Hostname: page-component-669899f699-7tmb6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-04-30T01:59:14.066Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Anticoagulation with warfarin for paediatric cardiac indications: a retrospective study

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 November 2024

Stephen T. O’Brien
Affiliation:
Department of Paediatric Cardiology, Children’s Health Ireland at Crumlin, Dublin, Ireland
Sophie Duignan
Affiliation:
Department of Paediatric Cardiology, Children’s Health Ireland at Crumlin, Dublin, Ireland
Kathleen Crumlish
Affiliation:
Department of Paediatric Cardiology, Children’s Health Ireland at Crumlin, Dublin, Ireland
Jacqueline O’Donoghue
Affiliation:
Department of Paediatric Cardiology, Children’s Health Ireland at Crumlin, Dublin, Ireland
Orla Franklin
Affiliation:
Department of Paediatric Cardiology, Children’s Health Ireland at Crumlin, Dublin, Ireland
Colin J. McMahon*
Affiliation:
Department of Paediatric Cardiology, Children’s Health Ireland at Crumlin, Dublin, Ireland School of Medicine, University College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland
*
Corresponding author: Colin J. McMahon; Email: [email protected]

Abstract

Warfarin is used as anticoagulation for children for a wide range of cardiac indications but carries the disadvantage of requiring international normalised ratio monitoring and dose adjustment. Management of warfarin therapy is challenging due to its narrow therapeutic window and is further complicated in children by dietary changes, frequent illnesses, and developing systems of metabolism and haemostasis.

A retrospective review was performed of patients’ medical records to assess the indication for warfarin use, percentage of international normalised ratio values in target range (%ITR), and frequency of phlebotomy.

Twenty-six patients were identified. The most common indication for warfarin use was in patients post-total cavo-pulmonary connection (n = 19, 73%). We demonstrated a variability in duration of warfarin therapy following total cavo-pulmonary connection (median of 11.1 months). Nineteen (73%) patients had used the CoaguChek machine for home measurement of international normalised ratio. The median frequency of phlebotomy for all indications was once every 10 days, and the median %ITR was 55.4 % (29.7–86.4%). Of note, the percentage under target range in the patients with mechanical mitral (n = 2) and aortic valves (n = 1) was found to be 23% and 33%, respectively.

These data demonstrate a high frequency of international normalised ratio values outside of the target range as seen in previous studies of warfarin in children. This necessitates frequent phlebotomy and dose changes, which can have a significant effect on the quality of life of these patients and their families highlighting the need to focus on quality improvement in the area of anticoagulation in paediatric cardiac patients.

Type
Original Article
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2024. Published by Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Jain, S, Vaidyanathan, B. Oral anticoagulants in pediatric cardiac practice: a systematic review of the literature. Ann Pediatr Cardiol 2010; 3 : 3134.Google Scholar
Ansell, J, Hirsh, J, Hylek, E, et al. Pharmacology and management of the vitamin K antagonists: American college of chest physicians evidence-based clinical practice guidelines (8th Edition). 2008; 133, Chest, 160s198s.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McCrindle, BW, Manlhiot, C, Cochrane, A, et al. Factors associated with thrombotic complications after the fontan procedure: a secondary analysis of a multicenter, randomized trial of primary thromboprophylaxis for 2 years after the fontan procedure. J Am Coll Cardiol 2013; 61: 346353.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Giglia, TM, Massicotte, MP, Tweddell, JS, et al. Prevention and treatment of thrombosis in pediatric and congenital heart disease: a scientific statement from the American heart association. Circulation 2013; 128: 26222703.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Streif, W, Andrew, M, Marzinotto, V, et al. Analysis of warfarin therapy in pediatric patients: a prospective cohort study of 319 patients. Blood 1999; 94: 30073014.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hamberg, AK, Friberg, LE, Hanséus, K, et al. Warfarin dose prediction in children using pharmacometric bridging--comparison with published pharmacogenetic dosing algorithms. Eur J Clin Pharmacol 2013; 69: 12751283.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hamberg, AK, Hellman, J, Dahlberg, J, et al. A bayesian decision support tool for efficient dose individualization of warfarin in adults and children. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak 2015; 15: 7.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Al-Metwali, BZ, Rivers, P, Goodyer, L, et al. Personalised warfarin dosing in children post-cardiac surgery. Pediatr Cardiol 2019; 40: 17351744.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sharabiani, A, Bress, A, Douzali, E, Darabi, H. Revisiting warfarin dosing using machine learning techniques. Comput Math Methods Med 2015; 2015: 560108.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Grossi, E, Podda, GM, Pugliano, M, et al. Prediction of optimal warfarin maintenance dose using advanced artificial neural networks. Pharmacogenomics 2014; 15: 2937.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Asiimwe, IG, Zhang, EJ, Osanlou, R, Jorgensen, AL, Pirmohamed, M. Warfarin dosing algorithms: a systematic review. Br J Clin Pharmacol 2021; 87: 17171729.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
McCrindle, BW, Michelson, AD, Van Bergen, AH, et al. Thromboprophylaxis for children post-fontan procedure: insights from the UNIVERSE study. J Am Heart Assoc 2021; 10: e021765.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Portman, MA, Jacobs, JP, Newburger, JW, et al. Edoxaban for thromboembolism prevention in pediatric patients with cardiac disease. J Am Coll Cardiol 2022; 80: 23012310.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Payne, RM, Burns, KM, Glatz, AC, et al. A multi-national trial of a direct oral anticoagulant in children with cardiac disease: design and rationale of the safety of apiXaban on pediatric heart disease on the preventioN of embolism (SAXOPHONE) study. Am Heart J 2019; 217: 5263.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Halton, J, Brandão, LR, Luciani, M, et al. Dabigatran etexilate for the treatment of acute venous thromboembolism in children (DIVERSITY): a randomised, controlled, open-label, phase 2b/3, non-inferiority trial. The Lancet Haematology 2021; 8: e22e33.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Van den Eynde, J, Possner, M, Alahdab, F, et al. Thromboprophylaxis in patients with fontan circulation. J Am Coll Cardiol 2023; 81: 374389.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Alsaied T, Possner M, Van den Eynde, J, Kreutzer, J, et al. Anticoagulation algorithm for fontan patients. J Am Coll Cardiol 2023; April 5. Google Scholar
Newall, F, Savoia, H, Campbell, J, Monagle, P. Anticoagulation clinics for children achieve improved warfarin management. Thromb Res 2004; 114: 59.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jones, S, McLoughlin, S, Piovesan, D, Savoia, H, Monagle, P, Newall, F. Safety and efficacy outcomes of home and hospital warfarin management within a pediatric anticoagulation clinic. J Pediatr Hematol Oncol 2016; 38: 216220.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bauman, M, Black, K, Bauman, M, et al. EMPoWarMENT: Edmonton pediatric warfarin self-management pilot study in children with primarily cardiac disease. Thromb Res 2010; 126: e110e115.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jones, S, Hislop, JL, Gilmore, H, et al. Using an electronic medical record patient portal for warfarin self-management: empowering children and parents. Research and Practice in Thrombosis and Haemostasis 2023; 7: 100066.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Betensky, M, Monagle, P, Male, C, Goldenberg, NA. What did we learn (and did not learn) from the pediatric direct oral anticoagulant trials, and how might we better design pediatric anticoagulant trials in the future? Res Pract Thromb Haemost 2023; 7: 100140.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Choueiter, NF. Advancing anticoagulation for children with cardiac disease. J Am Coll Cardiol 2022; 80: 23112313.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Giossi, R, Menichelli, D, D’Amico, F, et al. Efficacy and safety of direct oral anticoagulants in the pediatric population: a systematic review and a meta-analysis. J Thromb Haemost 2023; 21: 27842796.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Male, C, Lensing, AWA, Palumbo, JS, et al. Rivaroxaban compared with standard anticoagulants for the treatment of acute venous thromboembolism in children: a randomised, controlled, phase 3 trial. Lancet Haematol 2020; 7: e18e27.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Eghbali, A, Rahimi Afzal, R, Sheikhbeygloo, R, Eghbali, A, Taherkhanchi, B, Bagheri, B. Dabigatran versus warfarin for the treatment of pediatric thromboembolism: a pilot randomized trial. Pharm Sci 2020; 26: 338342.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
O’Brien, SH, Rodriguez, V, Lew, G, et al. Apixaban versus no anticoagulation for the prevention of venous thromboembolism in children with newly diagnosed acute lymphoblastic leukaemia or lymphoma (PREVAPIX-ALL): a phase 3, open-label, randomised, controlled trial. Lancet Haematol 2024; 11: e27e37.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
VanderPluym, C, Esteso, P, Ankola, A, et al. Real-world use of apixaban for the treatment and prevention of thrombosis in children with cardiac disease. J Thromb Haemost 2023; 21: 16011609.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Monagle, P, Cochrane, A, Roberts, R, et al. A multicenter, randomized trial comparing heparin/warfarin and acetylsalicylic acid as primary thromboprophylaxis for 2 years after the Fontan procedure in children. J Am Coll Cardiol 2011; 58: 645651.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mullen, CA. Apixaban for children with heart disease. J Am Coll Cardiol 2023; 82: 23102311.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Flinn, AM, Gavin, PJ, McMahon, CJ, Oslizok, P, Disease, Butler KM. Kawasaki. A review of treatment and outcomes in an irish paediatric cohort 2010-14. Ir Med J 2018; 111: 691 Google Scholar
Burney, JA, Roberts, SC, DeHaan, LL, et al. Epidemiological and clinical features of kawasaki disease during the COVID-19 pandemic in the United States. JAMA Netw Open 2022; 5: e2217436.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rosendaal, FR, Cannegieter, SC, van der Meer, FJ, Briët, E. A method to determine the optimal intensity of oral anticoagulant therapy. Thromb Haemost 1993; 69: 236239.Google ScholarPubMed
Biss, TT, Avery, PJ, Walsh, PM, Kamali, F. Comparison of ‘time within therapeutic INR range’ with ‘percentage INR within therapeutic range’ for assessing long-term anticoagulation control in children. J Thromb Haemost 2011; 9: 10901092.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed