Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-94fs2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-19T05:43:19.819Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Human Rights and the Ethics of Globalization. By Daniel E. Lee and Elizabeth J. Lee. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 280 pages.

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 March 2016

Graham Mayeda*
Affiliation:
Faculty of Law, University of Ottawa
Get access

Abstract

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Book Reviews / Recensions de livres
Copyright
Copyright © The Canadian Council on International Law / Conseil Canadien de Droit International, representing the Board of Editors, Canadian Yearbook of International Law / Comité de Rédaction, Annuaire Canadien de Droit International 2011

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Lee, Daniel E and Lee, Elizabeth J, Human Rights and the Ethics of Globalization (New York: Cambridge University Press, 2010).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

2 Ibid at xiv.

3 Aliens Tort Claim Act, 28 USC §1350 [ATCA].

4 Lee and Lee, supra note 1 at 230.

5 Ibid at 231.

6 Ibid at 243.

7 Ibid at 244.

8 Ibid at 245.

9 Larocque, Francois Civil Actions for Uncivilized Acts: The Adjudicative Jurisdiction of Common Law Courts in Transnational Human Rights Proceedings (Toronto: Irwin Law, 2010).Google Scholar

10 Lee and Lee, supra note 1 at ix.

11 Negri, Antonio and Hardt, Michael, Empire (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2000).Google Scholar

12 Stiglitz, Joseph E Globalization and Its Discontents (New York: Norton, 2002) at 4.Google Scholar

13 Scholte, Jan Aart Globalization: A Critical Introduction (New York: St. Martin’s Press, 2000).Google Scholar

14 On the “web” as the defining feature of globalization, see Friedman, Thomas L The Lexus and the Olive Tree (New York: Anchor Books, 2000) at 8.Google Scholar

15 Lee and Lee, supra note 1 at 47.

16 Ibid.

17 Ibid at 46.

18 Ibid at 44–45.

19 Ibid at 46.

20 Ibid.

21 Ibid.

22 Ibid at 18.

23 Ibid at 31 .

24 Ibid at 55–56 and 181 .

25 Ibid at 56.

26 Ibid at 30.

27 Ibid at 32–33.

28 Ibid.

29 Ibid at 58.

30 Ibid.

31 Ibid at 61 .

32 See, eg, Peerenboom, RandallAssessing Human Rights in China: Why the Double Standard?” (2005) 38 Cornell Int’l LJ 71.Google Scholar

33 For information on the Global Sullivan Principles, see ˂http://www.thesullivan-foundation.org/about/global_sullivan_principles˃.

34 Lee and Lee, supra note 1 at 108.

35 Ibid at 74.

36 Ibid.

37 Ibid at 74–75.

38 Ibid at 77 (Lee and Lee refer to the Critique of Pure Reason, Doc. A807/B835).

39 Immanuel Kant, “On the Common Saying: ‘This May Be True in Theory, but It Does Not Apply in Practice,’” in Reiss, Hans Siegbert ed, Kant:Political Writings, 2nd edition, translated by Hugh Barr Nisbet (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1991) at 61 and 89.Google Scholar

40 See Larocque, supra note 9 at 27–40, for a full consideration of these justifications for the ATCA.

41 Lee and Lee, supra note 1 at 210.

42 Larocque, supra note 9 at 52.

43 Ibid at 68.

44 Lee and Lee, supra note 1 at 219.

45 Ibid at 113.

46 Ibid at 136.