the ORCID record for Benjamin Asschenfeldt [Opens in a new window] ,
Christian E. Rex ,
Steffen Ringgaard  and
Vibeke E. Hjortdal
Marie Maagaard*
Affiliation:
Department of Cardiothoracic and Vascular Surgery, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark Department of Clinical Medicine, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark
Johan Heiberg
Affiliation:
Department of Cardiothoracic and Vascular Surgery, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark Department of Clinical Medicine, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark
Filip Eckerström
Affiliation:
Department of Cardiothoracic and Vascular Surgery, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark Department of Clinical Medicine, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark
Benjamin Asschenfeldt
Affiliation:
Department of Cardiothoracic and Vascular Surgery, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark Department of Clinical Medicine, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark
Christian E. Rex
Affiliation:
Department of Cardiothoracic and Vascular Surgery, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark Department of Clinical Medicine, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark
Steffen Ringgaard
Affiliation:
The MR Research Centre, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark
Vibeke E. Hjortdal
Affiliation:
Department of Cardiothoracic and Vascular Surgery, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark Department of Clinical Medicine, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark
*
Author for correspondence: M. Maagaard, Department of Cardiothoracic and Vascular Surgery, Aarhus University Hospital, Palle Juul-Jensens Blv. 99, DK-8200 Aarhus N, Denmark. Tel: +45 7845 3086; Fax: +45 7845 3079; E-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Ventricular septal defects – large, surgically closed or small, untreated – have demonstrated lower peak exercise capacity compared with healthy controls. The mechanisms behind these findings are not yet fully understood. Therefore, we evaluated biventricular morphology in adults with a ventricular septal defect using MRI. Adults with either childhood surgically closed or small, untreated ventricular septal defects and healthy controls underwent cine MRI for the evaluation of biventricular volumes and quantitative flow scans for measurement of stroke index. Scans were analysed post hoc in a blinded manner. In total, 20 operated patients (22±2 years) and 20 healthy controls (23±2 years) were included, along with 32 patients with small, unrepaired ventricular septal defects (26±6 years) and 28 controls (27±5 years). Operated patients demonstrated larger right ventricular end-diastolic volume index (103±20 ml/m2) compared with their controls (88±16 ml/m2), p=0.01. Heart rate and right ventricular stroke index did not differ between operated patients and controls. Patients with unrepaired ventricular septal defects revealed larger right ventricular end-diastolic volume index (105±17 ml/m2) compared with their controls (88±13 ml/m2), p<0.01. Furthermore, right ventricular stroke index was higher in unrepaired ventricular septal defects (53±12 ml/minute/m2) compared with controls (46±8 ml/minute/m2), p=0.02, with similar heart rates. Both patient groups’ right ventricles were visually characterised by abundant coarse trabeculation. Positive correlations were demonstrated between right ventricular end-diastolic volume indices and peak exercise capacity in patients. Left ventricle measurements displayed no differences between groups. In conclusion, altered right ventricular morphology was demonstrated in adults 20 years after surgical ventricular septal defect repair and in adults with small, untreated ventricular septal defects.

Keywords

Ventricular septal defectsMRIventricular morphologyadult CHD
Type
Original Article
Information
Cardiology in the Young , Volume 28 , Issue 12 , December 2018 , pp. 1379 - 1385
Copyright
© Cambridge University Press 2018 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Gabriel, HM, Heger, M, Innerhofer, P, et al. Long-term outcome of patients with ventricular septal defect considered not to require surgical closure during childhood. J Am Coll Cardiol 2002; 39: 1066–1071.Google Scholar
2. Gabriels, C, De Backer, J, Pasquet, A, et al. Long-term outcome of patients with perimembranous ventricular septal defect: results from the Belgian Registry on Adult Congenital Heart Disease. Cardiology. 2016; 136: 147–155.Google Scholar
3. Neumayer, U, Stone, S, Somerville, J. Small ventricular septal defects in adults. Eur Heart J 1998; 19: 1573–1582.Google Scholar
4. Karonis, T, Scognamiglio, G, Babu-Narayan, SV, et al. Clinical course and potential complications of small ventricular septal defects in adulthood: late development of left ventricular dysfunction justifies lifelong care. Int J Cardiol 2016; 208: 102–106.Google Scholar
5. Jortveit, J, Leirgul, E, Eskedal, L, et al. Mortality and complications in 3495 children with isolated ventricular septal defects. Arch Dis Child 2016; 101: 808–813.Google Scholar
6. Menting, ME, Cuypers, JA, Opic, P, et al. The unnatural history of the ventricular septal defect: outcome up to 40 years after surgical closure. J Am Coll Cardiol 2015; 65: 1941–1951.Google Scholar
7. Heiberg, J, Laustsen, S, Petersen, AK, Hjortdal, VE. Reduced long-term exercise capacity in young adults operated for ventricular septal defect. Cardiol Young. 2015; 25: 281–287.Google Scholar
8. Maagaard, M, Heiberg, J, Hjortdal, VE. Small, unrepaired ventricular septal defects reveal poor exercise capacity compared with healthy peers: a prospective, cohort study. Int J Cardiol 2017; 227: 631–634.Google Scholar
9. Heiberg, J, Schmidt, MR, Redington, A, Hjortdal, VE. Disrupted right ventricular force-frequency relationships in adults operated for ventricular septal defect as toddlers: abnormal peak force predicts peak oxygen uptake during exercise. Int J Cardiol 2014; 177: 918–924.Google Scholar
10. Moller, T, Brun, H, Fredriksen, PM, et al. Right ventricular systolic pressure response during exercise in adolescents born with atrial or ventricular septal defect. Am J Cardiol 2010; 105: 1610–1616.Google Scholar
11. Gabriels, C, Van De Bruaene, A, Helsen, F, et al. Recall of patients discharged from follow-up after repair of isolated congenital shunt lesions. Int J Cardiol 2016; 221: 314–320.Google Scholar
12. Heiberg, J, Ringgaard, S, Schmidt, MR, Redington, A, Hjortdal, VE. Structural and functional alterations of the right ventricle are common in adults operated for ventricular septal defect as toddlers. Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging 2015; 16: 483–489.Google Scholar
13. Mertens, LL. What is wrong with the right ventricle after surgical closure of a ventricular septal defect? Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging 2015; 16: 473–474.Google Scholar
14. Asschenfeldt, B, Heiberg, J, Ringgaard, S, Maagaard, M, Redington, A, Hjortdal, VE. Impaired cardiac output during exercise in adults operated for ventricular septal defect in childhood: a hitherto unrecognised pathophysiological response. Cardiol Young. 2017; 27: 1591–1598.Google Scholar
15. Sievers, B, Kirchberg, S, Bakan, A, Franken, U, Trappe, HJ. Impact of papillary muscles in ventricular volume and ejection fraction assessment by cardiovascular magnetic resonance. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson 2004; 6: 9–16.Google Scholar
16. Winter, MM, Bernink, FJ, Groenink, M, et al. Evaluating the systemic right ventricle by CMR: the importance of consistent and reproducible delineation of the cavity. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson 2008; 10: 40.Google Scholar
17. Hundley, WG, Li, HF, Lange, RA, et al. Assessment of left-to-right intracardiac shunting by velocity-encoded, phase-difference magnetic resonance imaging. A comparison with oximetric and indicator dilution techniques. Circulation 1995; 91: 2955–2960.Google Scholar
18. Shrout, PE, Fleiss, JL. Intraclass correlations: uses in assessing rater reliability. Psychol Bull. 1979; 86: 420–428.Google Scholar
19. Maagaard, M, Heiberg, J, Asschenfeldt, B, Ringgaard, S, Hjortdal, VE. Does functional capacity depend on the size of the shunt? A prospective, cohort study of adults with small, unrepaired ventricular septal defects. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2017; 51: 722–727.Google Scholar
20. Brun, H, Moller, T, Fredriksen, PM, Thaulow, E, Pripp, AH, Holmstrom, H. Mechanisms of exercise-induced pulmonary hypertension in patients with cardiac septal defects. Pediatr Cardiol 2012; 33: 782–790.Google Scholar
21. Monreal, G, Youtz, DJ, Phillips, AB, et al. Right ventricular remodeling in restrictive ventricular septal defect. J Mol Cell Cardiol 2010; 49: 699–706.Google Scholar
22. Kawel-Boehm, N, Maceira, A, Valsangiacomo-Buechel, ER, et al. Normal values for cardiovascular magnetic resonance in adults and children. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson 2015; 17: 29.Google Scholar
23. Otterstad, JE, Simonsen, S, Erikssen, J. Hemodynamic findings at rest and during mild supine exercise in adults with isolated, uncomplicated ventricular septal defects. Circulation. 1985; 71: 650–662.Google Scholar
24. Jablonsky, G, Hilton, JD, Liu, PP, et al. Rest and exercise ventricular function in adults with congenital ventricular septal defects. Am J Cardiol 1983; 51: 293–298.Google Scholar