Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-j824f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-05T09:57:58.786Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Adult CHD patients under clinical follow-up have a similar quality of life to the general population in Malta

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 November 2016

Maryanne Caruana*
Affiliation:
Department of Cardiology, Mater Dei Hospital, Msida, Malta, Europe
Victor Grech
Affiliation:
Department of Paediatrics, Mater Dei Hospital, Msida, Malta, Europe
*
Correspondence to: Dr M. Caruana, Cardiac Catheterisation Suite, Department of Cardiology, Mater Dei Hospital, Msida MSD 2090, Malta, Europe. Tel: +356 7970 3708; Fax: +356 2545 3894; E-mail: [email protected]

Abstract

Background

The improved survival of patients born with CHD has led to increasing interest in research on quality of life of adult survivors. We report the findings of the first study in Malta carried out to investigate quality of life in adults with CHD under follow-up.

Methods

A self-reporting questionnaire modelled on the basis of the European Health Interview Survey 2008, including questions on mental health and vitality, was administered to consecutive adult CHD outpatients, aged 16 years and over, between May, 2013 and May, 2014. Foreigners and patients with learning difficulties or cognitive impairment were excluded. Quality-of-life data were compared with that from 371 age- and sex-matched 2008 survey responders – general population cohort. The impact of congenital lesion complexity, hospitalisation in the preceding 12 months, arrhythmias, co-morbidities, and cardiac medication use on quality of life of the CHD cohort was also investigated.

Results

There were a total of 120 patient responders (63 males; mean age 30.53, SD 12.77 years). Overall, there were no significant differences in mental health and vitality between patient and general population cohorts, although older patients had better mental health scores compared with age-matched controls. Within the adult CHD cohort, hospitalisation in the preceding 12 months was the only factor associated with a poorer quality of life.

Conclusions

Overall, CHD has no negative impact on mental health and vitality in Maltese adult patients under follow-up. Patients needing frequent hospitalisations might warrant closer attention by clinical psychologists.

Type
Original Articles
Copyright
© Cambridge University Press 2016 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Moons, P, Bovijn, L, Budts, W, Belmans, A, Gewillig, M. Temporal trends in survival to adulthood among patients born with congenital heart disease from 1970 to 1992 in Belgium. Circulation 2010; 122: 22642272.Google Scholar
2. Marelli, AJ, Ionescu-Ittu, R, Mackie, AS, Guo, L, Dendukuri, N, Kaouache, M. Lifetime prevalence of congenital heart disease in the general population from 2000 to 2010. Circulation 2014; 130: 749756.Google Scholar
3. Schroder, M, Boisen, KA, Reimers, J, Teilmann, G, Brok, J. Quality of life in adolescents and young adults with CHD is not reduced: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Cardiol Young 2016; 26: 415425.Google Scholar
4. Bang, JS, Jo, S, Kim, GB, et al. The mental health and quality of life of adult patients with congenital heart disease. Int J Cardiol 2013; 170: 4953.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
5. Apers, S, Kovacs, AH, Luyckx, K, et al. Assessment of Patterns of Patient-Reported Outcomes in Adults with Congenital Heart disease – International Study (APPROACH-IS): rationale, design, and methods. Int J Cardiol 2015; 179: 334342.Google Scholar
6. World Happiness Report 2016, Sustainable development solutions network, 2016. Retrieved 17 April 2016 from http://worldhappiness.report/.Google Scholar
7. Grech, V. Spectrum of congenital heart disease in Malta. An excess of lesions causing right ventricular outflow tract obstruction in a population-base study. Eur Heart J 1998; 19: 521525.Google Scholar
8. Caruana, M, Grech, V. Lifestyle habits among adult congenital heart disease patients in Malta. Congenit Heart Dis 2016; 11: 332–340.Google Scholar
9. Government of Malta. European Health Interview Survey 2008 (HIS 2008). Retrieved 17 April 2016 from http://health.gov.mt/en/dhir/Pages/Surveys/eurohealthintervsurvey2008.aspx.Google Scholar
10. Meltzer, H. Development of a common instrument for mental health. In: Nosikov A, Gudex C, (eds) EUROHIS – Developing Common Instruments for Health Surveys. IOS Press, Amsterdam, 2003: 3560.Google Scholar
11. Warnes, CA, Liberthson, R, Danielson, GK, et al. Task force 1: the changing profile of congenital heart disease in adult life (32nd Bethesda Conference). J Am Coll Cardiol 2001; 37: 11701175.Google Scholar
12. Immer, FF, Althaus, SM, Berdat, PA, Saner, H, Carrel, TP. Quality of life and specific problems after cardiac surgery in adolescents and adults with congenital heart diseases. Eur J Cardiovasc Prev Rehabil 2005; 12: 138143.Google Scholar
13. Lane, DA, Lip, GY, Millane, TA. Quality of life in adults with congenital heart disease. Heart 2002; 88: 7175.Google Scholar
14. Apers, S, Moons, P, Goossens, E, et al. Sense of coherence and perceived physical health explain the better quality of life in adolescents with congenital heart disease. Eur J Cardiovasc Nurs 2013; 12: 475483.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
15. Antonovsky, A. The structure and properties of the sense of coherence scale. Soc Sci Med 1993; 36: 725733.Google Scholar
16. Rodriguez, FH, Moodie, DS, Parekh, DR, et al. Outcomes of heart failure-related hospitalization in adults with congenital heart disease in the United States. Congenit Heart Dis 2013; 8: 513519.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
17. Agarwal, S, Sud, K, Menon, V. Nationwide hospitalization trends in adult congenital heart disease across 2003-2012. J Am Heart Assoc 2016; 5: pii: e002330. doi:10.1161/JAHA.115.002330.Google Scholar
18. Negishi, J, Ohuchi, H, Yasuda, K, Miyazaki, A, Norifumi, N, Yamada, O. Unscheduled hospitalization in adults with congenital heart disease. Korean Circ J 2015; 45: 5966.Google Scholar
19. Verheugt, CL, Uiterwaal, CS, van der Velde, ET, et al. The emerging burden of hospital admissions of adults with congenital heart disease. Heart 2010; 96: 872878.Google Scholar
20. Latal, B, Helfricht, S, Fischer, JE, Bauersfeld, U, Landolt, MA. Psychological adjustment and quality of life in children and adolescents following open-heart surgery for congenital heart disease: a systematic review. BMC Pediatr 2009; 9: 6.Google Scholar
21. Jackson, JL, Hassen, L, Gerardo, GM, Vannatta, K, Daniels, CJ. Medical factors that predict quality of life for young adults with congenital heart disease: what matters most? Int J Cardiol 2016; 202: 804809.Google Scholar
22. Saliba, Z, Butera, G, Bonnet, D, et al. Quality of life and perceived health status in surviving adults with univentricular heart. Heart 2001; 86: 6973.Google Scholar
23. Zomer, AC, Vaartjes, I, Uiterwaal, CS, et al. Social burden and lifestyle in adults with congenital heart disease. Am J Cardiol 2012; 109: 16571663.Google Scholar
24. Apers, S, Luyckx, K, Moons, P. Quality of life in adult congenital heart disease: what do we already know and what do we still need to know? Curr Cardiol Rep 2013; 15: 407.Google Scholar
25. Loup, O, von Weissenfluh, C, Gahl, B, Schwerzmann, M, Carrel, T, Kadner, A. Quality of life of grown-up congenital heart disease patients after congenital cardiac surgery. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2009; 36: 105111.Google Scholar
26. Bedair, R, Babu-Narayan, SV, Dimopoulos, K, et al. Acceptance and psychological impact of implantable defibrillators amongst adults with congenital heart disease. Int J Cardiol 2015; 181: 218224.Google Scholar